孙远GMAT作文讲义.docx

孙远GMAT作文讲义.docx

《孙远GMAT作文讲义.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《孙远GMAT作文讲义.docx（17页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

孙远GMAT作文讲义

孙远--GMAT作文--讲义

课　　程：

GMAT考试辅导作文

主讲教师：

孙远

总课时：

7.00

课程简介：

大家好，欢迎您选择了我的GMAT作文课。

您已经做出了正确的选择。

GMAT考两篇文章：

AnalysisofArgument（逻辑问题分析）和AnalysisofIssue（是非问题分析）。

GMAT作文话题涉及面很广，其中包括大量的商业类话题。

从内容、论证、结构到语言，GMAT作文对考生都提出了很高的要求。

但是，我相信经过我们共同的努力，你一定能如愿夺得高分。

一、考试指南

GMAT作文考两篇作文，一篇是一个是非问题分析（AnalysisofanIssue）;另一篇作文是一个逻辑问题分析（AnalysisofanArgument）。

两篇作文各考30分钟，加起来共一个小时。

简单地说，第一篇作文是立论，第二篇作文是驳论。

1.逻辑问题分析例文

ThefollowingappearedinamemorandumfromtheDirectorofHumanResourcestotheexecutiveofficersofCompanyX.“Lastyear,wesurveyedouremployeesonimprovementsneededatCompanyXbyhavingthemrank,inorderofimportance,theissuespresentedinalistofpossibleimprovements.Improvedcommunicationsbetweenemployeesandmanagementwasconsistentlyrankedastheissueofhighestimportancebytheemployeeswhorespondedtothesurvey.Asyouknow,wehavesinceinstitutedregularcommunicationssessionsconductedbyhigh-levelmanagement,whichtheemployeescanattendonavoluntarybasis.Therefore,itislikelythatmostemployeesatCompanyXnowfeelthattheimprovementmostneededatthecompanyhasbeenmade.”

Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.Inyourdiscussionbesuretoanalyzethelineofreasoningandtheuseofevidenceintheargument.Forexample,youmayneedtoconsiderwhatquestionableassumptionsunderliethethinkingandwhatalternative,explanationsorcounterexamplesmightweakentheconclusion.Youcanalsodiscusswhatsortofevidencewouldstrengthenorrefutetheargument,whatchangesintheargumentwouldmakeitmorelogicallysound,andwhat,ifanything,wouldhelpyoubetterevaluateitsconclusion.2.是非问题分析例文

“Employeesshouldkeeptheirprivatelivesandpersonalactivitiesasseparateaspossiblefromtheworkplace.”Discusstheextenttowhichyouagreeordisagreewiththeopinionstatedabove.Supportyourviewswithreasonsand/orexamplesfromyourownexperience,observations,orreading.

GMAT作文题库是怎么回事

GMAT作文的评分标准

GMAT作文如何阅卷和评分

二、课程安排1.教学内容

PartOne:

AnalysisofanArgumentCaseStudy1CaseStudy2CaseStudy3CaseStudy4

PartTwo:

AnalysisofanIssueCaseStudy1CaseStudy2CaseStudy3CaseStudy4

PartThree:

Summary1.LanguageSkills2.PrepTips

2.教学方法

（1）案例分析逻辑分析（4个）是非分析（4个）

（2）作文的结构和模式（3）论证方法（4）语言问题

PartOne

三、逻辑问题例文分析

CaseStudy1：

Thefollowingappearedaspartofanarticleinadailynewspaper.“Thecomputerizedonboardwarningsystemthatwillbeinstalledincommercialairlinerswillvirtuallysolvetheproblemofmidairplanecollisions.Oneplane’swarningsystemcanreceivesignalsfromanother’stransponder--aradiosetthatsignalsaplane’scourse--inordertodeterminethelikelihoodofacollisionandrecommendevasiveaction.”

Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.Inyourdiscussionbesuretoanalyzethelineofreasoningandtheuseofevidenceintheargument.Forexample,youmayneedtoconsiderwhatquestionableassumptionsunderliethethinkingandwhatalternative,explanationsorcounterexamplesmightweakentheconclusion.Youcanalsodiscusswhatsortofevidencewouldstrengthenorrefutetheargument,whatchangesintheargumentwouldmakeitmorelogicallysound,andwhat,ifanything,wouldhelpyoubetterevaluateitsconclusion.

2分作文:

Thisargumenthasnoinformationaboutaircollisions.Ithinkmostcaseshappenisnewairportsbecausetheairtrafficisheavy.Inthiscasesoundairportcontrolcouldsolvetheproblem.Ithinkthisargumentislogicallyreasonable.Itsassumptionisthatplanecollisionsarecausedbyplanesthatdon’tknoweachotherspositions.Sopilotscandonothing,iftheyknoweachother’spositionthroughthesystemitwillsolvetheproblem.Ifitcanprovideevidencetheproblemislackofknowledgeofeachother’spositions,itwillbemoresoundandpersuasive.Moreinformationaboutaircollisionsishelpful,（thereasonforaircollisions）

------------------------------------------------第一课时完-----------------------------------------------

4分作文

Theargumentisnotlogicallyconvincing.Itdoesnotstatewhetherallplanescanreceivesignalsfromeachother.Itdoesnotstatewhetherplanesconstantlyreceivesignals.Iftheyonlyreceivesignalsonceeverycertaintimeinterval,collisionswillnotdefinitelybeprevented.Furtheriftheyreceiveasignalrightbeforetheyareabouttocrash,theycannotavoideachother.Themainflawintheargumentisthatitassumesthatthetwoplanes,uponreceivingeachother’ssignals,willknowwhichevasiveactiontotake.Forexample,thetwoplanescouldbegoingtowardseachotherandthenreceivethesignals.Ifoneturnsatanangletotheleftandtheotherturnsatanangletotheright,thetwoplaneswillstillcrash.Eveniftheyreceiveanupdatedsignal,theywillnothavetime,toavoideachother.

Thefollowingargumentwouldbemoresoundandpersuasive.T