completeness and relevance of a social assessment framework for project and technology management in.docx

completeness and relevance of a social assessment framework for project and technology management in.docx

《completeness and relevance of a social assessment framework for project and technology management in.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《completeness and relevance of a social assessment framework for project and technology management in.docx（14页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

completenessandrelevanceofasocialassessmentframeworkforprojectandtechnologymanagementin

SolidwastemanagementinEuropeancountries:

Areviewofsystemsanalysistechniques  ReviewArticle

JournalofEnvironmentalManagement

Inthepastfewdecades,solidwastemanagementsystemsinEuropehaveinvolvedcomplexandmulti-facetedtrade-offsamongaplethoraoftechnologicalalternatives,economicinstruments,andregulatoryframeworks.Thesechangesresultedinvariousenvironmental,economic,social,andregulatoryimpactsinwastemanagementpracticeswhichnotonlycomplicateregionalpolicyanalysis,butalsoreshapetheparadigmofglobalsustainabledevelopment.Systemsanalysis,adisciplinethatharmonizestheseintegratedsolidwastemanagementstrategies,hasbeenuniquelyprovidinginterdisciplinarysupportfordecisionmakinginthisarea.Systemsengineeringmodelsandsystemassessmenttools,bothofwhichenrichtheanalyticalframeworkofwastemanagement,weredesignedspecificallytohandleparticulartypesofproblems.ThoughhowtosmoothoutthebarrierstowardachievingappropriatesystemssynthesisandintegrationofthesemodelsandtoolstoaidinthesolidwastemanagementschemesprevalentinEuropeancountriesstillremainssomewhatuncertain.ThispaperconductsathoroughliteraturereviewofmodelsandtoolsilluminatingpossibleoverlappedboundariesinwastemanagementpracticesinEuropeancountriesandencompassingtheprosandconsofwastemanagementpracticesineachmemberstateoftheEuropeanUnion.WhereastheSouthernEuropeanUnion（EU）countriesneedtodevelopfurthermeasurestoimplementmoreintegratedsolidwastemanagementandreachEUdirectives,theCentralEUcountriesneedmodelsandtoolswithwhichtorationalizetheirtechnologicalchoicesandmanagementstrategies.Nevertheless,consideringsystemsanalysismodelsandtoolsinasynergisticwaywouldcertainlyprovideopportunitiestodevelopbettersolidwastemanagementstrategiesleadingtoconformitywithcurrentstandardsandfosterfutureperspectivesforboththewastemanagementindustryandgovernmentagenciesinEuropeanUnion.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.CurrentwastemanagementprinciplesintheEU

3.Systemsanalysistechniques

3.1.Systemsengineeringmodels

3.2.Systemsassessmenttools

4.SystemsanalysisusedforsolidwastemanagementinEuropeancountries

4.1.Methodology

4.2.WastemanagementsystemsinEuropeancountries

4.3.Comparativeanalysis

5.FutureperspectivesofsystemsanalysisforsolidwastemanagementinEurope

5.1.Currentstatusandlimitations

5.2.Gapsonknowledgeofwastemanagement

5.3.Researchneedsforthefuture

6.Conclusions

References

SPECIES—Co-evolutionofproducts,processesandproductionsystems  OriginalResearchArticle

CIRPAnnals-ManufacturingTechnology

Manufacturingenterprisesarechangingthewaytheybehaveinthemarkettofacetheincreasingcomplexityoftheeconomic,socio-politicalandtechnologicaldynamics.Manufacturingproducts,processesandproductionsystemsresultinbeingchallengedbyevolvingexternaldrivers,includingtheintroductionofnewregulations,newmaterials,technologies,servicesandcommunications,thepressureoncostsandsustainability.Theco-evolutionparadigmsynthesisestherecentscientificandtechnicalapproachesproposedbyacademicandindustrialcommunitiesdealingwithmethodologiesandtoolstosupportthecoordinatedevolution（co-evolution）ofproducts,processesandproductionsystems.Thispaperaimsatreviewingandsystemisingtheresearchcarriedoutinthefieldofmanufacturingco-evolutionwithaparticularfocusonproductionsystems.Anintroductoryinvestigationofvariousindustrialperspectivesontheproblemofco-evolutionispresented,followedbythedescriptionoftheco-evolutionmodelandthemethodologyadoptedforframingtheexistingscientificcontributionsintheproposedmodel.Then,thecorepartoftheworkispresented,consistinginasystemisedanalysisofthecurrentmethodologiesdealingwithco-evolvingproduct,processandsystemandadescriptionofproblemsthatremainunsolved,thusmotivatingfutureresearchstrategiesandroadmaps.

ArticleOutline

1.Introductionandproblemstatement

1.1.Industrialmotivation

1.1.1.Industrialequipmentusers

1.1.2.Industrialequipmentproducers

1.1.3.DigitalEnterpriseTechnologies（DET）

1.2.Theco-evolutionparadigm

2.Proposedframework:

theco-evolutionmodel

2.1.Objectivesoftheframework

2.2.Fundamentaldefinitions

2.3.Integrationandco-evolutionofproducts,processesandproductionsystems（P3S）

2.3.1.Integration

2.3.2.Impactofcompanyorganisation

2.3.3.Evolution

2.3.4.Evolutiondynamics

2.4.Theroleofthestrategy

2.4.1.Themanufacturingstrategy

2.4.2.Companystrategy

3.Stateoftheartanalysis

3.1.Classificationmethodology

3.2.Bibliographicsearch

3.3.Usingtheco-evolutionparadigmtoclassifyexistingscientificliterature

4.Methodologiestodrivetheco-evolutionofproducts,processesandproductionsystems（P3S）

