年大学英语六级考试真题详细解析第三套Word格式文档下载.docx
《年大学英语六级考试真题详细解析第三套Word格式文档下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《年大学英语六级考试真题详细解析第三套Word格式文档下载.docx(28页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
ReadingComprehension
40minutes>
SectionA
Inthissection,thereisapassagewithtenblanks.Youarerequiredtoselectoneword
foreachblankfromalistofchoicesgiveninawordbankfollowingthepassage.Readthepassage
throughcarefullybeforemakingyourchoices.Eachchoiceinthebankisidentifiedbyaletter.
PleasemarkthecorrespondingletterforeachitemonAnswerSheet2withasinglelinethrough
thecentre.Youmaynotuseanyofthewordsinthebankmorethanonce.
Questions26to35arebasedonthefollowingpassage.
ManyEuropeancountrieshavebeenmakingtheshifttoelectricvehiclesandGermanyhas
juststatedthattheyplantobanthesaleofvehiclesusinggasolineanddieselasfuelby2030.The
countryisalsoplanningtoreduceitscarbonfootprintby80-95%by2050,___26___ashiftto
greenenergyinthecountry.Effectively,thebanwillincludetheregistrationofnewcarsinthe
countryastheywillnotallowanygasoline___27___vehicletoberegisteredafter2030.
Partofthereasonthisbanisbeingdiscussedand___28___isbecauseenergyofficialssee
thattheywillnotreachtheiremissionsgoalsby2050iftheydonot___29___alargeportionof
vehicleemissions.Thecountryisstill___30___thatitwillmeetitsemissionsgoals,likereducing
emissionsby40%by2020,butthe___31___ofelectriccarsinthecountryhasnotoccurredas
fastasexpected.
Othereffortstoincreasetheuseofelectricvehiclesincludeplanstobuildover1million
63
hybridandelectriccarbatterychargingstationsacrossthecountry.By2030,Germanyplanson
havingover6millionchargingstations___32___.AccordingtotheInternationalBusinessTimes,
electriccarsalesareexpectedtoincreaseasVolkswagenisstillrecoveringfromitsemissions
scandal.
Thereare___33___around155,000registeredhybridandelectricvehiclesonGermanroads,
dwarfedbythe45milliongasolineanddieselcarsdrivingtherenow.Ascountriescontinuesetting
goalsofreducingemissions,greaterstepsneedtobetakentohavea___34___effectonthe
surroundingenvironment.Whiletheeffortsarecertainlynot___35___,theresultsofsuchbans
willlikelyonlystarttobeseenbygenerationsdowntheline,betteringtheworldforthefuture.
A>
acceptance
B>
currently
C>
disrupting
D>
eliminate
E>
exhaust
F>
futile
G>
hopeful
H>
implemented
I>
incidentally
J>
installed
K>
noticeable
L>
powered
M>
restoration
N>
skeptical
O>
sparking
SectionB
Inthissection,youaregoingtoreadapassagewithtenstatementsattachedtoit.
Eachstatementcontainsinformationgiveninoneoftheparagraphs.Identifytheparagraphfrom
whichtheinformationisderived,Youmaychoosea,paragraphmorethanonce.Eachparagraph
ismarkedwithaletter.AnswerthequestionsbymarkingthecorrespondingletteronAnswer
Sheet2.
Apple’sStanceHighlightsaMoreConfrontationalTeachIndustry
ThebattlebetweenAppleandlawenforcementofficialsoverunlockingaterrorist’s
smartphoneistheculminationofaslowturningofthetablesbetweenthetechnologyindustryand
theUnitedStatesgovernment.
AfterrevelationsbytheformerNationalSecurityAgencycontractorEdwardJ.Snowdenin
2013thatthegovernmentbothcoziedupto<
讨好>
certaintechcompaniesandhackedintoothers
togainaccesstoprivatedataonanenormousscale,techgiantsbegantorecognizetheUnited
Statesgovernmentasahostileactor.Butiftheconfrontationhascrystallizedinthislatestbattle,it
mayalreadybeheadingtowardapredictableconclusion:
Inthelongrun,thetechcompaniesare
destinedtoemergevictorious.
64
Itmaynotseemthatwayatthemoment.Ontheoneside,youhavetheUnitedStates
government’smightylegalandsecurityapparatusfightingfordataofthemostsympatheticsort:
thesecretsburiedinadeadmassmurderer’sphone.Theactionstemsfromafederalcourtorder
issuedonTuesdayrequiringAppletohelptheFederalBureauofInvestigation<
F.B.I>
tounlockan
iPhoneusedbyoneofthetwoattackerswhokilled14peopleinSanBernardino,California,in
December.
Intheothercorneristheworld’smostvaluablecompany,whosechiefexecutive,TimothyD.
Cook,hassaidhewillappealthecourt’sorder.Applearguesthatitisfightingtopreservea
principlethatmostofuswhoareaddictedtooursmartphonescandefend:
WeakenasingleiPhone
sothatitscontentscanbeviewedbytheAmericangovernmentandyouriskweakeningall
iPhonesforanygovernmentintruder,anywhere.
