HeideggerBeingandTime09Word格式.docx
《HeideggerBeingandTime09Word格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《HeideggerBeingandTime09Word格式.docx(33页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![HeideggerBeingandTime09Word格式.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-11/16/d9ebe42f-e78d-435d-8535-8d54ccd6faab/d9ebe42f-e78d-435d-8535-8d54ccd6faab1.gif)
sAuthenticBeing-a-wholetotheLaying-bareofTemporalityasaPhenomenon
Anauthenticpotentiality-for-Being-a-wholeonthepartofDaseinhasbeenprojectedexistentially.Byanalysingthisphenomenon,wehaverevealedthatauthenticBeing-towards-deathisanticipation.iDasein'
sauthenticpotentiality-for-Being,initsexistentiellattestation,hasbeenexhibited,andatthesametimeexistentiallyInterpreted,asresoluteness.1Howarethesetwophenomenaofanticipationandresolutenesstobebroughttogether?
Hasnotourontologicalprojectionoftheauthenticpotentiality-for-Being-a-wholeledusintoadimensionofDaseinwhichliesfarfromthephenomenonofresoluteness?
Whatcandeathandthe'
concreteSituation'
oftakingactionhaveincommon?
Inattemptingtobringresolutenessandanticipationforciblytogether,arewenotseducedintoanintolerableandquiteunphenomenologicalconstruction,forwhichwecannolongerclaimthatithasthecharacterofanontologicalprojection,baseduponthephenomena?
302
Anysuperficialbindingtogetherofthetwophenomenaisexcluded.Therestillremainsonewayout,andthisistheonlypossiblemethod:
namely,totakeasourpointofdeparturethephenomenonofresoluteness,asattestedinitsexistentiellpossibility,andtoask:
"
Doesresoluteness,initsownmostexistentielltendencyofBeing,pointforwardtoanticipatoryresolutenessasitsownmostauthenticpossibility?
"
Whatifresoluteness,inaccordancewithitsownmeaning,shouldbringitselfintoitsauthenticityonlywhenitprojectsitselfnotuponanyrandompossibilitieswhichjust-lieclosest,butuponthatuttermostpossibilitywhichliesaheadofeveryfacticalpotentiality-for-BeingofDasein,2and,assuch,entersmoreorless
____________________
1
'
InseinerexistenziellenBezeugungwurde,daseigentlicheSeinkö
nnen,desDaseinsalsEntschlossenheitaufgezeigtundzugleichexistenzialinterpretiert.'
Intheearliereditionsthewords'
aufgezeigtundzugleichexistenzialinterpretiert'
areinsertedbetween'
Bezeugung'
and'
wurde'
notintheirpresentposition.
2
...dieallemfaktischenSeinkö
nnendesDaseinsvorgelagertist...'
Cf.note1,p.303,H.259above.
-349-
undisguiscdlyintoeverypotentiality-for-BeingofwhichDaseinfacticallytakeshold?
Whatifitisonlyintheanticipationof[zum]deaththatresoluteness,asDasein'
sauthentictruth,hasreachedtheauthenticcertaintywhichbelongstoit?
What,ifitisonlyintheanticipationifdeaththatallthefactical'
anticipatoriness'
ofresolvingwouldbeauthenticallyunderstood—inotherwords,thatitwouldbecaughtupwithinanexistentiellway?
1
InourexistentialInterpretation,theentitywhichhasbeenpresentedtousasourthemehasDasein'
skindofBeing,andcannotbepiecedtogetherintosomethingpresent-at-handoutofpieces'
whicharepresent-athand.Solongaswedonotforgetthis,everystepinourInterpretationmustbeguidedbytheideaofexistence.Whatthissignifiesforthequestionofthepossibleconnectionbetweenanticipationandresoluteness,isnothinglessthanthedemandthatweshouldprojecttheseexistentialphenomenaupontheexistentiellpossibilitieswhichhavebeendelineatedinthem,and'
thinkthesepossibilitiesthroughtotheend'
inanexistentialmanner.Ifwedothis,theworking-outofanticipatoryresolutenessasapotentiality-for-Being-a-wholesuchthatthispotentialityisauthenticandispossibleinanexistentiellway,willlosethecharacterofanarbitraryconstruction.ItwillhavebecomeawayofInterpretingwherebyDaseinisliberatedforitsuttermostpossibilityofexistence.
303
Intakingthisstep,theexistentialInterpretationmakesknownatthesametimeitsownmostmethodologicalcharacter.Uptillnow,exceptforsomeremarkswhichwereoccasionallynecessary,wehavedeferredexplicitdiscussionsofmethod.Ourfirsttaskwasto'
goforth'
towardsthephenomena.But,beforelayingbarethemeaningoftheBeingofanentitywhichhasbeenrevealedinitsbasicphenomenalcontent,wemuststopforawhileinthecourseofourinvestigation,notforthepurposeof'
resting'
butsothatwemaybeimpelledthemorekeenly.
Anygenuinemethodisbasedonviewinginadvanceinanappropriatewaythebasicconstitutionofthe'
object'
tobedisclosed,orofthedomainwithinwhichtheobjectlies.Thusanygenuinelymethodicalconsideration—whichistobedistinguishedfromemptydiscussionsoftechnique—mustlikewisegiveinformationaboutthekindofBeingoftheentitywhichhasbeentakenasourtheme.Theclarificationofthemethodologicalpossibilities,requirements,andlim