QualityInOnlineLearning.docx

上传人:b****6 文档编号:6325625 上传时间:2023-01-05 格式:DOCX 页数:5 大小:19.66KB
下载 相关 举报
QualityInOnlineLearning.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
QualityInOnlineLearning.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
QualityInOnlineLearning.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
QualityInOnlineLearning.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
QualityInOnlineLearning.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

QualityInOnlineLearning.docx

《QualityInOnlineLearning.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《QualityInOnlineLearning.docx(5页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

QualityInOnlineLearning.docx

QualityInOnlineLearning

QualityInOnlineLearning(Ò»)

Abstract:

Wearenowdeliveringthousandsofonlinecoursestomillionsofstudentsaroundtheworld.Wehaveprogressedbeyondtheearlyexplorationsinto"howtoteachonline,"tothemorecomplexchallengeof"howwell?

"ThispapersummarizestheresultsofanationwideempiricalstudyperformedintheUnitedStates,inanefforttosystematicallyidentifythefactorsthatdeterminethequalityofe-learningcourses.Ourinvestigationssoughthowtodesignqualityintoweb-enhancedcourses,howtoensuredeliveryofaqualitysupportsystemforonlinelearners,andhowtoassessthequalityofonlinecourses.Thisisthefirstinaseriesofreportsontheoutcomesofthisinvestigation,andhowtousewhatwelearnedabouthowtoensureandassessqualityinweb-basedlearning.Thisfirstreportfocusesoninstructionaldesignofqualitycourses.

 

Introduction

Afterreviewinghundredsofstudiesoneducation,LionGardinerconcluded:

"[W]henwesubjectthequalityofourcollectiveworkaseducatorstothesamecloseexaminationwedemandinourdisciplines,wefindasubstantialbodyofevidencethatclearlydemonstratesacrisisofeducationalqualityinournation'scollegesanduniversities.¡Weneedtobeginimmediatelytoassess,evaluate,andimprovethequalityofourwork."

Gardinerfurtherexplainsthat,bycombiningbest-practiceinstructionaldesignmethodswithInternettechnologies,itispossible(butnotnecessarilytrue)thatmuchgreaterhigher-orderlearningandhigher-valueeducationaloutcomescanbeachieved.

Onecontextualchallengecoursedevelopersfaceisthatqualityisnotsolelyanintrinsicfeatureofacourse;butisexpressiblethroughtheviewpoints,values,andneedsofthecourseconsumer,whetherheisastudent,aninstructor,adepartmentchair,anacademicvicepresidentorfinancialofficer,aninstitutionalplanner,oracorporatehumanresourcesdirector.Thereisnoonechecklistbywhichwecandesignorevaluatequalityinacourse.Wemustmakeexplicittheviewpointfromwhichthecourseisbeingassessed.Inthesecondsectionofthispaper,wewillsummarizethecriteriaforqualitynativetothesedifferentconsumerviewpointsandthoroughlyanalyzecoursequalityasviewedfromtheperspectiveofthestudentconsumer.

Simplyput,itisverydifficulttodesignandjudgecoursequality.Weknowthisfromtheproliferationofthousandsofmediocreonlinecourses.Fromtheeducationalresearchliterature,weareoftengivenguidingprinciplesthataretoogeneraltobeinstructiveatthelevelofclassroompracticeandcoursedesign.Makingclass"happen"inaweb-basedenvironmentissonew,anddifferent,thatneitherbroadprinciplesnornarrowlyprescriptivepracticesarehelpfulwhenwesitatacomputerandtrytoreinventourteachinginthisnewenvironment.

Afterall,ifaninstructorwhoundertakestodesignaweb-basedclassistold"Followtheprincipleofgivingfrequentfeedbackintheformofformativeassessments,"hewillsay"Youhaven'thelpedmeabit;Ialreadyapplythatprincipletomyclassroom-basedclass.If,ontheotherhand,youtellhim"Requirestudentstoe-mailyouasynopsisofeachweek'sreading,"youhaven'thelpedhimeitherbecausethatcourseprocessmayneitherapplytocoursenorcomplementhiscoursedesign.

Iftheconceptofdesigningandevaluatingacoursebynarrowprescriptiveformulaeismisguided,what'saninstructortodo?

Inourinvestigation,wefoundmanycategoriesofgoodexperience-provenpracticalideasthatseemedtosortthemselvesintothreebasiclevelsofguidanceforqualityonlinepedagogy:

principlesoflearningscience;practicesininstructionalartistry;andapplicationsofonlinesystems.

Theinstructor'sbeststrategyistoarmhimselfwithafewsturdyprinciples,tobeguidedbyatranslationoftheseprinciplesintopracticeseffectiveinaweb-basedenvironmentandtothinkcreativelyallthewhileusingspecificapplicationmethodsasapointofreference.Atsomelevel,theinstructormustdopreciselywhateachstudentmustdoandteachhimselfbydrawinginferencesandextendingfromtheknowntotheunknown.Thequalityoftheinferencesandextensions,however,canbepositivelyinfluencedbythesolidityoftheprinciplesandthequalityoftheillustrationsusedasguides.

Principles,practices,andspecificapplicationssortthemselvesoutalongascaleofspecificity:

¡ìAprincipleisapplicabletonearlyanyformallearningsituation,independentofthedeliverymedium.Thatisbecausethese"principlesoflearningscience"deriveprimarilyfromcharacteristicsoflearnersandthefunctionsofhumanbrain-learning,andnotfromthespecificcoursenorthemediumofcoursedelivery.

