工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:22636161 上传时间:2023-02-05 格式:DOCX 页数:9 大小:23.01KB
下载 相关 举报
工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共9页
工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共9页
工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共9页
工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共9页
工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共9页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx

《工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx(9页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

工程造价论文中英文资料对照外文翻译Word格式.docx

ABSTRACT

ThisanalysisusedacasestudymethodologytoanalysetheissuessurroundingthepartialcollapseoftheroofofabuildinghousingtheheadquartersoftheStandardsAssociationofZimbabwe(SAZ).Inparticular,itexaminedthepriorrolesplayedbytheteamofconstructionprofessionals.TheanalysisrevealedthattheSAZ’straditionalconstructionprojectwasgenerallycharacterizedbyhighrisk.Therewasaclearindicationofthefailureofacontractorandarchitectsinpreventingand/ormitigatingpotentialconstructionproblemsasallegedbytheplaintiff.Itwasreasonabletoconcludethatbetweenthemthedefectsshouldhavebeendetectedearlierandrectifiedingoodtimebeforethepartialrooffailure.Itappearedjustifiedfortheplaintifftohavebroughtanegligenceclaimagainstboththecontractorandthearchitects.Theriskanalysisfacilitated,throughitsmulti-dimensionalapproachtoacriticalexaminationofaconstructionproblem,theidentificationofaneffectiveriskmanagementstrategyforfutureconstructionprojects.Itfurtherservedtoemphasizethepointthatclientsarebecomingmoredemanding,morediscerning,andlesswillingtoacceptriskwithoutrecompense.Clientsdonotwantsurprise,andaremorelikelytoengageinlitigationwhenthingsgowrong.

KEYWORDS:

Arbitration,claims,construction,contracts,litigation,projectandrisk

ThestructuraldesignofthereinforcedconcreteelementswasdonebyconsultingengineersKnightPiesold(KP).QuantitysurveyingserviceswereprovidedbyHawkins,Leshnick&

Bath(HLB).ThecontractwasawardedtoCentralAfricanBuildingCorporation(CABCO)whowasalsoresponsiblefortheprovisionofaspecialistroofstructureusingpatented“gangnail”rooftrusses.ThebuildingconstructionproceededtocompletionandwashandedovertotheownersonSept.12,1991.TheSAZtookeffectiveoccupationoftheheadquartersbuildingwithoutacertificateofoccupation.Also,thedefectsliabilityperiodwasonlythreemonths.

Theroofstructurewasinplace10yearsbeforepartialfailureinDecember1999.Thebuildinginsurancecoveragedidnotcoverenough,theCityofHarare,agovernmentmunicipality,issuedthecertificateofoccupation10yearsafteroccupation,andafterpartialcollapseoftheroof.

AtfirsttheSAZdecidedtogotoarbitration,butthisfailedtoyieldanimmediatesolution.TheSAZthendecidedtoproceedtolitigateincourtandtobringanegligenceclaimagainstCABCO.Thepreparationforarbitrationwasreusedforlitigation.TheSAZ’squantifiedlossesstoodatapproximately$6millioninZimbabwedollars(US$1.2m).

Afterallpartieshadexaminedthefactsandevidencebeforethem,itbecameclearthattherewasagreatprobabilitythatthecourtsmightrulethatboththearchitectsandthecontractorwereliable.Itwasatthisstagethatthedefendants’lawyersrequestedthatthematterbesettledoutofcourt.Theplaintiffagreedtothissuggestion,withthetermsofthesettlementkeptconfidential.

TheaimofthiscriticalanalysiswastoanalysetheissuessurroundingthepartialcollapseoftheroofofthebuildinghousingtheHQofStandardAssociationofZimbabwe.Itexaminedthepriorrolesplayedbytheprojectmanagementfunctionandconstructionprofessionalsinpreventing/mitigatingpotentialconstructionproblems.Itfurtherassessedtheextenttowhichtheemployer/clientandpartiestoaconstructioncontractareabletorecoverdamagesunderthatcontract.Themainobjectiveofthiscriticalanalysiswastoidentifyaneffectiveriskmanagementstrategyforfutureconstructionprojects.Theimportanceofthisstudyisitsmultidimensionalexaminationapproach.

Experiencesuggeststhatparticipantsinaprojectarewellabletoidentifyrisksbasedontheirownexperience.Theadoptionofariskmanagementapproach,basedsolelyinpastexperienceanddependantonjudgement,mayworkreasonablywellinastablelowriskenvironment.Itisunlikelytobeeffectivewherethereisachange.Thisisbecausechangerequirestheextrapolationofpastexperience,whichcouldbemisleading.Allconstructionprojectsareprototypestosomeextentandimplychange.Changeintheconstructionindustryitselfsuggeststhatpastexperienceisunlikelytobesufficientonitsown.Astructuredapproachisrequired.Suchastructurecannotandmustnotreplacetheexperienceandexpertiseoftheparticipant.Rather,itbringsadditionalbenefitsthatassisttoclarifyobjectives,identifythenatureoftheuncertainties,introduceseffectivecommunicationsystems,improvesdecision-making,introduceseffectiveriskcontrolmeasures,protectstheprojectobjectivesandprovidesknowledgeoftheriskhistory.

