ERPflagship.docx
《ERPflagship.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ERPflagship.docx(37页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
ERPflagship
EducationforRuralPeople
ERPFlagship,abroadpictureofpartners
Contents
IntroductionPag.2
1.ThepurposeofthisthisstudyPag.3
2.Thecharacteristicoftheanalysistool(thequestionnaire)Pag.4
3.Theanalysisofthedata-ThecharacteristicsofthepartnersPag.5
3.1Analysisoftheopenanswers(Otherusefulinformation-Pag.5
Describeherethetypeofexperiencesyouwishtosharewithothers).
Themainfinding(Theopinionsandtherequestsofthepartners)
3.2Geographicaldistributionofthepartners(byheadquarter).Pag.8
3.3Geographicaldistributionofthepartners(byareasofactivities)Pag.10
3.4DistributionofthepartnersbycontinentandbytypeoforganizationPag.10
3.5DistributionofthepartnersbykindoftechnologyusedforERPPag.11
3.6DistributionofthepartnersbytypeofERPactivitiescarriedoutPag.11
3.6SectionofthewebsitePag.15
3.7NumberofpeoplereachedbyERPactivitiesofthepartnersPag.16
Annexen.1ThequestionnairePag.18
Annexen.2Listofthepartners-(1March2005)Pag.21
Introduction.
FAOandUNESCOleadaflagshiptopromoteaworldwideinitiativecalledEducationforRuralPeople.Thisinitiative,launchedattheWorldSummitonSustainableDevelopment(WSSD)inJohannesburgon3September2002,seekstocontributetotheachievementoffoodsecurity,sustainabledevelopment,EducationForAll(EFA,Jomtien,1990andDakar,2000)aswellastheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(NewYork,2000).
TheWorldFoodSummit(FAO,Rome,1996)alsofocusedontheneedtoensureandenableanenvironmentconducivetopovertyandhungereradication,durablepeaceandfoodsecurityandengagedgovernmentsincollaborationwithcivilsocietytosupportinvestmentsinhumanresources,suchaseducation,literacy,andotherskillstraining,whichareessentialtosustainabledevelopment.TheSummitstressedtheneed"forpromotingaccessforall,especiallythepoorandmembersofvulnerableanddisadvantagedgroups,tobasiceducation".
FAObelievesthatthekeyforachievingthesegoalsisthepromotionofanappropriateeducationfortheworld’sbiggestneglectedmajority:
ruralpeople.
Infacttheworld’spoorestmajority,illiteratesandchildrennotattendingschoolliveintheseareas.
FAOhasacceptedtobetheEducationalforRuralPeople(ERP)leadagencysinceitisconvincedthateducationisakeytosustainabledevelopment,foodsecurityandpovertyreduction.
“Educationisapowerfulinstrumentofeconomic,socialandculturalchange”andruraldevelopmentcanallowtoachievebothpovertyreductionandEducationforAll.“Thiscanbeachievethroughnewmultisectoralandinterdisciplinaryalliancesandpartnershipsamongaidspecialistsworkingineducationandthoseworkinginagricultureandruraldevelopment”.
“Sustainedpovertyreductionalsorequirespro-poorinstitutionsandthebuildingofpartnershipbetweentheruralpoorandtheotherstakeholders”;thepoorcanhelpthemselvestoescapefrompoverty.
Thereforethisflagshipisastepinthisdirectionandithasthefollowinggoals:
ØToassureabetteraccesstobasiceducationtoruralpeople
ØToreducethedifferenceintheareaofeducationbetweenruralandurbanareas
ØToimprovethequalityofeducationinruralareas
Øtocontributetotheeradicationofhungerandpovertyandtoasustainabledevelopment
ØtoincreasecoordinateandcollaborativeeffortswithandforruralpopulationsandexchangeinformationonactivitiesandgoodpracticesintheareaofEducationforRuralPeopledevelopedbypartners.
Besides,inthiscontext,FAOcoordinatesandincreasestechnicalsupporttocountrieswillingtoaddressthebasiceducationforruralpeople.
“Theflagshipshouldbealightmechanismofadvocacyandcoordination,shakeitselffreefrombureaucraticconstraintsanddaretobehaveasapioneering,activist,lobbyingmechanism”.
1.Thepurposeofthisstudy
Withintwoyearsofthelaunchoftheflagship(fromseptember2002toFebruary2005)114organizations(seeannexn°2),governmental,non-governmentalandinternational,hadpledgedthemselvestoworkwithFAOandUNESCOinpushingforwardtheprogrammesoftheflagship.
AstrongnetworkiscurrentlybeingbuiltamongthepartnersoftheflagshipthatareNGOs,Fondations,Universities,privateandpubliceducationtraininginstitutions.
ManyactivitieswereundertakenbyFAO:
ØAtinternationallevel:
Organizationsofworkshopsandseminarsonthistopic,
ØAtnationallevel:
StudiesandpilotprojectsinBosnia,Croatia,Egypt,KosovoandSerbia.
Communicationinstrumentswerecreatedforsupportingtheexchangeofinformationandgoodpractices:
ØTheinformalnewletter,
ØThewebsite
ØThequestionnairefilledbythepartners.