¡ìApracticeismanifeststhe"artofinstruction"withinandsuitedtoaspecificmodeofdelivery.,classbased,online,mixedmode).Practicesintheartofinstructionreflectamergingoflearningscienceprincipleswiththeartistryofinstruction.

¡ìAnapplication(oflearningscienceprinciplesandinstructionalartistry)isspecifictoaparticularcourse,withinaspecificdeliveryinfrastructure.

Principles,practices,andapplicationscanalsobeindexedbydegreeofprescriptiveness.

Atthefoundationofthepyramid,therearefewerprinciples.Wecanmorereadilyenumeratemajorprinciplesoflearningsciencethatbroadlyaddressthefoundationuponwhichmostalllearningisbased.Theyarelessspecificallyprescriptive.Practicesaremorespecific,andtheyapplytoaparticulardeliverymedium.But,theyarestillsoabstractastoalmostdemandexperiencedexpertiseinordertoutilizetheminanyconcreteway.Onthelowendofthespectrum,methodsareimmediatelyapplicable.Buttheyaresonarrowlyspecificthattheyareinnumerable.infeasibletosimplypresentacompleteenumerationofallpossiblemethodsthatmightbehighlybeneficialtoaspecificlearningactivity.

Theabundanceofspecificmethods(learningactivities,"assignableunits,"projects)bywhichyoumayassurethesuccessofagivenpracticeandtheapplicationofagivenprinciplewillbewilderyouifyouseekasimpleformulatoanswerthequestion"WhatdoIdotocreateandassessqualityine-learning?

"

Approach

Thispaperreportsfindingsdevelopedaspartofanationwidestudyofqualityinweb-basedandweb-intensivelearning.Thestudyisongoing,andaddressestheinstructionaldesignofqualitypedagogy,qualityassuranceincoursedelivery,andassessmentofqualityinexistingcourses.

Thisstudydoesnotinvolvebasicscientificresearch,butwehavereliedheavilyonthescientificandeducationalresearchliterature.Researchtopicshaveencompassedneurophysiologicalandneuropsychologicalfactorsunderlyinghumanmemoryandlearningprocesses.Secondly,thestudyhasalsoinvestigatedbasicandappliedresearchoninstructionaldesignmodels.Third,wehaveincorporatedmuchpracticalknowledgeofthecurrentstateoftheartininstructionaldeliverysystems.Fromthesethreefoundationsofinvestigation,theoverallstudyisbasedon"thescienceoflearning,theartofinstruction,andtheapplicationofsystems."

Thisinvestigationwasbeguninformallyin1994,andcontinuedassuchuntilaformalnationalinvestigationwaslaunchedinNovember1999.Theplanofinvestigationhasinvolvedaverylabor-intensiveprocessoftargetedinformationcollection.(Wewantedtoavoidthecommonpitfallsinoverlyhomogenizedfindingsfromamonolithicsurveyofunknownsources.)Besidestranslatingbasicresearchintolearningscience,ourapproachhasbeentocarefullyidentifyexpertsinthefieldwhobringbothlearnedexpertiseandpracticalapplicationexperiences.Therefore,theprocessofsimplyidentifyingtheseexpertshasbeenakeyelementofthestudy.Wehavelurkedonnationallistserv'stoidentifyexperts,andtopickupnewideas.Wehavefollowedupwithmanyofthem,inconductinginterviews.Wehaveorganizedroundtablediscussionsandpanelsessionsattheleadingnationalconferencesandthenfollowedupwithemailswiththoseparticipants.Wehaveexaminedonlinefacultyguidesfromleadinginstitutions,andonlinecourse-sitesoninstructionaldesign,andfollowedupwiththeirauthorswherethatseemedhelpful.Notsurprisingly,oneofthemostinformativesourcesofideasandexemplars(bothpositiveandweak)hasbeenmanyonlinecoursesitesthemselves.Inall,thestudyhastodateinvolvedseveralhundredpagesofresearchliterature,hundredsoflistservpostingsandfollowupemails,overonehundredactualonlinecoursesites,hundredsofconferenceattendees,anddozensofinterviewswithindividualexperts.Thisinvestigationisongoing,andfurtherfindingsareindevelopmentforreleaseinsubsequentOFSOLUTION:

Learningscienceyieldslearningprinciples,andtheseprinciplesstandwithoutneedforreferencetomodeofdelivery.Theseprinciplesderivefromfeaturesofthehumanbrainandcharacteristicsofhumanlearning.Theydonotderivefromthefeaturesandcharacteristicsofagivencourse.

Further,indesigninganycoursewemustkeepinmindthatknowledgeisnottransmitted;itisconstructed.Learninghappensinthebrainofthestudent,andnotnecessarily"ontheweb"orinclassat10:

32.orviainteractivevideo.

Inourfindings,welistanddefineninelearningprinciplesbeforetranslatingeachoneintopracticeseffectiveinaweb-basedenvironment.Wethendescribeanapplicationmethodforeachprincipleandpractice,toillustratehowalloftheseprinciplesandpracticesofcoursequalitycanbeincorporatedintotheinstructionaldesign.

Exogenous(Uncontrollable)FactorsThatAffect"ApparentQuality"

Courseoracademic-program"qu

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 表格模板 > 合同协议

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1