written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文.docx

written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文.docx

《written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文.docx（5页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

writteninchineseenglishlearnerstoexploretheconjunctionofthecorpusanalysis英语论文

WritteninChineseEnglishlearnerstoexploretheconjunctionofthecorpusanalysis

PaperNetwork:

PaperKeywords:

EnglishwrittenlanguagecorpusconjunctionAbstract:

buildingacoherentEnglishdiscourseconnectivesisanimportantmeansofthismethodtoexploretheuseofcorpuswrittenChineselearnersofEnglishusageinconjunctionresultsshowedthat:

First,thelearnersuseconnectivessignificantlymorethannativespeakerssecond,learnersandnativespeakersinthechoiceofwordstendtohavegreatersimilarity,thethreelearnersinconjunctionwiththeexistenceoftheconceptoffuzzysemantic,syntacticandstylisticknowledge,lackofawarenessisweak.interlanguagedevelopmentcharacteristics,andnegativetransferofmothertongueisthemaincauseoftheformationoftheaboveproblems.

Chapteristoachievesmoothconvergence,animportantwaytoclearlogicasacomponentofconvergence,themainfunctionistoconnectthewordsinthechaptersthatdominantlogicbyconnectingwordspeoplecanunderstandthesemanticlinksbetweensentences,orevenbylogicallybeexpectedfromtheprecedingsentenceafterthesentencesemantics.[1]（P92）scholarsgenerallybelievethatthecorrectandrationaluseofconjunctionscansignificantlyenhancethecoherenceandclarityofthearticle,thereadergrasptheauthor’seasywritingideastoimprovethereadertounderstandchapterefficiency,soastoachievethepurposeofeffectivecommunication,however,becausethelargenumberofEnglishconjunctions,usageandmorecomplexmeaningandbecomeoneofthemajordifficultiesoflearners.Inthispaper,comparativeinterlanguagecorpusresearchmethodstoinvestigateChineselearnersofEnglishwritteninconjunctionusage,analyzeproblems,lookforwardtoimprovingtheteachingofEnglishprovidesreferencedata.

I.Background

Sincethe1980s,sincetherapiddevelopmentofcomputercorporainordertobetterunderstandanddescribethelanguageoffersgreatpotentialandpossibilities.Alargenumberofdomesticresearchaboutconvergence,butthemethodusedtoconnectwordstocorporaspecialcontrast,quantitativestudiesarerare,researchershavemainlyLuoa,[2]（P59-62）,ZhaoWeiBin,[3]（P72-76）PanFan[4]（P157-162）andMoTsang.[5]（P45-50）viewoftheabovestudiescanbefound:

first,tosimilarorthesamegroupforthestudy,thefindingsdonotcoincide.Mostscholarsbelievethat,relativetothenativeauthor,theChineselearnersingeneralthereistoomuchtendencytoconnectwordswithEnglish,Chineselearnershavefoundthatthewordsusedinthemajorityofconnectionsshowedtoolittletousetrendsonthesecond,comparedtothematchingcorpustobefurtherimproved,asLuoYiOnthelimitationsoftheirstudytimesaid,‘shouldenhancethecorpusofthematching,comparativeanalysisofthecorpusofthematch,thehighertheresultswillspeakforthemselves.[2]corpusGrangerexpertshavepointedout,theinvestigationoftheparallelcorpususedtobeinthelearner’slearningphase,thetasktypeofdiscoursegenreandsocomparable,comparablecorpusisthebasisforcomparativeanalysis,otherwiseitwilldirectlyaffecttheconclusionsconvincing.[6]（P17-20）

Second,thestudydesign1.CorpuscollectionThecorpususedtoinvestigatethethree,byaBritishuniversitythesisMasterofAppliedLinguisticscompositioncourses,includingLanguagePlanning,LanguageTesting,SecondLanguageAcquisition,LanguageTeachingTheoryandPractice.Endofthecourse,teachersinaccordancewiththestandardrequirementsforallstudents（thesistopic,numberofwordstocompleteeachcourseandotherpapers.Gathererpapersclassifiedaccordingtothenationalityofthelearner,learnercorpusassembledinChina（98178words,nativespeakerscorpus（94231wordsandinternationallearnercorpus（97,183wordsInternationallearnerwhoisfromJapan,Korea,Pakistan,Norway,Denmark,Greece,Italyandothercountries,learnersshouldbesaid,morethaninthelearner’slearningcorpusstagewritingtask,discoursegenre,lengthofthearticlehaveahighlevelofmatching.

2.ResearchquestionsThisstudyattemptstoanswerare:

①Chineselearnersinthegeneraltendencytousewordstoconnectaresignificantlydifferentfromthenativespeakers;②Chineselearnersofthemostfrequentlyusedconjunctionswhich;③thannativespeakers,learningtendtoomuch,toolittleuseofwhatconjunctions;④Chineselearnersuseinconjunctionwithwhatthemainproblems.

