reflection on language testing.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:30057399 上传时间:2023-08-04 格式:DOCX 页数:8 大小:40.04KB
下载 相关 举报
reflection on language testing.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
reflection on language testing.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共8页
reflection on language testing.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共8页
reflection on language testing.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共8页
reflection on language testing.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共8页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

reflection on language testing.docx

《reflection on language testing.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《reflection on language testing.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

reflection on language testing.docx

reflectiononlanguagetesting

ReflectionsonLanguageTesting

Languagetesting,authoredbyTimMcnamara,isdividedintoeightchapters.Thereisacloserelationshipamongthem.Theyformawholepart.Next,Iwillwriteasummaryforeachoftheminthefollowingparagraphs.

Chapteronepresentsuswiththedefinitionoflanguagetesting,typesoftest,testpurpose,thecriterionandthetest-criterionrelationship.Weallknowthattestingisauniversalfeatureofsociallife.Testingforpurposesofdetectionortoestablishidentityhasbecomeanacceptedpartofsport(drugstesting),thelaw(DNAtests,paternitytests,liedetectiontests),andotherfields.Testtoseehowapersonperformsparticularlyinrelationtoathresholdofperformancehavebecomeimportantsocialinstitutionsandfulfillagatekeepingfunctioninthattheycontrolentrytomanyimportantsocialroles.Whatistrueoftestingingeneralistrueoflanguagetesting.Languagetestingplaysapowerfulroleinmanypeople’slives,actingasgatewaysatimportanttransitionalmomentsineducation,inemployment,andinmovingfromonecountrytoanother.Sincelanguagetestsaredevicesfortheinstitutionalcontrolofindividuals,itisclearlyimportantthattheyshouldbeunderstood,andsubjectedtoscrutiny.Therefore,anunderstandingoflanguagetestingisrelevantbothforthoseactuallyinvolvedincreatinglanguagetests,andalsomoregenerallyforthoseinvolvedinusingtestsorcontexts.Notalllanguagetestsareofthesamekind.Intermsofmethod,wecanbroadlydistinguishtraditionalpaper-and-pencillanguagetestsfromperformancetests.Paper-and-pencillanguageteststaketheformofthefamiliarexaminationquestionpaper.Theyareusuallyusedforassessmenteitherofseparatecomponentsoflanguageknowledge(grammar,vocabulary,etc.)orofthereceptiveunderstanding(listeningandreadingcomprehension).Inperformancebasedtests,languageskillsareassessedinanactofcommunication.Performancetestsaremostcommonlytestsofspeakingandwriting,inwhichamoreorlessextendedsampleofspeechorwritingiselicitedfromthetest-taker,andjudgedbyoneormoretrainedratesusinganagreedratingprocedure.Languagetestsalsodifferaccordingtotheirpurpose.Achievementtestsareassociatedwiththeprocessofinstructionandproficiencytestslookstothefuturesituationoflanguageusewithoutnecessarilyanyreferencetothepreviousprocessofteaching.Testsarebasedontheoriesofthenatureoflanguageuseinthetargetsettingandthewayinwhichthisisunderstoodwillbereflectedintestdesign.

Chaptertwointroducescommunicationandthedesignoflanguagetests.Thetermtestconstructreferstothoseaspectsofknowledgeorskillpassedbythecandidatewhicharemeasured.Therewasatendencytoatomizeanddecontextualizetheknowledgetobetested,andtotestaspectsofknowledgetobetested,andtotestaspectsofknowledgeinisolation.Materialtobetestedwaspresentedwithminimalcontext,forexampleinanisolatedsentence.Thispracticeoftestingseparate,individualpointsofknowledge,knownasdiscretepointtesting,wasreinforcedbytheoryandpracticewithinpsychometrics,theemergingscienceofthemeasurementofcognitiveability.Thediscretepointtraditionoftestingwasseenasfocusingtooexclusivelyonknowledgeoftheformallinguisticsystemforitsownsakeratherthanonthewaysuchknowledgeisusedoachievecommunication.Theneworientationresultedinthedevelopmentoftestswhichintegratedknowledgeofrelevantsystematicfeaturesoflanguage(pronunciation,grammar,vocabulary)withanunderstandingofcontext.FurtherOllerproposedwhatcametotheknownastheUnitaryCompetenceHypothesis,thatis,thatperformanceonthewholerangeoftests(whichhetermedpragmatictests)dependedonthesameunderlyingcapacityinthelearner---theabilitytointegrategrammatical,lexical,contextual,andpragmaticknowledgeintestperformance.Hearguedthatcertainkindsofmoreeconomicalandefficienttests,particularlytheclozetest,measuredthesamekindsofskillsasthosetestedinproductivetestsofthetypeslistedabove.Itseemsthattherearenoshortcutsinthetestingofcommunicativeskills.Fromtheearly1970s,anewtheoryoflanguageandlanguageusebegantoexertasignificantinfluenceonlanguageteachingandpotentiallyonlanguagetesting.ThiswasHymes’stheoryofcommunicativecompetence,whichgreatlyexpandedthescopeofwhatwascoveredbyanunderstandingoflanguageandtheabilitytouselanguageincontext,particularlyintermsofthesocialdemandsofperformance.Variousaspectsofknowledgeofcompetencewerespecifiedintheearly1980sbyMichaelCanaleandMerrillSwaininCanada:

grammaticalorformalcompetence,sociolinguisticcompetencestrategiccompetence,anddiscoursecompetence.Furtheryearsofdiscussionandreflectiononthisframeworkhaveledtoitsmoredetailedreformulation.Thisreworkingoftheideaofstrategiccompetencehasimportantimplicationsforassessment.Anotherdevelopmenthasbeentheattempttocharacterizetherealtasksinthecriterionsituationidentifiedthroughjobanalysisintermsoftheaspectofabilityorskilltheycallupon.

