在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译.docx
《在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译
在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译
本科毕业论文外文翻译
外文题目:
IntegratingPublicHealthandPersonalCareinaReformedUSHealthCareSystem
出处:
AmericanJournalofPublicHealth
作者:
Chernichovsky,Dov,Leibowitz,ArleenARigotti,NancyA
原文:
IntegratingPublicHealthandPersonalCareinaReformedUSHealthCareSystem
THEUNITEDSTATESHASTHEmosttechnologicallyintensivemedicalpracticeintheworld.Italsospendsmorethananyothernationonmedicalcare,buthealthoutcomesintheUnitedStatesareinferiortothoseinmostotherdevelopednations.Thisinefficiency?
spendingmorewithpoorerresults?
stemspartlyfromfailuretoprovideeffectiveaccesstomedicalcaretoasubstantialshareofthepopulation.LackofaccessleadstowiderdisparitiesinhealthintheUnitedStatesthanareexperiencedbythepopulationsofotherdevelopednations.Thefragmenteddeliverysystemalsoleadstocostshiftinginsurers'attemptstotransfercoststootherpayers,administrativewaste,andanimbalancebetweenspendingonmedicalcareandspendingonpopulationhealthinitiatives.
ThereisgeneralagreementthattheUShealthcaresystemshouldbemoreefficientaswellasmoreequitable.Mostcomprehensiveproposalsforreformingthesystemrecognizetheneedforuniversalcoveragethatisindependentofemploymentstatus,disabilitystatus,orage,althoughsomewouldcontinuetorelyonemployerstocollecthealthinsurancepayments.Althoughuniversalinsuranceisimportant,itisnottheonlyurgentissue.Areformedsystemshouldintegratepersonalpreventiveandtherapeuticcarewithpublichealthandshouldincludepopulation-widehealthinitiatives.CoordinatingpersonalmedicalcarewithpopulationhealthwillrequireamorestructuredsystemthanhaseverexistedintheUnitedStates.
Wearguethatareformedhealthcaresystemnotonlyshouldprovidehealthinsurancecoverageforallbutshouldalsobeorganizedandfundedtotakeadvantageofnewknowledgeaboutmedicalandnonmedicaldeterminantsofhealth.ThishealthtrustsystemHTSwould1assessthecostofhealthinsuranceequitably,2promoteefficiencybyreducingfragmentationandrelyingoncompetitivemarkets,3allowcoordinationofspendingonpopulationhealthandpersonalmedicalcare,4accommodateheterogeneouspreferences,and5buildonexistingAmericanhealthinsuranceandproviderinstitutions,informedbyinternationalexperience.
UNDERINVESTMENTINPUBLICHEALTH
UnderinvestmentinpreventivecareandpopulationhealthpersistsintheUnitedStatesdespitethegrowingevidencethatsuchinvestmentshavegreatpotentialtoimprovehealth.Highratesofreturnhavebeendemonstratedforcommunity-levelinterventionstoreducethehigh-riskbehaviorsthatpromotechronicdiseases,whichaccountfortwothirdsofalldeathsintheUnitedStatesandahigherpercentageofdeathsamongthemostdisadvantagedgroups.Thesechronicdiseasesareoftenassociatedwithhigh-risklifestyleconsumptionchoicessmoking,drinking,andpoordiet,whichmaybemoreeffectivelyavertedbypolicyinterventionsinthecommunityandearlyinthelifecoursethanalteredbylaterinterventionswithinthemedicalcaresector.Forexample,2structuralinterventionsinCalifornia?
levyingacigarettetaxandbanningindoorsmokinginpublicplaces?
resultedindramaticdeclinesinsmoking,followedbydeclinesintheratesoflungcancerandheartdiseaseinthestate.Disadvantagedpopulations,whichbearthegreatestburdenofchronicdisease,standtobenefitmostfrompublicandpopulationhealthinterventions.
ThecurrentfinancingstructureandorganizationofcareintheUnitedStatesprovidestrongincentivestotreatillnessafteritoccursratherthantoinvestinprevention.Healthinsurancepoliciesalsoencourageasuboptimalmixofservices,relyingonexpensive,andoftenredundant,technology,withinadequatecoverageforpreventivecare.Thefragmentedhealthcarefinancingsystemalsowastesresourcesthroughcostshiftingandexcessiveadministrativcosts.
Tocreateamoreeffectiveandefficienthealthcaresystem,theUnitedStatesshouldcapitalizeoncurrenthealthreformeffortsthataimtomakeaccesstocareuniversalandcontainitscostswithinanintegratedhealthsystem.Thiswillrequireredesigningthesystemtoallocateresourcestotherapeuticcareandtopopulationhealthinabalancethatmorecloselyreflectstheirabilitiestopromotehealthandtherebyincreasesthehealthreturnsgeneratedbyhealthexpenditures.
ARCHITECTUREOFANINTEGRATEDHEALTHSYSTEM
Inadditiontoprovidinguniversalaccessandequitablefunding,areformedhealthsystemshouldstriveto1increaseefficiencybyformulatingcoherentpolicywithappropriateincentives,information,andsupportinginfrastructure;2fostercoordinationofpublic,population,andprivatehealthcareatthelocallevel;3imposefinancialdiscipline,orcostcontainment;and4encouragechoicefor,andresponsivenessto,clients.