4.1.Integratedknowledgemanagement

4.1.1.KnowledgemanagementforintegratedP3S

4.1.2.KnowledgemanagementforevolvingP3S

4.2.Configurationofco-evolvingproductionsystems

4.2.1.Performanceevaluationofco-evolvingproductionsystems

4.2.2.Useofthesystemco-evolutionenablers

4.2.3.Selectionofthesystemco-evolutionenablers

4.2.4.Definitionoftheproductionsystemandresourcearchitecture

4.3.Controlofevolvingproductionsystems

4.4.Productionplanningandschedulingunderuncertainty

4.5.Evolutionaryprocessplanning

4.6.ControlofthedynamicsofP3Sco-evolution

4.6.1.Factorycontrol

4.6.2.Productionnetworkcoordination

4.6.3.Manufacturingstrategy

4.7.Implementationofco-evolution

4.7.1.Newbusinessmodels

4.7.2.Complexityandco-evolution

4.7.3.Reconfigurability,flexibility,adaptability,changeabilityandco-evolution

4.7.4.Guidelinesforindustrialapplications

4.7.5.Co-evolutionandresearchpolicies

5.Futureresearchpriorities

6.Conclusions

Acknowledgements

References

Service-orientedtechnologyandmanagement:

Perspectivesonresearchandpracticeforthecomingdecade  OriginalResearchArticle

ElectronicCommerceResearchandApplications

Service-orientedtechnologiesandmanagementhavegainedattentioninthepastfewyears,promisingawaytocreatethebasisforagilitysothatcompaniescandelivernew,moreflexiblebusinessprocessesthatharnessthevalueoftheservicesapproachfromacustomer’sperspective.Service-orientedapproachesareusedfordevelopingsoftwareapplicationsandsoftware-as-a-servicethatcanbesourcedasvirtualhardwareresources,includingon-demandandutilitycomputing.Thedrivingforcescomefromthesoftwareengineeringcommunityandthee-businesscommunity.Service-orientedarchitecturepromotestheloosecouplingofsoftwarecomponentssothatinteroperabilityacrossprogramminglanguagesandplatforms,anddynamicchoreographyofbusinessprocessescanbeachieved.Nevertheless,oneoftoday’smostpervasiveandperplexingchallengesforseniormanagersdealswithhowandwhentomakeacommitmenttothenewpractices.Thepurposeofthisarticleistoshedlightonmultipleissuesassociatedwithservice-orientedtechnologiesandmanagementbyexaminingseveralinterrelatedquestions:

whyisitappropriatenowtostudytherelatedbusinessproblemsfromthepointofviewofservicesresearch?

Whatnewconceptualframeworksandtheoreticalperspectivesareappropriateforstudyingservice-orientedtechnologiesandmanagement?

Whatvaluewillaservicescienceandbusinessprocessmodelingoffertothefirmsthatadoptthem?

And,howcantheseapproachesbeimplementedsoastoaddressthemajorchallengesthatorganizationsfacewithtechnology,informationandstrategy?

Wecontributenewknowledgeinthisareabytyingtheeconomicsandinformationtechnologystrategyperspectivestothesemanticanddesignscienceperspectivesforabroaderaudience.Usuallythemoretechnicalperspectiveisofferedonastandalonebasis,andconfinedtothesystemsspace–evenwhenthediscussionisaboutbusinessprocesses.Thisarticlealsooffersinsightsontheseissuesfromthemultipleperspectivesofindustryandacademicthoughtleaders.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.Growthofserviceseconomyandservicesresearch

3.Rethinkingsystemsarchitecturefromaserviceperspective

3.1.Semantics

3.2.Reuse

3.3.Information

4.Characteristicsofitservices

5.Economicsandservice-orientedtechnologyandmanagement

5.1.Thebusinessvalueofservice-orientedtechnologiesandmanagement

5.2.RiskmanagementofITservices

5.3.Estimatingdiffusion

5.4.Organization,intermediationandownership

5.5.Finalthoughts

6.Conclusion

6.1.Contributions

6.2.Managerialguidelinesandrelatedresearchdirectionsforpractice

6.3.Pitfallstoavoidintheimplementationoftheservice-orientedparadigm

6.4.Limitations

7.Afterword

Acknowledgements

References

工艺设备研发

建筑/建材/工程  建筑/建材/工程

材料工程研究中心

混凝土

建材制品

设备工艺及生产设备

课题/研究，参与,专业,研发成果,推广及工程应用，项目,集团,重大工程,提供,专业技术支持

机械制造及工艺设备/材料工程，博士学历，英语，兼具,材料工程和机械工程,专业背景,优先，国外留学,经历,优先；

具有,较高,专业科研水平，丰富的,专业理论基础和实践经验，科研机构/化工行业/机械制造行业,从业经历；

精通,材料/化工/机械制造,方面,专业软件

Decisionsupportforconstructionmethodselectioninconcretebuildings:

Prefabricationadoptionandoptimization  OriginalResearchArticle

AutomationinConstruction

Technicalandenvironmentaleffectsofconcreteproduction:

drybatchversuscentralmixedplant  OriginalResearchArticle

JournalofCleanerProduction

Newtrendsfordesigntowardssustainabilityinchemicalengineering:

Greenengineering  

ChemicalEngineeringJournal

Abroadreview