Talking about the object of study of library science Perplexity and Reflections.docx
《Talking about the object of study of library science Perplexity and Reflections.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Talking about the object of study of library science Perplexity and Reflections.docx(20页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![Talking about the object of study of library science Perplexity and Reflections.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-10/4/ddc80923-ff07-4d53-a869-983d94ad4a7f/ddc80923-ff07-4d53-a869-983d94ad4a7f1.gif)
1
Talkingabouttheobjectofstudyoflibrary
sciencePerplexityandReflectionsAbstract:
ThisarticlereviewsthestudyoflibraryscienceinChinaseveralmainpoints,onthisbasis,theauthorofthestudyLibraryScienceconductedareflectiononseveralissues.
[Keywords:
]studiedlibraryscience/librarysciencetheory/
LibraryScience
[Text]
Astudyoflibraryscienceconfusion.
Whatistheobjectofstudyoflibraryscience,‘manypeople,
includinglibrariesandlibrarywithintheboundsofthepeople,
didnothesitatetoassert:
Libraryscienceresearchobjectisthe
library’.Thisseemstobeself-evidenttruth.‘However,in
fact,fromthedateofthebirthoflibraryscience,library
sciencehasbecometheobjectofstudylong-contentious
issue,thestudyoflibrarysciencethecontroversyhasnever
stoppe
D.‘Accordingtochronologicalorder,wecanstudy
libraryscienceroughlydividedintothefollowingcategories:
First,finishingthatbook.‘LibraryScience’Thenamewas
firstintroducedbyGermanShiRettingerproposedin1807,so
heisknowasthefounderofmodernlibraryscience.Acipenser2
thatthestudyofthecontentsofthelibraryshouldbe
consistentwiththepurposeoffinishinginthelibrarywithall
necessarypropositionscombine
D.Shiretinalsobelievethat
thelibraryisthecoreoftheworkofthepreparationofthe
directory.Henotonlycompile12categories,200
sub-categoriesclassification,butalsoworkingoffthetheme
directoriesandalphabeticaldirectories.AnotherGerman
scientistAlbertdevelopedlibraryfacilitiesRettingerpointof
view.Heclearlypointedoutthatthe‘libraryscienceshould
studytheactualtechnicalworkoftheLibrary.‘Thisscientist
withtheU.S.LibraryofDewey’sviewsareverysimilar.The
objectofstudyoflibraryscienceisdefinedasthe‘book
order’or‘thelibraryintheworkoftechnicalexperience’
isthemainpointofearlylibraryscientists,butalsoforfuture
generations,oneofthemostinfluentialschoolsofthought.
Second,librarymanagement,sai
D.‘LibraryManagement
said,’isoneoftheearlyideasoflibraryscience.Albertwas
firstintroducedin1821‘librarymanagement’ofthestory.
FrenchHesse(1893)consideredthatthepurposeoflibrary
sciencetoaddresshowbesttoeffectivelymanagethelibrary.
BritishEdwardsandPanizzialsocommittedtothelibrary
managementthinkingresearch.-19Aswellasthe17th3
centuryacenturyoflibrarymanagementexperience,a
comprehensivesummary.Dewey’sideaoflibraryscience,in
essence,istoimprovelibrarymanagementandcost
effectiveness.China’sfirstgenerationoflibrarysciencewho
isalsoasourceofacademicideasoutofthis.
Third,theexchangeofknowledgeandinformation,sai
D.
AfterWorldWarII,scienceandtechnologyinformation
exchangebecomingmorefrequent,interdisciplinary,
cross-disciplinary,cross-sectionalsubjectshavecomeout
fromLibraryandInformationSciencewasspunoffinthis
mother.The20thcentury,40years-70years,someforeign
scholarstothelibraryofknowledge,information,exchanges
ofinformationhasreceivedconsiderableattention.Suchas
theAmericanLibraryH.Sherainthe‘libraryscience
educationfoundation’abookmade,‘communicationisthe
socialstructureoftheadhesives’,’Libraryisasocial
communicationinthechainlink.‘‘Libraryofaneducational
roleandtheroleofinformationtransmission.Itisdocumented
thatpeoplewithknowledgeofanintermediarybetween,isto
promoteknowledgeofthemaximumrecordedforthecommunitytotakeadvantageofthecommunicationsystem‘.TheformerSovietscholarMikhailNove,cubaLiangalsobelievethattheexchangeofinformationistheinformationdepartment’smaintask.The20thcentury,80years,‘the
exchangesaid,’theintroductionofthefieldoflibraryscience.
‘Knowledgeexchangethat’intheoryclaimingtobeonthe
formthetheoreticalfoundationoflibraryscience,infactitis
theobjectofstudyoflibraryscience,anewsolution.Itis
startingoutfromthelibraryentitiesinthestudyoflibrary
sciencetodeterminetheclosedmodeofthinking,new
perspectivesandnewmethodsoflibraryscienceresearch.
Fourth,informationresources,sai
D.The20thcentury,80
years,theriseofEuropeanandAmericancountries,anew
professionalterminology‘informationresources
management’(InformationResourcesManagement,referred
toasIRM).IRMtheory,soonaftertheformationofinfiltration
areasofLibraryandInformationScience.Thelate80s,IRM
intoourcountryandcauseastrongreflection.Suchasthe
early90s,thedomesticlibraryandinformationsciencehave
renamedtheDepartmentofInformationManagementora
relateddepartmentname.Andinteachinghasincreasedthe
proportionofinformationresourcesmanagementcourses.In
1999,XUYin-chiHuoNational’s‘Theoryo