民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trial.docx

民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trial.docx

《民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trial.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trial.docx（8页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

民事审判哲学范式初论Onthephilosophicalparadigmofciviltrial

民事审判哲学范式初论（Onthephilosophicalparadigmofciviltrial）

[Abstract]contemporaryChinaisinahistoricalperiodofsocialtransformation,andtheconstructionoftheruleoflawrequiresthejudgetoestablish

Aprofessionalcommunity,andthesoulofthecommunityisacertainparadigm.Thejudicialparadigmstipulatesthatthejudgeshoulddealwithit

Commonbasictheories,basicviewsandbasicmethodsaffectthejudge'sknowledgeintheprocessoflitigation,

Thinkingandacting.Weshouldanalyzethebasicprocessoftrialsettlementofdisputesfromtheparadigmpointofview.adopt

Focusingonthecharacteristicsofthetrialinontology,methodologyandepistemology,wecanseethecourseofthetrial

Howdoesthejudicialparadigmguidethejudgestorealizethefactsandthelegalissues,soastoexplorethenewparadigmoftrial?

.

Judicialparadigm;trial;mediation

Theterm"paradigm"comesfromGreekandcontainsthemeaningof"commondisplay",whichleadstothemodelandmodel,

Paradigmequivalence.Thiswordhasalonghistoryandhasmanymeaningsindifferenttimesandindifferentfields.AmericanSociety

ThomasKuhn,asociologyscientist,broughtmeaningtosociologyandbecameamemberofaparticularcommunity

Thesumofacceptedbeliefs,acceptedvalues,andtechniques.Edgar,aFrenchscholar,thinksthatone

Peoplerecognize,think,andactontheparadigmthatcultureiswrittenonthemselves.Itguides,rules,controls

Theorganizationofindividualreasoningandtheorganizationofthosewhofollowtheparadigmaresystematicallyorganized.Theoreticalcirclesinourcountrybelievethat

Itisthecommonbeliefofagroupofscientistsinaparticularsubjectordiscipline

Theircommonbasictheories,basicviewsandbasicmethodsprovideacommontheoreticalmodelforthem

Andproblemsolvingframeworks,thusformingacommontraditionofthediscipline,andforthedevelopmentofthediscipline

Setacommoncourse.Limitedtothelengthandcognitivelevelofthearticle,wetakeintoconsiderationtheword"paradigm"

Atthesametime,itisbasedonChineselegaltheoryandjudicialpractice,fromontology,methodologyand

Theextensionofepistemologytodefinethejudgeasthiscommunityjusticeparadigm,andasaguide,thetrial

Thetrialprocessisatentativeexploration.

Ontology:

thesubjectiveandobjectiverelationsinthetrial-basedonfacts

TheGermanphilosopherKantwillbearationalpersoncalled"chasingmakingprimitiveability",and"primitive,isplaced

Inthefirstthing".Forthejudgeasatypicalrationalperson,thefactofthecaseiscalled

Theabilitytotracethe"factsofthecase"isthetrialofthe"original"

Reason.Therefore,inontology,thetrialattachesimportancetotherelationshipbetweensubjectandobject,andregardsobjectas

Theobjectofbeingoutsideistheobjectofhumanbeing,andthesubjectusestheobjectofunderstandingtoconquertheobject.Thesubjecthere"

Notonlytheplaintiff,thedefendant,butmoreimportantly,thejudge:

theobjecthereisthefactofthecase,too

Itcanbesaidthattheobjectoftrialisthedisputethatleadstothetrial.

Thesubjectiveandobjectiverelationsinthetrialareconcentratedinadynamicreasoningprocess.Nomatterwhatauthorityitis

Modeloradversarymodel,andtheactionisundertheparticipationofthejudgeandthepartiesandtheiragents

Proceedinaccordancewithlegalprocedures.Thelegalexpertsofbothpartiesandtheiremploylawyersintheirowninterests

Actinsearchofthebestevidenceprovidedbythelaw,andmakethemostfavourableexplanationtoone'sown.Judgepress

Inthetrialprocedure,fromthefactinvestigationtothecourtdebate,aformalreasoningprocessiscompleted:

theapplicationofthelegalnormsis

Thelogicofthesyllogism,thelogicofthecase,thefactthatthecaseistheminorpremise,thecourt'sdecision

Istheconclusionofthisreasoningprocess.

Itneedstobeexplainedthatthelegalnormisnotonlyalogicalproposition,butalsoajudgmentofauthority

Broken.Atthesametime,becauseofthefactofthecaseandthecourtstatement,thereisnotonlytimeinterval,butalso

Thereisagapbetweenrealityandlanguage.Whatismoreimportantisthat..,

Thejudgeasthethirdpartyandthefactsofthecase

Therearedifferentcognitivebackgroundsamongmanufacturers.Allthismayleadtothefailureofformalreasoningfunction

Theresultisthattheconclusionisfarfromtheobjectivefacts,andmayalsoberelatedtothetermoftheParty（eventhewinningparty）

Farcryfrom.

