Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx

Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx

《Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx（20页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

ApplicationofTopologySizeandShapeOptimizationMethodsinPolymerMetalHybridStructural

ApplicationofTopology,SizeandShapeOptimizationMethodsinPolymerMetalHybridStructuralLightweightEngineering

Abstract

Applicationoftheengineeringdesignoptimizationmethodsandtoolstothedesignofautomotivebody-in-white（BIW）structuralcomponentsmadeofpolymermetalhybrid（PMH）materialsisconsidered.Specifically,theuseoftopologyoptimizationinidentifyingtheoptimalinitialdesignsandtheuseofsizeandshapeoptimizationtechniquesindefiningthefinaldesignsisdiscussed.TheoptimizationanalysesemployedwererequiredtoaccountforthefactthattheBIWstructuralPMHcomponentinquestionmaybesubjectedtodifferentin-serviceloadsbedesignedforstiffness,strengthorbucklingresistanceandthatitmustbemanufacturableusingconventionalinjectionover-molding.Thepaperdemonstratestheuseofvariousengineeringtools,i.e.aCADprogramtocreatethesolidmodelofthePMHcomponent,ameshingprogramtoensuremeshmatchingacrossthepolymer/metalinterfaces,alinear–staticanalysisbasedtopologyoptimizationtooltogenerateaninitialdesign,anonlinearstatics-basedsizeandshapeoptimizationprogramtoobtainedthefinaldesignandamold-fillingsimulationtooltovalidatemanufacturabilityofthePMHcomponent.

Keywords

Topology,Optimization,HybridStructural,LightweightEngineering

1.Introduction

Lightweightengineeringforautomobilesisprogressivelygaininginimportanceinviewofrisingenvironmentaldemandsandever-tougheremissionsstandards.Currenteffortsintheautomotivelightweightengineeringinvolveatleastthefollowingfivedistinctapproaches[1]:

（a）Requirementlightweightengineeringwhichincludeseffortstoreducethevehicleweightthroughreductionsincomponent/subsystemrequirements（e.g.areducedrequiredsizeofthefueltank）;（b）Conceptuallightweightengineeringwhichincludesthedevelopmentandimplementationofnewconceptsandstrategieswithpotentialweightsavingssuchastheuseofaself-supportingcockpit,astraightenginecarrier,etc.;（c）Designlightweightengineeringwhichfocusesondesignoptimizationoftheexistingcomponentsandsub-systemssuchastheuseofribsandcomplexcrosssectionsforenhancedcomponentstiffnessatareducedweight;（d）Manufacturinglightweightengineeringwhichutilizesnovelmanufacturingapproachestoreducethecomponentweightwhileretainingitsperformance（e.g.acombinedapplicationofspotweldingandadhesivebondingtomaintainthestiffnessofthejoinedsheet-metalcomponentswithreducedwallthickness）;and（e）Materiallightweightengineeringwhichisbasedontheuseofmaterialswithahighspecificstiffnessand/orstrengthsuchasaluminumalloysandpolymer-matrixcompositesorasynergisticuseofmetallicandpolymericmaterialsinahybridarchitecture（referredtoaspolymermetalhybrids,PMHs,intheremainderofthismanuscript）.Inthepresentwork,theproblemofintegrationoftheengineeringoptimizationmethodsandtoolsintotheaforementionedlightweightengineeringefforts,specificallyintoPMHtechnologyforbody-in-white（BIW）load-bearingautomotivecomponentsprocessedbytechniquessuchasinjectionover-molding[2]ormetalover-molding[3].Suchcomponentsaretypicallydesignedforstiffnessandbucklingresistanceandtheirperformanceisgreatlyaffectedbythedesignoftheplasticribbingstructureinjectionmoldedintoasheet-metalstamping.

Inconventionalautomotivemanufacturingpractice,metalsandplasticsarefiercecompetitors.ThePMHtechnologies,incontrast,aspiretotakefulladvantageofthetwoclassesofmaterialsbycombiningtheminasinglecomponent/sub-assembly.Thefirstexampleofasuccessfulimplementationofthistechnologicalinnovationinpracticewasreportedattheendof1996,whenthefrontendoftheAudiA6（madebyEcia,Audincourt/France）wasproducedasahybridstructure,combiningsheetsteelwithelastomer-modifiedpoly-amidePA6-GF30（DurethanBKV130fromBayer）.Akeyfeatureofhybridstructuresisthatthematerialsemployedcomplementeachothersothattheresultinghybridmaterialcanofferanenhancedoverallstructuralperformance.

Currently,PMHsarereplacingall-metalstructuresinautomotivefront-endmodulesatanacceleratedrateandarebeingusedininstrument-panelandbumpercross-beams,doormodules,andtailgatesapplications.Moreover,newPMHtechnologiesarebeing

introduced.

ThemainPMHtechnologiescurrentlybeingemployedintheautomotiveindustrycanbegroupedintothreemajorcategories:

（a）Injectionover-moldingtechnologies[2];（b）Metal-over-moldingtechnologiescombinedwithsecondaryjoiningoperations[3];and（c）Adhesively-bondedPMHs[4].AdetaileddescriptionforeachofthesegroupsofPMHmanufacturingtechnologiescanbefoundinourrecentwork[5].

