Analysis of feasibility of the implementation of the teaching of the gas Volleyball College girls sp.docx

Analysis of feasibility of the implementation of the teaching of the gas Volleyball College girls sp.docx

《Analysis of feasibility of the implementation of the teaching of the gas Volleyball College girls sp.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Analysis of feasibility of the implementation of the teaching of the gas Volleyball College girls sp.docx（6页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

AnalysisoffeasibilityoftheimplementationoftheteachingofthegasVolleyballCollegegirlssp

AnalysisoffeasibilityoftheimplementationoftheteachingofthegasVolleyballCollegegirlssportscourses

[Abstract]gasVolleyballincreasinglymoderncollegegirlspsychological,physiologicalcharacteristicsandrequirementsfit,thepurposeofthisresearchistoexplorethegasVolleyballsuitableasateachingreformincollegevolleyballgirlscarriedoutafeasibilitylevel,atthesametimeasgasvolleyballCollegegirlscarriedouttoprovideatheoreticalandpracticalbasis.

[Keywords]theordinaryuniversitiesgasvolleyballteachingcurriculumimplementationfeasibility

Anobjectofstudyandmethods

1.1TheobjectofstudySuzhouUniversityVolleyballingeneralrepairclassesrandomlyselectedtwo,oneastheexperimentalclass,oneasthecontrolclasses.

1.2ResearchMethod1.2.1literaturedata;mathematicalstatistics1.2.2questionnaireQuestionnairesitereleaseandrecyclinginperson,bymailappointedtimerecoveryandcommissioneddeliveredtotheteachers,recoveredintheformofpaymentofstudents,teachers,expertsintotalof543questionnaireswerereturned528,andthetotalrecoveryof97.24%,aftertheeffectiverateofrecoveryabove80%.

1.2.3TeachingexperimentalmethodExperimentalclassesandcontrolclassesstudentsfitnessteachingbeforetheexperiment（100mrun,standinglongjump,throwthemedicineball）,volleyballtechnicalbasisofthelevelofprocessingthedatafoundintheexperimentalclassesandcontrolclassesthereisnosignificantdifference（P>0.05belongtothesameoverall.

2results

Resultsandanalysisofthe2.1VolleyballCourseExerciseIntensity

2.1.1gasVolleyballlessonthehardVolleyballCourse（courseExerciseIntensityComparativeAnalysisSubjectiveperformanceandobjectiveperformanceoftheexperimentalclassesandcontrolclassesthestudentmovementloadstrengthisbasicallythesame,thereisnosignificantdifferencecomparedtothelowside,thelessonfullloadstrengthofthestudentmovementoftheGasVolleyballExerciseIntensitythanthehardvolleyballlessonstudents,butthereisnosignificantdifference.

2.1.2gasVolleyballlessonandHardVolleyballTeachingduringthegamestudentsExerciseIntensityforcomparisonanalysisTheprocessofteachingthegame,theGasVolleyballExerciseIntensitythanHardVolleyballExerciseIntensity,boththeexistenceofsignificantdifferences,thereasonforthisdifferenceisduetothebettertheGasVolleyballcontinuityrace,bettermobilizeTheenthusiasmofthestudentstoparticipate,studentsExerciseIntensityalsothecorrespondinglarger.

2.2GasVolleyballHardVolleyballcompetitioneffectsanalysis（①experimentalgroup1andexperimentalgroup2averageevery1minute,thetwosidestouchtheballmorefrequently,andamaximumof9and5,respectively,wereaverageand1.35times.

②controlgroupandthecontrolgroupaverageof1minuteeach,bothsidesballfewerhighestonly5timesand3times,respectively,anaverageof0.60timesand0.46times.

（2①experimentalgroup1andexperimentalgroup2averageper1minutebackandforththeballmorefrequently,upto5timesand3times,respectively,0.390and0.396timesaverage.

②controlgroupandthecontrolgroupaverageof1pointpernumberofbackandforththeballrarely,almostnobackandforthtotheball,thehighestwaseachtime,anaverageofonly0.09timesand0.07times.

（3①experimentalgroupandthecontrolgroupaveragepergameteeshotandthesame,at11.5,theproportionaccountedfor46.0%and43.8%,respectively,thereisnosignificantdifference.

②experimentalgroup2andcontrolgroupdifferencebetweentheaverageeachfaultyservicerateBureaularger,7.5and11,respectively,theproportionaccountedfor28.3%and45.8%,respectively,thereisasignificantdifference.

③experimentalgroup1andexperimentalgroup2serveerrorsrateisrelativelylow,averagepergame,respectively,2.25and1.50,withthecontrolgroup（4.25andcontrolgroup2（3existsignificantdifference.

Bytheanalysis,thecontinuityofthegasvolleyballgame,thegameisbetterabletobettermobilizetheemotionsoftheparticipants.

The2.3gasvolleyballwithHardVolleyballgameeffectivelyserveinthecomparativeanalysisofthetime-of-flight

（1experimentalgroup1andexperimentalgroup2effectivelyservetheaverageflighttimeis4.17secondsand3.68seconds,respectively,thanthatofthecontrolgroup1（3.01seconds,thecontrolgroup2（3.02secondsrespectivelygrow1.16secondsand0.66seconds,thereisasignificantdifference.