Weareallspeculative,instinctively,aboutthemostdifficultquestions,theleastofthem

Thefundamentalexplorationoftheproblemexhibitsaparticularpreference.Forthoseobsessedwithusingtrialcasehandling

Thejudge'sspecialpreferenceisquestionable:

（1）canthelegaltruthbeinfinitelyclosetoobjectivetruth?

as

Thefactthattheobjectivefactsofthecasehavehappened,andthatthepastisimpossibletoreconstruct,thenwhat?

Toknowwhetherajudgmentiscloseorfarfromtheobjectivefacts?

Infact,acourtcaseforacase

Thenumberoftrialsislimited,therefore,thecourt'scognizanceofthecaseislimited,limitedtrial

Howcanonepossiblyapproachtheobjectivefactsinfinitely?

（2）theheartofthejudge

Areyousureyoucancountonit?

Inthefaceoftheparty'sactiveoppositionlitigation,thejudge'sinnerconvictionisnotonly10000

Onemistake,Iamdifficulttodetect,butalsoforthesuddennatureoftherefereeforeshadowed,andmoredifficulttoruleoutthepeople

Reasonabledoubts.Thejudge'sreasoningonlyappearsinthelinesbetweenthereferee'spapersandservesastheconclusion

Characterizedbyfinalityandargument.

Two.Methodology:

scientificmetaphysicsintrial-startingfromproposition

Acourtinvestigationofacourtdebate-theprocessofapplyingthelawtothescienceofmetaphysics

Theprocessofapplyingthemethodsofscientificinquiry.Then,thecourt'sdecisionisnotbasedonfact,because

Inareasoningprocess,thepremiseofaconclusionisoneorseveralknownpropositions,notoneormoreactualones

Rawfacts.Thepropositioninlogicisthefactofthecaseinthelawsuit.Ifthecourt

Ifjudgmentistheprocessoflogicalreasoningofsyllogism,thenitcanonlybethefactofthecase,

Ofcourse,itisatruestatementoffactbyaparty,thatis,atrueproposition.Propositionsandfacts,thefactsoftheparties

Thepropositioniscloselyrelatedtothefactofaparticularcase,thatis,thepropositionisalwaysaboutthefacts,thesubjectoftheparties

Zhangisalwaysonthefactsofthecase,eventhetruthofthepropositiondependsonwhetheritagreeswiththefacts,thatis,when

Andonlywhenthedefendantnotalsoowetheplaintiff,thedefendantowe"theclaimistrue,canmake

Groundsforjudgment.

Therehavebeencountlessfactsatdifferenttimes,andatthesametime,countlessdifferentplaceshavetakenplace

Infact,thesedividedfactsarespecificandunique,andthefactsareoccurringatthesametime

Itwillbepermanentlyandirrevocablyeliminated,forexample,thefactthattheplaintiffhaslentthedefendant100yuanmusthavebeenissued

Thefactofborrowingmoneyataparticulartime,place,andeverydetailofborrowingmoney,

Suchasnegotiation,signing,counting,issuedIOUs,side,sidealsodisappearing.Andlife

Theword"problem"referstoasentencethatconformstocertainnorms,andsomepeoplerefertoitas"themeaningofsuchasentence,butwithout"

Onhowtounderstand,propositionsarerelatedtoourlanguagestatements,whichisourdescriptionoffacts,andalife

Theproblemdoesnotloseitsidentityatdifferenttimesandindifferentspaces.

Thetruthitselfisnottrueorfalse.Theso-called"objectivefacts",infact,istheemphasisontheobjectivityofthefacts,

Itdoesnotmeanthatthereisacorrespondingsubjectivefact".Apropositionisastatementofourunderstandingofobjectivefacts,

Judgment,andourknowledge,judgmentmaybecorrect,mayalsobewrong,therefore,thepropositionistrueandfalse

Branch.Apropositionagreeswithafact,atrueproposition,orafalseproposition,aboutthetruthortruthofaproposition

Infact,thefactsofthecaseitselfareneithertruenorfalse,andonlytheclaimsofthepartiesaretrueandfalse

Inlitigation,thefactthattheevidenceneedstobeprovedisthefactofthepartyratherthanthefactofthecase

Obtainajudgmentthatisadvantageoustooneself;needevidencetoproveone'sopinionordisprovetheother'sclaim.

Allexactknowledgebelongstoscience.Thetheoryofsystemscienceastheobject,becauseitisalways

Ifwedividethewholeintoparts,wewillalwayshavetheonesidednessthatcannotbecompletelyeliminated,namely,metaphysics.hold

Innature,allkindsofthingsandprocessesareisolated,leavinggreatandgeneralconnectionstoinvestigate,

Thus,notfromthestateofmotion,butfromthestateofstillness;nottothinkofthemasessentially

Somethingthatischanged,butsomethingthatisimmutable;notfromalivingstate,butfromastateofdeath

Investigate。

ThismethodofinvestigationwastransplantedfromintothephilosophybyBaconandRock

Thepeculiarlimitationsofthepastfewcenturies,themetaphysicalwayofthinking.Iwasclearlytheexactknowledgeofthelaw,

Belongtoscientificcategory.Thetrialistoisolatethefactsofthecaseandseizethemainlineoftheapplicationofthelaw

Itisnotpossibletoavoidmetaphysics,asitisfromstatic,eternal,deadthings.

Three.Epistemology:

therulesofevidenceintria