NPWTRCT.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:10598505 上传时间:2023-02-21 格式:DOCX 页数:12 大小:23.58KB
下载 相关 举报
NPWTRCT.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共12页
NPWTRCT.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共12页
NPWTRCT.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共12页
NPWTRCT.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共12页
NPWTRCT.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共12页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

NPWTRCT.docx

《NPWTRCT.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《NPWTRCT.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

NPWTRCT.docx

NPWTRCT

Geneexpressionprofilingofnegative-pressure-treatedskingraftdonorsitewounds.

NuutilaK,SiltanenA,PeuraM,HarjulaA,NieminenT,VuolaJ,KankuriE,AarnioP.

Source

InstituteofBiomedicine,Pharmacology,Biomedicum,UniversityofHelsinki,Haartmaninkatu8,00290Helsinki,Finland.kristo.nuutila@helsinki.fi

Abstract

Negative-pressurewoundtherapy(NPWT)iswidelyusedtoimproveskinwoundhealing.AlthoughNPWThasbeenstudiedasatreatmentforwoundclosureandhealing,themolecularmechanismsexplainingitstherapeuticeffectsremainunclear.ToinvestigatetheeffectofNPWTongeneexpression,andtodiscoverthegenesmostdominantlyrespondingtothistreatmentduringskinwoundhealing,weappliednegativepressureonsplit-thicknessskingraftdonorsitesfromthefirstpostoperativeday(POD)totheseventhPOD.Biopsieswerecollectedfrom4NPWT-treatedand2controlpatients.Twobiopsysamplesweretakenfromeachpatient:

onefromintactskinbeforegraftharvesting,andoneontheseventhPODfromthedonorsitewound.Genome-widemicroarrayswereperformedonallsamples.GeneexpressionchangesontheseventhPODwerecomparedbetweenNPWTandcontrolpatients,andwereanalyzedforstatisticalsignificance.Inaddition,weanalyzedwoundexudatesforvolume,andforconcentrationsofleukocytes,erythrocytes,andhaemoglobin.NPWTinducedmajorchangesingeneexpressionduringhealing.Thesechangesrangedfrom10-foldinductionto27-foldsuppression.Thegenesmostinducedwereassociatedwithcellproliferationandinflammation,andthemostdown-regulatedgeneswerelinkedtoepidermaldifferentiation.OurresultsprovidethefirstinsightintothemolecularmechanismsbehindNPWT,andsuggestthatNPWTenhancesspecificinflammatorygeneexpressionattheacutephaseassociatedwithepithelialmigrationandwoundhealing.However,itscontinuedusemayinhibitepithelialdifferentiation.

Copyright©2012ElsevierLtdandISBI.Allrightsreserved.

PMID:

23141686

[PubMed-indexedforMEDLINE

Clinicalevaluationofgauze-basednegativepressurewoundtherapyinchallengingwounds.

TuncelU,ErkorkmazÜ,TuranA.

Source

UTuncel,DepartmentofPlasticReconstructiveandAestheticSurgery,FacultyofMedicine,GaziosmanpaşaUniversity,Tokat60150,Turkey.drumuttuncel@

Abstract

Theaimofthisrandomisedclinicalstudywastoevaluatetheeffectivenessandsafetyofgauze-basednegativepressurewoundtherapy(NPWT)inpatientswithchallengingwounds.Atotalof50consecutivepatientswhohadwounddrainageformorethan5days,requiredopenwoundmanagementandhadexistenceofculturepositiveinfectionwereincludedthestudy.Inthisstudy,gauze-basedNPWTwascomparedwithconventionaldressingtherapyinthetreatmentofpatientswithdifficult-to-healwounds.Thepatientswererandomlydividedintotwogroups.GroupI(n=25)wasfollowedbyconventionalantiseptic(polyhexanidesolution)dressings,andgroupII(n=25)wastreatedwithsaline-soakedantibacterialgauze-basedNPWT.Thewounds'sizes,numberofdebridement,bacteriologyandrecurrencewerecomparedbetweengroupIandgroupII.Themeanageofthepatientswas59·50years(range23-97).IngroupI,averagewoundsizesofpre-andpost-treatmentperiodswere50·60±55·35and42·50±47·92cm

(2),respectively(P<0·001).Averagedurationoftreatmentwas25·52±16·99days,andaveragewoundsizereductionfollowingthetreatmentwas19·99%inthisgroup.IngroupII,thewoundsdisplayedconsiderableshrinkage,acceleratedgranulationtissueformation,decreasedandclearedawayexudate.Theaveragewoundsizesinthepre-andpost-treatmentperiodswere98·44±100·88and72·08±75·78cm

(2),respectively(P<0·001).Averagedurationoftreatmentwas11·96±2·48days,andaveragewoundsizereductionfollowingthetreatmentwas32·34%.Thepatientstreatedwithantibacterialgauze-basedNPWThadasignificantlyreducedrecurrence(2woundsversus14wounds,P=0·001),andincreasednumberoftheculture-negativecases(22woundsversus16wounds,P<0·047)inafollow-upperiodof12months.Therewasastatisticallysignificantdifferencebetweentwogroupsinallmeasurements.Asaresult,wecansaythatthegauze-basedNPWTisasafeandeffectivemethodinthetreatmentofchallenginginfectivewoundswhencomparedwithconventionalwoundmanagement.

©2012TheAuthors.InternationalWoundJournal©2012BlackwellPublishingLtdandMInc

Burns.2012Jun;38(4):

573-7.doi:

10.1016/j.burns.2011.10.010.Epub2011Nov17.

Anoveloptioninnegativepressurewoundtherapy(NPWT)forchronicandacutewoundcare.

Rahmanian-SchwarzA,WillkommLM,GonserP,HirtB,SchallerHE.

