语篇分析.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:9037794 上传时间:2023-02-02 格式:DOCX 页数:49 大小:53.97KB
下载 相关 举报
语篇分析.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共49页
语篇分析.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共49页
语篇分析.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共49页
语篇分析.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共49页
语篇分析.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共49页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

语篇分析.docx

《语篇分析.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《语篇分析.docx(49页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

语篇分析.docx

语篇分析

AdaptedfromMcCarthy,M.(1991)DiscourseanalysisforlanguageteacherCUP

Cohesionandcoherence

Cohesionisonlyaguidetocoherence,andcoherenceissomethingcreatedbythereaderintheactofreadingthetext.Coherenceisthefellingthatatexthangstogether,thisitmakessense,andisnotjustajumbleofsentences(seeNeubauer1983:

7).Thesentences‘Clarelovespotatoes,shewasborninIreland.’arecohesive(Clare/she),butareonlycoherentifonealreadysharesthestereotypeethnicassociationbetweenbeingIrishandlovingpotatoes,orispreparedtoassumeacause-effectrelationshipbetweenthetwosentences.Socohesionisonlypartofcoherenceinreadingandwriting,andindeedinspokenlanguagetoo,forthesameprocessesoperatethere.

Lookingbackward:

anaphoricreference

Whatcanbe(andoftenisnot)directlytaughtaboutasystemsuchasthatofEnglishisthedifferentwaysofreferringtothediscourseitselfbyuseofitemssuchasit,thisandthat,whichdonotseemtotranslateinaone-to-onewaytootherlanguages,evenwherethesearecloselycognate(cf.German,French,Spanish).

Surprisingly,conventionalgrammarsdonotgivesatisfactorydescriptionsofsuchusage(it,thisandthat)(e.g.seeQuirketal.1985:

868).discourseanalystshavetoucheduponthearea(seeThavenius1983:

167-9),andtheinsightsofdifferentanalystshaveacertainamountincommon.

Itissimplytomakethepointthatmanyunansweredgoodgrammaticalquestionscanberesolvedatthediscourselevel,andthatmuchgooddiscourseanalysisrecognizesthelinksbetweendiscourseorganizationandgrammaticalchoice.Assuch,discourse-levelinvestigationsareofteninvaluablereadingforteacherslookingforanswerstogrammaticalproblems.

Lookingoutward:

exophoricreference

Exophoricreferenceswilloftenbetoaworldsharedbysenderandreceiverofthelinguisticmessage,regardlessofculturalbackground,butequallyoften,referenceswillbeculture-boundandoutsidetheexperiencesofthelanguagelearner(e.g.BritishreferencestheCity,theChancellorandsoon).Inthesecasesthelearnerwillneedtoconsultsomesourceofencyclopedicinformationoraskaninformant.ThisaspectoflanguagelearningisagradualfamiliarizationwiththeculturalcontextofL2.Languageteachersandmaterialswriterswillneedtomonitorthedegreeofculturalexophoricreferencesittextchosenforteachingtoensurethereferentialburdenisnottoogreat.

Lookingforward:

cataphoricreference

Themostcharacteristicfunctionofcataphoricreference:

toengageandholdthereader’sattentionwitha‘readonandfindour’message.p42

Cataphoricreferenceisthereverseofanaphoricreferenceandisrelativelystraightforward,gutlanguagelearnersmaylackawarenessofconfidencetoputitintouseinconstructingtexts,andmyneedtohavethefeatureexplicitlytaughtorexercised.Thereis,too,thedangerofitsoveruseoritsuseinunnaturalcontexts.Asalways,itisaquestionoftrainingthelearnertoobservefeaturesoflangueabovesentencelevelwherethesemightnotnecessarilybeautomaticallytransferredformL1,especiallysince,inEnglish,referenceofinvolvesthedefinitearticleanddemonstratives,whichdonottranslateeasilyintomanyotherlanguages.p42

Ellipsisandsubstitution

Ellipsisasanotinisprobablyauniversalfeatureoflanguagebutthegrammaticaloptionswhichrealizeitindiscoursemayvarymarkedly.P43

Ellipisisnotonlycreatesdifficultiesinlearningwhatstructuralomissionsarepermissible,butalsodoesnotseemtobereadilyusedevenbyproficientlearnersinsituationwherenativenaturallyresorttoit(seeScarcellaandBrunak1981).

Conjunction

Differencesinperformancedataofthesekindsareoftenthereasonwhyevenquiteadvanced-learneroutputcanseemunnatural.Oneofthemajorcontributionsofdiscourseanalysishasbeentoemphasistheanalysisofrealdata,andthesignificanceincommunicativetermsofsmallwordssuchascommoneverydaymarkers.Inpreviouslinguisticapproachestheseweretoooftendismissedasunimportantfeaturesof‘performance’whichdistractedformthebusinessodescribingunderlying‘competence’.p50

Themeandrheme

Grammarteachingmayhavetoreorientsomeofitsstructuraldescriptions,whileothersalreadydealtwithinsentence-levelexercisesmaybeadequatelycoveredintraditionalteachingandsimplyadjustedtodiscourse-orientedapproaches.P51