Theobjectiveofthepresentworkistoextendtheaforementionedtwo-stepoptimizationapproachtoBIWloadbearingPMHcomponents.Atypicalall-metalBIWloadbearingcomponent,Figure1（a）,consistsoftwoflangedU-shapestampingsjoinedalongtheirmatchingflangesbyspot-welding（oftencomplementedbyadhesivebonding）.Whensuchanall-metalcomponentisreplacedwithaPMHcomponent,Figure1（b）,oneofitsstampingsisremovedandtheexterioroftheremainingstampingreinforcedusinganinjection-moldedthermoplasticrib-likestructure.Hence,theobjectiveofthepresentworkistoaddresstheoptimalarchitectureoftheribbingstructurewithrespecttodifferentloadingrequirements（axialcompression,bending,twisting）anddifferentdesignrequirements（e.g.stiffness,strength,bucklingresistance）.Theexamplesconsideredshowhowtopologyoptimizationmaybeusedtosuggestgoodinitialdesigns,butalsodemonstrateshowatopologyoptimizationfollowedbyadetailedsizeandshapeoptimizationmaybeusedtoprovideefficientdesignssatisfyingperformanceandmanufacturingconstraints.

Fig.1（a）Atwin-shellall-metalrearcross-roofmemberand（b）itspolymermetalhybridcounterpartconsistingasinglemetal-shellstampingandinjection-moldedplasticribbing.

Theorganizationofthepaperisasfollows:

Anoverviewofthebasicsoftopology,

sizeandshapeoptimizationmethodsispresentedandabriefdescriptionofthemaincomputationaltoolsusedinthepresentworkisgiveninSectionII.TheresultsobtainedinthepresentworkarepresentedanddiscussedinSectionIII.ThemainconclusionsresultingfromthepresentworkaresummarizedinSectionIV.

2.ComputationProcedure

2.1TheBasicsofStructuralTopology,SizeandShapeOptimization

Structuraloptimizationisaclassofengineeringoptimizationproblemsinwhichthe

evaluationofanobjectivefunction（s）orconstraintsrequirestheuseofstructural

analyses（typicallyafiniteelementanalysis,FEA）.Incompactform,theoptimization

problemcanbesymbolicallydefinedas:

Minimizetheobjectivefunctionf（x）

Subjecttothenon-equalityconstraintsg（x）<0andtotheequalityconstraints

h（x）=0

WherethedesignvariablesxbelongtothedomainD

where,ingeneral,g（x）andh（x）arevectorfunctions.Thedesignvariablesxformavectorofparametersdescribingthegeometryofaproduct.Forexample,x,f（x）

g（x）andh（x）canbeproductdimensions,productweight,astressconditiondefiningtheonsetofplasticyielding,andconstraintsonproductdimensions,respectively.

TopologyOptimization

Topologyoptimizationmethodsallowthechangesinthewaysubstructuresareconnectedwithinafixeddesigndomainandcanbeclassifiedas（a）discreteelement

（alsoknownasthegroundstructure）approach;and（b）continuumapproaches.Inthe

discreteelementapproach,thedesigndomainisrepresentedasafinitesetofpossible

locationsofdiscretestructuralmemberssuchastruss,frame,andpanels.Byvaryingthewidth/thicknessofeachmemberinthedesigndomainbetweenzero（inthiscasetheelementbecomesnonexistent）andacertainmaximumvalue,structureswithdifferentsizesandtopologiescanberepresented.Inthecontinuumapproach,thedesigndomainisrepresentedasthecontinuummixtureofamaterialand“void”andtheoptimaldesignisdefinedwithrespecttothedistributionsofthematerialdensitywithinthedesignspace.Sincethediscreteelementapproachutilizesacollectionofprimitivestructuralmembers,itallowseasyinterpretationoftheconceptualdesign.However,potentiallyoptimaltopologiesmaynotbeattainablebythenumberandtypesofpossiblememberlocationsdefinedinthedesigndomain.Thecontinuumapproach,ontheotherhand,doesnothavethislimitation,whileitmaybecomputationallymoreexpensive.Overthelastdecades,majoradvanceshavebeenreportedintheareaofthediscreteelementstructuraloptimization[6-10].

SizeOptimization

Withinsizeoptimizationapproach,thedimensionsthatdescribeproductgeometryare

usedasdesignvariables,x.Theapplicationofsizeoptimizationis,consequently,mostlyusedatthedetaileddesignstagewhereonlythefinetuningofproductgeometryisnecessary.Sizeoptimizationistypicallydoneinconjunctionwithfeature-basedvariationgeometry[11]whichisavailableinmanymodernCADprograms.Withpresent-dayavailabilityoffastpersonalcomputers,sizeoptimizationisrelativelyastraightforwardtaskandittypicallyrequiresnore-meshingofthefiniteelementmodelsduringoptimizationiterations.Adifficultymayarise,however,whenextremelylargefiniteelementmodelsorhighlynonlinearphenomenaneedtobeanalyzed,inwhichcasesurrogate（simplified）modelsaretypicallyemployed.

ShapeOptimization

Shapeoptimizationallowsthecha