TED英语演讲稿越有钱越无情.docx
《TED英语演讲稿越有钱越无情.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《TED英语演讲稿越有钱越无情.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![TED英语演讲稿越有钱越无情.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2023-2/25/0abd3827-23f4-4ec7-a13a-93cf31262f9d/0abd3827-23f4-4ec7-a13a-93cf31262f9d1.gif)
TED英语演讲稿越有钱越无情
TED英语演讲稿:
越有钱越无情?
简介:
人有了钱就会变坏?
社会心理学家paulpiff通过操纵大富翁游戏做了一个有趣的实验,测试人们感到富有时会如何表现。
iwantyouto,foramoment,thinkaboutplayingagameofmonopoly,exceptinthisgame,thatcombinationofskill,talentandluckthathelpearnyousuccessingames,asinlife,hasbeenrenderedirrelevant,becausethisgamesbeenrigged,andyouvegottheupperhand.youvegotmoremoney,moreopportunitiestomovearoundtheboard,andmoreaccesstoresources.andasyouthinkaboutthatexperience,iwantyoutoaskyourself,howmightthatexperienceofbeingaprivilegedplayerinariggedgamechangethewaythatyouthinkaboutyourselfandregardthatotherplayer?
soweranastudyontheu.c.berkeleycampustolookatexactlythatquestion.webroughtinmorethan100pairsofstrangersintothelab,andwiththeflipofacoinrandomlyassignedoneofthetwotobearichplayerinariggedgame.theygottwotimesasmuchmoney.whentheypassedgo,theycollectedtwicethesalary,andtheygottorollbothdiceinsteadofone,sotheygottomovearoundtheboardalotmore.(laughter)andoverthecourseof15minutes,wewatchedthroughhiddencameraswhathappened.andwhatiwanttodotoday,forthefirsttime,isshowyoualittlebitofwhatwesaw.youregoingtohavetopardonthesoundquality,insomecases,becauseagain,thesewerehiddencameras.soweveprovidedsubtitles.richplayer:
howmany500sdidyouhave?
poorplayer:
justone.
richplayer:
areyouserious.poorplayer:
yeah.
richplayer:
ihavethree.(laughs)idontknowwhytheygavemesomuch.
paulpiff:
okay,soitwasquicklyapparenttoplayersthatsomethingwasup.onepersonclearlyhasalotmoremoneythantheotherperson,andyet,asthegameunfolded,wesawverynotabledifferencesanddramaticdifferencesbegintoemergebetweenthetwoplayers.therichplayerstartedtomovearoundtheboardlouder,literallysmackingtheboardwiththeirpieceashewentaround.weweremorelikelytoseesignsofdominanceandnonverbalsigns,displaysofpowerandcelebrationamongtherichplayers.
wehadabowlofpretzelspositionedofftotheside.itsonthebottomrightcornerthere.thatallowedustowatchparticipantsconsummatorybehavior.sowerejusttrackinghowmanypretzelsparticipantseat.
richplayer:
arethosepretzelsatrick?
poorplayer:
idontknow.
pp:
okay,sonosurprises,peopleareontous.theywonderwhatthatbowlofpretzelsisdoingthereinthefirstplace.oneevenasks,likeyoujustsaw,isthatbowlofpretzelsthereasatrick?
andyet,despitethat,thepowerofthesituationseemstoinevitablydominate,andthoserichplayersstarttoeatmorepretzels.
richplayer:
ilovepretzels.
(laughter)
pp:
andasthegamewenton,oneofthereallyinterestinganddramaticpatternsthatweobservedbegintoemergewasthattherichplayersactuallystartedtobecomerudertowardtheotherperson,lessandlesssensitivetotheplightofthosepoor,poorplayers,andmoreandmoredemonstrativeoftheirmaterialsuccess,morelikelytoshowcasehowwelltheyredoing.richplayer:
ihavemoneyforeverything.poorplayer:
howmuchisthat?
richplayer:
youoweme24dollars.youregoingtoloseallyourmoneysoon.illbuyit.ihavesomuchmoney.ihavesomuchmoney,ittakesmeforever.richplayer2:
imgoingtobuyoutthiswholeboard.richplayer3:
youregoingtorunoutofmoneysoon.imprettymuchuntouchableatthispoint.
pp:
okay,andhereswhatithinkwasreally,reallyinteresting,isthatattheendofthe15minutes,weaskedtheplayerstotalkabouttheirexperienceduringthegame.andwhentherichplayerstalkedaboutwhytheyhadinevitablywoninthisriggedgameofmonopoly--(laughter)theytalkedaboutwhattheyddonetobuythosedifferentpropertiesandearntheirsuccessinthegame,andtheybecamefarlessattunedtoallthosedifferentfeaturesofthesituation,includingthatflipofacointhathadrandomlygottenthemintothatprivilegedpositioninthefirstplace.andthatsareally,reallyincredibleinsightintohowthemindmakessenseofadvantage.
