外文翻译通过建筑结构设计以改善建筑物的抗倒性Word格式文档下载.docx
《外文翻译通过建筑结构设计以改善建筑物的抗倒性Word格式文档下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译通过建筑结构设计以改善建筑物的抗倒性Word格式文档下载.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![外文翻译通过建筑结构设计以改善建筑物的抗倒性Word格式文档下载.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-11/25/31954d39-4739-45a8-b7f7-aec42daa4c20/31954d39-4739-45a8-b7f7-aec42daa4c201.gif)
toProgressiveCollapse
DANethercota
aDepartmentofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineering,ImperialCollegeLondon
Abstract:
Itisrarenowadaysfora“newtopic”toemergewithintherelativelymaturefieldofStructuralEngineering.Progressivecollapse-or,moreparticularly,understandingthemechanicsofthephenomenonanddevelopingsuitablewaystoaccommodateitsconsiderationwithinournormalframeworksforstructuraldesign-canbesoregarded.BeginningwithillustrationsdrawnfromaroundtheworldoverseveraldecadesandculminatinginthehighlypublicWTCcollapses,thosefeaturesessentialforarepresentativetreatmentareidentifiedandearlydesignapproachesarereviewed.Morerecentworkisthenreported,concentratingondevelopmentsofthepastsevenyearsatImperialCollegeLondon,whereacomprehensiveapproachcapableofbeingimplementedonavarietyoflevelsandsuitablefordirectusebydesignershasbeenunderdevelopment.Illustrativeresultsareusedtoassistinidentifyingsomeofthekeygoverningfeatures,toshowhowquantitativecomparisonsbetweendifferentarrangementsmaynowbemadeandtoillustratetheinappropriatenessofsomepreviousdesignconceptsasawayofdirectlyimprovingresistancetoprogressivecollapse.
2011PublishedbyElsevierLtd.
Keywords:
Compositestructures;
ProgressiveCollapse;
Robustness;
Steelstructures;
Structuraldesign
1.Introduction
Overtimevariousdifferentstructuraldesignphilosophieshavebeenproposed,theirevolutionarynaturereflecting:
*Growingconcerntoensureadequateperformance.
*Improvedscientificknowledgeofbehaviour.
*Enhancedabilitytomovefromcraftbasedtosciencebasedandthusfromprescriptivetoquantitativelyjustifiedapproaches
Thiscanbetracedthroughconceptssuchas:
permissiblestress,ultimatestrength,limitstatesandperformancebased.Asclients,usersandthegeneralpublichavebecomeincreasinglysophisticatedandthusmoredemandingintheirexpectations,soitbecamenecessaryfordesignerstocoveraneverincreasingnumberandrangeofstructuralissues–mostlythroughconsiderationofthe“reachingthisconditionwouldbetoagreaterorlesserextentunacceptable”approach.Thereforeissuesnotpreviouslyconsidered(oronlyallowedforinanimplicit,essentiallycopyingpastsatisfactoryperformance,way)startedtorequireexplicitattentionintheformof:
anassessmentofdemand,modellingbehaviourandidentificationofsuitablefailurecriteria.Thetreatmentoftopicssuchasfatigue,fireresistance,durabilityandserviceabilitycanallbeseentohavefollowedthispattern.
Totakeaspecificexample:
designingadequatefireresistanceintosteelframedbuildingsbegan(oncetheneedhadbeenrecognised)withsimpleprescriptiverulesforconcreteencasementofvulnerablemembersbutithas,inrecentyears,evolvedintoasophisticateddisciplineoffireengineering,concernedwithfireloading,theprovisionofprotectivesystemssuchassprinklers,calculationofresponseintheeventofafireandtheabilitytomakequantitativecomparisonsbetweenalternativestructuralarrangements.Notonlyhasthisledtoobviouseconomicbenefitsinthesenseofnotprovidingfireprotectionwhereitgaveonlynegligiblebenefit,ithasalsoledtoincreasedfiresafetythroughbetterunderstandingofthegoverningprinciplesandtheabilitytoactintelligentlyindesigningsuitablearrangementsbasedonaproperassessmentofneed.
PriortotheRonanPointcollapseinLondonin1968thetermsrobustness,progressivecollapse,
disproportionatecollapseetc.,werenotpartofStructuralEngineeringvocabulary.Theconsequencesofthedamagedonetothat22storeyblockofpre-castconcreteapartmentsbyaverymodestgasexplosiononthe18thfloorledtonewprovisionsintheUKBuildingRegulations,outlawingformanyyearsofsocalledsystembuiltschemes,demolitionofseveralcompletedbuildings,temporaryremovalofgasinhighriseconstructionandtheformationoftheStandingCommitteeonStructuralSafety.Eventually,thebenefitsofproperlyengineeredpre-fabricationwererecognised,safemethodsfortheinstallationofgasweredevisedandtheindustrymovedon.However,thestructuraldesignguidanceproducedatthattime-thatstillunderpinsmuchpresentdayprovision-wasessentiallyprescriptiveinnaturewithnoreallinktoactualperformance.