Source

DepartmentofPlastic,Reconstructive,HandandBurnSurgery,BG-TraumaCenter,EberhardKarlsUniversityTuebingen,Germany.arahmanian@bgu-tuebingen.de

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Negativepressurewoundtherapy(NPWT)hasbecomeawidelyacceptedtechniqueintreatmentofallkindsofwounds.AfteralongperiodofclinicalapplicationoftheV.A.C.™system(KCIInc.,SanAntonio,Texas,USA)anumberofoptionsfordeliveryofNPWTarenowcommerciallyavailable.AnurgentneedexistsforevidencedemonstratingclinicalefficacyofthesenewdevicestosupportcliniciansregardingtheirchoiceofNPWT.

METHODS:

42patientswithanacuteorchronicwoundwererandomlyassignedtoeithertreatmentbyV.A.C.™(groupA)ortherapywithanalternativenewlyavailablepolyurethanefoam-basedNPWTsystem(RENASYSGO™-F/P,Smith&NephewGmbH)(groupB).InbothgroupsNPWTwasappliedaftersurgicaldebridementtopreparethewoundbedforskingrafting.AfterskingraftingNPWTwasappliedadditionallytosecureskingraftsandimprovegraftssurvival.Primaryoutcomemeasureswerethetimetocompletehealing(days)anddurationoftheNPWTapplication(days).Secondaryoutcomemeasureswerethenumberofdressingchangesandreportedcomplications.Inaddition,weevaluatedthecost-benefitintheclinicalimplementation.

RESULTS:

Therewerenosignificantdifferencescomparingtheinvestigatedparametersbetweenbothgroups.EspeciallyaveragetimetocompletehealingandaveragetimeNPWTwasapplieddidnotdiffer(p>0.05).Nocomplicationsoccurredineithergroup.ByanalmostidenticalsupplyagreementofbothprovidersforourhospitalRENASYS™systemappearedtobemorecost-effective.

CONCLUSION:

AfteralongperiodofpreservingamonopolymarketpositionoftheV.A.C.™system,anewcomparableoptionwassuccessfullytestedinthispreliminarystudy.Thepolyurethanefoam-basedNPWTsystem(RENASYSGO™-F/P,Smith&NephewGmbH)isanefficientandcost-effectivealternativeNPWTsystem,whichweeffectivelyimplementedintherapeuticmanagementofdifferentkindsofwounds.

ApilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofnegativepressurewoundtherapytotreatgradeIII/IVpressureulcers[ISRCTN69032034].

AshbyRL,DumvilleJC,SoaresMO,McGinnisE,StubbsN,TorgersonDJ,CullumN.

Source

DepartmentofHealthSciences,TheUniversityofYork,York,UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Negativepressurewoundtherapy(NPWT)iswidelypromotedasatreatmentforfullthicknesswounds;however,thereisalackofhigh-qualityresearchevidenceregardingitsclinicalandcosteffectiveness.AtrialofNPWTforthetreatmentofgradeIII/IVpressureulcerswouldbeworthwhilebutprematurewithoutassessingwhethersuchatrialisfeasible.TheaimofthispilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwastoassessthefeasibilityofconductingafuturefulltrialofNPWTforthetreatmentofgradeIIIandIVpressureulcersandtopilotallaspectsofthetrial.

METHODS:

Thiswasatwo-centre(acuteandcommunity),pilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial.EligibleparticipantswererandomisedtoreceiveeitherNPWTorstandardcare(SC)(spunhydrocolloid,alginateorfoamdressings).Outcomemeasuresweretimetohealingofthereferencepressureulcer,recruitmentrates,frequencyoftreatmentvisits,resourcesusedanddurationoffollow-up.

RESULTS:

Threehundredandtwelvepatientswerescreenedforeligibilityintothistrialovera12-monthrecruitmentperiodand12/312participants(3.8%)wererandomised:

6toNPWTand6toSC.Onlyonereferencepressureulcerhealed(NPWTgroup)duringfollow-up(timetohealing79 days).Themeannumberoftreatmentvisitsperweekwas3.1(NPWT)and5.7(SC);6/6NPWTand1/6SCparticipantswithdrewfromtheirallocatedtrialtreatment.Themeandurationoffollow-upwas3.8(NPWT)and5.0(SC)months.

CONCLUSIONS:

Thispilottrialyieldedvitalinformationfortheplanningofafuturefullstudyincludingprojectedrecruitmentrate,requireddurationoffollow-upandextentofresearchnursesupportrequired.Datawerealsousedtoinformthecost-effectivenessandvalueofinformationanalyses,whichwereconductedalongsidethepilottrial.

Dopatientandnurseoutcomedifferencesexistbetween2negativepressurewoundtherapysystems?

AlbertNM,RockR,SammonMA,BenaJF,MorrisonSL,WhitmanA,KatoI,Landis-ErdmanJC.

Source

NursingInstitute,ClevelandClinic,Ohio44195,USA.albertn@ccf.org

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Weprospectivelycomparedtheeffectivenessoffoam-andgauze-basednegativepressurewoundtherapy(NPWT)systemsonwoundhealing,pain,cost,andhospitallengthofstay.Wealsocompareeaseofuseandtimeinperformingdressingchangesreportedbynurses.

DESIGN:

Randomized,controlledclinicaltrialcomparingfoam-andgauze-basedNPWTsystems.

SUBJECTSANDSETTING:

ElevenadultsubjectswithphysicianordersforNPWTparticipatedinthestudy.Subjectsweremiddle-aged,white,andmale.

METHODS:

Sixsubjectswererandomlyallocatedtofoam-basedand5togau

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 党团工作 > 思想汇报心得体会

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1