英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:20588588 上传时间:2023-01-24 格式:DOCX 页数:14 大小:28.47KB
下载 相关 举报
英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共14页
英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共14页
英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共14页
英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共14页
英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共14页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx

《英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx(14页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

英国顶级高校 伦敦政治经济学院 毕业论文完全英文版Word格式.docx

Problemofregulatingfinancialmarket

(inChina)

CandidateNo36332

2010-2011

PublicManagementandGovernance

DepartmentofManagement

Course:

MG415PolicyAnalysis,EvaluationandImplementation

DateofSubmissionrequired:

23rdMay2011

(5,655words,excludingreferences)

AConciseAnalysisandEvaluation

ontheFinancialRegulationinChina

Introduction:

SinceChinainitiateditseconomicreformmorethan30yearsago,China’sfinancialindustryhasgrownupsorapidlythatitattractsincreasinginternationalattentions.Accordingtostatistics(thePeople’bankofChina,2011),thetotalassetsofChina’sfinancialindustryin2009amountsto153,800billionU.S.dollars,whichismorethan300foldsofthatintheyear1978whenChinanewlyunveileditseconomicreformandopeneduptotheoutsideworld.AstrikingfeaturewithChina’sfinancialindustryisthat,fordecades,ithadsurvivedsomanyturbulencesandchallenges,includingtheeconomicchaosinlate1980sresultingfromfoodpricereform,spilloverofthefinancialcrisisintheSoutheastAsia,directandintensecompetitionsfromforeignbanksafterChina’saccessiontotheWTOin2002,aswellasthecurrentfinancialcrisiscommencingfrom2008.Nowonderthatpeople,especiallytheyoungChinesepatrioticclaimthatChina’sfinancialindustry,particularlyChina’sfinancialregulatorshavebeenperformingwellenough.ThisleadstotheillusionthatthecurrentfinancialregulationinChinaisnearperfection,andeventhatregulatorsfrommodernwesterncountriesshouldreflectandconsiderlearningsomethingfromtheirChinesepeers.Tryingtoanswerthisquestion,Iwillelaborateonitinthisessay,whichconsistsof4sections.

InSection1,Iwillfocusonthetheoriesoffinancialregulationandtrytoexaminethefollowingpoints:

whyshouldweregulatefinancialindustry?

Whatisthegeneralapproachforfinancialregulation?

Whatcanbedeemedastheappropriatequalitativeandquantitativemeasurementsforfinancialregulationandsupervision?

InSection2,IwillexploreintothecurrentstructureandarrangementforfinancialregulationinChinaandtracebacktoitshistorybackground.Also,acomparisonismadeonthefinancialregulationpracticesbetweenChinaandU.K.,toinvestigatewhetherornotapparentsimilaritiesanddifferencesareexistingbetweenthetwocountrieswithregardtotheregulatoryandsupervisorystructure,sourcesoffunding,regulatoryobjectivesandsoon.TheSection3willfocusonanalysisandcommentontheChina’sfinancialregulation.Mainly,itwillreviewwhetherthecurrentregulationshavebroughtabouteffectiveoutcomes,advantageanddisadvantageofthecurrentregulatoryarrangement,andvariousrecommendationsforpolicyandsystemreformandtheirvalidity.Also,itwilldiscusspathdependencyinChinesefinancialregulationthroughconsiderationofthenatureofChina’seconomicreformfordecades.ThiswillfinallyleadtoSection4,whichistheconclusionofthisessay.Becausethebankingindustrypossessesmorethan93%ofChina’sfinancialresources,MyessaywillmainlyfocusonfinancialregulationinBanking.

Section1Rationale,generalapproachandmeasurementoffinancialregulation.

Financialindustryseemstobeoneofthemostfragileindustriesintheworld.SincetheIndustrialRevolutioninwesterncountriesinthe18thcentury,theworldhasexperiencedfinancialcrisisdozensoftimes,fromtheGreatDepressioninthelate1920s,Asia’sfinancialcrisisin1997,anddowntothecurrentcreditcrunch.Thiswillcertainlyraisequestionsontheimportanceandeffectivenessoffinancialregulation.Fromtimetotime,thepublic,politicians,andtheacademicshaveaskedthesamequestions.Doesthecurrentfinancialregulationprovidesufficientoversightandatthesametimemitigatefinancialrisks?

Wouldthesituationhavebeennotsobadifwehadbeengivenbetteralternativeregulationarrangements?

Thesetrickyandhauntingquestionshaveprofoundanddeepmeaning.Onewillnotunderstandclearlyuntilhe(she)isconvincedbythetheoriesoffinancialregulation.

