考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:7728498 上传时间:2023-01-26 格式:DOCX 页数:67 大小:103.66KB
下载 相关 举报
考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共67页
考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共67页
考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共67页
考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共67页
考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共67页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx

《考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx(67页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案.docx

考研阅读理解真题及翻译答案

2016年英语考研真题及答案  

Par`tA

  Directions:

  Readthefollowingfourtexts.AnswerthequestionsbeloweachtextbychoosingA,B,CorD.MarkyouranswersontheANSWERSHEET.(40points)

  Text1

  France,whichpridesitselfastheglobalinnovatoroffashion,hasdecideditsfashionindustryhaslostanabsoluterighttodefinephysicalbeautyforwoman.Itslawmakersgavepreliminaryapprovallastweektoalawthatwouldmakeitacrimetoemployultra-thinmodelsonrunways.

  Theparliamentalsoagreedtobanwebsitesthat”inciteexcessivethinness”bypromotingextremedieting.

  Suchmeasureshaveacoupleofupliftingmotives.Theysuggestbeautyshouldnotbedefinedbylooksthatendupwithimpingingonhealth.That’sastart.Andthebanonultra-thinmodelsseemstogobeyondprotectingmodelsfromstarringthemselvestohealth–assomehavedone.Ittellsthefashionindustrythatitmovetakeresponsibilityforthesignalitsendswomen,especiallyteenagegirls,aboutthesocialtape–measuretheymustuseto determinetheirindividualworth.

  Thebans,iffullyenforced,wouldsuggesttowoman(andmanymen)thattheyshouldnotletothersbeorbitersoftheirbeauty.Andperhapsfaintly,theyhintthatpeopleshouldlooktointangiblequalitieslikecharacterandintellectratherthandietingtheirwaytosinezeroorwasp-waistphysiques.

  TheFrenchmeasures,however,relytoomuchonseverepunishmenttochangeaculturethatstillregardsbeautyasskin-deep-andbone-showing.Underthelaw,usingafashionmodelthatdoesnotmeetagovernment-definedindexofbodymesscouldresultina$85,000fineandsixmonthsinprison.

  Thefashionindustryknowsithasaninherentprobleminfocusingonmaterialadornmentandidealizedbodytypes.InDenmark,theUnitedStates,andafewothercountries,itistryingtosetvoluntarystandardformodelsandfashionimagesthererelymoreonpearpressureforenforcement.

  IncontrasttoFrance’sactions,Denmark’sfashionindustryagreedlastmonthonrulesandsanctionsregardingage,health,andothercharacteristicsofmodels.ThenewlyrevisedDanishFashionEthicalcharterclearlystates,weareawareofandtakeresponsibilityfortheimpactthefashionindustryhasonbodyideals,especiallyonyoungpeople.Thecharter’smaintollofenforcementistodenyaccessfordesignersandmodelingagenciestoCopenhagen.Fashionweek,whichismenbytheDanishFashionInstitute.Butingeneralitreliesonaname-and–shamemethodofcompliance.

  Relyingonethicalpersuasionratherthanlawtoaddressthemisuseofbodyidealsmaybethebeststep.Evenbetterwouldbetohelpelevatenotionsofbeautybeyondthematerialstandardsofaparticularindustry.

  21.Accordingtothefirstparagraph,whatwouldhappeninFrance?

  [A]Physicalbeautywouldberedefined

  [B]Newrunwayswouldbeconstructed

  [C]Websitesaboutdietingwouldthrive

  [D]Thefashionindustrywoulddecline

  22.Thephrase“impingingon”(Line2Para2)isclosestinmeaningto

  [A]heighteningthevalueof

  [B]indicatingthestateof

  [C]losingfaithin

  [D]doingharmto

  23.Whichofthefollowingistrueofthefashionindustry

  [A]TheFrenchmeasureshavealreadyfailed

  [B]NewstandardsarebeingsetinDenmark

  [C]Modelsarenolongerunderpeerpressure

  [D]Itsinherentproblemsaregettingworse

  24.AdesignerismostlikelytoberejectedbyCFWfor

  [A]settingperfectphysicalconditions

  [B]caringtoomuchaboutmodels’character

  [C]showinglittleconcernforhealthfactors

  [D]pursuingahighagethresholdformodels

  25.Whichofthefollowingmaybethebesttitleofthetext?

  [A]AchallengetotheFashionIndustry’sBodyIdeals

  [B]ADilemmaforthestarvingmodelsinFrance

  [C]JustAnotherRoundofstruggleforbeauty

  [D]TheGreatThreatstotheFashionIndustry

  Text2

  Forthefirsttimeinthehistorymorepeopleliveintownsthaninthecountry.InBritainthishashadacuriousresult.WhilepollsshowBritonsrate“thecountryside”alongsidetheroyalfamily.ShakespeareandtheNationalHealthService(NHS)aswhatmakethemproudestoftheircountry,thishaslimitedpoliticalsupport.

  AcenturyagoOctaviaHilllaunchedtheNationalTrustnottorescuestylishhousesbuttosave“thebeautyofnaturalplacesforeveryoneforever”.Itwasspecificallytoprovidecitydwellerswithspacesforleisurewheretheycouldexperience“arefreshingair”.Hill’spressurelaterledtothecreationofnationalparksandgreenbelts.Theydon’tmakecountrysideanymore,andeveryyearconcreteconsumesmoreofit.Itneedsconstantguardianship.