Themeandrheme

Patternsofsequencingofthemeandrhemearetendenciesratherthanabsolutes.Veryfewtexts(exceptperhapshighlyritualizedonessuchreligiouslitanies)repeatthesamethematisingpatternsendlessly.Wehavesuggestedthatlow-levellearnersmightbetrappedinunnaturalpatternsowingtolimitedgrammaticalresourcesorlackofconfidenceonanewL2,butmostadvancedlearnersarelikelytohaveagoodfeelforcreatingtopicframeworksandorientingtheiraudience.Thegrammaticalstructuresthatareunderplayedingrammarbooks(e.g.leftdisplacements,object-fronting)maybeproducedunconsciouslybylearners,butawarenessandmonitoringonthepartofteachersisnecessarytoensurethatnaturalproductionusingthewideresourcesofthgrammarisindeedtakingplace.P58

Lexicalcohesion

Itisimportanttomakelearnersawarethatsynonymsarenotjustwaysofunderstandingnewwordswhentheycropupinclass,noraretheysomeabstractnotionfortheorganizationoflexiconsandthesauri,buttheyaretheretobeused,justasanyotherlinguisticdevice,inthecreationofnaturaldiscourse.P67

Lexisintalk

Wefindthatinterestingobservationscanbemakeconcerninghowspeakersreiteratetheirownandtakeuponeanother’svocabularyselectionsinoneformoranotherfromturntoturnanddevelopandexpandtopicsindoingso.weshallrefertothisphenomenonasrelexicalisation.

Theintimatebondbetweentopicdevelopmentandthemodificationandreworkingoflexicalitemsalreadyusedmakestheconversationdevelopcoherently,seemingtomoveformsub-topictosub-topicasaseamlesswhole,inthisthescopeofthetopicsisworkedoutbetweentheparticipants,withneithersidenecessarilydominating,thisaccordswiththeethnomethodologicalapproachtodiscourseanalysis,whichseesconversationasajointactivitythathastobeworkedat.Topicsunfoldinteractively,ratherthan‘existing’asstaticentities;Wardaugh(1985:

139-40)referstotopicasa‘consensualoutcome’.Thisisquiteclearlysohere.Speakerscanthrowtopicsintothering,butwhethertheyaretakenupordiedependsontheotherspeaker(s);ifonespeakerinsisteronpursuinghis/hertopics,ignoringthewishesofothers,thisispreciselywhenwerecognizedevianceintomonologueorcomplainlatertoourfriendsthat‘Xwashoggingtheconversation’.Utterancesbyonespeakerareaninvitationtoresponsebyanother(seeGoffman1976);theinitiatingutteranceputsanobligationontherespondingspeakertomakehis/herturnbothrelevanttopreviousturnandapositivecontributiontotheforwardmovingofthediscourse(seeVuchinich1977).Relexicalisationofsomeelementsofthepreviousturnprovidesjustsuchacontributiontorelevanceandprovidesotherimportant‘Iamwithyou’signalstotheinitiator.pp69-70

Exchanges

ParticularlynoticeableintheSinclair-Coultharddatawasthepatternofthethree-partexchangeintraditionalclassrooms,wheretheteachermaketheinitiationandthefollow-upmove,whilepupilswererestrictedtorespondingmoves.Inagoodmanylanguageclassesthisisstillthepattern,especiallyinsituationswherelargeclassesofperhaps40to50pupilsisthenorm.wherethishappensitislikelythatpupilswillhavethechancetopractiseonlyaveryimpoverishedrangeofutterancefunctions..insuchlanguageclassrooms,learnersrarelygettheopportunitytotakeotherthantherespondingrole,andeveningcaseswherestudentsareencouragetoinitiatethefollow-upmoveisoftenstillinthehandsoftheteacher,andlearnersgetlittleornopracticeinthisparticulardiscoursefunction.P123

Turn-taking

Thetraditionalclassroom,asobservedbySinclairandCoulthard,hasveryorderedturn-takingunderthecontroloftheteacher,andpupilsrarelyspeakoutofturn.Morerecenttrendsinclassroomorganization,suchaspairandgroupwork,attempttobreakthisrigidturn-takingpattern;butdonotalwayssucceedinrecreatingmorenaturalpatterns.Oftentheproblemlies,asbefore,inactivitydesign.Weareallfamiliarwithroleplayswhereindividualsaresointentonformulatingtheircontributionsandmakingthematthe‘right’momentasdeterminedbytheactivityrubric,thattheypaylittleattentiontothecontributionsofothers,andthenaturalpatternsofback-channel,utterancecompletion,etc.simplydonotoccur.Theloosertherestrictionsonwhatandwhenpeoplemayspeak,themorenaturalturn-takingemerges.P.128

 

Studyofwritingasaculturalactivity

Connor,U.(1996)ContrastiveRhetoricCambridgeUniversityPressp21-22

InadiscussionofthedevelopmentofliteracyinL1andL2,Carson(1992)examineshowChineseandJapanesespeakerslearntoreadandwriteinL1andhowthatleaningaffectstheirexpectationsandstrategiesinlearningtoreadandwriteinL2.Carsonisconcernedabouttheinfluencesofsocialcontext,particularlytheeducationalsystem,andsheemphasizescognitiveconsiderationssuchasproblemspertainingtoorthographyinlearningtoreadandwriteinL1andlaterL2.ShebeginsbydescribinghowJapanesechildrenlearnoreadandwriteinasocietythatvalues“theimportanceofeducation(andofliteracy),theneedtoworkhardtosucceed,theinherentvaluesofthegroup,andtheprima

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 解决方案 > 学习计划

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1