Fromthe18thcenturytotheearlier1930s,acrossthemajorwesterncivilizedcountries,themajordutiesoffinancialregulators,mainlythecentralbanks,weretoactaslendersoflastresortandimplementthedepositinsurancesystem.ThesetwomainpolicyarrangementswereheavilycriticizedbyHayek(1976)andDowd(1996),whoarguethatmarketcancorrectitsownerrorandimperfectionthroughexpansionandself-adaptationatlast.Thetotalpowerofcentralbanksshouldbediminishedsoastotackleinflation.Atthesametime,allpeopleshouldbefreetousecurrencyoftheirownchoicessoastoavoidthenegativeimpactofinflation.Moreover,theyclaimthatthereshouldbenowrongwithfreetradeandlaissez-faireinfinancialservicessectoriffreetradeisgenerallydesirable.Theirclaimhasbeenechoedbyotheracademicliberals(Benston,1996;

Kane,1997)whofurtherarguethateventhereismarketfailure,financialregulationmaystillbeundesirable,unnecessaryandcan’tinpracticesolvethefailures,andmayleadtoabundantlyexcessiveregulationcostsandinduceseriousmoralhazards.Theseliberalideologiesineconomicsmaynotturnouttobecompletelyconvincingifoneconsidersthedevastatingresultsoffinancialcrisisthroughouthumanhistory.Stiglitz(1993)examinestheimportanceofinformationinfinancialmarketandidentifiessevenmarketfailuresandclaimsthatinformationisapublicgoodandthatregulationcanleadtoParetooutcomebyprovidingenoughinformationthatotherwisewouldnotbeprovidedunderfreefinancialmarket.

Llewellyn(1999)outlines6potentialbenefitsoffinancialregulation:

①toreducetransactioncostsforconsumers;

②tomitigateoramelioratemarketfailuresoastoachieveefficiencygains;

③toimproveandmaintainconsumerconfidence;

④togeneratepositiveexternalities;

⑤toexpelhazardousfirmsfromthemarketthroughefficientauthorizationprocedures;

⑥tomakesurethatconsumerscanhaveinformedandreasonablejudgmentsanddecisionsbyincreasingtransparencyofcontractsanddisclosingduecomprehensivemarketinformation.Inadditiontothecomprehensiverationaleforfinancialregulation,hefurtherpointsoutthatefficientlyframedregulationhasitslimitationandinrealityisunabletocoveralltherisks,therefore,efficientregulationshouldneverdiminishtheincentiveforconsumerstoexerciseduecarewhiletheyarepurchasingfinancialproductsandservices.

Goodhart(1998)demonstratesthatregulationshouldbeneededsoastorefrainmonopolyoroligopolyfromexploitingconsumers,toprotectsmaller,retailclientswhoarelessinformed,tomaintainfinancialsystemicstability.Theyfurtherexamineandprovethatsystemicriskinvolvedinbankingindustryisconsiderablymoreevidentthaninnon-bankingfinancialservicesinthatthefailureofonebankcanbeofcontagionandleadtothewithdrawofdepositsfromotherbanksandthereisnowell-establishedsecondarymarketinbankloans.

Davies(2008),however,putsitverysimplethatweneedregulationoffinancialfirmsbecauseweneedtoprotecttheLenderofLastResortanddepositprotectionschemes.Moreover,thereisinformationasymmetrybetweenfinancialservicesprovidersandconsumers,andfinancialregulationandsupervisionmaybeabletocorrectsuchasymmetry.

Goodhart(1998)identifiesthegeneralapproachoffinancialregulationthroughincentivestructures:

①Regulationshouldberegardedasasetofcontracts;

②Moreemphasisshouldbelaidoninternalriskanalysis,managementandcontrolsystemsandsoon.

Sincethelate20thcentury,scholarshaveproposedacoupleofmeasurementstofacilitateregulationfromMacro-prudentialtoMicro-prudentialdimensions.Sundararajan(2002)createdfinancialsoundnessindicatorswhichincludecoresetandencouragedset.Thecoresetindicatorsmainlycovercapitaladequacy,assetquality,earningandprofitability,liquidityandsensitivitytomarketriskandotherfactorsofdeposit-takinginstitutions.Thesedetailedindicatorsincluderegulatorycapitaltorisk-weightedassets,nonperformingloanstototalgrossloans,returnonassets,liquidassetstototalassets,durationofassetsandsoon.Financialregulatorsarestronglyrecommendedtoapplythesecoresetindicators.Additionally,theencouragedsetindicatorscoverwiderrangeoffactorsinnonbankfinancialinstitutions,corporatesector,householdsandrealestatemarkets.

Hilbers(2000)proposedmacro-prudentialindicatorswhichintegratesaggregatedmicro-prudentialindicatorswithmacroeconomicindicators.Theaggregatedmicro-prudentialindicators,whicharebasedontheCAMELSframework(capital,assets,management,earnings,liquidityandsensitivitytomarketrisk),includeaggregatecapitalratios,sectoralcreditconcentration,expenseratios,returnonassets,centralbankcredittofinancialinstitutions,foreignexchangerisk,marketpricesoffinancialinstrumentsandotherratios.Themacroeconomicindicators,ontheotherhand,focusoneconomicgrowth,balanceofpayments,inflation,interestandexchangerates,lendingandassetpricebooms,contagioneffectsandotherfactors.Thesefactorscanbemeasuredbyaggregategrowthrates,currentaccountdeficit,volatilityininflation,volatilityininterestandexchangerates,lendingbooms,financialmarketcorrelation,directedlendingandinvestmentandotherratiosorfigures.

Itisallknownthatacademicsaroundtheworldstillproducenosignificantandreliablequantitativemeasurementtogaugeconsumer’sprotectioninfinancials

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 农林牧渔 > 林学

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1