P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:11210210 上传时间:2023-02-25 格式:DOCX 页数:26 大小:36.72KB
下载 相关 举报
P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共26页
P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共26页
P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共26页
P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共26页
P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共26页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx

《P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx(26页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

P2P 网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融.docx

P2P网络借贷文献综述及外文文献互联网金融

本份文档包含:

关于该选题的外文文献、文献综述

一、外文文献

标题:

EmergenceofFinancialIntermediariesinElectronicMarkets:

TheCaseofOnlineP2PLending

作者:

Berger,SvenC;Gleisner,Fabian

期刊:

BusinessResearch;卷:

2;期:

1;页:

39-65;出版年份:

2009

EmergenceofFinancialIntermediariesinElectronicMarkets:

TheCaseofOnlineP2PLending

Abstract

Weanalyzetheroleofintermediariesinelectronicmarketsusingdetaileddataofmorethan14,000originatedloansonanelectronicP2P(peer-to-peer)lendingplatform.Insuchanelectroniccreditmarket,lendersbidtosupplyaprivateloan.Screeningofpotentialborrowersandthemonitoringofloanrepaymentcanbedelegatedtodesignatedgroupleaders.Wefindthatthesemarketparticipantsactasfinancialintermediariesandsignificantlyimproveborrowers'creditconditionsbyreducinginformationasymmetries,predominantlyforborrowerswithlessattractiveriskcharacteristics.Ourfindingsmaybesurprisinggiventhereplacementofabankbyanelectronicmarketplace.

Keywords:

Asymmetricinformation,intermediation,sociallending,electronicmarkets

1Introduction

Theevolutionofinformationtechnologyinrecentyearshasledtothedevelopmentofelectronicmarketplaceswheretraditionalintermediariesmaybelessimportantorevenredundantfortheeconomicinteractionofmarketparticipants(BenjaminandWigand1995,EvansandWurster1997,Malone,Yates,andBenjamin1987).Withinthefinancialservicesindustry,thedebateaboutdisintermediationandthefuturerelevanceoffinancialintermediaries(AllenandSantomero2001,Nellis,McCaffery,andHutchinson2000,Schmidt,Hackethal,andTyrell1999)isfueledbytheincreasingroleofelectroniclendingmarkets(P2PLendingorSocialLending)whereanelectronicmarketplacereplacesabankasthetraditionalintermediaryandenablesthebrokerageofconsumerloansdirectlybetweenborrowersandlenders(HulmeandWright2006,Meyer2007).Arecentstudypredictsthatwithinthenextfewyearssuchsocialbankingplatformsmayhaveamarketshareoftenpercentoftheworldwidemarketforretaillendingandfinancialplanning(GartnerInc.2008).FortheUS,theP2PlendingmarketisestimatedtogrowtoavolumeofuptotenbillionUSDwithinthenext10years(Bruene2007).Weexaminemorethan14,000credittransactionsontheAmericanelectronicP2PlendingplatformP,coveringalltransactionsthattookplaceinthemarketbetween2005-11and2007-09.OuranalysisoftheP2Pcreditmarketstartswiththeobservationthat,despitethedirectmediationofloansinthemarketplace,newtypesofintermediariesemergeasmarketparticipantsprovidepaidintermediaryservices.Inthepaperwethenfocusonthefollowingquestions:

(1)Fromatheoreticalpointofview,howcantheseintermediariescreatevalueintheinteractionbetweenborrowersandlenders?

(2)Shouldallborrowersmakeuseofanintermediary,andcanitmakesensetopayforintermediaryservices?

(3)Fromtheborrowers'perspective,whatistheeconomicimpactofintermediationintheelectroniclendingmarketplace?

Ourempiricalanalysisisconfirmatoryinnature.Itisbasedontheliteratureonfinancialintermediation(e.g.,Diamond1984,LelandandPyle1976)fromwhichwederivehypothesesontheroleofintermediariesinelectronicmarketplaces.

2Intermediariesinelectroniccreditmarketplaces

2.1Electronicmarketplacesanddisintermediation

Marketsareessentialforeconomicactivityinmediatingthedemandforandsupplyofgoodsandservices.Intermediarieshelptofacilitatetransactionsbetweenbuyersandsellersby

(1)providingtransactionprocessingcapabilities,

(2)bringingenhancedlevelsofknowledgeandexpertise,and(3)addingtothetransactabilityofagivengoodorservice(ChircuandKauffman2000).

Theinternethasmadee-commercepossiblewhereelectronicmarketsarebecomingmoreimportantincoordinatingsupplyanddemand(Grieger2003,Segev,Gebauer,andFarber1999).Electronicmarketscanfacilitateeconomicactivityevenundercomplexandinsecureconditions(Cordella2006),significantlyreduceinformationandtransactioncosts,andmayinthiswaydisplacetraditionalintermediaries(Malone,Yates,andBenjamin1987).Manyauthorsarguethatonceelectronicmarketsemerge,traditionalintermediariesmaybethreatenedbyanelectronicbrokerageeffectalsocalleddisintermediation(foraliteratureoverviewseeChircuandKauffman2000).Insharpcontrasttothat,thetheoreticalcontributionsonelectronicmarketsanddisintermediationhavenotyetbeensupportedbyconvincingempiricalevidence(ChircuandKauffman2000,SenandKing2003).Moreover,thedisplacementoftraditionalintermediariesmayneveroccur.AuthorslikeSarkar,Butler,andSteinfield(1998)orHagelandSinger(1999)arguethatelectronicmarketsmayleadtonewformsofintermediation.

