TPO124综合写作范文.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:24050163 上传时间:2023-05-23 格式:DOCX 页数:31 大小:37.88KB
下载 相关 举报
TPO124综合写作范文.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共31页
TPO124综合写作范文.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共31页
TPO124综合写作范文.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共31页
TPO124综合写作范文.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共31页
TPO124综合写作范文.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共31页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

TPO124综合写作范文.docx

《TPO124综合写作范文.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《TPO124综合写作范文.docx(31页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

TPO124综合写作范文.docx

TPO124综合写作范文

Topic1

Answer

Thereadingandlisteningpassagesdebatetheprosandconsofthepracticeofsalvagelogging.Thereadingmaterialoutlines(provides)itsthreemajorbenefits,whicharecontradictedbythefollowinglecture.

First,thereadingpassageclaimsthatsalvageloggingprovidesspacesforforestgrowth.However,thespeakerclaimsthatsalvageloggingmakesthesoillessnutritiousbecausedamagedtreescanprovidenutritionforthesoilaftertheydecay.Thispracticallyrefutesthereading’sclaim.

Secondly,thereadingpassagearguesthatsalvageloggingcontrolsharmfulinsects,forinstance,sprucebeetles.However,thespeakerbelievesthatsprucebeetlesarenotharmful.Andhearguesthatsalvageloggingreducesthenumbersofbeneficialspecies.

Finally,thereadingclaimsthatsalvageloggingprovideseconomicalbenefits.Tworeasonsareprovided.Foronething,ithelpslocalcompaniestoreducelossesbyrecyclingdamagedtrees.Second,itprovidesjobopportunitiestolocalpeople.However,thespeakerbelievesthatthisisnotthecase.Foronething,salvageloggingneedsveryexpensivetransportation,e.g.helicopters.Foranotherthing,salvageloggingneedsskillfulworkers,whodonotcomefromthelocalcommunity.

 

Topic2

Thereadingiscorrectinpointingouttheproblemsassociatedwithoilpoweredcars.Yes,oilisafiniteresource,andyes,burningoilharmstheenvironment.However,thereadingisawaytoooptimisticattheassessmentofhydrogen-basedfuel-cellengines.Hydrogenisnotthesolutiontotheseproblems.

First,hydrogenisnotaseasilyavailableasthepassageindicates.Althoughit’spresentincommonsubstanceslikewater,isnotdirectlyusableinthatform.Foruseinafuel-cellengine,hydrogenmustfirstbeobtainedinapureliquidsstate.Thispureliquidhydrogenisahighlyartificialsubstance.It’stechnologicallyverydifficulttoproduceandstoreliquidhydrogen.Forexample,itmustbekeptvery,verycold,atminus253degreeCelsius.Imagingtheelaboratecoolingtechnologythat’srequiredforthat,sohydrogen’snotsuchapracticallyandeasilyavailablesubstance,isit?

Second,usinghydrogenwouldnotsolvethepollutionproblemsassociatedwithcars.Why?

Producingpurehydrogencreatesalotofpollution.Togetpurehydrogenfromwaterornaturalgas,youhavetouseapurificationprocessthatrequireslotsofenergythatobtainedbyburningcoaloroil.Andburningcoalandoilcreateslotsofpollution.Soalthoughthecarswouldnotpollute,thefactoriesthatgeneratethehydrogenforthecarswouldpollute.

Third,therewon’tnecessarilybeanycostssavingswhenyouconsiderhowexpensiveitistomanufacturethefuelcellengine.That’sbecausefuelcellenginesrequirecomponentsmadeofplatinum,averyrareandexpensivemetal.Withouttheplatinumcomponentintheengine,thehydrogendoesn’tundergothechemicalreactionthatproducestheelectricitytopowertheautomobile.Alltheeffortstoreplaceplatinumwithacheapermaterialhavesofarbeenunsuccessful.

 

Topic3

Reading

IntheUnitedStates,employeestypicallyworkfivedaysaweekforeighthourseachday.However,manyemployeeswanttoworkafour-dayweekandarewillingtoacceptlesspayinordertodoso.Amandatorypolicyrequiringcompaniestooffertheiremployeestheoptionofworkingafour-dayworkweekforfour-fifths(80percent)oftheirnormalpaywouldbenefittheeconomyasawholeaswellastheindividualcompaniesandtheemployeeswhodecidedtotaketheoption.

Theshortenedworkweekwouldincreasecompanyprofitsbecauseemployeeswouldfeelmorerestedandalert,andasaresult,theywouldmakefewercostlyerrorsintheirwork.Hiringmorestafftoensurethatthesameamountofworkwouldbeaccomplishedwouldnotresultinadditionalpayrollcostsbecausefour-dayemployeeswouldonlybepaid80percentofthenormalrate.Intheend,companieswouldhavefeweroverworkedanderror-proneemployeesforthesamemoney,whichwouldincreasecompanybenefits.

Forthecountryasawhole,oneoftheprimarybenefitsofofferingthisoptiontoemployeesisthatitwouldreduceunemploymentrate.Ifmanyfull-timeemployeesstartedworkingfewerhours,someoftheirworkloadwouldhavetobeshiftedtoothers.Thus,foreveryfouremployeeswhowentonan80percentweek,anewemployeecouldbehiredatthe80percentrate.

Finally,theoptionofafour-dayworkweekwouldbebetterforindividualemployees.Employeeswhocouldaffordalowersalaryinexchangeformorefreetimecouldimprovethequalityoftheirlivesbyspendingtheextratimewiththeirfamilies,pursuingprivateinterestsorenjoyingleisureactivities.

