Analysis of feasibility of the implementation of the teaching of the gas Volleyball College girls sp.docx

1、Analysis of feasibility of the implementation of the teaching of the gas Volleyball College girls sp Analysis of feasibility of the implementation of the teaching of the gas Volleyball College girls sports coursesAbstract gas Volleyball increasingly modern college girls psychological, physiological

2、characteristics and requirements fit, the purpose of this research is to explore the gas Volleyball suitable as a teaching reform in college volleyball girls carried out a feasibility level, at the same time as gas volleyball College girls carried out to provide a theoretical and practical basis. Ke

3、ywords the ordinary universities gas volleyball teaching curriculum implementation feasibility An object of study and methods 1.1 The object of study Suzhou University Volleyball in general repair classes randomly selected two, one as the experimental class, one as the control classes. 1.2 Research

4、Method 1.2.1 literature data; mathematical statistics 1.2.2 questionnaire Questionnaire site release and recycling in person, by mail appointed time recovery and commissioned delivered to the teachers, recovered in the form of payment of students, teachers, experts in total of 543 questionnaires wer

5、e returned 528, and the total recovery of 97.24%, after the effective rate of recovery above 80%. 1.2.3 Teaching experimental method Experimental classes and control classes students fitness teaching before the experiment (100 m run, standing long jump, throw the medicine ball), volleyball technical

6、 basis of the level of processing the data found in the experimental classes and control classes there is no significant difference (P> 0.05 belong to the same overall. 2 results Results and analysis of the 2.1 Volleyball Course Exercise Intensity 2.1.1 gas Volleyball lesson the hard Volleyball C

7、ourse (course Exercise Intensity Comparative Analysis Subjective performance and objective performance of the experimental classes and control classes the student movement load strength is basically the same, there is no significant difference compared to the low side, the lesson full load strength

8、of the student movement of the Gas Volleyball Exercise Intensity than the hard volleyball lesson students, but there is no significant difference. 2.1.2 gas Volleyball lesson and Hard Volleyball Teaching during the game students Exercise Intensity for comparison analysis The process of teaching the

9、game, the Gas Volleyball Exercise Intensity than Hard Volleyball Exercise Intensity, both the existence of significant differences, the reason for this difference is due to the better the Gas Volleyball continuity race, better mobilize The enthusiasm of the students to participate, students Exercise

10、 Intensity also the corresponding larger. 2.2 Gas Volleyball Hard Volleyball competition effects analysis ( experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 average every 1 minute, the two sides touch the ball more frequently, and a maximum of 9 and 5, respectively, were average and 1.35 times. control

11、 group and the control group average of 1 minute each, both sides ball fewer highest only 5 times and 3 times, respectively, an average of 0.60 times and 0.46 times. (2 experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 average per 1 minute back and forth the ball more frequently, up to 5 times and 3 tim

12、es, respectively, 0.390 and 0.396 times average. control group and the control group average of 1 point per number of back and forth the ball rarely, almost no back and forth to the ball, the highest was each time, an average of only 0.09 times and 0.07 times. (3 experimental group and the control g

13、roup average per game tee shot and the same, at 11.5, the proportion accounted for 46.0% and 43.8%, respectively, there is no significant difference. experimental group 2 and control group difference between the average each faulty service rate Bureau larger, 7.5 and 11, respectively, the proportion

14、 accounted for 28.3% and 45.8%, respectively, there is a significant difference. experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 serve errors rate is relatively low, average per game, respectively, 2.25 and 1.50, with the control group (4.25 and control group 2 (3 exist significant difference. By the

15、analysis, the continuity of the gas volleyball game, the game is better able to better mobilize the emotions of the participants. The 2.3 gas volleyball with Hard Volleyball game effectively serve in the comparative analysis of the time-of-flight (1 experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 effe

16、ctively serve the average flight time is 4.17 seconds and 3.68 seconds, respectively, than that of the control group 1 (3.01 seconds, the control group 2 (3.02 seconds respectively grow 1.16 seconds and 0.66 seconds, there is a significant difference. (2 experimental group 1 and experimental group 2

17、 effectively serve the maximum flight time of 13.77 seconds and 9.22 seconds, compared with the control group (5.41 seconds, the control group (5.43 seconds grow 8.36 seconds and 3.79 seconds, there was a significant differences. (3 experimental group and the experimental group effectively serve the