2.2Electroniclendingplatforms

Electroniclendingplatformsareelectronicmarketsthatmediatebetweenborrowersandlendersofloans.Wefocushereonconsumerloansbetweenindividualborrowersandlendersandexcludeplatformsforbondsorsyndicatedloans(Steelmann2006).TheelectroniccreditmarketplaceasawebsiteintheWorldWideWebconstitutesthegeneralconditionsforpeer-to-peerlendingandprovidestheadministrationofcurrentloans.Electroniclendingplatformsdifferinthewayloansareoriginated:

Someprovidersmediatebetweenborrowersandlendersthemselves,whereasotherprovidersmatchborrowers'creditlistingsandlenders'bidswithanauctionmechanism(Meyer2007).

Thelionshareofparticipantsinthemarketplaceareprivateindividuals,althoughthereareinstitutionallendersinvestinginsome,too.Therearenumerousprovidersthatoperatenationallyduetodifferingregulatoryframeworks.Table1providesanoverviewofthethreemajorAnglo-AmericanandGermanprovidersandtheirbusinessmodels.ArecentdevelopmentofthebusinessmodelofP2Plendingmarketplacesisthatlendersmaytradeloanspriortomaturity,increasingtheliquidityofP2Ploans.AsofFebruary2009,Prosperisstillintheprocess,whereasLendingClubhasalreadysuccessfullyregisteredwiththeSECtocreateasecondaryloanmarket.Despitedifferingbusinessmodels,thereisonedistinctivefeaturethatthesemarketplaceshaveincommon:

Transactionsinelectroniccreditmarketplacesoccuranonymouslybetweenfictitious"screennames".Therefore,informationisasymmetricallydistributedbetweenborrowersandlenders.Loansarenotcollateralizedandlendersfacetheinherentriskofdefault(Steelmann2006).

Despiteanonymousinteractions,loanlistingscontainadditionalinformationonpotentialborrowers.Lenderscanevaluateindividualcreditworthinessthroughquantitativeaswellasqualitativefigures.P,America'slargestpeer-topeerlendingmarketplace,providesanindividualratingandanindicatorofindebtednessincooperationwiththecreditreportingagencyExperianasthetwomainquantitativefigures.Theinformationalvalueofthesefiguresshouldbeconsideredhigh,althoughthedegreetowhichconsumercreditreportsareaccurate,completeorconsistentisindispute(Avery,Calem,Canner,andBostic2003).Mostplatformsgivemarketparticipantstheopportunitytoprovideadditionalpersonalinformationabouttheirbackground,theirfinancialstandingandthepurposeoftheloan.Thisqualitative,"soft"informationismandatoryanditsvalidityisapriorinotcontrolled.Borrowerstherebymighthaveanincentivetooveremphasizetheir"quality"(thepresentvalueoftheprospectiveprojects,theirfinancialstandingorpaymentbehavior)intheirpersonaldescriptions(moralhazard).

2.3GroupsonP

Inadditiontopersonalprofiles,borrowersandlenderscanformgroups.Thesesmallercommunitieswithinthemarketplacereviewandassessthecreditworthinessofindividualmembers.Groupsarepotentiallybeneficialformarketparticipantsbyprovidingandverifyinginformationorobtainingadditionalinformationaboutborrowersthatisnotpubliclyavailable.Groupslackdistinctownershipandgovernancefeaturesastheytypicallyexistincreditcooperatives(Davis2001,Taylor1971).Thereisnoownershipofthegroups,andthereisnocollectivedecisionmechanismonacceptinggroupmembersorgrantingloans.Furthermore,groupsdonotexclusivelydealwiththeirmembers.Atanytime,lendersfromoutsidethegroupmayinvestinagroupmember'sloanlisting.Thisimpliesthatthereisnorotationofmoneywithinthegroup,andnospecificallocationprocess.TherearetwopapersthatspecificallyexaminetheroleofgroupsontheP2PlendingwebsiteP:

FreedmanandJin(2008)usetransactiondatafrom200601-06until2008-07-31coveringaround290,000loanlistingsand25,000fundedloans.Theyfindevidencefortheideathatthemonitoringwithinsocialnetworksprovidesastrongerincentivetopayoffloansex-post:

Loanswithfriendendorsementsandfriendbidshavefewermissedpaymentsandyieldsignificantlyhigherratesofreturnthanotherloans.Everett(2008)looksattheinfluenceofgroupmembershiponloandefaultwithin13,486Prosperloans.Thedatasetcoversfundedloansfrom2006-05-31until2007-11-06andincorporatesexpostloanperformanceinformationuntil2008-05-07.Hefindsthatmembershipinagroupsignificantlydecreasesloandefaultriskifthegroupenforcesreal-lifepersonalconnectionslike,e.g.,employeesofthesamecompanyoralumniofacertainuniversity.Bothstudiespresentedabovelookatsocialnetworksinthecreditmarketbutdonotspecificallytakethegroupleaderintoaccount.Itis,however,notthegroupasaninstitutionperse,butthegroupleaderwhodecidesaboutmembership

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 历史学

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1