修改稿coverletter模板Word下载.docx

修改稿coverletter模板Word下载.docx

《修改稿coverletter模板Word下载.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《修改稿coverletter模板Word下载.docx（9页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

×

@×

　　2）namebe-mail:

　　wedeeplyappreciateyourconsiderationofourmanuscript,andwelookforwardtoreceivingcommentsfromthereviewers.ifyouhaveanyqueries,pleasedon’thesitatetocontactmeattheaddressbelow.

　　thankyouandbestregards.

　　yourssincerely,

　　×

　　correspondingauthor:

　　name:

　　e-mail:

　　二、催稿信

　　dearprof.×

:

　　sorryfordisturbingyou.iamnotsureifitistherighttimetocontactyoutoinquireaboutthestatusofmysubmittedmanuscripttitled“papertitle”.（id:

文章稿号）,althoughthestatusof“witheditor”hasbeenlastingformorethantwomonths,sincesubmittedtojournalthreemonthsago.iamjustwonderingthatmymanuscripthasbeensenttoreviewersornot

　　iwouldbegreatlyappreciatedifyoucouldspendsomeofyourtimecheckthestatusforus.iamverypleasedtohearfromyouonthereviewer’scomments.

　　thankyouverymuchforyourconsideration.

　　bestregards!

　　三、修改稿coverletter

　　deardr/prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的editors）:

　　onbehalfofmyco-authors,wethankyouverymuchforgivingusanopportunitytoreviseourmanuscript,weappreciateeditorandreviewersverymuchfortheirpositiveandconstructive

　　commentsandsuggestionsonourmanuscriptentitled“papertitle”.（id:

文章稿号）.

　　wehavestudiedreviewer’scommentscarefullyandhavemaderevisionwhichmarkedinredinthepaper.wehavetriedourbesttoreviseourmanuscriptaccordingtothecomments.attachedpleasefindtherevisedversion,whichwewouldliketosubmitforyourkindconsideration.

　　wewouldliketoexpressourgreatappreciationtoyouandreviewersforcommentsonourpaper.lookingforwardtohearingfromyou.

　　四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）

　　listofResponses

　　deareditorsandReviewers:

　　thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“papertitle”（id:

文章稿号）.thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches.wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:

　　Respondstothereviewer’scomments:

　　Reviewer#1:

　　1.Responsetocomment:

（简要列出意见）

　　Response:

　　2.Responsetocomment:

　　。

。

　　逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏

　　针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：

　　weareverysorryforournegligenceof...

　　weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting...

　　itisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat

　　wehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.

　　wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion

　　asReviewersuggestedthat

　　consideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave

　　最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：

　　specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.

　　Reviewer#2:

　　同上述

　　Reviewer#3:

　　otherchanges:

　　1.line60-61,thestatementsof“”werecorrectedas“”

　　2.line107,“”wasadded

　　3.line129,“”wasdeleted

　　wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthe

　　manuscript.thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.

　　weappreciateforeditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval.

　　onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions.

　　五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要）

　　thanksverymuchforyourkindworkandconsiderationonpublicationofourpaper.onbehalfofmyco-authors,wewouldliketoexpressourgreatappreciationtoeditorandreviewers.thankyouandbestregards.

　　六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）

　　dear×

　　sorryfordisturbingyou.iamnotsureifitistherighttimetocontactyoutoinquireaboutthestatusofouracceptedmanuscripttitled“papertitle”（id:

文章稿号）,sincethecopyrightagreementforpublicationhasbeensenttoyoutwomonthsago.iamjustwonderingthathowlongicanreceivetheproofofourmanuscriptfromyou

　　iwouldbegreatlyappreciatedifyoucouldspendsomeofyourtimeforareply.iamverypleasedtohearfromyou.

　　七、文章校稿信件

　　dearmr.×

　　thanksverymuchforyourkindletterabouttheproofofourpapertitled“papertitle”（id:

文章稿号）forpublicationin“journalname”.wehavefinishedtheproofreadingandcheckingcarefully,andsomecorrectionsabouttheproofandtheanswerstothequeriesareprovidedbelow.

　　corrections:

　　1.in******shouldbe****（page***,Rightcolumn,line***）

　　2.in****the“*****”shouldbe“****”（page****,Rightcolumn,line****）answersfor“authorqueries”:

　　1.*********************.

　　2.**********************

　　3.**********************

　　wegreatlyappreciatetheefficient,professionalandrapidprocessingofourpaperbyyourteam.ifthereisanythingelseweshoulddo,pleasedonothesitatetoletusknow.

　　篇二：

怎样写好国外期刊修改稿的cover_letter

　　coverletter是一篇文章的外衣,对国外投稿能否成功很关键,一般投稿时的coverletter并不是很重要,只要说明你稿件的研究方向及创新点,并声明没有在其他期刊发表过.最难写的就是Revisedmanuscript中的coverletter,这将关系到是否录用你的稿件,或要进一步审稿.国外专家讲求的是精益求精,老外们对文章都很严谨的,一个单词哪怕是一个介词的使用都是很有考究的,因此会提出很多似乎对文章无关紧要的修改意见,但是这你要给予充分的重视.通过国外发表几篇文章后,开始一直失败,但是我没有放弃,通过总结现在将一些经验和大家分享,以免大家走很多不必要的弯路.

