英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx

上传人:b****4 文档编号:27023578 上传时间:2023-06-25 格式:DOCX 页数:10 大小:21.53KB
下载 相关 举报
英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共10页
英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共10页
英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共10页
英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共10页
英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共10页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx

《英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论.docx

英语辩论稿范本北京外国语大学英语专业议会制辩论

DEBATES

THISHOUSEBELIEVESTHATHOUSEWIVESSHOULDBEPAIDFORTHEIRWORK

Housewivesareentitledtopay

Thephilosophicalbasisofentitlementforpayisderivedfromthenotionthatifsomethingcomesintobeingastheproductofanindividual’slabor,thenthatindividualisentitledtotheprofitandbenefitofsuchaproductbecauseitsexistencewasresultantofthatindividual’slabor[1].Thatinthiscasethelaborisonservicesdoesnotmakeanydifference,theproductofthehousewife’slaboristhatthechildrenarelookedafteranddomesticmattersareallsorted.Thisisbeneficialtosocietyashousewivesinadditiontohelpingtheirownfamilyarelikelytohavethetimetohelpoutothers–throughvolunteering,throughlookingafterother’schildrenafterschooletc.

Itisestimatedthatthevalueofahousemaker’sserviceswouldbeequivalenttoapproximately£30,000peryear[2].Inthesamewaythatanyproductorserviceiscreated,offeredormanufacturedbyindividualworkers,theservicesofhome-keepingaredeliveredbythelaborofthehome-keeper.Justasallworkersareentitledtoremunerationforthegoodsandservicestheycreate,soisahousewifeissoentitledforthehouse-keepingservicestheyoffer.

Notalllaborisrewardedwithwagesorpaydespitethefactthatgoodsandservicesareproductsofsaidlabor.Forexample,voluntaryandcharityworkarebothtypesoflaborthatisnotpaid.Thedistinctioniswheretheworkisdoneandtheobligationsowedtopeopleasaresult.Home-keepingisavoluntaryjobthathasitsownformsofremuneration(familyconnectionsetc.)inthesamewaythatvolunteeringandcharityworkdo(e.g.feelingasthoughyouarepartofsomethinglarger).

 

Payinghousewivespromotesmorepositiveimagesofwomenandfamilylife

Genderstereotypesdictatethatthewoman’splaceisinthehomeandthatthatisaninferiorpositioninthesocialhierarchythanthatofthemale’scorporatebread-winnerstatus.Thestereotypeisparticularlydamagingtowomen’sexpectationsforthemselvesandthewaysocietytreatswomen.

Bypayinghousewivesfortheirwork,agreateremphasisisplacedontheroleofthehome-keeperandonthewomenthattendtothisjob.Itelevatesthepositionofwomeninthehouseholdbyeconomicallyempoweringthemandgivingthemtheverythingthatusuallyimpliesthegreaterimportanceofthebread-winnersinthefamily(economicpowerandstatus).Moreover,itelevatessocietalviewsofhousewivesandhome-keepersbyvaluingtheircontributionstothehouseholdandsocietyinatangible,monetarywaythatsocietycaresabout.

Payinghousewivesfortheirworkgrantsgreatersocialstatusandpowertowomenandfamilylives,whichimprovesviewsofwomenandtherolestheytakeinthefamily.

Payinghousewiveswouldnotmakemuchdifferencetoimagesofwomenandfamilylife,andcouldevenmakethingsworseratherthanbetter.Bypayinghousewives,monetizingthepositionofhousewifeandhome-keeper,thestatere-affirmstheideathattheonlytruevalueapersoncanholdisaneconomiconeandthattheonlywaytoassessandquantifythevalueofanindividualortheirimpactisthroughfinancialmeans.Re-enforcingsuchafinancial-centricversionofworthandvalueisdangeroustohousewives,who,byanyreasonableexpectation,willnevermakeasmuchasprivate-sectorprofessionalssuchasCEOs.Itsimplyre-enforcestheinferiorityofhouse-keepingandtheroleofthefamilyunitinsociety.

Thispaygapsimplyre-affirmsprejudiceandbiasoftheinferiorityofhome-keepingasaprofessionandgivestangibleevidencetosupportthisbyplacingamonetaryvalueonwhathousewivesdoandinevitablynotincludingthenon-monetarybenefits,suchasthechildrenhavingtheirmothertotakethemhomefromschool.

Keepingadivisionbetweenthemoney-ledeconomicworldandthelove-drivenfamilyworldisbeneficialtothefamilydynamicandtheperceptionsofallthoseinvolved.

Payinghousewivesfortheirworkisanimportantformofeconomicempowerment.

Oneofthemostimportantfactorsofoppressionofwomen’srights,particularlyinthedevelopingworld,isdependence[1].Womenareoftenconfinedtothehomebyforce,lackofopportunityorsocialstigma,onbehalfoftheirhusbands.Whensheisnotpaid,ahousewifemustrelyonherhusbandformoney,especiallyifshehaschildrensheisexpectedtotakecareof.Economicempowermentallowsfurtherfreedomforwomenincountrieswherewomenareconfinedtothehome[2].Bymakingwomeneconomicactors,youempowerthemtoengageindifferentsocialstructuresandholdastakeandpositioninthecentresofeconomicpower.Thisisthemostempoweringtoolonecanofferwomeninmostcountriesaroundtheworld[3].