3.ConjunctionscaleHallidayandHasan’sclassificationofconnectedwordhasbeenrecognizedasahigherauthority.Celce-MurciaandLarsen-FreemanofHallidayandHasan’sclassificationhasbeensimplifiedinthisstudyusedCelce-MurciaandLarsen-Freeman’sclassification[7],minoradjustmentsonthisbasis,theformationofscaleinvestigationoftheconjunction.

4.ResearchproceduresUseofcorpusanalysissoftwareWordsmithTools4.0andSocialSciencesstatisticalsoftwareSPSSforcorpusprocessinganddataanalysis.Concretestepsareasfollows:

①theWordlistrunWordsmithTools4.0features,statistics,threecorpusofinformation,②therunWordsmithTools4.0Concordfunctiontoretrievetheconnectionofeachcorpusinthefrequencyofwordsandtheircontextinformation,andthenby-caseexaminationtoexcludeirrelevantevidence.tothen,forexample,itcontainsmorethanonemeaning,thentheuseofartificialmeanstoidentify,screening,③calculatethestandardconnectivesfrequencyper100,000wordsinthefrequencyappearstofacilitatethestatistics,contrast,④runSPSSinconjunctionChi-Squaretestcorpusindifferentfrequencydifferences.

Third,theresultsandanalysis1.Theresults（AgeneraltendencyWordsintheinvestigationofvarioustypesofconnections,thesamewithnativespeakers,mostChineselearnersuseconnectivestoindicatetherelationshipbetweenaddition,theuseofthewordstheproportionofnearlyhalfofthetotalconnections,theChi-Squaretest,x2=19.9709,p=0.000<0.05,showslearnersandnativespeakersinconjunctionwiththeexistenceofsignificantdifferencesinfrequency,thenumberoflearnersconjunctionwithsignificantlymorethannativespeakers.

（2mostfrequentlyusedconjunctionsChineselearnersandnativespeakersofthetwocorporausedinconjunctionslightlydifferentorder,butthelearnersmostfrequentlyusedwordsinthetop10ineightnativespeakersusethewordinthefirst10,thatconnectlearnersandnativespeakersinthechoiceofwordshavegreatsimilarity,bothtendtousealso,forexample/instance,however,then,therefore,inaddition,first（ly）/firstofall,thusconnectingtheseeightwords,thissurveyatotalof68conjunctions,frequencyofuseamongthetop10wordsaboutone-seventhofthetotalsurvey,however,theirfrequencyofusewasashighastheactualtermsofthetotalsurveytwo-thirdsormore（65.6%and73.3%）,indicatingthatbothnativespeakers,ortheChineselearners,theyareverydependentonwritinginconnectionwithasmallpartofthepromptwordstothereadersbeforeandafterthestatement,betweenthecontentthelogicallink,inordertoguidethereaderinterprettheinformationcontentofthearticleandtheintentionofwritingwiththefindingsofLuoadifferenceisthatthisstudydatashowthatnativespeakerstendtousemorethanafewlearnerstoseveralconnectives,whichalsorankedfirstinthewordoftherelativefrequencyofuseisashighas26.7%,thereasontodoalittlelatertodiscuss.

（3highandlowfrequencyconjunctionsThepracticeofdrawingpaperQiufang[8]（P150-156）,with10millionwordsfortheunit,andthencompareseachconnectedwordsappearinthetwocorporastandardfrequencyifthefrequencydifferenceof10orless,thenignored.Thestatistics,first（ly）,second（ly）,third（ly）,fourth（ly）,thatis,inaddition,moreoverin10wordsintheChineselearnercorpusinthefrequencyhigherthannativespeakers,also,however,similarly,andinturn4expressions.frequencyofusethanthelatter.Whetheritisfromthenumberofwords,orfromtheuseofthefrequencypointofview,learnerstendtousethehighsideoftheconnectiontermslessthanthetendencyismoreobvious.

2.AnalysisandDiscussionCorpusretrievalanddatainterpretationshowsthattheChinesewrittenlanguagelearnerstoconnectthewordsusedsignificantlymorethannativespeakers.MorewhatistheChineselearnersusingconjunctionsuniquepersonalitytraits,orthesecondlanguagelearnerinterlanguagedevelopmentprocesstherecommonproblems?

Forthisreason,Ijointheinternationallearnercorpustobeincontrol,expecttobeabletohelpdescribetheproblem.Asnotedabove,thecorpusofthesampleoflearnersfromdifferentcountries,Masterthesiscomposition,fromacertainsense,theyarerepresentativesofmanysecondlanguagelearners.searchfoundinternationallearnersuseconnectivesstandardfrequencyisveryclosetoChineselearners（1370and1400,Chineselearnerstendtousemorewordsinthefirst10connections,9andconsistentwithinternationallearners,andbothmoreandlessuseofthewordintheaveragestandardrateisalsoverysimilar（62and67.Inviewofthis,thewholesituation,itcanbesaidisthetendencyofexcessiveuseofconjunctionssecondlanguagedevelopmentoflearnerinterlanguagecommon,itisdifficulttoavoidthenon-nativefeatures,thisdevelopmentisnotshownbecauseofthecommonalityoflanguagelearnersappearverydifferentbackgroundandthesametime,althoughbothexcessiveuseofconjunctionsalmostthesame,butsomespecificwords