The Lights of the Church and the Light of ScienceWord文档格式.docx
《The Lights of the Church and the Light of ScienceWord文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《The Lights of the Church and the Light of ScienceWord文档格式.docx(16页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
noonedoubtsthatanypersonofsoundfaculties,properlyplaced,whowaspresentatWhitehallthroughoutthatday,andwhousedhiseyes,wouldhaveseentheKing'
sheadcutoff;
andthattherewouldhaveremainedinhismindanideaofthatoccurrencewhichhewouldhaveputintowordsofthesamevalueasthosewhichweusetoexpressit.
Orthenarrativemaybepartlytrueandpartlyfalse.Thus,somehistoriesofthetimetelluswhattheKingsaid,andwhatBishopJuxonsaid;
orreportroyalistconspiraciestoeffectarescue;
ordetailthemotiveswhichinducedthechiefsoftheCommonwealthtoresolvethattheKingshoulddie.OneaccountdeclaresthattheKingkneltatahighblock,anotherthathelaydownwithhisneckonamereplank.Andtherearecontemporarypictorialrepresentationsofboththesemodesofprocedure.Suchnarratives,whileveraciousastothemainevent,mayanddoexhibitvariousdegreesofunconsciousandconsciousmisrepresentation,suppression,andinvention,tilltheybecomehardlydistinguishablefrompurefictions.
Thus,theypresentatransitiontonarrativesofathirdclass,inwhichthefictitiouselementpredominates.Here,again,thereareallimaginablegradations,fromsuchworksasDefoe'
squasi-historicalaccountofthePlagueyear,whichprobablygivesatruerconceptionofthatdreadfultimethananyauthentichistory,throughthehistoricalnovel,drama,andepic,tothepurelyphantasmalcreationsofimaginativegenius,suchastheold"
ArabianNights"
orthemodern"
ShavingofShagpat."
ItisnotstrictlyneedfulformypresentpurposethatIshouldsayanythingaboutnarrativeswhichareprofessedlyfictitious.
Yetitmaybewell,perhaps,ifIdisclaimanyintentionofderogatingfromtheirvalue,whenIinsistupontheparamountnecessityofrecollectingthatthereisnosortofrelationbetweentheethical,ortheaesthetic,oreventhescientificimportanceofsuchworks,andtheirworthashistoricaldocuments.Unquestionably,tothepoeticartist,oreventothestudentofpsychology,"
Hamlet"
and"
Macbeth"
maybebetterinstructorsthanallthebooksofawildernessofprofessorsofaestheticsorofmoralphilosophy.But,asevidenceofoccurrencesinDenmark,orinScotland,atthetimesandplacesindicated,theyareoutofcourt;
theprofoundestadmirationforthem,thedeepestgratitudefortheirinfluence,areconsistentwiththeknowledgethat,historicallyspeaking,theyareworthlessfables,inwhichanyfoundationofrealitythatmayexistissubmergedbeneaththeimaginativesuperstructure.
Atpresent,however,Iamnotconcernedtodwellupontheimportanceoffictitiousliteratureandtheimmensityoftheworkwhichithaseffectedintheeducationofthehumanrace.
Iproposetodealwiththemuchmorelimitedinquiry:
Aretheretwootherclassesofconsecutivenarratives(asdistinctfromstatementsofindividualfacts),oronlyone?
Isthereanyknownhistoricalworkwhichisthroughoutexactlytrue,oristherenot?
Inthecaseofthegreatmajorityofhistoriestheanswerisnotdoubtful:
theyareallonlypartiallytrue.EventhosevenerableworkswhichbearthenamesofsomeofthegreatestofancientGreekandRomanwriters,andwhichhavebeenacceptedbygenerationaftergeneration,downtomoderntimes,asstoriesofunquestionabletruth,havebeencompelledbyscientificcriticism,afteralongbattle,todescendtothecommonlevel,andtoconfessiontoalargeadmixtureoferror.Imightfairlytakethisforgranted;
butitmaybewellthatIshouldentrenchmyselfbehindtheveryappositewordsofahistoricalauthoritywhoiscertainlynotobnoxioustoevenasuspicionofscepticaltendencies.
<
quote>
Timewas--andthatnotverylongago--whenalltherelationsofancientauthorsconcerningtheoldworldwerereceivedwithareadybelief;
andanunreasoninganduncriticalfaithacceptedwithequalsatisfactionthenarrativeofthecampaignsofCaesarandofthedoingsofRomulus,theaccountofAlexander'
smarchesandoftheconquestsofSemiramis.Wecanmostofusrememberwhen,inthiscountry,thewholestoryofregalRome,andeventhelegendoftheTrojansettlementinLatium,wereseriouslyplacedbef