Spiro Theodore Agnew Televisi.docx
《Spiro Theodore Agnew Televisi.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Spiro Theodore Agnew Televisi.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
SpiroTheodoreAgnewTelevisi
SpiroTheodoreAgnew:
Televisi
spirotheodoreagnew:
televisionnewscoverage
ithinkit'sobviousfromthecamerasherethatididn'tcometodiscussthebanoncyclamatesorddt.ihaveasubjectwhichithinkifofgreatimportancetotheamericanpeople.tonightiwanttodiscusstheimportanceofthetelevisionnewsmediumtotheamericanpeople.nonationdependsmoreontheintelligentjudgmentofitscitizens.nomediumhasamoreprofoundinfluenceoverpublicopinion.nowhereinoursystemaretherefewerchecksonvastpower.so,nowhereshouldtherebemoreconscientiousresponsibilityexercisedthanbythenewsmedia.thequestionis,"arewedemandingenoughofourtelevisionnewspresentations?
""andarethemenofthismediumdemandingenoughofthemselves?
"
mondaynightaweekago,presidentnixondeliveredthemostimportantaddressofhisadministration,oneofthemostimportantofourdecade.hissubjectwasvietnam.myhope,ashisatthattime,wastorallytheamericanpeopletoseetheconflictthroughtoalastingandjustpeaceinthepacific.for32minutes,hereasonedwithanationthathassufferedalmostathirdofamillioncasualtiesinthelongestwarinitshistory.
whenthepresidentcompletedhisaddress--anaddress,incidentally,thathespentweeksinthepreparationof--hiswordsandpoliciesweresubjectedtoinstantanalysisandquerulouscriticism.theaudienceof70millionamericansgatheredtohearthepresidentoftheunitedstateswasinheritedbyasmallbandofnetworkcommentatorsandself-appointedanalysts,themajorityofwhomexpressedinonewayoranothertheirhostilitytowhathehadtosay.
itwasobviousthattheirmindsweremadeupinadvance.thosewhorecallthefumblingandgropingthatfollowedpresidentjohnson¡¯sdramaticdisclosureofhisintentionnottoseekanothertermhaveseenthesemeninagenuinestateofnonpreparedness.thiswasnotit.
onecommentatortwicecontradictedthepresident¡¯sstatementabouttheexchangeofcorrespondencewithhochiminh.anotherchallengedthepresident¡¯sabilitiesasapolitician.athirdassertedthatthepresidentwasfollowingapentagonline.others,bytheexpressionsontheirfaces,thetoneoftheirquestions,andthesarcasmoftheirresponses,madecleartheirsharpdisapproval.
toguaranteeinadvancethatthepresident¡¯spleafornationalunitywouldbechallenged,onenetworktrottedoutaverellharrimanfortheoccasion.throughoutthepresident'saddress,hewaitedinthewings.whenthepresidentconcluded,mr.harrimanrecitedperfectly.heattackedthethieugovernmentasunrepresentative;hecriticizedthepresident¡¯sspeechforvariousdeficiencies;hetwiceissuedacalltothesenateforeignrelationscommitteetodebatevietnamonceagain;hestatedhisbeliefthatthevietcongornorthvietnamesedidnotreallywantmilitarytake-overofsouthvietnam;andhetoldalittleanecdoteabouta¡°very,veryresponsible¡±fellowhehadmetinthenorthvietnamesedelegation.
allinall,mr.harrisonofferedabroadrangeofgratuitousadvicechallengingandcontradictingthepoliciesoutlinedbythepresidentoftheunitedstates.wherethepresidenthadissuedacallforunity,mr.harrimanwasencouragingthecountrynottolistentohim.
awordaboutmr.harriman.for10monthshewasamerica¡¯schiefnegotiatorattheparispeacetalks--aperiodinwhichtheunitedstatesswappedsomeofthegreatestmilitaryconcessionsinthehistoryofwarfareforanenemyagreementontheshapeofthebargainingtable.likecoleridge¡¯sancientmariner,mr.harrimanseemstobeundersomeheavycompulsiontojustifyhisfailurestoanyonewhowilllisten.andthenetworkshaveshownthemselveswillingtogivehimalltheairtimehedesires.
noweveryamericanhasarighttodisagreewiththepresidentoftheunitedstatesandtoexpresspubliclythatdisagreement.butthepresidentoftheunitedstateshasarighttocommunicatedirectlywiththepeoplewhoelectedhim,andthepeopleofthiscountryhavetherighttomakeuptheirownmindsandformtheirownopinionsaboutapresidentialaddresswithouthavingapresident¡¯swordsandthoughtscharacterizedthroughtheprejudicesofhostilecriticsbeforetheycanevenbedigested.
whenwinstonchurchillralliedpublicopiniontostaythecourseagainsthitler¡¯sgermany,hedidn¡¯thavetocontendwithagaggleofcommentatorsraisingdoubtsaboutwhetherhewasreadingpublicopinionright,orwhetherbritainhadthestaminatoseethewarthrough.whenpresidentkennedyralliedthenationinthecubanmissilecrisis,hisaddresstothepeoplewasnotchewedoverbyaroundtableofcriticswhodisparagedthecourseofactionhe¡¯daskedamericatofollow.
