argumentation 议论文特征.docx
《argumentation 议论文特征.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《argumentation 议论文特征.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
argumentation议论文特征
Argumentation
Aims:
1.Knowingtodefinetheterm,
2.Comparingthisstyleofwritingwithexposition,description,andnarration
3.KnowingrequirementsofaGOODargumentativeessay
4.Knowinghowtooutlineanaugmentativeessay:
threeparts.
Procedure:
(theory-practice)
Thepurposeofexpositionistoinform;thepurposeofargumentation,ontheotherhand,istoconvince.Whileanexpositorypapermakesknownsomethingandexplainsittomakethereaderunderstand,anargumentativeessaytriestomakethereaderagreewithitspointofviewandsupportit,topersuadehimtochangehismindorbehavior,andtoapproveapolicyoracourseofactionthatitproposes.Speechesonpolicies,editorialsofnewspapers,articlesonpoliticalortheoreticalquestions,andvariousproposalsareoftenargumentative.
Argumentationfrequentlymakesuseoftheotherthreetypesofwriting---description,narration,andaboveallexposition,forargumentationandexpositionareverycloselyrelated---argumentationisactuallyexpositionwiththeadditionalpurposeofconvincingorpersuading.
Althoughtheycantakedifferentshapes,argumentativeessayshavecertainbasicfeaturesincommon.Ifyouwishtowriteagoodargumentativeessay,youshoulddoyourbesttomeetthefollowingrequirements:
(1)Adebatablepoint
Itisimperativethatthepapershouldhaveadebatablepoint,thatis,somethingwhichcanbeviewedfrommorethanoneangleandisthereforeopentodispute.Generallyspeaking,thefollowingarenotgoodthemes.
1)Merestatementsoffacts
“Chinesedoctorsuseacupunctureanesthesiatoperformcertainoperations”isafactthatcannotbedebated.Butifitischangedinto“acupunctureanesthesiashouldreplaceconventionalanesthesiainalloperations”,itbecomesdebatable.
2)Statementsofpersonalpreference
“BaJinismyfavoriteauthor”expressespersonalpreferencewhichdoesnotleadtodispute.Butastatementlike“BaJinisthegreatestChinesewriterofthe20thcentury”isdisputableandsufficientevidenceshouldbeprovided.
3)Viewpointsthataregenerallyacceptedorcanbeeasilyverified
Itisuniversallyknownthat“noisepollutionisharmfultopeople’shealth”,butitisnotgenerallyacceptedthat“noisepollutionisthemostharmfulofallenvironmentalpollution”.Theformerviewpointcanbeproved,butthelaterisarguable.
(2)Sufficientevidence
Sincethepointofyourpaperisnotafact,astatementofpersonaltaste,oraviewpointuniversallyaccepted,youwillhavetoprovidesufficientevidencetoconvincethereader.Sufficientevidenceincludescommonknowledge;specificexamples;hard,notsoft,evidence,orfacts,notopinions,unlesstheopinionsareexpertandauthoritative;statistics;andquotationsfromauthorities.Validevidenceisthatwhichisclearlyanddirectlyconnectedwiththepointtobeproved.
(3)Goodlogic
Itisobviousthatgoodlogicisevenmoreimportanttoargumentationthantoanyothertypesofwriting.Allthefactsandreasonsthataregivenasevidenceshouldbelogicallyconnectedwiththeconclusionandwitheachother.Anyfallacyinlogicorwrongstepinreasoningwouldleavethereaderindoubtaboutthewholeargument.
Therearegenerallytwowaysofreasoning:
1)Inductivereasoning(fromspecificfactstoageneralconclusion)
Inductivereasoningisthemorecommonway.Whenyouuseinduction,youstartwithfactsandproceedfromfactstoageneralconclusion.Inotherwords,youmovefromspecificexamplestoageneralstatement.
2)Deductivereasoning(fromageneralstatementtoaspecificconclusion)
Theprocessisjusttheoppositeofinductivereasoning---itmovesfromageneralstatementtoaspecificconclusion.Itworksonthemodelofsyllogism---athree-partargumentinwhichtherearetwostatements,knownasthemajorpremiseandtheminorpremise,andaconclusion.
Hereisanexampleofasyllogism:
A.Allhumanbeingsmakemistakes.(ageneralstatement)
B.Xisahumanbeing.
C.Therefore,Xmakesmistakes.(aspecificconclusion)
Fromtheaboveexamplewecanseethatthemajorpremisemustbeanacceptedgeneralization,andtheminor,afactualexampleofthatgeneralization.IfAandBaretrue,C,theconclusion,isboundtobetrue.
Youmustbeverycarefulaboutyourpremises,especiallyyourmajorpremise,suchstatementsas“allstudentslovetostudy”and“womenaremoreimaginativethanmen”arenotgenerallyaccepted,andthereforecannotbeusedasmajorpremises.
(4)Clearlogic
Atypicalargumentativeessayconsistsofthreeparts:
anintroductionwhichidentifiestheissuetobediscussedandexplainstheimportanceofsuchadiscussion;abodywhichpresentstheevidence;andaconclusioninwhichtheproposition,ifitisstatedatthebeginning,isreaffirmed.
Inthebody,itisadvisablethatyoudevotethefirstoneor