fabrics of kink bands in the DarringtoGeometrymicrostructuresand within.docx
《fabrics of kink bands in the DarringtoGeometrymicrostructuresand within.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《fabrics of kink bands in the DarringtoGeometrymicrostructuresand within.docx(29页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
fabricsofkinkbandsintheDarringtoGeometrymicrostructuresandwithin
Geometry,microstructures,andmagneticfabricsofkinkbandsintheDarrington
Phyllite,northwesternWashington,USA:
Processeswithinfixed-hingekinking
美国华盛顿州西北部达灵顿千枚岩的几何形状、纤维构造、磁组构,膝折带:
固定枢纽扭折过程
Keywords:
KinkbandPhylliteDeformationMagneticanisotropyThinsectionMicrofabric
Field,thinsection,andmagneticfabricanalysesofmonoclinal,contractionalkinkbandsintheDarringtonPhylliteofnorthwesternWashington,USA,provideevidenceofkinematicevolutionandmicrostructuralprocessesduringkinking.Relationshipsamonginternal,external,androtationanglesofkinkbandssuggestthatrotationwasaprimarymechanismofkinking,andasignificantnumberofkinkbandsdeviatefromthe“ideal”kinkbandgeometry(equalinternalandexternalkinkangles).Dilationspaces(voids)filledwithunrecrystallizedquartzand/orcalciteinsidekinkbandsandalongtheboundariesarecommonlyobservedinkinkbandswithunequalkinkangles.Evidenceforlocalizedinterlayerslipinsidekinkbandsincludesmicagrainsprotrudingintothehingevoidsandstair-stepgeometryofthevoids.Interlayerslipallowedforrotationoftheinternalfoliationduringkinking.Pressuresolutionisnotubiquitousinsidekinkbandsfromthestudyarea;however,significantpressuresolutionisassociatedwith“locked”kinkbands(equalkinkangles).Anewapproachusingtheanisotropyofmagneticsusceptibility(AMS)showsthatthemagneticfabricandsusceptibilityinsidethekinkbandsiffermorefromtheoutsidefabricthancanbeexplainedbysimplerotationoftheoutsidefabricintothekinkattitudes.Combined,ourobservationssuggestthatfixed-hingekinkingoperatedatthislocation,andthatveining,interlayerslip,andpressuresolutionwerethedominantdeformationmechanisms.
1.Introduction
Kinkbandsarecommonstructuresincontractionaldeformationzones,butmechanism(s)ofkinkingatboththemacro-andmicroscalesarepoorlyunderstood.Despitearichliteratureinfieldobservationsanddeformationexperiments,fewstudiesreportanalysesofthemicrofabricswithinkinkbandsthatcouldilluminatetheprocessesofkinkbandgrowth.
Thinsectionandmagneticfabricanalyseshavebeenperformedonkinkbands(e.g.PatersonandWeiss,1966;Verbeek,1978;StewartandAlvarez,1991;KirkerandMcClelland,1997);hereweadvancethisworkbyconnectingobservedmicrofabricsassociatedwithkinkbandstospecifickinkingmechanism(s).
Kinkbandsaresmallmonoclinalfoldswithsharpparallelhinges
(Fig.1)thatoccurinfine-grained,anisotropicrocks.
Bothcontractionalandextensionalkinkbandsarepossible(Dewey,1965);thispaperfocusesonlyonthecharacteristicsofcontractionalkinkbands.
Asinglekinkbandconsistsoftwolong(undeformed)limbsbracketingashorter“kinked”(deformed)limb,andthetracesoftheaxialplanesofthehingesmarktheboundariesofthekinkband.
Previousworkershavedefinedanumberofanglesinkinkbands
(e.g.Verbeek,1978;Fig.1):
theexternal(acute)angle(a)between
theundeformedfoliationandthekinkbandboundary;theinternal
angle(b)betweenthekinkedfoliationandtheboundary;andthe
rotationangle(k)throughwhichthekinkedfoliationhasbeen
rotated,wherek¼180eaeb(Weiss,1980).
Fieldstudiesofkinkbands(e.g.Anderson,1964;Clifford,1968;Fyson,1968;Hobson,1973;Verbeek,1978;KirschnerandTeixell,1996)havefocusedmainlyonoutcrop-scalefeaturesandgeometries,usuallyqualitativelyandinthecontextofaregionaldeformationframework.
Analogandrockexperiments(e.g.PatersonandWeiss,1966;Anderson,1974;StewartandAlvarez,1991)providedsomeobservationsofmicrostructuresandfabricinthinsection,but
detaileddescriptionsofnaturalkinkbandsinthinsectionare
uncommonintheliterature.
Observationsonthegeometryofkinkbandshavebeenusedtoproposeandevaluatemodelsforkinkbanddevelopment(e.g.Dewey,1965;Verbeek,1978;Weiss,1980;StewartandAlvarez,1991),generallyfocusingontheangularrelationshipsbetweenthefoliationandthekinkbandboundariesandonlymarginallyonthegrain-scalecharacteristicsoftherocks.
Microstructuresandmagneticfabricsrelatedtokinkbandscan
yieldinformationondeformationmechanismsandstrainwithin
thekinkbands(e.g.StewartandAlvarez,1991;Kirkerand
McClelland,1997),whichcanberelatedtokinkbandgeometry
andmodelsofkinkbanddevelopment.
Themechanicsbywhichkinkbandsdevelopareunresolved;
previousworkershavegenerallyadheredtooneoftwomajor
kinematicmodels.