　　为了更好理解,我用我发的一篇文章作为例子来说明:

　　这里是期刊审稿人的修改意见:

　　dear*****,

　　thereviewofyourmanuscript,thermaldecompositionandkineticsstudieson1,4-dinitropiperazine（dnp）,submittedtojournalofhazardousmaterialshasbeencompleted.thereviewersrecommendtheneedforminorrevisions.pleasereviseyourmanuscriptaccordingtothereviewerscommentsattached,andre-submittomeyourrevisedversionofthemanuscriptincludinganitemizedresponsetoeachreviewerscomments.

　　pleasesubmityourrevisedsubmissionbeforejul11,20xx.iwillthenbeginthere-reviewprocess.

　　pleasenotethatrevisedmanuscriptswillbesentforreviewbecauserevisingamanuscriptdoesnotautomaticallymeanitwillbeacceptedforpublication.

　　Foryourguidance,reviewerscommentsareappendedbelow.

　　onyourmainmenupageisafolderentitled"

submissionsneedingRevision"

.youwillfindyoursubmissionrecordthere.

　　pleaseensurethatthearticleconformstotheformatofthejournal.inparticularmakesurethatallthearticlesinyourreferenceshavetitlesincluded.thejournalguideforauthorsisavailableonthejournalhomepage

　　/locate/hazmat

　　whensubmittingyourrevisedmanuscript,pleaseensurethatyouuploadthesourcefiles（e.g.word）.uploadingapdFfileatthisstagewillcreatedelaysshouldyourmanuscriptbefinallyacceptedforpublication.ifyourrevisedsubmissiondoesnotincludethesourcefiles,wewillcontactyoutorequestthem.

　　onceagain,thankyouforyourinterestinjournalofhazardousmaterials.

　　mervFingas,phd

　　editor

　　journalofhazardousmaterials

　　Reviewerscomments:

thepaperreportsonthethermaldecompositionandkineticsofdnp.itisawelcomeadditiontotheliteratureandappectableforpublicationaftersomerevision:

　　（i）pleaseprovidelargebasis-setdFtcalculationstosupporttheassignmentoftheiRbandsofdnp.

　　（ii）pleaseassignalliRbandsofFig.5

authorshavecarriedoutworkonthethermalanalysisofthedinitropiperazine.thenewinformationreportedinthepaperisscanty.thelargeamountofdatahasbeenalreadyreportedbytheseveralresearchersonthethermalanalysisofdinitropiperazine（seethereferencesectionofthepaperandalsoreviewerhasdonethescopussearch）.theonlynewinformationreportedinthispaperisofthe

　　t-jumpiRstudiesanddscstudiesunderdifferentpressures,whichmayaddsontotheexistingscientificdatabase.thereisnotmuchnoveltyinthereportedwork.

　　thetable1andfigure1needtobedeletedfromthepapersinceitisalreadywellreportedintheliterature.

　　table2andfigure3givesthesameinformation.authorsarerequestedtodeletetable2andthesameinformationmaybeexplainedintheresultsanddiscussionpartofthepaper.

　　mayialsokindlyrequestauthorstoupdatetheliteraturesurveytilldateondnpintheintroductionpartofthepaperusingchemicalabstractsondisk（caoncd）database.

　　thequalityandclarityofthefiguresinthepaperneedtobeimproved.

　　englishneedtobeimproved.

　　thepaperisrecommendedforshortcommunicationaftertheminorrevision.

thepaperisokayintermsofcontents.however,sinceithasbeenwrittenby

　　achinese,theenglishisverypoorandassuchrequiresalotofcorrectionsandeditingbyyourteam.

　　theauthorshaveusedozawaandkissengermethodstofindoutactivationenergy.however,theyhavegivendataforactivationenergybyozawamethod

　　onlyunder3.4thermaldecompositionkinetics）.thedataforeobykissengermethodsshould

　　alsobeincludedinthepaper.

　　also,captionsofFigs1,3smethodisokasafirstapproximation,butFriedmansmethodisthebestisoconversionalmethod.evenozawahasabandonedhismethodinfavorofFriedmans.

　　2.themethodofcomparingalargenumberofkineticmodelsagainstdataatasingleheatingrate（page5）isinvalid,discredited,andshouldnotbepublished.thisissuehasbeendiscussedinseveralpapersbyVyzovkinandinainternationalkineticstudypublishedbybrownetal,thermochemicaacta355,125-143,2000,andfollowingpapers.consequently,thereisnorealevidencepresentedthattheequationisfirst-order.infact,frommystudiesofenergeticmaterials,includingRdxandhmx,iwouldhavethoughtthatnucleation-growthkineticswouldbemostappropriate.however,iwouldhavetodoamorerigorouskineticanalysisofthedatatoknowforsure.

　　3.thebestwaytojudgeakineticmodelishowitcomparesw