发展中国家的经济增长和经济发展外文翻译.docx
《发展中国家的经济增长和经济发展外文翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《发展中国家的经济增长和经济发展外文翻译.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![发展中国家的经济增长和经济发展外文翻译.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-12/1/f8a18f91-6747-48e3-b0b3-c79e45564b4a/f8a18f91-6747-48e3-b0b3-c79e45564b4a1.gif)
发展中国家的经济增长和经济发展外文翻译
外文翻译
FinancialDevelopmentandEconomicGrowthinUnderdevelopedCountries
MaterialSource:
googleAuthor:
HughT.Patrick
Anobservedcharacteristicoftheprocessofeconomicdevelopmentovertime,Inamarket-orientedeconomyusingthepricemechanismtoallocateresources.isanincreaseInthenumberandvarietyoffinancialinstitutionsandasubstantialriseintheproportionnotonlyofmoneybutalsoofthetotalofallfinancialassetsrelativetoGNPandtotangiblewealth.However,thecausalnatureofthisrelationshipbetweenfinancialdevelopmentandeconomicgrowthhasnotbeenfullyexploredeithertheoreticallyorempirically.
Typicalstatementsindicatethatthefinancialsystemsomehowaccommodatesor,totheextentthatitmalfunctions,itrestricts-growthofrealpercapitaoutput.Forexample,Itseemstobethecasethatwhereenterpriseleadsfinancefollows.Thesameimpulseswithinaneconomywhichsetenterpriseonfootmakeownersofwealthventuresome,andwhenastrongimpulsetoinvestisfetteredbylackoffinance,devicesareinventedtoreleaseitandhabitsandinstitutionsaredeveloped.
Suchanapproachplacesemphasisonthedemandsideforfinancialservices;astheeconomygrowsitgeneratesadditionalandnewdemandsfortheseservices,whichbringaboutasupplyresponseinthegrowthofthefinancialsystem.Inthisview,thelackoffinancialinstitutionsinunderdevelopedcountriesissimplyanindicationofthelackofdemandfortheirservices.
Wemaytermas“demand-following"thephenomenoninwhichthecreationofmodernfinancialinstitutions,theirfinancialassetsandliabilities,andrelatedfinancialservicesisinresponsetothedemandfortheseservicesbyinvestorsandsaversintherealeconomy.Inthiscase,theevolutionarydevelopmentofthefinancialsystemisacontinuingconsequenceofthepervasive,sweepingprocessofeconomicdevelopment.Theemergingfinancialsystemisshapedbothbychangesinobjectiveopportunities-theeconomicenvironment,theinstitutionalframeworkandbychangesinsubjectiveresponses-individualmotivations,attitudes,tastes,preferences.
Thenatureofthedemandforfinancialservicesdependsuponthegrowthofrealoutputanduponthecommercializationandmonetizationofagricultureandothertraditionalsubsistencesectors.Themorerapidthegrowthrateofrealnationalincome,thegreaterwillbethedemandbyenterprisesforexternalfunds(thesavingofothers)andthereforefinancialintermediation,sinceundermostcircumstancesfirmswillbelessabletofinanceexpansionfrominternallygenerateddepreciationallowancesandretainedprofits.(Theproportionofexternalfundsinthetotalsourceofenterprisefundswillrise)Forthesamereason,withagivenaggregategrowthrate,thegreaterthevarianceInthegrowthratesamongdifferentsectorsorindustries,thegreaterwillbetheneedforfinancialintermediationtotransfersavingtofast-growingindustriesfromslow-growingIndustriesandfromindividuals.ThefinancialsystemcanthussupportandsustaintheleadingsectorsIntheprocessofgrowth.
Thedemand-followingsupplyresponseofthegrowingfinancialsystemispresumedtocomeaboutmoreorlessautomatically.Itisassumedthatthesupplyofentrepreneurshipinthefinancialsectorishighlyelasticrelativetothegrowingopportunitiesforprofitfromprovisionoffinancialservices,sothatthenumberanddiversityoftypesoffinancialinstitutionsexpandssufficiently;andafavorablelegal,institutional,andeconomicenvironmentexists.Thegovernment'sattitudes,economicgoals,andeconomicpolicies,aswellasthesizeandrateofincreaseofthegovernmentdebt,areofcourseimportantinfluencesinanyeconomyonthenatureoftheeconomicenvironment.Asaconsequenceofrealeconomicgrowth,financial
marketsdevelop,widen,andbecomemoreperfect,thusincreasingtheopportunitiesforacquiringliquidityandforreducingrisk,whichinturnfeedsbackasastimulanttorealgrowth.
Thedemand-followingapproachimpliesthatfinanceisessentiallypassiveandpermissiveInthegrowthprocess.LateeighteenthandearlynineteenthcenturyEnglandmaybecitedasahistoricalexample.Infact,theincreasedsupplyoffinancialservicesinresponsetodemandmaynotbeatallautomatic,flexible,orinexpensiveInunderdevelopedcountries.ExamplesincludetherestrictivebankinglegislationinearlynineteenthcenturyFrance,religiousbarriersagainstloansandinterestcharges,andGerschenkron'sanalysisoftheabortiveupswingofItalianindustrialdevelopmentinthe1880's"mainly,itisbelieved,becausethemoderninvestmentbankhadnotyetbeenestablishedInItaly.Inunderdevelopedcountries
today,similarobstacles,togetherwithimperfectionsIntheoperationofthemarketmechanism,maydictateanInadequatedemand-followingresponsebythefinancialsystem.Thelackoffinancialservices,thus,inonewayoranotherrestrictsorinhibitseffectivegrowthpatternsandprocesses.
