书作文之意见书英文.docx
《书作文之意见书英文.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《书作文之意见书英文.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![书作文之意见书英文.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2023-1/15/c98c99a9-37dc-49a2-8de5-0e2e7f587d10/c98c99a9-37dc-49a2-8de5-0e2e7f587d101.gif)
书作文之意见书英文
意见书英文
【篇一:
一些英文审稿意见的模板】
最近在审一篇英文稿,第一次做这个工作,还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿,我想不会枪毙它的,给他一个majorrevision后接收吧。
呵呵
网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1、目标和结果不清晰。
itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnical
englisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:
theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshow
ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:
ahypothesisneedstobepresented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:
whatwastherationaleforthefilm/sbfvolumeratio?
7、对研究问题的定义:
trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,
writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:
thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.
9、对claim,如a>b的证明,verification:
thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.
10、严谨度问题:
mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.
11、格式(重视程度):
inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.
beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheinstructionsandformsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):
有关语言的审稿人意见:
itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnical
englisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.
theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.
aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.
theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthat
youobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.
pleasehavesomeonecompetentintheenglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit?
thequalityofenglishneedsimprov
ing.
作为审稿人,本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开(冒风险啊),
但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意,
就贴出来吧,当然,有关审稿人的名字,email,文章题名信息等就都删除了,
以免造成不必要的麻烦!
希望朋友们多评价,其他有经验的审稿人能常来指点大家!
国人一篇文章投mater.类知名国际杂志,
被塞尔维亚一审稿人打25分!
个人认为文章还是有一些创新的,
所以作为审稿人我就给了66分,(这个分正常应该足以发表),提了一些修改意见,望作者修改后发表!
登录到编辑部网页一看,一个文章竟然有六个审稿人,
详细看了下打的分数,60分大修,60分小修,66分(我),25分拒,(好家伙,竟然打25分,有魄力),拒但没有打分(另一国人审),最后一个没有回来!
两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的!
(括号斜体内容为我注解)
reviewer4
reviewerrecommendationterm:
reject
overallreviewermanuscriptrating:
25
commentstoeditor:
reviewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelow.pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.
title(prof./dr./mr./mrs.):
prof.
name:
xxx
affiliation:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
manuscriptentitledsynthesisxxx。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
ithasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsandinavarietyofforms.thismanuscriptdoesnotbringanynewknowledgeordataonmaterialspropertyandthereforeonlycontributionmaybeinnovelpreparationmethod,stillthispointisnotelaboratedproperly(seeremark1).presentationandwritingisratherpoor;thereareseveralstatementsnotsupportedwithdata(forsomeseeremarks2)andevensomeflaws(seeremark3).forthesereasonsisuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentform.
1.thepaperdescribesanewmethodforpreparationofxxxx,but:
-thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsforpreparationofxxxxpowders
(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),(通常的写作格式,审稿人实际上很在意的)
-ithastobedescribedwhythismethodisbetterordifferentfromothermethods,
(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),
-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofxxxxxxbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthismethod(abstract,resultsanddiscussion,conclusions).
(很多人不会写这个地方,大家多学习啊)
2.whendiscussingxrddataxxxauthors
-statethatxxxxx
-statethatxxxx
-thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,particlesize?
(很多人用xrd,结果图放上去就什么都不管了,这是不应该的)
3.whendiscussingluminescencemeasurementsauthorswritexxxxxifthereissecond
harmonicinexcitationbeamitwillstaytherenomatterwhattypeofmaterialoneinvestigates!
!
!
(研究了什么?
?
?
)
4.英语写作要提高
(这条很多人的软肋,大家努力啊)
reviewer5
reviewerrecommendationterm:
reject
overallreviewermanuscriptrating:
n/a
commentstoeditor:
title(prof./dr./mr./mrs.)rof.
name:
(国人)
affiliation:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
deareditor:
thankyouforinvitingmetoevaluatethearticletitledxxxx“.inthispaper,theauthorsinvestigatedtheinfluencesofsinteringconditiononthecrystalstructureandxxxxxx,however,itisdifficultforustounderstandthemanuscriptbecauseofpoorenglishbeingused.thetextisnotwellarrangedandthelogicisnotclear.exceptenglishwriting,therearemanymistakesinthemanuscriptandtheexperimentalresultsdontshowgoodandnewresults.soirecommendtoyouthatthismanuscriptcannotbeaccepted.thefollowingarethequestionsandsomemistakesinthismanuscript:
(看看总体评价,不达标,很多人被这样郁闷了,当然审稿人也有他的道理)
1.thexxxxxxx.however,thiskindmaterialhadbeeninvestigatedsince1997asmentionedintheauthorsmanuscript,andsimilarworkshadbeenpublishedinsimilarjournals.whatarethe
【篇二:
英文期刊审稿意见模板】
1、目标和结果不清晰。
itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:
theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshow
ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:
ahypothesisneedstobepresented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:
whatwastherationaleforthefilm/sbfvolumeratio?
7、对研究问题的定义:
trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,
writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:
thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.
9、对claim,如a>b的证明,verification:
thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.
10、严谨度问题:
mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.
11、格式(重视程度):
inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.
beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheinstructionsandformsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):
有关语言的审稿人意见:
itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.
theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.
aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.
theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.
pleasehavesomeonecompetentintheenglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit?
thequalityofenglishneedsimproving.
作为审稿人,本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开(冒风险啊),
但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意,
就贴出来吧,当然,有关审稿人的名字,email,文章题名信息等就都删除了,
以免造成不必要的麻烦!
两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的!
(括号斜体内容为我注解)
reviewer4
reviewerrecommendationterm:
reject
overallreviewermanuscriptrating:
25
commentstoeditor:
reviewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelow.pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.