Therewillprobablybemonthsoflegaltussling,anditisnotatallclearwhichsidewillprevail
incourt,norinthebattleforpublicopinionandlegislativefavor.Yetunderlyingallofthisisa
simpledynamic:
Apple,Google,Facebookandothercompaniesholdmostofthecardsinthis
confrontation.Theyhaveourdata,andtheirbusinessesdependontheglobalpublic’scollective
beliefthattheywilldoeverythingtheycantoprotectthatdata.
Anycrackinthatfrontcouldbefatalfortechcompaniesthatmustoperateworldwide.IfApple
isforcedtoopenupaniPhoneforanAmericanlawenforcementinvestigation,whatistoprevent
itfromdoingsoforarequestfromtheChineseortheIranians?
IfAppleisforcedtowritecode
thatletstheF.B.I.getintothePhone5cusedbySyedRizwanFarook,themaleattackerintheSan
Bernardinoattack,whowouldberesponsibleifsomehackergotholdofthatcodeandbrokeinto
itsotherdevices?
Apple’sstanceontheseissuesemergedpost-Snowden,whenthecompanystartedputtingin
placeaseriesoftechnologiesthat,bydefault,makeuseofencryptiontolimitaccesstopeople’s
data.Morethanthat,Apple-and,indifferentways,othertechcompanies,includingGoogle,
Facebook,TwitterandMicrosoft-havemadetheiroppositiontothegovernment’sclaimsapoint
ofcorporatepride.
Apple’semergingglobalbrandisprivacy;
ithasstakeditscorporatereputation,nottomention
theinvestmentofconsiderabletechnicalandfinancialresources,onlimitingthesortofmass
surveillancethatwasuncoveredbyMr.Snowden.Sonow,formanycasesinvolvinggovernmental
65
intrusionsintodata,once-lonelyprivacyadvocatesfindthemselvesfightingalongsidethemost
powerfulcompanyintheworld.
"
Acomparisonpointisinthe1990sbattlesoverencryption,"
saidKurtOpsahl,general
counseloftheElectronicFrontierFoundation,aprivacywatchdoggroup."
Thenyouhadafew
companiesinvolved,butnotoneofthelargestcompaniesintheworldcomingoutwithalengthy
andimpassionedpost,likewesawyesterdayfromTimCook.Theprofilehasreallybeenraised."
Appleandothertechcompaniesholdanotherace:
thetechnicalmeanstokeepmakingtheir
devicesmoreandmoreinaccessible.NotethatApple’spublicoppositiontothegovernment’s
requestisitselfahindrancetomassgovernmentintrusion.Andtogetatthecontentsofasingle
iPhone,thegovernmentsaysitneedsacourtorderandApple’shelptowritenewcode;
inearlier
versionsoftheiPhone,onesthatwerecreatedbeforeApplefoundreligionon<
热衷于>
privacy,
theF.B.I.mayhavebeenabletobreakintothedevicebyitself.
Youcanexpectthatnoose<
束缚>
tocontinuetotighten.Expertssaidthatwhetherornot
Applelosesthisspecificcase,measuresthatitcouldputintoplaceinthefuturewillalmost
certainlybeabletofurtherlimitthegovernment’sreach.
That’snottosaythattheoutcomeoftheSanBernardinocaseisinsignificant.AsAppleand
severalsecurityexpertshaveargued,anordercompellingAppletowritesoftwarethatgivesthe
F.B.I.accesstotheiPhoneinquestionwouldestablishanunsettlingprecedent.Theorder
essentiallyasksAppletohackitsowndevices,andonceitisinplace,theprecedentcouldbeused
tojustifylawenforcementeffortstogetaroundencryptiontechnologiesinotherinvestigationsfar
removedfromnationalsecuritythreats.
OncearmedwithamethodforgainingaccesstoiPhones,thegovernmentcouldasktouseit
proactively<
先发制人地>
beforeasuspectedterroristattack-leavingAppleinabindasto
whethertocomplyorriskanattackandsufferapublic-relationsnightmare."
Thisisabrand-new
salvointhewaragainstencryption,"
Mr.Opsahlsaid."
We’vehadplentyofdebatesinCongress
andthemediaoverwhetherthegovernmentshouldhaveabackdoor,andthisisanendrunaround
that-heretheycomewithanordertocreatethatbackdoor."
Yetit’sworthnotingthatevenifAppleultimatelylosesthiscase,ithasplentyoftechnical
meanstocloseabackdoorovertime."
Ifthey’reanywherenearworththeirsaltasengineers,Ibet
66
they’rerethinkingtheirthreatmodelaswespeak,"
saidJonathanZdziarski,adigitalforensic
expertwhostudiestheiPhoneanditsvulnerabilities.
Onerelativelysimplefix,Mr.Zdziarskisaid,wouldbeforAppletomodifyfutureversionsof
theiPhonetorequireausertoenterapasscodebeforethephonewillacceptthesortofmodified
operatingsystemthattheF.B.I.wantsAppletocreate.Thatway,Applecouldnotunilaterally
introduceacode