Lessemphasishasbeengiveninacademicdiscussions(ifnotinpolicyactions)towhatmaybetermedthe"supply-leading”phenomenon:
thecreationoffinancialinstitutionsandthesupplyoftheirfinancialassets,liabilities,andrelatedfinancialservicesinadvanceofdemandforthem,especiallythedemandofentrepreneurs.Inthemodern,growth-inducingsectors."Supply-leading”hastwofunctions:
totransferresourcesfromtraditional(non-growth)sectorstomodernsectors,andtopromoteandstimulateanentrepreneurialresponseinthesemodernsectors.Financialintermediationwhichtransfersresourcesfromtraditionalsectors,whetherbycollectingwealthandsavingfromthosesectorsInexchangeforitsdepositsandotherfinancialliabilities,orbycreditcreationandforcedsaving,isakintotheSchumpeterianconceptofinnovationfinancing.
Newaccesstosuchsupply-leadingfundsmayinItselfhavesubstantial,favorableexpectationalandpsychologicaleffectsonentrepreneurs.Itopensnewhorizonsastopossiblealternatives,enablingtheentrepreneurto"thinkbig.'Thismaybethemostsignificanteffectofall,particularlyincountrieswhereentrepreneurshipisamajorconstraintondevelopment.Moreover,ashasbeenemphasizedbyRondoCameron,thetopmanagementoffinancialinstitutionsmay
alsoserveasentrepreneursinindustrialenterprises.TheyassistintheestablishmentoffirmsInnewindustriesorinthemergeroffirms(theadvantagesofeconomiesofscalemaybemorethanoffsetbytheestablishmentofrestrictivecartelsormonopolies,however),notonlybyunderwritingasubstantialportionofthecapital,butmoreimportantlybyassumingtheentrepreneurialinitiative.
Byitsverynature,asupply-leadingfinancialsysteminitiallymaynotbeabletooperateprofitablybylendingtothenascentmodernsectors.Thereare,however,severalwaysinwhichnewfinancialinstitutionscanbemadeviable.First,theymaybegovernmentinstitutions,usinggovernmentcapitalandperhapsreceivingdirectgovernmentsubsidies.ThisisexemplifiednotonlybyRussianexperienceinthelatterhalfofthenineteenthcentury,butbymanyunderdevelopedcountriestoday.Second,privatefinancialinstitutionsmayreceivedirectorindirectgovernmentsubsidies,usuallythelatter.Indirectsubsidiescanbeprovidedinnumerousways.Commercialbanksmayhavetherighttoissuebanknotesunderfavorablecollateralconditions;thistechniquewasmoreimportantintheeighteenthandnineteenthcenturies(nationalbankinginJapaninthe1870's;wildcatbankingintheUnitedStates)thanitislikelytobeinpresentunderdevelopedcountries,wherethisrightisreservedforthecentralbankortreasury.Nonetheless,modernequivalentsexist.Theyincludeallowingprivatefinancialinstitutiontocreatedepositmoneywithlow(theoretically,evennegative)reserverequirementsandcentralbankrediscountofcommercialbankloansatinterestrateseffectivelybelowthoseontheloans.Third,new,modernfinancialinstitutionsmayinitiallylendalargeproportionoftheirfundstotraditional(agriculturalandcommercial)sectorsprofitably,graduallyshiftingtheirloanportfoliotomodernindustriesasthesebegintoemerge.Thismorecloselyresemblesthedemand-followingphenomen;whethersuchafinancialinstitutionissupply-leadingdependsmainlyonitsattitudeinsearchingoutandencouragingnewventuresofamodernnature.
Itcannotbesaidthatsupply-leadingfinanceisanecessaryconditionorpreconditionforinauguratingself-sustainedeconomicdevelopment.Rather,itpresentsanopportunitytoinducerealgrowthbyfinancialmeans.Itthusislikelytoplayamoresignificantroleatthebeginningofthegrowthprocessthanlater.Gerschenkronimpliesthatthemorebackwardtheeconomyrelativetoothersinthesametimeperiod(andthegreatertheforced-draftnatureoftheeconomicdevelopmenteffort),thegreatertheemphasiswhichisplacedonwhatIheretermsupply-leadingfinance.'Atthesametime,itshouldberecognizedthatthesupply-leadingapproachtodevelopmentofacountry'sfinancialsystemalsohasitsdangers,andtheyshouldnotbeunderestimated.Theuseofresources,especiallyenterpreneurialtalentsandmanagerialskills,andthecostsofexplicitorimplicitsubsidiesinsupply-leadingdevelopmentmustproducesufficientbenefitsintheformofstimulatingrealeconomicdevelopmentforthisapproachtobejustified.
Inactualpractice,thereislikelytobeaninteractionofsupply-leadinganddemandfollowingphenomena.Nevertheless,thefollowingsequencemaybepostulated.Beforesustainedmodernindustrialgrowthgetsunderway,supply-leadingmaybeabletoinducerealinnovation-