Bypayinghousewivesfortheirwork,youofferoneofthemostpowerfulformsofsocialempowermentforwomenaroundtheworld.

Itishighlyunlikelythatthiscanbeimplementedinanycountrywherefemaleempowermentisasrestrictedasisdiscussed.Ifwomenareasdependentandoppressedasthepropositionsuggests,thepoliticalwilltopasssuchlegislationwillnotexist.Evenifalawwerepassed,thepaywouldbeverylow,andsothewifewouldstillrelyonthehusband’sincome.

Paymentandobligationworksdifferentlyinpublicandinprivate.

Theeconomicsphereandtheprivate(family)spherehaveseparateobligationsandsystemsofcontracts.Thewayinwhichtheeconomicsystemworksisthatgenerallypeoplearepaidfortheirlaborbythosewhobenefitfromit,eitherdirectlyorindirectly.Thisisamutualrelationshipofmonetary-laborexchange.Inthefamilysphere,thecontractsarebasedonpersonalobligationandthefamilyunitasopposedtoindividualcontractionofservices.Thefamilyunitisapre-existingrelationshipnotcreatedonlabor-payagreements.Individualsoptintobeingaparentinafamilyunitonavoluntarybasisandwithnoexpectationorpretenceofreturnfortheirservices,exceptperhapsfromtheirchildreninthefuture.Remunerationiscreatedintheformofafunctioning,rewardingfamilyunitandfamilylifeandtheproductsandservicesproducedareofnoquantifiablemonetaryvaluenorcantheybesoldordotheycreatewealth.Becausehousewivesdonotlaborforanybodyoutsideoftheirhousehold,theyshouldnotbepaidbyanybodyoutsideoftheirfamily.Moreovermostoftheworkthathousewivesdowouldhavetobedonebyamemberofthefamilyunitregardlessofwhethereveryonewasalsoengagedinmonetizedwork–therewouldstillneedtobewashing,cleaning,shoppingetcdone.

Housewivesdonotexistasworkersintheeconomicsphereastheydonotcreateamonetizedproductwiththeirlaborandoptintotheagreementonvoluntarynon-monetarybases.Assuch,theyarenotentitledtopay.

Thejobofhousewivesprovidesanessentialservicetosociety—toraiseahealthyfamily—andsothosewhoperformthejobshouldbepaid.Evenifaproductorserviceisnoteconomicallyquantifiable,thepersonwhoprovidesitmayhavecreatedsomethingthatotherwisewouldnotexistthroughtheexertionoftheirlabor.Moreover,simplybecausetheyneverhadanoptiontooptintoamonetizedagreementorexchangedoesnotmeanthattheydonotdeservesuchanoptioninthefutureorthattheirservicesarenoteconomicallyvaluable,andthus,entitlesthemtowages.

Payinghousewivesreducessocialmobility

Bypayinghousewivesfortheirwork,youcreatenegativestereotypesaboutfamiliesandwomenbycommodifyingtheroleofhome-keeper.Payinghousewivesfortheirworkre-enforcestheveryframeworkthatisseenasoppressiveonhome-keepers.Itcreatesasysteminwhichwomenareevenmorestronglyexpectedtobehousewivesthantheyarenow,ratherthanseekingoutcareerjobswithupwardmobility.Theresultisthatwomenarediscouragedfromseekingtofulfiltheirowndreamsbycreatingtheirowncareersastheyaremorefirmlychainedtotheirtraditionalrole.Thisisdamagingtosocietalviewsofwomenandthefamily.

Asaresultthefullpotentialofmanymorewomenwillnotbereached.AsisthecaseinSaudiArabiawomenarelikelytobeverywelleducatedbutthenhavetheireducationandtalentswastedbybeingexpectedtoremaininthehome.[1]Thiswouldneitherbegoodfortheindividualsinvolvedortheeconomyasawhole.

 

Payinghousewivesawagewouldimprovenotreducesocialmobility.Manywomenwouldstillchoosetogotouniversityandthevastmajoritywhodowillstillwanttowork.Payinghousewiveswillnotpreventanywomenwhowantstoworkfromworking.Ratheritwillsimplyprovideanotheroptionforthosewhowishtodevotethemselvesfulltimetotheirfamily.Thiswillgivethesewomensomefinancialfreedomgivingthemmoreopportunitiestoeducatethemselvesandtheirchildrensothattheycangetabetterjobthantheyotherwisewouldwhentheynolongerwishtojustbeahousewife.

Payinghousewivesisfinanciallyimpractical.

Anarticleinapopularonlinenewspaperquestionedhowonecouldputapricetagonhouseholdwork.“Doesshegetpaidextraforcookingupanelaboratebirthdaydinner,asopposedtodishinguptheusualdalchawal?

”ActivistMayaJohnprovidesadifferentsolutioninheropinionpieceinTheHindu,“Insteadofaskingamantopayhiswifeforherdomesticwork,thestatemustcreatejobsforwomenoutsidethehomeinordertotrulyempowerthem.”

Sadhguru:

Themostbasicstructureofthesocialunitisthefamily.Fortunatelysofar,thegovernmenthashadthewisdomtostayaway,keeptheirhandsoffthefamily,becausetheyknowtheywillmessitup.Butitlookslikenowtheywanttoenteryourfamilyintheguiseofgivingjusticetowomen.Youneedtounderstandone

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 高中教育 > 语文

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1