thepurposeofmyremarkstonightistofocusyourattentiononthislittlegroupofmenwhonotonlyenjoyarightofinstantrebuttaltoeverypresidentialaddress,but,moreimportantly,wieldafreehandinselecting,presenting,andinterpretingthegreatissuesinournation.first,let¡¯sdefinethatpower.
atleast40millionamericanseverynight,it¡¯sestimated,watchthenetworknews.sevenmillionofthemviewa.b.c.,theremainderbeingdividedbetweenn.b.c.andc.b.s.accordingtoharrispollsandotherstudies,formillionsofamericansthenetworksarethesolesourceofnationalandworldnews.inwillroger¡¯sobservation,whatyouknewwaswhatyoureadinthenewspaper.todayforgrowingmillionsofamericans,it¡¯swhattheyseeandhearontheirtelevisionsets.
nowhowisthisnetworknewsdetermined?
asmallgroupofmen,numberingperhapsnomorethanadozenanchormen,commentators,andexecutiveproducers,settleuponthe20minutesorsooffilmandcommentarythat¡¯storeachthepublic.thisselectionismadefromthe90to180minutesthatmaybeavailable.theirpowersofchoicearebroad.
theydecidewhat40to50millionamericanswilllearnoftheday¡¯seventsinthenationandintheworld.wecannotmeasurethispowerandinfluencebythetraditionaldemocraticstandards,forthesemencancreatenationalissuesovernight.theycanmakeorbreakbytheircoverageandcommentaryamoratoriumonthewar.theycanelevatemenfromobscuritytonationalprominencewithinaweek.theycanrewardsomepoliticianswithnationalexposureandignoreothers.
formillionsofamericansthenetworkreporterwhocoversacontinuingissue--liketheabmorcivilrights--becomes,ineffect,thepresidingjudgeinanationaltrialbyjury.
itmustberecognizedthatthenetworkshavemadeimportantcontributionstothenationalknowledge--throughnews,documentaries,andspecials.theyhaveoftenusedtheirpowerconstructivelyandcreativelytoawakenthepublicconsciencetocriticalproblems.thenetworksmadehungerandblacklungdiseasenationalissuesovernight.thetvnetworkshavedonewhatnoothermediumcouldhavedoneintermsofdramatizingthehorrorsofwar.thenetworkshavetackledourmostdifficultsocialproblemswithadirectnessandanimmediacythat¡¯sthegiftoftheirmedium.theyfocusthenation¡¯sattentiononitsenvironmentalabuses--onpollutioninthegreatlakesandthethreatenedecologyoftheeverglades.butitwasalsothenetworksthatelevatedstokelycarmichaelandgeorgelincolnrockwellfromobscuritytonationalprominence.
noristheirpowerconfinedtothesubstantive.araisedeyebrow,aninflectionofthevoice,acausticremarkdroppedinthemiddleofabroadcastcanraisedoubtsinamillionmindsabouttheveracityofapublicofficialorthewisdomofagovernmentpolicy.onefederalcommunicationscommissionerconsidersthepowersofthenetworksequaltothatoflocal,state,andfederalgovernmentsallcombined.certainlyitrepresentsaconcentrationofpoweroveramericanpublicopinionunknowninhistory.
nowwhatdoamericansknowofthemenwhowieldthispower?
ofthemenwhoproduceanddirectthenetworknews,thenationknowspracticallynothing.ofthecommentators,mostamericansknowlittleotherthanthattheyreflectanurbaneandassuredpresenceseeminglywell-informedoneveryimportantmatter.wedoknowthattoamanthesecommentatorsandproducersliveandworkinthegeographicalandintellectualconfinesofwashington,d.c.,ornewyorkcity,thelatterofwhichjamesrestontermsthemostunrepresentativecommunityintheentireunitedstates.
bothcommunitiesbaskintheirownprovincialism,theirownparochialism.
wecandeducethatthesemenreadthesamenewspapers.theydrawtheirpoliticalandsocialviewsfromthesamesources.worse,theytalkconstantlytooneanother,therebyprovidingartificialreinforcementtotheirsharedviewpoints.dotheyallowtheirbiasestoinfluencetheselectionandpresentationofthenews?
davidbrinkleystatesobjectivityisimpossibletonormalhumanbehavior.rather,hesays,weshouldstriveforfairness.
anotheranchormanonanetworknewsshowcontends,andiquote:
¡°youcan¡¯texpungeallyourprivateconvictionsjustbecauseyousitinaseatlikethisandacamerastartstostareatyou.ithinkyourprogramhastoreflectwhatyourbasicfeelingsare.i¡¯llpleadguiltytothat.¡±
lessthanaweekbeforethe1968election,thissamecommentatorchargedthatpresidentnixon¡¯scampaigncommitmentswerenomoredurablethancampaignballoons.heclaimedthat,wereitnotforthefearofhostilereaction,richardnixonwouldbegivinginto,andiquotehimexactly,¡°hisnaturalinstincttosmashtheenemywithacluborgoafterhimwithameataxe.¡±
hadthisslanderbeenmadebyonepoliticalcandidateaboutanother,itwouldhavebeendismissedbymostcommentatorsasapartisanattack.butthisattackemanatedf