Weproposeahealthsystemconsistingofanationalindependentbody,anationalhealthtrustNHT,whichwouldcoordinateregional-orstate-basedaffiliates-regionalhealthtrustsRHTs?
andwhichwouldformacoherentnationalstructuretoensureorderlyandefficientoperation.
ADVANTAGESANDSAFEGUARDSINAHEALTHTRUSTSYSTEM
MostofthepoliticaldiscussionofhealthcarereformintheUnitedStateshascenteredonthecrisisinhealthcarecostsandtherelatedlackofaccesstoqualitymedicalcare.Theseimportantissuesare,however,partofalargerproblem:
thecurrentinabilityoftheUnitedStatestocareforthehealthforitspopulationefficientlybecauseitlacksacoherentsystemforfinancingandprovidingmedicalcareaswellasamechanismforallocatingresourcesbothtomedicalcareforindividualsandtopublicandpopulationhealthinitiatives.Ourproposalwouldcreatealogical,nestedorganizationthatwouldbuildonthefoundationsofthecurrentUShealthcaresystem.
Ourproposedstructurewouldhaveseveralfundamentaladvantages.Itcouldensurethathealthspendingwouldbetargetedtoitsmostproductiveusesandthatdecisionmakerscouldtakeamoreappropriatelong-termperspectiveonthehealthofAmericansbyinvestingnowinpreventionandhealthpromotion,whilealsoprovidingmedicalcareequitablytoallAmericans.Suchasystemwouldreducebillingcostsandadministrativewastebyeliminatingmedicalunderwriting,duplicatecoverage,andcostshifting.Inaddition,therebalancingofpersonalandpopulationhealthinitiativesandthedevelopmentanddisseminationofinformationontheconstituentsofcost-effectivehealthcarewouldacttocontrolcosts.
Universality
TheproposedHTSpromiseseveryAmericanaportable,basicpackageofcorebenefits,independentofemploymentstatus,whichwouldcomprisepersonalandpopulationservicesforpreventionandtreatment.ThisHTSwouldmainstreamthecareoflow-incomepersonscurrentlyenrolledincategoricalprogramsforpeoplewithparticularcharacteristics,suchasMedicaidforthedisabled,theStateChildren'sInsuranceProgramforchildren,orRyanWhiteCareActprogramsfortreatmentofHIV/AIDS.UnderanHTS,avoucherwouldsupportenrollmentofthecategoricallyeligibleinanyplanofferedintheirarea,therebyexpandingtheirchoiceofproviders.Plans'incentivestofavorlow-riskapplicantswouldbemitigatedbyreceiptofarisk-adjustedcapitationpaymentthatwouldbeindependentoftheenrolleecontribution.
Universalitydoesnotimplyuniformcare,eitherincontentorinform.InanHTS,individualswouldhaveagreaterchoiceofprovidersthaniscurrentlyavailabletomostAmericans.Althougheveryonewouldbeguaranteedthesamecorebenefits,individualscouldsatisfydiversepreferencesbysupplementingthecorebenefitswiththeirpersonalfunds,withinthesamehealthsystem,muchasFEHBPenrolleescurrentlydo.Althoughthisarrangementmayraisethespecterofa2-tieredsystem,supplementationhasnotbeenamajorissueintheFEHBP.Someindividualsnowhavebenefitsthatexceedthecorebenefitsthatcanbeprovideduniversally.Allowingthemtosupplementthecorebenefitpackageandkeeptheircurrenthealthinsuranceiftheypreferitmaybenecessaryforpoliticalacceptability.
TheorganizationofhealthcoverageintheNetherlandsprovidesaprototypeforthetypeofsystemweadvocate.Dutchresidentsreceivearisk-adjustedvoucherforabasicbenefitpackage,purchasedfromcompetinginsurers.Theycansupplementthecorebenefitsthroughtheirownresourcesorfundingfromtheiremployer.TheNetherlandscombatsrisksegmentationbycompensatingplanswithhighlydevelopedrisk-adjustedcapitationpayments.
Governance
AnHTSwouldfinanceuniversalcoveragethroughmandatedcontributionsbutwouldrelyonprivateproviderstosupplymedicalcare.Itwouldnotresemblesocializedmedicine.Thefederalgovernmentwouldinfactremaindistantfromtheorganizationandmanagementofthesystem,letalonethemanagementandprovisionofcare.However,toensurethatplansassumeafiduciaryroleonbehalfofthepublic,theNHTandRHTswouldhavetocarefullymonitorthathealthplansareprovidingappropriatecareandnotengaginginriskselection.
ThebasicnatureofUShealthcareprovisionwouldremainintact,andallAmericansenrolledinaninsuranceplanofanytypecouldcontinuetoreceivecareinthesamemannertheyreceiveittoday,althoughfundingsourceswouldchange.Theproposedplanwouldrelyheavilyonprivate,nongovernmentalentitiestoinsurethecorebenefitsaswellastooffersupplementalinsurance.Specializedgovernment-runprogramssuchasMedicareandMedicaidcouldremaininplaceandfunctionashealthplans,atl