ThispublicationaimsatdrawingabroadpictureoftheERPflagshippartnersafteritsfirsttwoyearsofactivitiesthroughtheanalysisofthedataretrievedfromthequestionnaires.
ItalsoaimsathelpingthepartnersoftheflagshiptoknowbetterthemselvesanditcouldbeaninstrumentofcommunicationbetweenalltheERPpartners.
2.Thecharacteristicoftheanalysistool(thequestionnaire)
Thequestionnaire,thepurposeofwhichistoanalysethepartnerscharacteristicsismadeof7closedquestionsand2openquestions(“experiencesthatyouwouldliketoshare”and“Anyotherinformationonyouractivity”).
Thelattertwoquestionsallowtherespondentstoexpresstheiropinionsevenifinalimitedway.
TheanswersobtainedemphasizedtheaspectsandproblemsofparticularimportanceforthepartnersaboutERP.
Thedatacollectedallowedforamorefocussedandpreciseanalysis.Thequestionnairehasbeensenttothepartnersbye-mailfollowingtheirsubscriptiontothepartnershipandtheirreplieswerenotsolicited.Thefilledquestionnaireswerealsoreturnedbythepartnersbye-mail.
Thenumberofquestionnaires(60)answeredrepresent43%ofthetotalsubscribers(142)
(NGOs,foundations,Universitiesandothers).
(totalofpartners,NGOs,Fondations,Universities)
Continent
Numberofpartners
Perc.
Africa
31
21.83
Asia
28
19.72
Australia
2
1.41
CentralAmerica
5
3.52
Europe
57
40.14
NorthAmerica
7
4.93
SouthAmerica
12
8.45
Total
142
100.00
(sample,partnersthatfilledinthequestionnaire)
Continent
Numberofpartners
Perc.
Africa
14
23.33
Asia
15
25.00
CentralAmerica
2
3.33
Europe
25
41.67
NorthAmerica
1
1.67
SouthAmerica
3
5.00
Total
60
100.00
Thissampleissufficientlyrepresentativeofthewholeofthepartners.
Thematerialcollectedwasquitesufficienttomeettherequirementsoftheresearch:
i.e.todrawaclearpictureofthesituation;butprovedalsoveryusefulandrichtoallowforthedesignofa2ndquestionnairemoreextendedandmoretargeted.
Theintegraltextofthequestionnaireisattachedinannexn°1.
3.Theanalysisofthedata-Thecharacteristicsofthepartners
3.1.Analysisoftheopenanswers(Otherusefulinformation-
Describeherethetypeofexperiencesyouwishtosharewithothers)
Themainfinding.Theopinionandtherequestsofthepartners
Fromtheanalysisofthe60questionnairesfilledinbythepartnersitresultedalotofinterestingpointsandaverypositivepictureoftheinitiative,bothemphasizedbythenumberofthepartnerswhosubscribedtothepartnership(187)andbythecharacteristicanddiversityofthepartners.Asamatteroffactnearly40,64ofthepartnersarenationalNGOs.
Fromthetablewecanseethatnationalnon-governmentalorganizationsconstitutethemostimportantactorsoftheflagship.
NGOshavedemonstratedlargecapacityanddynamismtocarry-outimportantprogrammesintheeducationarea.
Partnersbytypeoforganization
TypeofOrganization
Numberofpartners
Perc.
InternationalOrganization
15
8.02
Governmentalentity
34
18.18
NationalNGO
76
40.64
InternationalNGO
7
3.74
Publiceducation/traininginstitution
12
6.42
Privateeducation/traininginstitution
21
11.23
Fondation
4
2.14
Other
18
9.63
Total
187
100.00
NGOshavetheirheadquarterinlow-incomecountries.
Partners byheadquarter
Continent
Numberofpartners
Perc.
Africa
35
18.72
Asia
37
19.79
Australia
2
1.07
CentralAmerica
15
8.02
Europe
68
36.36
NorthAmerica
9
4.81
SouthAmerica
21
11.23
Total
187
100.00
Thisshowsthattheinitiativehaselicitedtheinterestfromtheorganizationswhichworkinthecountrieswherethereisaneedfordevelopingandimprovingeducationforruralpeople.
ThesenationalNGOsareorganizationswhichbetterknowtheneedandtheproblemsofruralpeopleandarebettersuitedtoproposebottom-upactionaswellasinnovativeeducationalprogrammestailoredtotheneedsofruralcommunities,trulyparticipatoryandnorpreconceivedpackage.
Thisprogramsaremoresensitivetotheneedsofrurallearners,dedicatedtooutreachactivitiesandmorecommunityfocused.
“Thereisanawarenessoftheneedtoharmonizemodernknowledgeandlocalwisdom”.
Theactivitiesregisteredinthequestionnairedifferfromcommunitytocommunitydependingontheirsituationandspecificneedsbecauseruralareasarenothomogeneous.
Thepartnersinvolvethecommunityintheidentificationandmanagingofprogramsbasedonthesocialandculturalenvironment.
Theyunderlinetheneedforrespectfuldialoguewithparents,othersadultsincommunitiesandlocalauthorities.
Theeducationalprogramsproposedrespondtotheexpressedwishesofthecommunity.
Theschoolcurriculaaremeaningfulregardingthelifesituationofruralpeopleandincludeskillsrelatedtolocalcustomsandlivelihoodsandd