 

Topic3

Listening

Offeringemployeestheoptionsoffour-dayworkweekwon’taffectcompanyprofits,economicconditionsorthelivesofemployeesinthewaysthereadingsuggests?

First,offeringafour-dayworkweekwillprobablyforcecompaniestospendmore,possiblyalotmore.Addingmoreworkersmeansputtingmuchmoremoneyintoprovidingtrainingandmedicalbenefits.Remember,thecostsofthingslikehealthbenefitscanbethesamewhetheremployeesworksfourdaysorfive.Andhavingmoreemployeesalsorequiresmoreofficespaceandmorecomputers.Theseadditionalcostswillquicklycutintocompanyprofits.

Second,withrespecttooverallemployment,itdoesn’tfollowthatwhensomeemployeeschooseafour-dayworkweek,manymorejobswillbecomeavailable.Hiringanewworkeriscostly,asIarguedamomentago;andcompanieshaveotheroptions:

theymightjustchoosetoasktheiremployeestoworkovertimetomakeupthedifference.Worst,companiesmightraisetheirexpectations;theymightstarttoexpecttheirfour-dayemployeescandothesameamountofworktheyusedtodoinfivedays.Ifthishappens,thennoadditionaljobswillbecreated,andcurrentjobswillbecomemoreunpleasant.

Finally,whileafour-dayworkweekoffersemployeesmorefreetimetoinvestontheirpersonallives,italsopresentssomerisksthatcouldendupreducingtheirqualityoftheirlive.Workingashorterweekcandecreaseemployees’jobstabilitiesandharmtheirchancesforadvancingtheircareers.Four-dayemployeesarelikelytobethefirsttolosetheirjobsduringaneconomicdownturn.Theymayalsobepassedoverforpromotionsbecausecompaniesmightprefertohavefive-dayemployeesinthemanagementpositionstoensurecontinuouscoverageandconsistentsupervisionfortheentireworkweek.

Topic3

Answer

Thereadingandlisteningpassageshaveaconflictofopinionabouttheproposalofafour-dayworkweekforeightypercentofsalary.Thereadingpassagepointsoutitsthreebenefits,whicharecontradictedbythefollowinglecture.

First,thereadingpassagebelievesthattheplanwillincreasecompany’sprofitsbecausehiringmoreemployeeswillnotincreasecompany’scosts.However,thespeakerbelievesthatthisisnotthecase.Foronething,moreemployeesmeanmoretrainingcostsandmedicalbenefits.Foranotherthing,companieswillhavetospendmoreonofficespacesandcomputers.

Second,thereadingpassagearguesthattheplanwillreduceunemploymentratebecauseifemployeesworkfewerhours,companieswillhavetoemploymorepeople.Yet,thespeakerholdstheoppositeopinion.Hearguesthatcompanieswillaskemployeestoworkovertimeorraiseworkexpectationsinsteadofhiringmore.

Finally,thereadingpassagepointsouttheplanwillimprovethequalityoflivesofemployees.However,thespeakerbelievesthatthisisnotthecasebecauseemployeeswillbemorelikelytolosetheirjobsandlesslikelytobepromotedtohigherpositions.

 

Topic4

Reading

SoontherewillbesomethingnewforthetouristwhohasbeeneverywhereandseeneverythingonEarth.Spacecraftbeingdevelopedbyprivatecommercialcompanieswillsoonenableprivatecitizenstobuytheirownticketstotravelintospace,therebycreatingaspacetourismindustry.Sofar,spacetravelhasbeenundertakenonlybygovernments,butthenew,privatizedspaceflightindustrywillbringgreatbenefitstobothscienceandthepublic.

First,privatespacetravelwillbenefitseriousspaceexplorationbymakingspaceflightcheaper.Privatizationofspacetechnologywillbringtechnologicalcostsdownveryfastbecauseitwillallowcompetition—andcompetitionisoneofthestrongestmotivatorstocutcosts.Thus,loweringthecostofspacetravelwillbenefitnotonlyspacetouristsbutalsoscientists,whowillbeabletouseprivatespaceflightsforresearchpurposes.

Furthermore,privatizationofspacetravelwillacceleratetherateatwhichimportantscientificdiscoveriesoccur.Theaerospaceindustryalreadysponsors发起,主办alotofgroundbreakingscientificresearch,andaddingprivatespaceflightcompaniestoitwillmaketheindustryasawholegrowinsize,therebyemployingmorescientiststhanitdoesnow.Thatincreasednumberofworkingscientistsmeansnotonlythatmorediscoveriesarelikelytobemadebutalsothatthosediscoveriesarelikelytobemademorequicklythaninthepast.

Finally,whengovernmentsarethesoleprovidersofspacetravel,thecostsarepaidforbythewholetaxpayingpublic,butwithprivatization,theexpensesofspacetravelwillbebornebythecustomersoftheindustry.Thefactthatprivatespaceflightoperatorswillbeabletoraisefundsthroughticketsalesmeansthatthefinancialburdenontaxpayerswillbeeasedsignificantly.

Topic4

Listening

Well,itlooksasthoughwe’llsoonseeprivatespaceshipscarryingtouristsintospace.Butwillitreallyprovidegreatbenefitsforseriousscienceandforthepublic?

Idon’tthinkso.

First,privatizedspacetravel,whichisextraordi

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 自然科学 > 化学

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1