Themobile-hingemodelofkinkinghasbeenchampionedbymany(e.g.PatersonandWeiss,1966;Weiss,1980;StewartandAlvarez,1991).
Inthismodel,kinkbandsaccommo-dateshorteningbyincorporatingnewmaterialasthehingesmigrateoutwardintotheexternal(undeformed)mediumandmaterialisfoldedandthenunfoldedasthekinkbandwidens(Weiss,1980).
Evidenceforhingemigrationhasbeenseeninthinsection(PatersonandWeiss,1966)andindeformationexperiments(PatersonandWeiss,1966;GayandWeiss,1974;StewartandAlvarez,1991).
Thegeometricconstraintsofthemobile-hingemodelrequirezerodilationinsidethekinkbandandequalkinkanglesaandb(see
Fig.1).
Thefixed-hingemodelofkinkinghasbeeninvokedinseveralfield-basedstudies(e.g.Dewey,1965;Hobson,1973;Verbeek,1978).
Kinkbandsinthismodeldevelopviarigidrotationoftheinternalfoliationbetweentwofixedhinges.
Thisrequiresdilationbetweentheinternalfoliationplanesandalongthekinkbandboundariesatlowrotationangleswhenb>a;deformationceaseswhenthekinkband“locks”atb¼a(Verbeek,1978;StewartandAlvarez,1991).
Forbothmodels,kinkbandswithequalanglesaandbaretakenasthe“ideal”(mobile-hinge)or“locked”(fixed-hinge)case.
Infixed-hingekinking,kinkbandswithlowrotationanglesandb>aareintheearlystagesofformation.
ThecasebBoththemobile-andfixed-hingekinkingmodelsrequireinterlayerslipinsidethekinkband(PatersonandWeiss,1966;Weiss,1980;StewartandAlvarez,1991),sinistralslipinsidedextralkinkbands(Fig.1)andviceversa(e.g.Verbeek,1978;Rousell,1980).
Someworkershavearguedthatbothmechanismsoperateunderdifferentconditions,dependingontheamountofstrainaccommodated(StewartandAlvarez,1991)ortheconfiningpressureoftherocksatthetimeofkinking(Anderson,1974).
Itisalsopossibletoimaginehybridkinematicsthatinvolvebothrotationofthekinkedlimbandmigrationofitsboundaries(e.g.TwissandMoores,1992).
Theroleofothermechanisms(e.g.pressuresolu-tion)ispoorlyaddressed,thoughStewartandAlvarez(1991)suggestthatpressuresolutioncouldbeinvokedasahinge-migrationmechanism.
Weusefield,thinsection,andmagneticfabricanalysesto
characterizethemacro-andmicro-scalefeaturesofkinkbandsin
theDarringtonPhylliteofnorthwesternWashingtoninorderto
understandwhatprocessesoperateonthegrainscalewithinkink
bandsandhowtherockcharacteristicsaffecttheformationofkink
bands.
Fieldandthinsectionobservationsprovideadetailedrecord
ofthevariationsinkinkbandgeometryandrelatedfeatures.
Wealsopresentanewmethodthatexaminesmagneticfabricsfrom
outsideandinsidekinkbandstoquantifychangesduetokinking.
Theseobservationsareusedtoassesswhetherinterlayerslipand/
orpressuresolutionoccurredduringkinking.
Thecharacteristicsofthekinkbandsarealsousedtoevaluatetheapplicabilityofthemobile-and/orfixed-hingekinkingmodelstothekinkbandsintheDarringtonPhyllite
2.stadyarea
Adensenetworkofmonoclinalkinkbandsrecordslatedeformationofawell-developedfoliationintheDarringtonPhylliteon
SamishIslandinnorthwesternWashington(Fig.2).
TheDarringtonPhylliteispartoftheShuksanMetamorphicSuite(Misch,1966;Brown,1986;Gallagheretal.,1988),whichcomprisesoceanfloorsedimentaryandigneousrocksthathaveundergonesubductionrelatedmetamorphismandseveralsubsequentdeformationevents(Haugerud,1980;Haugerudetal.,1981;Brown,1986).
OnSamishIsland,theDarringtonPhylliteisamicaceousquartzose
phyllitethatunderwentblueschist-faciesmetamorphismat~154
Ma(Lamb,2000).
Metamorphismandrecrystallizationaresufficientlyintensethattheoriginalsedimentarylayeringoftherockisobscured,althoughthereisabroadtrendofincreasinggrainsizeandincreasedquartzfromNEtoSWintheexposedrocks
(Lamb,2000).
ThestructuralhistoryofSamishIslandismultistage
andcomplex,withatleastfivedeformationepisodes(Lamb,2000;
Schermeretal.,2007).
Atleasttwofoldingeventsthatpredatedthedevelopmentofkinkbandswereaccompaniedbydevelopmentofveinsandpressuresolutioncleavageswhoseorientationsandfabricassociationsaredistinctfromlaterkinkbandsandkinkrelatedpressuresolutionseams;thefoldingeventswerefollowedbymultiplefaultingeventsandveindevelopmentduringaperiodofextension(Lamb,2000;Schermeretal.,2007).
Themostrecentdeformationeventsincludedevelopmentofkinkfolds,strike-slipfaults,andpossiblyopenfoldingofallpreexistingstructures.
FieldobservationsandpreviousthinsectionanalysesbyLamb
(2000)suggestthatkinkfoldingoccurredafterallfabric-forming
events:
kinkbandsarenotablyabsentinareaswithstrongly
developedF2foldsorV2veins,andboththeS1andS2cleavages
arekinked.
Althoughso