SubsequentincidencesofprogressivecollapsesuchastheMurraghBuildingandtheWorldTradeCentrebroughtincreasedattentiontotheactualphenomenonandissuesofhowitmightreasonablybetakenintoaccountforthosestructuraldesignswhereitwasconsideredappropriate.Indoingthisitis,ofcourse,essentialtoincludeboththeriskofatriggeringincidentandtheconsequencesofafailuresothattheresultingmoreonerousstructuraldemandsareusedappropriately.Arguably,adisproportionateresponseintermsofrequiringcostlyadditionalprovisionsincaseswheretherisks/consequencesareverylow/veryminormaybeasharmfulasfailingtoaddressthosecaseswheretherisks/consequencesarehigh/severe.
ThispaperwillreviewcurrentapproachestodesigntoresistprogressivecollapseandcontrastthesewithworkundertakenoverthepastsevenyearsatImperialCollegeLondon,wherethegoalhasbeentheprovisionofarealisticallybasedmethodsuitableforuseinroutinedesign.Theessentialfeaturesofthemethodwillbepresented,itsuseonseveralexamplesdescribedandresultspresentedtoillustratehowitisleadingtoabetterunderstandingofboththemechanicsofprogressivecollapseandthewaysinwhichstructuralengineerscanbestconfiguretheirstructuressoastoprovideenhancedresistance
2.Designtoresistprogressivecollapse
Thetwomostfrequentlyuseddesignapproachesintendedtoaddresstheissueofprogressivecollapseare:
*Providingtyingcapacity
*Checkingalternateloadpaths
Figure1:
TieForcesinaFrameStructure
Thefirstisessentiallyprescriptiveandconsistsofensuringthatbeams,columns,connectionsandfloor(orroof)canacttogethertoprovideaspecifiedminimumlevelofhorizontaltyingresistance;
theactualvaluesrequiredarenormallyrelatedtotheverticalloading.Figure1,whichistakenfromrecentUSGuidance(SEI2010),illustratestheprinciple.Theapproachissimpletoappreciate,requiresminimalstructuralcalculationand,insituationswheretheoriginalprovisionsarefoundtobeinadequate,canbemadetoworkbyprovidingmoresubstantialconnectionsand/oradditionalreinforcementinfloorslabsInaninterestingrecentdevelopment,thatrecognizesthelinktothegenerationofcatenaryaction,USGuidancehasrestrictedtheuseoftyingbetweenthestructuralmemberstosituationsinwhichitcanbedemonstratedthattheassociatedconnectionscancarrytherequiredforceswhilstundergoingrotationsof0.2radiance.Wherethisisnotpossible,tyingshouldactthroughthefloorsandtheroof.However,recentstudies(Nethercotetal2010a;
Nethercotetal2010b)havesuggestedthattyingcapacitycorrelatespoorlywithactualresistancetoprogressivecollapse.Moreover,beingprescriptive,itdoesnotpermitthemeaningfulcomparisonofalternativearrangements-afundamentalfeatureofstructuraldesign.
Initsmostfrequentlyusedformthealternativeloadpathapproachpresumestheinstantaneouslossofasinglecolumnandthenrequiresthattheabilityoftheresultingdamagedstructuretobridgethelossbedemonstratedbysuitablecalculation(GudmundssonandIzzuddin2010).Theapproachmaybeimplementedatvaryinglevelsofsophisticationintermsoftheanalysis;
forexample,recentthinkingintheUnitedStates(SEI2010)makesprovisionforanyof:
linearstatic,non-linearstaticornon-lineardynamicanalysisandprovidessomeguidanceontheuseofeach.Itmayalsobeusedasthebasisformoresophisticatednumericalstudiesofparticularstructuresandparticularincidentse.g.forensicwork;
thebestofthese–whicharelikelytobecomputationallyverydemanding–havedemonstratedtheirabilitytocloselyreplicateactualobservedbehaviour.
3.Essentialfeaturesofprogressivecollapse
Threefeatureshavepreviously(Nethercot2010)beingidentifiedasessentialcomponentsofanyreasonablyrealisticapproachtodesignagainstprogressivecollapse:
*Eventstakeplaceoveraveryshorttimescaleandtheactualfailureisthereforedynamic.
*Itinvolvesgrossdeformations,generatinglargestrains,leadingtoinelasticbehaviouraswellaschangeofgeometryeffects.
*Failureessentiallycorrespondstoaninabilityofthestructureinitsdamagedstatetoadoptanewpositionofequilibriumwithoutseparationofkeyelements.
Figure2:
Simplifiedmulti-levelapproachforprogressivecollapseassessment
Additionalfeatures,designedtomaketheapproachattractiveforusebypracticingEngineershavealsobeenproposed(Nethercot2010):
*Processshouldconsistofaseriesofstepsbroadlysimilarinconcepttothoseusedfor“conventional”structuraldesign.
*Itshould,preferably,becapableofimplementationatavarietyatlevelsofcomplexity–withthechoicereflectingtheimportanceofthestructure.
*Anyrequiredanalysisshouldutilisefamiliartechniques;
wheretheserequirecomputationsbeyond“handmethods”,theseshouldbebasedontheuseofavailableanalysissoftware.
*Arealisticandrecognisablecriterionoffailureshouldbeused.
*Approachshouldpermitstudyofcauseandeffectandbesuitableforthemaking