专业学位研究生英语水平自测习题集浙江大学出版社18篇完形填空.docx
《专业学位研究生英语水平自测习题集浙江大学出版社18篇完形填空.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《专业学位研究生英语水平自测习题集浙江大学出版社18篇完形填空.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![专业学位研究生英语水平自测习题集浙江大学出版社18篇完形填空.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-10/10/2f5e4a84-59ff-4c5e-b068-fe49a92500c2/2f5e4a84-59ff-4c5e-b068-fe49a92500c21.gif)
专业学位研究生英语水平自测习题集浙江大学出版社18篇完形填空
自测1
Agreatdealoftheknowledgewehaveabouthouseholdgoodsderiveslargelyfromtheadvertisementsweread.Advertisementsintroduceustonewproductsorremindusoftheexistenceofoneswealreadyknowabout.Supposeyouwantedtobuyawashingmachine,itismorethanlikelyyouwouldobtaindetailsregardingperformance,price,etc.,fromanadvertisement.
Lotsofpeoplepretendthattheyneverreadadvertisements,butthisclaimmaybeseriouslydoubted.Itishardlypossiblenottoreadadvertisementsthesedays.Andwhatfuntheyoftenare,too!
Justthinkwhatarailwaystationoranewspaperwouldbelikewithoutadvertisements.Wouldyouenjoygazingatablankwallorreadingrailwaybylawswhilewaitingforatrain?
Wouldyouliketoreadonlycloselyprintedcolumnsofnewsinyourdailypaper?
Acheerful,wittyadvertisementmakessuchadifferencetoadrabwalloranewspaperfullofthedailyrationofcalamities.
Wemustnotforget,either,thatadvertisingmakesapositivecontributiontoourpockets.Newspapers,commercialradioandtelevisioncompaniescouldnotsubsistwithoutthissourceofrevenue.Thefactthatwepaysolittleforourdailypaper,orcanenjoysomanybroadcastprogramsisentirelyduetothemoneyspentbyadvertisers.Justthinkwhatanewspaperwouldcostprovidingwehadtopayitsfullprice!
Anotherthingwemustn'tforgetisthe“smallads.”whichareinvirtuallyeverynewspaperandmagazine.Whatatremendouslyusefulservicetheyperformforthecommunity!
Justaboutanythingcanbeaccomplishedthroughthesecolumns.Nootheriteminanewspaperprovidessuchentertainingreadingorofferssuchadeepinsightintohumannature.It'sthebestadvertisementforadvertisingthereis!
自测2
AftertheviolentearthquakethatshookLosAngelesin1904,earthquakescientistshadgoodnewstoreport:
Thedamageanddeathtoll(死亡人数)couldhavebeenmuchworse.
Morethan60peoplediedinthisearthquake.Bycomparison,anearthquakeofsimilarintensitythatshookAmericain1988claimed25,000victims.
InjuriesanddeathswererelativelylessinLosAngelesbecausethequakeoccurredat4:
31a.m.onaholiday,whentrafficwaslightonthecity'shighways.Moreover,changesmadetotheconstructioncodesinLosAngelesduringthelast20yearshavestrengthenedthecity'sbuildingsandhighways,makingthemmoreresistanttoquakes.
Forallthegoodnews,civilengineersaren'trestingontheirsuccesses.Pinnedtotheirdrawingboardsareblueprints(蓝图)forimprovedquake-resistantbuildings.Thenewdesignsshouldofferevengreatersecuritytocitieswhereearthquakesoftentakeplace.
Inthepast,makingstructuresquake-resistantmeantfirmyetflexiblematerials,suchassteelandwood,thatbendwithoutbreaking.Later,peopletriedtoliftabuildingoffitsfoundation,andinsertrubberandsteelbetweenthebuildinganditsfoundationtoreducetheimpactofgroundvibrations.Themostrecentdesignsgivebuildingsbrainsaswellasconcreteandsteelsupports.Calledsmartbuildings,thestructuresrespondlikelivingorganismstoanearthquake'svibrations.Whenthegroundshakesandthebuildingtipsforward,thecomputerwouldforcethebuildingtoshiftintheoppositedirection.
自测3
Itcan,ofcourse,bearguedthatthoughthevastmajorityofpeoplecontributetothefundsofsocialsecurityequally,working-classpersonsaremorelikelytoreceivesocialsecuritybenefitsthanupper-classpersons.Thisistrueforthosebenefitswhichcanbeclassedasbeingforformsof“diswelfare”,touseTitmuss’sterm,i.e.aformofmonetarycompensationforthehardshiptheysufferthroughtheoperationofthesocialandeconomicsystem-benefitsforindustrialdisability,unemploymentandillnessaswellassupplementarybenefits.Itisnot,however,trueofretirementpensionsandtheyafterallaccountforatleasthalftheexpenditureofsocialsecuritywidelydefined.Sinceretirementpensionsarepaidtoallwhohavepaidthenecessarynumberofcontributionstheyinvolveanegativeformofverticalredistributionofincome—fromthepoortotherich—becauseretiredpersonsofhigherincomegroupslivelongerthanthoseoflowerincomegroups.Thisisofcrucialimportancebecauseallthestudiessofarhaveexaminedthequestionoftheredistributiveeffectsofsocialsecuritywithinalimitedincomeperiod-atmostduringaperiodoftwelvemonths.Itisnotsurprisingthereforethattheyreachedtheconclusionthatsocialsecuritybenefitsthepoorattheexpenseoftherich.Hadtheyexaminedthequestionoveramuchlongerperiod,preferablyoverthewholelifecycle,theywouldhavereachedadifferentconclusion.Ifonealsotakesintoaccountthefactthatoccupationalbenefitsforretirement,widowhoodandsicknessstronglyfavourthemiddleandupperclasses,thenthecombinedope