Attribute perceptions as factors explaining Mobile Internet acceptance of cellular customers in GermWord格式.docx
《Attribute perceptions as factors explaining Mobile Internet acceptance of cellular customers in GermWord格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Attribute perceptions as factors explaining Mobile Internet acceptance of cellular customers in GermWord格式.docx(28页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Purchase
$37.95
227
TheUKtransportcarbonmodel:
Anintegratedlifecycleapproachtoexplorelowcarbonfutures
EnergyPolicy,InPress,CorrectedProof,Availableonline9September2010
ChristianBrand,MartinoTran,JillianAnable
Closepreview
AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences
Abstract
Currentdebatefocusesontheneedforthetransportsectortocontributetomoreambitiouscarbonemissionreductiontargets.IntheUK,variousmacro-economicandenergysystemwide,top-downmodelsareusedtoexplorethepotentialforenergydemandandcarbonemissionsreductioninthetransportsector.Thesemodelscanlackthebottom-up,sectoraldetailneededtosimulatetheeffectsofintegrateddemandandsupply-sidepolicystrategiestoreduceemissions.Bridgingthegapbetweenshort-termforecastingandlong-termscenario“models”,thispaperintroducesanewlydevelopedstrategictransport,energy,emissionsandenvironmentalimpactsmodel,theUKTransportCarbonModel(UKTCM).TheUKTCMcoverstherangeoftransport–energy–environmentissuesfromsocio-economicandpolicyinfluencesonenergydemandreductionthroughtolifecyclecarbonemissionsandexternalcosts.Themodelisdemonstratedinthispaperbypresentingtheresultsofthreesinglepoliciesandonepolicypackagescenario.Limitationsofthemodelarealsodiscussed.DevelopedundertheauspicesoftheUKEnergyResearchCentre(UKERC)theUKTCMcanbeusedtodeveloptransportpolicyscenariosthatexplorethefullrangeoftechnological,fiscal,regulatoryandbehaviouralchangepolicyinterventionstomeetUKclimatechangeandenergysecuritygoals.
ArticleOutline
1.Introduction
2.Background
2.1.Carbonpathways
2.2.Strategicmodellingofthetransport–energy–environmentsystem
3.Modeldesignandmethods
3.1.Modeloverviewandarchitecture
3.2.Transportdemandmodel
3.2.1.Approach
3.2.2.Overviewofmodelspecification
3.2.3.Demandmodelcalibration
3.3.Vehiclestockmodel(VSM)
3.3.1.Approach
3.3.2.Modelspecification:
focusonvehicletechnologychoice
3.4.Directenergyandemissionsmodel(DEEM)
3.4.1.Approach
3.4.2.Modelspecification,datasourcesandcalibration
3.5.Lifecycleandenvironmentalimpactsmodel(LCEIM)
3.5.1.Approach
3.5.2.Modelspecificationanddatasources
4.Areferencescenarioforcomparison
4.1.Approach
4.2.Keydatasourcesandassumptions
4.3.Referencescenarioresults
5.Alternativescenarios
5.1.Policydescriptionandassumptions
5.2.Mainresults
6.Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
$19.95
Researchhighlights
►Newstrategictransport,energy,emissionsandenvironmentalimpactsmodel.►Tooltodevelopandanalysefullconsequencesofmultiplescenariosoftransportpolicypackages.►Novelapproachtomodellingdemandfornewvehiclesbymarketandtechnology.►Modelavailableforusebyresearchcommunityviahttp:
//www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/tiki-index.php?
page=UK+Transport+Carbon+Model.
228
KnowledgetransferinMNCs:
Examininghowintrinsicmotivationsandknowledgesourcingimpactindividualcentralityandperformance
JournalofInternationalManagement,Volume15,Issue1,March2009,Pages15-31
RobinTeigland,MollyWasko
Studiesinvestigatingindividualperformanceinknowledge-intensiveworkarefindingthatindividualperformanceisaresult,tosomedegree,ofobtainingtherightinformationtosolvenovel,challengingproblems.Yetweknowlittleabouttherolethattheindividualplaysintheknowledgeprocessesinmultinationalsandtherelationshipbetweenindividualknowledgesourcingactivitiesandperformance.Ourexpectationisthatsuccessfulknowledgetransferwillbebasedonanindividual'
sintrinsicmotivation,accesstoknowledgefromexplicitortacitknowledgesourceswithinandacrossfirmboundaries,andpositionintheoveralladvicenetworkofthemultinationalcorporation.Usingsurveyandsocialnetworkdatacollectedinonemultinationalconsultingfirm,weinvestigatedtheknowledgesourcingactivitiesandinformaladvicenetworksfor1439oftheentire1698individualsinonemultinationalspreadacross28offices(84.7%responserate).Throughhierarchicalregressionanalysiswefindthat1)intrinsicmotivationsarestronglyrelatedtocreativityandefficiencyand2)MNCsshouldsupportindividuallevelactivitiesthatincludenotonlytheuseofinternalknowledgesourcesbutalsotheuseofexternalknowledgesources.Researchresultsalsosuggestthat3)therearedifferentpatternsofknowledgesourcingactivitiesbasedonwhetherefficientorcreativeperformanceisthegoaland4)thesediffersignificantlydependinguponthefunctionalgrouptowhichtheindividualbelongs.Implicationsfortheoriesoftheknowledge-basedviewofthemultinationalcorporationandpracticalimplicationsformanagersarediscussed.