nowthisgameofmonopolycanbeusedasametaphorforunderstandingsocietyanditshierarchicalstructure,whereinsomepeoplehavealotofwealthandalotofstatus,andalotofpeopledont.theyhavealotlesswealthandalotlessstatusandalotlessaccesstovaluedresources.andwhatmycolleaguesandiforthelastsevenyearshavebeendoingisstudyingtheeffectsofthesekindsofhierarchies.whatwevebeenfindingacrossdozensofstudiesandthousandsofparticipantsacrossthiscountryisthatasapersonslevelsofwealthincrease,theirfeelingsofcompassionandempathygodown,andtheirfeelingsofentitlement,ofdeservingness,andtheirideologyofself-interestincreases.insurveys,wefoundthatitsactuallywealthierindividualswhoaremorelikelytomoralizegreedbeinggood,andthatthepursuitofself-interestisfavorableandmoral.nowwhatiwanttodotodayistalkaboutsomeoftheimplicationsofthisideologyself-interest,talkaboutwhyweshouldcareaboutthoseimplications,andendwithwhatmightbedone.
someofthefirststudiesthatweraninthisarealookedathelpingbehavior,somethingsocialpsychologistscallpro-socialbehavior.andwewerereallyinterestedinwhosmorelikelytoofferhelptoanotherperson,someonewhosrichorsomeonewhospoor.inoneofthestudies,webringinrichandpoormembersofthecommunityintothelabandgiveeachofthemtheequivalentof10dollars.wetoldtheparticipantsthattheycouldkeepthese10dollarsforthemselves,ortheycouldshareaportionofit,iftheywantedto,withastrangerwhoistotallyanonymous.theyllnevermeetthatstrangerandthestrangerwillnevermeetthem.andwejustmonitorhowmuchpeoplegive.individualswhomade25,000sometimesunder15,000dollarsayear,gave44percentmoreoftheirmoneytothestrangerthandidindividualsmaking150,000or200,000dollarsayear.
wevehadpeopleplaygamestoseewhosmoreorlesslikelytocheattoincreasetheirchancesofwinningaprize.inoneofthegames,weactuallyriggedacomputersothatdierollsoveracertainscorewereimpossible.youcouldntgetabove12inthisgame,andyet,thericheryouwere,themorelikelyyouweretocheatinthisgametoearncreditstowarda$50cashprize,sometimesbythreetofourtimesasmuch.
werananotherstudywherewelookedatwhetherpeoplewouldbeinclinedtotakecandyfromajarofcandythatweexplicitlyidentifiedasbeingreservedforchildren--(laughter)participating--imnotkidding.iknowitsoundslikeimmakingajoke.weexplicitlytoldparticipantsthisjarofcandysforchildrenparticipatinginadevelopmentallabnearby.theyreinstudies.thisisforthem.andwejustmonitoredhowmuchcandyparticipantstook.participantswhofeltrichtooktwotimesasmuchcandyasparticipantswhofeltpoor.
weveevenstudiedcars,notjustanycars,butwhetherdriversofdifferentkindsofcarsaremoreorlessinclinedtobreakthelaw.inoneofthesestudies,welookedatwhetherdriverswouldstopforapedestrianthatwehadposedwaitingtocrossatacrosswalk.nowincalifornia,asyouallknow,becauseimsurewealldothis,itsthelawtostopforapedestrianwhoswaitingtocross.soheresanexampleofhowwedidit.thatsourconfederateofftotheleftposingasapedestrian.heapproachesastheredtrucksuccessfullystops.intypicalcaliforniafashion,itsovertakenbythebuswhoalmostrunsourpedestrianover.(laughter)nowheresanexampleofamoreexpensivecar,aprius,drivingthrough,andabmwdoingthesame.sowedidthisforhundredsofvehiclesonseveraldays,justtrackingwhostopsandwhodoesnt.whatwefoundwasthatastheexpensivenessofacarincreased,thedriverstendenciestobreakthelawincreasedaswell.noneofthecars,noneofthecarsinourleastexpensivecarcategorybrokethelaw.closeto50percentofthecarsinourmostexpensivevehiclecategorybrokethelaw.weverunotherstudiesfindingthatwealthierindividualsaremorelikelytolieinnegotiations,toendorseunethicalbehavioratworklikestealingcashfromthecashregister,takingbribes,lyingtocustomers.
nowidontmeantosuggestthatitsonlywealthypeoplewhoshowthesepatternsofbehavior.notatall.infact,ithinkthatweall,inourday-to-day,minute-by-minutelives,strugglewiththesecompetingmotivationsofwhen,orif,toputourowninterestsabovetheinterestsofotherpeople.andthatsunderstandablebecausetheamericandreamisanideainwhichweallhaveanequalopportunitytosucceedandprosper,aslongasweapplyourselvesandworkhard,andapieceofthatmeansthatsometimes,youneedtoputyourowninterestsabovetheinterestsandwell-beingofotherpeoplearoundyou.butwhatwerefindingisthat,thewealthieryouare,themorelikelyyouaretopursueavisionofpersonalsuccess,ofachievementandaccomplishment,tothedetrimentofothersaroundyou.hereiveplottedforyouthemeanhouseholdincomereceivedbyeachfifthandtopfivepercentofthepopulationoverthelast20years.in1993,thedifferencesbetweenthedifferentquintilesofthepopulation,intermsofincome,arefairlyegregious.itsnotdifficulttodiscernthattherearedifferences.butoverthelast20years,thatsignificantdifferencehasbecomeagrandcanyonofsortsbetweenthoseatthetopandeveryoneelse.infact,thetop20percentofourpopulationowncloseto90percentofthetotalwealthinthiscountry.wereatunprecedentedlevelsofeconomicinequality.whatthatmeansisthatwealthisnotonlybecomingincreasinglyconcent