（2experimentalgroup1andexperimentalgroup2effectivelyservethemaximumflighttimeof13.77secondsand9.22seconds,comparedwiththecontrolgroup（5.41seconds,thecontrolgroup（5.43secondsgrow8.36secondsand3.79seconds,therewasasignificantdifferences.

（3experimentalgroupandtheexperimentalgroupeffectivelyservetheshortestflighttimeis1.06secondsand1.28seconds,respectively,inthecontrolgroupandthecontrolgroup（1.08seconds2（1.13secondsthereisnosignificantdifference.

AnalysisandHardVolleyball,thecontinuityofthegasvolleyballgamebetterandmorenaturallyraisetheinterestofthestudents.

2.4GasVolleyballHardVolleyballCompetitionprocesstechnologyapplicationanalysis

（1）GasVolleyballandHardVolleyballgame,usethehighestproportionoftechnologyarepadtheballwithbothhands,accountingfor43.53%and75.75%,respectively,thereisasignificantdifference.

BalloonVolleyballandHardVolleyballCompetition

（2）,theuseofhandspassratiois31.18%and6.06%respectively,thedifferenceof25.12%,thereisasignificantdifference.

（3BalloonVolleyballwithHardVolleyballgame,usingtheproportionofsingle-armbattingis4.12%and9.09%,respectively,difference4.97%,thereisasignificantdifference.

（4gasVolleyballHardVolleyballCompetition,theuseofasinglehandpassratiois6.47%and1.52%,thedifferenceof4.95%,thereisasignificantdifference.

（5gasVolleyballTeachinggame,aswellasthetechnologyofitsowncharacteristics,suchashandsturnDingqiutechnologyandbothhandstheballtechnology,theuseratioof4.12%and9.41%,respectively.

（6BalloonVolleyballwithHardVolleyballgameinlessspikingtheuseoftechnology,theonlygasvolleyballteachingthegametousemorethan2times,accountingfor1.17%,thereisasignificantdifference.

Analysisshows,thehardvolleyballgameintechnologyuserathermonotonous,withouttheuseofgasvolleyballgametechnologyrichtechnicalmasteryandapplication,comparedwithHardVolleyballgasVolleyballeasiertomasteroperation.PostedinthefreepapersDownloadCenterhttp:

//2.5GasVolleyballandHardVolleyballTechniquetograspthesituationanalysis

PasspadballtechnologyassessmentusingDoublepassormatball,recordingtheeffectivenumberofsimultaneous,consecutivepassorpadball28standard,50outofthetechnicalevaluation.ServetechnologycontinuouslyTheassessmentusedsinglecontinuousfateffectivelyservearea10balltorecordeffectivelyservenumber,effectivelyservethefivestandards,10outoftechnologyassessmentatthesametime.

2.5.1passingtechniquestomaster,gasVolleyballcompliancerateissignificantlyhigherthantheHardVolleyball,boththeexistenceofsignificantdifferences

（1gasvolleyballpassingtechniquescomplianceratewas91.18%,theandHardVolleyballpassingtechnicalcompliancerateofonly86.67percent,thedifferenceof4.51%,thepresenceofsignificantdifferences.

Seengasvolleyballpassingcompliancerateissignificantlyhigherthanthecontrolstudents,boththeexistenceofsignificantdifferences,suchdifferencesbecausethesametime,andHardVolleyballgasvolleyballpassingtechniqueseasiertograsp.

2.5.2inDigsisconcerned,HardVolleyball’scompliancerateissignificantlyhigherthanthegasvolleyball,boththeexistenceofsignificantdifferences

Theairvolleyballtechnicalcomplianceratewas77%,HardVolleyballDigscomplianceratewas80%,thedifferenceof3%,thereisasignificantdifference.

Analysis,hardvolleyballcomplianceratewassignificantlyhigherthanthegasvolleyball,boththeexistenceofsignificantdifferences.

2.5.3servetechnicalmastery,gasvolleyballcomplianceratescoresignificantlyhigherthantheHardVolleyball,boththeexistenceofsignificantdifferences

GasVolleyballServetechnicalcomplianceratewas94.12%,HardVolleyballservetechnicalcomplianceratewas83.33%,10.97%differences,thereweresignificantdifferences.

Analysis,gasVolleyballServecomplianceratewassignificantlybetterthanthehardvolleyball,boththeexistenceofsignificantdifferences.

Testscoresbyteachingexperiment,theexperimentalclasstechnologyachievementsintermsofpassing,servesignificantlyhigherthanthecontrolclass,butislowerthanthatofthecontrolclassesinmatballreachedthelevelofsignificanceofthedifferentdegreesofdifferencebetweenthetwo.

3Conclusion

The3.1GasVolleyballlessonfullandessentialpartofExerciseIntensitywasslightlylowerthanthehardvolleyballclasses,butthereisnosignificantdifferenceintheprocessofteachingthegame,theGasVolleyballExerciseIntensityHardVolleyballlargerbothsignificantlinedifferences.

3.2GasVolleyballTeachinggameinaverageper1timesharingbothballnumberof1-ballperround-trips,andtheissueofthetimeofflightoftheballmuchbetterthanHardVolleyball,boththeexistenceofsignificant