  Atthenextelectionnoneofthebigpartiesseemlikelytoendorsethissentiment.TheConservatives’planningreformexplicitlygivesruraldevelopmentpriorityoverconservation,

  evenauthorizing“off–plan”buildingwherelocalpeoplemightobject.Theconceptofsustainabledevelopmenthasbeendefinedasprofitable.Labourlikewisewantstodiscontinuelocalplanningwherecouncilsopposedevelopment.TheLiberalDemocratsaresilentonlyu  sensingitschance,hassideswiththosepleadingforamoreconsideredapproachtousinggreenland.ItscampaigntoprotectRuralEnglandstruckterrorintomanylocalconservativeparties.   

  Thesensibleplacetobuildnewhousesfactoriesandofficesiswherepeopleareincitiesandtownswhereinfrastructureisinplace.TheLondonagentsStirlingAckroyedrecentlyidentifiedenoughsitesforhalfofmillionhousesintheLandonareaalonewithnointrusionongreenbelts.WhatistrueofLondoniseventrueroftheprovinces.Theideathat“housingcrisis”equals“concretedmeadows”ispurelobbytalk.Theissueisnottheneedformorehousesbut,asalways,wheretoputthemunderlobbypressure,GeorgeOsbornefavoursruralnew-buildagainsturbanrenovationandrenewal.Hefavoursout-of-townshoppingsitesagainsthighstreets.Thisisnotafreemarketbutabiasedone.Ruraltownsandvillageshavegrownandwillalwaysgrow.Theydosobestwherebuildingstickstotheiredgesandrespectstheircharacter.Wedonotruinurbanconservationareas.Whyruinruralones?

  Developmentshouldbeplanned,notlettrip,AftertheNetherlands,BritainisEurope’smostcrowedcountry.Halfacenturyoftownandcountryplanninghasenableittoretainanenviableruralcoherence,whilestillpermittinglow-densityurbanliving.Thereisnodoubtofthealternative-thecorruptedlandscapesofsouthernPortugal,SpainorIreland.Avoidingthisratherthanpromotingitshouldunitetheleftandrightofthepoliticalspectrum.

  26.Britain’spublicsentimentaboutthecountryside

  [A]isnotwellreflectedinpolitics

  [B]isfullybackedbytheroyalfamily

  [C]didn’tstartfilltheShakespeareanage

  [D]hasbroughtmuchbenefittotheNHS

  27.Accordingtoparagraph2,theachievementsoftheNationalTrustarenowbeing

  [A]largelyovershadowed

  [B]properlyprotected

  [C]effectivelyreinforced

  [D]graduallydestroyed

  28.Whichofthefollowingcanbeofferedfromparagraph3

  [A]Labourisunderattackforopposingdevelopment

  [B]TheConservativesmayabandon“off-plan”building

  [C]Ukipmaygainfromitssupportforruralconservation

  [D]TheLiberalDemocratsarelosingpoliticalinfluence

  29.TheauthorholdsthatGeorgeOsbornes’spreference

  [A]showshisdisregardforthecharacterofruralarea

  [B]stressesthenecessityofeasingthehousingcrisis

  [C]highlightshisfirmstandagainstlobbypressure

  [D]revealsastrongprejudiceagainsturbanareas

  30.Inthelastparagraphtheauthorshowhisappreciationof

  [A]thesizeofpopulationinBritain

  [B]theenviableurbanlifestyleinBritain

  [C]thetown-and-countryplanninginBritain

  [D]thepoliticallifeintoday’sBritain

  Text3

  “Thereisoneandonlyonesocialresponsibilityofbusiness”wroteMiltonFriedman,aNobelPrize-winningeconomist“Thatis,touseitsresourcesandengageinactivitiesdesignedtoincreaseitsprofits.”ButevenifyouacceptFriedman’spremiseandregardcorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)policiesasawasteofshareholders’smoney,thingsmaynotbeabsolutelyclear-act.NewresearchsuggeststhatCSRmaycreatemonetaryvalueforcompaniesatleastwhentheyareprosecutedforcorruption.

  ThelargestfirmsinAmericaandBritaintogetherspendmorethan$15billionayearonCSR,accordingtoanestimatebyEPG,aconsultingfirm.Thiscouldaddvaluetotheirbusinessesinthreeways.First,consumersmaytakeCSRspendingasa“signal”thatacompany’sproductsareofhighquality.Second,customersmaybewillingtobuyacompany’sproductsasanindirectmaytodonatetothegoodcausesithelps.Andthird,throughamorediffuse“haloeffect”wherebyitsgooddeedsearnitgreaterconsiderationfromconsumersandothers.

  PreviousstudiesonCSRhavehadtroubledifferentiatingtheseeffectsbecauseconsumerscanbeaffectedbyallthree.ArecentstudyattemptstoseparatethembylookingatbriberyprosecutionsunderAmerican’sForeignCorruptPracticesAct(FCPA).Itarguesthatsinceprosecutorsdonotconsumeacompany’sproductsaspartoftheirinvestigations,theycouldbeinfluencedonlybythehaloeffect.

  Thestudyfoundthat,amongprosecutedfirms,thosewiththemostcomprehensiveCSRprogrammestendedtogetmorelenientpenalties.Theiranalysisruledoutthepossibilitythatitwasfirm’spoliticalinfluence,ratherthantheirCSRstand,thataccountedfortheleniency:

Companiesthatcontributedmoretopoliticalcampaignsdidnotreceivelowerfines.

  Inall,thestudyconcludesthatwhereasprosecutorsshouldonlyevaluateacasebasedonitsmerits

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 表格模板 > 书信模板

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1