Constructionprofessionalsneedtoknowhowtobalancethecontingenciesofriskwiththeirspecificcontractual,financial,operationalandorganizationalrequirements.Manyconstructionprofessionalslookatrisksindividuallywithamyopiclensanddonotrealizethepotentialimpactthatotherassociatedrisksmayhaveontheirbusinessoperations.Usingaholisticriskmanagementapproachwillenableafirmtoidentifyalloftheorganization’sbusinessrisks.Thiswillincreasetheprobabilityofriskmitigation,withtheultimategoaloftotalriskelimination.

Recommendedkeyconstructionandriskmanagementstrategiesforfutureconstructionprojectshavebeenconsideredandtheirexplanationfollows.J.W.Hincheystatedthatthereisandcanbeno‘bestpractice’standardforriskallocationonahigh-profileprojectorforthatmatter,anyproject.Hesaid,instead,successfulriskmanagementisamind-setandaprocess.AccordingtoHinchey,theidealmind-setisforthepartiesandtheirrepresentativesto,first,beintentionalaboutidentifyingprojectrisksandthentoproceedtodevelopasystematicandcomprehensiveprocessforavoiding,mitigating,managingandfinallyallocating,bycontract,thoserisksinoptimumwaysfortheparticularproject.Thisprocessissaidtonecessarilybeginasascienceandendsasanart.

AccordingtoD.Atkinson,whethercontractor,consultantorpromoter,therightteamneedstobeassembledwiththerelevantmulti-disciplinaryexperienceofthatparticulartypeofprojectanditslocation.Thisissaidtobenecessarynotonlytoallowalternativeresponsestobeexplored.Butalsotoensurethattherightquestionsareaskedandthemajorrisksidentified.Headsofsourcesofriskaresaidtobeaconvenientwayofprovidingastructureforidentifyingriskstocompletionofaparticipant’spartoftheproject.Effectiveriskmanagementissaidtorequireamulti-disciplinaryapproach.Inevitablyriskmanagementrequiresexaminationofengineering,legalandinsurancerelatedsolutions.

Itisstatedthattheuseofanalyticaltechniquesbasedonastatisticalapproachcouldbeofenormoususeindecisionmaking.Manyofthesetechniquesaresaidtoberelevanttoestimationoftheconsequencesofriskevents,andnothowallocationofriskistobeachieved.Inaddition,atthepresentstageofthedevelopmentofriskmanagement,Atkinsonstatesthatitmustberecognizedthatmajordecisionswillbemadethatcannotbebasedsolelyonmathematicalanalysis.Thecomplexityofconstructionprojectsmeansthattheprojectdefinitionintermsofbothphysicalformandorganizationalstructurewillbebasedonconsiderationofonlyarelativelysmallnumberofrisks.Thisissaidtothenallowageneralstructuredapproachthatcanbeappliedtoanyconstructionprojecttoincreasetheawarenessofparticipants.

Thenew,simplifiedConstructionDesignandManagementRegulations(CDMRegulations)whichcameintoforceintheUKinApril2007,revisedandbroughttogethertheexistingCDM1994andtheConstructionHealthSafetyandWelfare(CHSW)Regulations1996,intoasingleregulatorypackage.

ThenewCDMregulationsofferanopportunityforastepchangeinhealthandsafetyperformanceandareusedtoreemphasizethehealth,safetyandbroaderbusinessbenefitsofawell-managedandco-ordinatedapproachtothemanagementofhealthandsafetyinconstruction.Ibelievethatthedevelopmentoftheseskillsisimperativetoprovidetheclientwiththemosteffectiveservicesavailable,deliveringthebestvalueprojectpossible.

ConstructionManagementatRisk(CMatRisk),similartoestablishedprivatesectormethodsofconstructioncontracting,isgainingpopularityinthepublicsector.Itisaprocessthatallowsaclienttoselectaconstructionmanager(CM)basedonqualifications;

maketheCMamemberofacollaborativeprojectteam;

centralizeresponsibilityforconstructionunderasinglecontract;

obtainabondedguaranteedmaximumprice;

produceamoremanageable,predictableproject;

savetimeandmoney;

andreduceriskfortheclient,thearchitectandtheCM.

CMatRisk,amoreprofessionalapproachtoconstruction,istakingitsplacealongwithdesign-build,bridgingandthemoretraditionalprocessofdesign-bid-buildasanestablishedmethodofprojectdelivery.

TheAEcanreviewtheCM’sapproachtothework,makinghelpfulrecommendations.TheCMisallowedtotakebidsorproposalsfromsubcontractorsduringcompletionofcontractdocuments,priortotheguaranteedmaximumprice(GMP),whichreducestheCM’sriskandprovidesusefulinputtodesign.Theprocedureismoremethodical,manageable,predictableandlessriskyforall.

Theprocurementofconstructionisalsomorebusiness-like.Eachtradecontractorhasafairshotatbeingthelowbidderwithoutfearofbidshopping.Eachmustdeliverthebesttogettheprojec.Competitioninthecommunityismoreequitable:

allsubcontra

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 考试认证 > 司法考试

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1