2.Theoreticalfoundation
2.1.Intrinsicmotivations,centralityandperformance
2.2.Internalexplicitknowledgetransferandperformance
2.3.Externalexplicitknowledgetransferandperformance
2.4.Internaltacitknowledgeintegrationandperformance
2.5.Externaltacitknowledgeintegrationandperformance
2.6.Centralityandperformance
2.7.Differencesacrossfunctions
3.Methods
3.1.Researchsettinganddatacollection
3.2.Surveyitemsandmeasures
3.2.1.Intrinsicmotivations
3.2.2.CentralityintheMNC'
sadvicenetwork
3.2.3.Individualperformance
3.2.4.Businessfunction
3.2.5.Controlvariables
4.Analysesandresults
4.1.Assessmentofthemeasurementmodel
4.2.Correlationsanddescriptivestatistics
4.3.Analyses
5.Results
6.Discussionandimplications
6.1.Practicalimplications
6.1.1.Knowledge-basedviewofthemultinationalfirm
6.1.2.Knowledge“leakage”andfirmperformance
7.Concludingremarks
$31.50
229
Identifyingstrengthsandweaknessesoflandscapevisualisationforeffectivecommunicationoffuturealternatives
LandscapeandUrbanPlanning,Volume100,Issue3,15April2011,Pages231-241
ChristopherJ.Pettit,ChristopherM.Raymond,BrettA.Bryan,HaydenLewis
Visualisationtechnologiesarepowerfultoolsforcommunicatingthescientificoutcomesofenvironmentalplanningmodels.Thisstudyspecificallyexploresthestrengthsandweaknessesoflandscapevisualisationtechniquesinenvironmentalplanningbydrawinguponinsightsfromthemulti-agencyLowerMurrayLandscapeFutures(LMLF)integratedmodellingandanalysisprojectinsouth-easternAustralia.Theprojectexploredspatiallyexplicitpolicyoptionsandscenariosforassessingtheimpactsofachievingregionalnaturalresourcemanagementtargets.Alternativelandscapefutureswerecommunicatedusingarangeofvisualisationtechniquesavailableonline.Weassessedthestrengthsandweaknessesofthesuiteofvisualisationproductsdeployedforcommunicatinglandscapefuturestotwoaudiences(i)currentuserscomprisingenvironmentalmanagersandplannersworkingwithinthestudyareaand(ii)futureuserscomprisinguniversitystudentscurrentlystudyingspatialinformationsciencesaspartoftheirenvironmentalmanagementprogram.Semi-structuredinterviewsandwebsiteevaluationsurveyswereundertakenwithcurrentusersandfutureusers,respectively.Resultsindicatethatbothaudiencesappreciatedtheenvironmentalplanningandinvestmentdecisionsupportstrengthsofthevisualisationproducts.Thecurrentusershadconcernsaroundthetargetaudienceandthenatureandextentofcommunicationsandstakeholderengagementinproductdevelopment.Thefutureusergroupweremoreinterestedinthevisualclarityofthevisualisationproducts.Enduserfeedbackprovidedanumberofusefulrecommendationsinrelationtohowthevisualisationproductscouldberefinedtoimprovethecommunicationeffectivenessandenduserexperience.Weconcludebypresentinganumberoffuturedirectionsforlandscapevisualisationscienceandcommunicationofenvironmentalmodellingoutcomes.
2.Methodology
2.1.Landscapemodelling
2.2.Visualisationmethods
2.3.Evaluationmethods
2.3.1.Currentusers
2.3.2.Futureusers
3.Results
3.1.Currentusers
3.1.1.Strengthsandweaknesses
3.1.2.Futuredirections
3.2.Futureusers
3.2.1.Strengthsandweaknesses
3.2.2.Futuredirections
4.Discussion
4.1.Visualisationforcommunicatingenvironmentalplanning
4.2.Embeddingvisualisationintotheenvironmentaldecision-makingprocess
4.3.Limitations
4.3.1.Landscapevisualisationapproach
4.3.2.Evaluation
5.Conclusions
Vitae
$41.95
►Resultsfromourenduserevaluationsuggestthatvisualisationtoolshaveanimportantroleinraisingknowledgeandawarenessoffuturelandscapescenario