完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:9727225 上传时间:2023-02-06 格式:DOCX 页数:8 大小:18.20KB
下载 相关 举报
完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共8页
完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共8页
完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共8页
完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共8页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx

《完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx

完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全

修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分)

ListofResponses

DearEditorsandReviewers:

Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers'commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”(ID:

文章稿号).Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches。

Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval。

Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper。

Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:

Respondstothereviewer’scomments:

Reviewer#1:

1。

Responsetocomment:

(……简要列出意见……)

Response:

××××××

2.Responsetocomment:

(……简要列出意见……)

Response:

××××××

..

逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:

Weareverysorryforournegligenceof…….。

Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……。

.

ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……

WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.

Wehavere—writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion

AsReviewersuggestedthat……

ConsideringtheReviewer'ssuggestion,wehave……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:

Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments。

Reviewer#2:

同上述

Reviewer#3:

××××××

Otherchanges:

1。

Line60-61,thestatementsof“……"werecorrectedas“…………"

2。

Line107,“……”wasadded

3。

Line129,“……”wasdeleted

××××××

Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript。

Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.

WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval。

Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions

以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复.与大家分享。

从中可以看出,这位审稿人认真读了文章,提出很多宝贵的意见。

这些意见

分布在文章的各个地方.我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章.看到这些意见,

我觉得很感激,不是因为接收文章的原因,而是这些意见能真正有助于提高

文章的质量.

从中还看出,回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。

对于回答问题,有的人就是一味反驳,却不加改进.

记得ACSStyleGuide里面说,当审稿人问到问题的,哪怕是他理解错误,这

也说明作者这么写,其他读者也会理解错误,引起歧义。

因此,作者就是要

修改句子,使表达不引起歧义。

因此:

有时间一味反驳,还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。

============================================

Reviewers'comments:

Reviewer#3:

Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.

1。

Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly.

2。

Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?

3。

Experimentalpart:

Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid—solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded。

4.Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup(page4)canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup。

5.ReslutsPart(Page6):

"COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages",themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?

Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?

6.Page12,2ndpara:

ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?

Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig。

7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn’tappear,onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b。

etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B。

etc。

tobecorrected.

7.Page14,1stpara:

’contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo—ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy’,butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature。

8。

Pages14through17:

theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbedCOonthePtsurface(figs3&4)hastobediscussedmoreprecisely。

Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect。

Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?

CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail。

9。

Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte。

g.,page3para1:

Itwasgeneralizedthat。

.。

..。

..,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.

10.Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy。

===============================================

DearEditor,

Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer’sinsightfulcomments。

NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS-06-247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer’scomments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful。

Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable.Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.

[general]TheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction.HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph.

[1]Ambiguousstatementi.e.,“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted.

[2]Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound(containingtwocarbonylgroups)todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow—coverageCO(comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy)attheliquid-solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid-phasechiralcatalysis,andslightdecompositionofEtPytoadsorbedCOwasreportedtoinfluencethecatalyticperformance.Inaddition,bystudyingthat,wecandirectlycompareourresultswithpreviousstudies.MoredetailsinthefirstparagraphofSection3.2。

[3]TheIRcellwasdesignedaccordingtotheIRcellsusedbymanyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswereadded.AphotowasgivenintheSupportingInformation。

[4]AflowdiagramoftheexperimentalsetupwasgiveninthenewFig.1。

[5]TheCOadsorptionexperimentswereperformedinthesameadsorptionmode,bybubblingCOthroughacleanPtsurfaceindifferentdaystoachievethesamesaturationcoverageofCO.InitialexperimentsindicatedthatgiventheCObubblingratewas0.85cm3/min,COcansaturateonPtafter30—45min.WebubbleCOfor60mintoguaranteethesameCOcoverage。

IfwebubbleCOformoretime,orifweincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesn’tchange,indicating60minisalreadyenough.AfigureshowingtheCOuptakeasafunctionofbubblingtimewasgivenintheSupportingInformation.

[6]ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4wasconfirmedbytheremovingofEtPypeaks。

ThementionofFig。

7aand7betc。

throughoutthetextwereallcorrected.

[7]ItisknownthatsomesolventssuchasacetonecancorrodetheVitono-ring.Wesawthedamageofo—ringafterusinghigh—concentrationEtPy.AreferencetotheVitono-ringinformationwasgiven。

[8]Theobservedreactivitytrendisduetoacombinationofbotheffects,withtheaccumulationoforganicmoietiesonPtsurfaceduringnumerousflushingcyclesthemoreimportantreason.Afewpropersentenceswereaddedtoclaritythispoint.

[9]TherepeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphinSection4.3weredeleted.

[10]Thetoo—longcaptionsweresignificantlyshortened.

Inall,Ifoundthereviewer’scommentsarequitehelpful,andIrevisedmypaperpoint—by—point.Thankyouandthereviewagainforyourhelp!

==============================================

结果:

http:

//dx.doi.org/10。

1016/j.jcis。

2006。

09.005

欢迎浏览:

OrganicChemistryonSolidSurfaces(Review)

Z。

Ma,F。

Zaera*,SurfaceScenceReports61(2006)229—281.

ScienceDirectTOP25HottestArticlesinChemistry

http:

//dx。

doi.org/10。

1016/j.surfrep.2006。

03.001

CI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板

修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分)

ListofResponses

DearEditorsandReviewers:

Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”(ID:

文章稿号)。

Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches。

Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper。

Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:

Respondstothereviewer’scomments:

Reviewer#1:

1。

Responsetocomment:

(……简要列出意见……)

Response:

××××××

2.Responsetocomment:

(……简要列出意见……)

Response:

××××××

.。

.。

逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:

Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……...

Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……。

.

ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……

WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments。

Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion

AsReviewersuggestedthat……

ConsideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:

Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.

Reviewer#2:

同上述

Reviewer#3:

××××××

Otherchanges:

1。

Line60—61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………”

2。

Line107,“……"wasadded

3。

Line129,“……”wasdeleted

××××××

Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript。

Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper。

Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper。

WeappreciateforEditors

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 求职职场 > 简历

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1