18、 shortest flight time is 1.06 seconds and 1.28 seconds, respectively, in the control group and the control group (1.08 seconds 2 (1.13 seconds there is no significant difference. Analysis and Hard Volleyball, the continuity of the gas volleyball game better and more naturally raise the interest of t

19、he students. 2.4 Gas Volleyball Hard Volleyball Competition process technology application analysis (1) Gas Volleyball and Hard Volleyball game, use the highest proportion of technology are pad the ball with both hands, accounting for 43.53% and 75.75%, respectively, there is a significant differenc

20、e. Balloon Volleyball and Hard Volleyball Competition (2), the use of hands pass ratio is 31.18% and 6.06% respectively, the difference of 25.12%, there is a significant difference. (3 Balloon Volleyball with Hard Volleyball game, using the proportion of single-arm batting is 4.12% and 9.09%, respec

21、tively, difference 4.97%, there is a significant difference. (4 gas Volleyball Hard Volleyball Competition, the use of a single hand pass ratio is 6.47% and 1.52%, the difference of 4.95%, there is a significant difference. (5 gas Volleyball Teaching game, as well as the technology of its own charac

22、teristics, such as hands turn Dingqiu technology and both hands the ball technology, the use ratio of 4.12% and 9.41%, respectively. (6 Balloon Volleyball with Hard Volleyball game in less spiking the use of technology, the only gas volleyball teaching the game to use more than 2 times, accounting f

23、or 1.17%, there is a significant difference. Analysis shows, the hard volleyball game in technology use rather monotonous, without the use of gas volleyball game technology rich technical mastery and application, compared with Hard Volleyball gas Volleyball easier to master operation. Posted in the

24、free papers Download Center http :/ / 2.5 Gas Volleyball and Hard Volleyball Technique to grasp the situation analysis Pass pad ball technology assessment using Double pass or mat ball, recording the effective number of simultaneous, consecutive pass or pad ball 28 standard, 50 out of the technical

25、evaluation. Serve technology continuously The assessment used single continuous fat effectively serve area 10 ball to record effectively serve number, effectively serve the five standards, 10 out of technology assessment at the same time. 2.5.1 passing techniques to master, gas Volleyball compliance

26、 rate is significantly higher than the Hard Volleyball, both the existence of significant differences (1 gas volleyball passing techniques compliance rate was 91.18%, the and Hard Volleyball passing technical compliance rate of only 86.67 percent, the difference of 4.51%, the presence of significant

27、 differences. Seen gas volleyball passing compliance rate is significantly higher than the control students, both the existence of significant differences, such differences because the same time, and Hard Volleyball gas volleyball passing techniques easier to grasp. 2.5.2 in Digs is concerned, Hard

28、Volleyballs compliance rate is significantly higher than the gas volleyball, both the existence of significant differences The air volleyball technical compliance rate was 77%, Hard Volleyball Digs compliance rate was 80%, the difference of 3%, there is a significant difference. Analysis, hard volle

29、yball compliance rate was significantly higher than the gas volleyball, both the existence of significant differences. 2.5.3 serve technical mastery, gas volleyball compliance rate score significantly higher than the Hard Volleyball, both the existence of significant differences Gas Volleyball Serve

30、 technical compliance rate was 94.12%, Hard Volleyball serve technical compliance rate was 83.33%, 10.97% differences, there were significant differences. Analysis, gas Volleyball Serve compliance rate was significantly better than the hard volleyball, both the existence of significant differences.

31、Test scores by teaching experiment, the experimental class technology achievements in terms of passing, serve significantly higher than the control class, but is lower than that of the control classes in mat ball reached the level of significance of the different degrees of difference between the tw

32、o. 3 Conclusion The 3.1 Gas Volleyball lesson full and essential part of Exercise Intensity was slightly lower than the hard volleyball classes, but there is no significant difference in the process of teaching the game, the Gas Volleyball Exercise Intensity Hard Volleyball larger both significant line differences . 3.2 Gas Volleyball Teaching game in average per 1 timesharing both ball number of 1-ball per round-trips, and the issue of the time of flight of the ball much better than Hard Volleyball, both the existence of significant