Chapterthreetellsushowtodesignandintroduceatest,whichinvolvesadesignstage,aconstructionstageandatry-outstage.Beforetheybeginthinkingindetailaboutthedesignofatest,testdeveloperswillneedtogetthelayoftheland,thatis,toestablishtheconstraintsunderwhichtheyareworking,andunderwhichthetestwillbeadministered.Fromapracticalpointofviewtestdesignbeginswithdecisionsabouttestcontent,whatwillgointothetest.Establishingtestcontentinvolvescarefulsamplingfromthedomainofthetest,thatis,thetestofthetasksortasksorthekindsofbehaviorsinthecriterionsetting,asinformedbyourunderstandingofthetestconstruct.Thenextthingtoconsiderintestdesignisthewayinwhichcandidateswillberequiredtoresponsetothematerials.Onceagain,testdesigninvolvesasortofprincipledcompromise.Alldesignsabouttestmethodinsuchacontextinevitablyinvolveacompromisebetweenthedesirabilityofanappearanceofauthenticityontheonehandandthepracticalitiesimposedbythetestsituationontheotherhand.Notethatthewayweresolvethiscompromisemayhavetheundesiredeffectofjeopardizingthefairnessoftheconclusionswereachaboutindividualcandidates.Obviously,asassessmentbecomesmoreauthentic,italsobecomesmoreexpensive,complex,andpotentiallyunwieldy.Analternativetograpplingwiththedilemmaofauthenticityofresponseinvolvesacceptingtoagreaterorlesserdegreetheartificialityofthetestsituation,andusingarangeofconventionalandpossiblyinauthentictestformats.Theresultofthedesignprocessintermsoftestcontentandtestmethodisthecreationoftestspecifications.Thefourthstageistrailingortryingoutthetestmaterialsandprocedurespriortotheiruseunderoperationalconditions.Thisstageinvolvescarefuldesignofdatacollectiontoseehowwellthetestisworking.Inaddition,test-takerfeedbackshouldbegatheredfromthetrialsubjects,oftenbyasimplequestionnaire.Materialsandprocedureswillberevisedinthelightofthetrials,inpreparationfortheoperationaluseofthetest.Inthischapterwehaveexaminedtheprocessthroughwhichatestingprocedureisconceptualized,developed,andputintooperation.

Chapterfourdiscussestheratingprocess.Therearethreeaspectsofthevalidationofratingprocedure:

theestablishmentofratingprotocols;exploringdifferencesbetweenindividualraters,andmitigatingtheireffects;andunderstandinginteractionsbetweenratersandotherfeaturesoftheratingprocess.Rater-mediatedassessmentisbecomingmoreandmorecentraltolanguagelearningandteaching.Rater-mediatedassessmentisalsoinlinewithinstitutionaldemandsforaccountabilityineducation,asoutcomesofeducationalprocessesareoftendescribedintermsofdemonstrablepracticalcompetenceinthelearner.Introducingtheraterintotheassessmentprocessisbothnecessaryandproblematic.Itisproblematicbecauseratingsarenecessarilysubjective.Inestablishingaratingprocedure,weneedtoconsiderthecriteriabywhichperformanceatagivenlevelwillberecognized,andthentodecidehowmanydifferentlevelsofperformancewewishtodistinguish.Itisusefultoviewachievementasacontinuum.Theassessmentisessentiallynotcompetitive.Thefunctionoftheassessmentatagivenlevelisnottomakedistinctionsbetweencandidates,otherthanabinarydistinctionbetweenthosewhomeettherequirementsofthelevelandthosewhodonot.Mostoften,frameworksforratingaredesignedasscales,asthisallowsthegreatestflexibilitytotheusers,whomaywanttousethemultipledistinctionsavailablefromascale,orwhomaychoosetofocusononlyonecut-pointorregionofthescale.Thepreparationofthescaleinvolvesdevelopingleveldescriptors.Animportantaspectofascaleisthewayinwhichperformanceatthetopendofthescaleisdefined.Thenumberoflevelsonaratingscaleisalsoanimportantmattertoconsider.Thissinglereportingscalemaymaintainitsanalyticorientationinthattheoverallcharacterizationofaleveldescriptionmayconsistofawavingtogetherofstrandsrelatingtoseparateaspectsofperformance.Animportantwaytoimprovethequalityofrater-mediatedassessmentschemesistoprovideinitialandtrainingtoraters.Thisusuallytakestheformofamoderationmeeting.Moderationmeetinghasthefunctionofbringingaboutbroadagreementontherel

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 考试认证 > 交规考试

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1