Gut Microbiome and Brain.docx
《Gut Microbiome and Brain.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Gut Microbiome and Brain.docx(17页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
GutMicrobiomeandBrain
GutMicrobiomeandBrain-GutAxisinAutism—AberrantDevelopmentofGut-BrainCommunicationandRewardCircuitry
ElizabethM.Sajdel-Sulkowska1 andRomualdZabielski2
[1] Dept.PsychiatryHarvardMedicalSchoolandBWH,USA
[2] DDept.PhysiologicalSciences,WarsawUniversityofLifeSciences,Poland
1.Introduction
Thefunctionofthegutmicrobiomeandthebidirectionalcommunicationbetweenthegastrointestinaltract(GIT)andthebrainisincreasinglyrecognizedinhealthanddiseaseanddisruptioninitscompositionisnotuniquetotheautisticpathology.However,thebidirectionalcommunicationbetweenthegutandthebrain,“thegut-brain/brain-gutaxis”inautismhasbeenrelativelyunderstudied.Ingeneral,thiscommunicationbetweengutandbrainoccursthroughadirectneuronalpathwayviathevagusnerve,thehormonalpathwayofseveralhormonesinvolvedintheregulationoffoodintake,suchascholecystokinin(CCK),ghrelin,leptinandinsulin,andbytheimmunologicalsignalingpathwayinvolvingcytokines.Recentstudiesindicatethatthevagusnerveisinvolvedinimmunomodulationassuggestedbyitsabilitytoattenuatetheproductionofproinflammatorycytokinesinexperimentalmodelsofinflammation(deJongeandUllola,2007).Furthermore,thegutmicrobiomeemergesasamajorplayernotonlyinthematurationofGITtissueandthegutbrainaxisbutalsoinbrainmaturation,throughitseffectonboththeimmuneandendocrinesystems.Manytoxins,toxicants,infectiousagents,dietorstress,affectanindividual’sgutmicrobiome,whichmaybeespeciallysensitiveduringthecriticaldevelopmentalperiod.Disruptionofthedevelopingmicrobiomemayhaveprofoundconsequencesonthedevelopinggut-brainaxisincludingthebrainaswellaslong-termeffectsonboththephysicalandpsychologicaldevelopment.
Thischapterattemptstobridgebasicanimalstudieswithclinicalfindingspertainingtothebrain-gutandgutmicrobiomeinautism,andincludesadiscussionofvariousstrategiesinmanagingautisticsymptoms.Thediscussionalsoincludespossiblechangesintherewardsystem(s)inautismasaconsequenceofalteredgutmicrobiome.Itispossiblethataberrantregulationoftherewardsystem(s)underlinesbehavioralabnormalitiesinASDthatcouldbetargetedbyfuturemicrobiome-targetingtherapies.
2.Effectofperinatalinfectionandtoxicantsonthedevelopingbrain
Inacontinuingquesttounderstandthenatureofgene-environmentinteractionsinASD,wehaverecentlycompletedtwoanimalstudiesexaminingtheeffectofperinatalexposureofthimerosal(TM)andlipopolysaccharides(LPS)onthedevelopingratcentralnervoussystem(CNS).BothTMandinfections(modeledbyLPSexposure)havebeenimplicatedinautisticpathology.
Organicmercurycompoundsarepowerfultoxicantswitharangeofharmfulneurologicaleffectsinhumansandanimals.TM,whichismetabolizedtoethylmercury,hasbeendiscontinuedasapreservativefrominfantvaccinesbutcontinuestobeusedinseveralvaccinesincludingafluvaccineadministeredtopregnantandlactatingmothers (Sulkowskietal.,2012).Perinatalmaternalexposureoftwostrainsofrats,SpragueDawley(SD)andspontaneouslyhypertensive(SHR)rats,tothimerosal(200ug/kgbodyweight)resultedinbothsex-andstrain-specificabnormalitiesintheneonatalrats(Sulkowskietal.,2012).Behavioralabnormalitiesincludeddelayedstartleresponseanddecreasedmotorlearning,withtheeffectsbeingbothsex-andstrain-specific.TMexposurealsoresultedinasignificantincreaseincerebellarlevelsofanoxidativestressmarker(3-nitrotyrosine)andadecreaseincerebellartype2deiodinase,responsibleforlocalintrabrainconversionofthyroxinetotheactivehormone,3’,3,5,-triiodothyronine(T3).TheseeffectswereassociatedwithanincreasedexpressionofseveralgenesnegativelyregulatedbyT3(Sulkowskietal.,2012); Khanetal.,2012)suggestingthatperinatalexposuretoTMimpactsthedevelopingbrainatthegeneticlevel.AsTMexposureduringthepostnatalphasecoincidedwithlactation,someoftheTMwasdeliveredthroughthemilktotheGITandmayhavehadaneffectonthedevelopinggutmicrobiomeknowntobesensitivetoheavymetalexposure(Lapanjeetal.,2007).Thiseffectmaybeinpartduetocompetitionwithzincresultinginadisturbanceinmetallothioneinfunctionandgeneralchelatingcapacityforothermetals.Thus,atleastpartoftheneonatalimpactofTM/mercurycouldbemediatedviaitsactiononthegutmicrobiome.
Inarelatedstudy(Xuetal.,submitted)weexaminedtheeffectofE.colilipopolysaccharides(LPS)exposureduringcriticaldevelopmentalperiodsonthedevelopingbrainemployingtheanimalmodelofinfection.Clinicalandepidemiologicaldatasuggestthatmaternalinfectionduringpregnancyandnursingincreasestheprobabilityofneonatalbraininjuryandmayhavealong-lastingimpactonbrainfunctions.Maternalinfectionduringpregnancyhasbeenlinkedtoneurologicalandneurobehavioraldisordersinhumanssuchascerebralpalsy(Schendel,2001;Schendeletal., 2002),neonatalstrokes(Ferrieo,2004),schizophrenia(Watsonetal.,1999; Pearce,2001)andaffectivedisorders(Watsonetal.,1999).AnimalstudiesimplicatebacterialinfectioninthepathologyofParkinson’sdisease(Carveyetal.,2003),andnotably,schizophreniaandautism(Patterson,2002).Thetriggeringsignalsforcytokineproductionareendotoxins,majorcomponentsoftheoutermembraneofGram-negativebacteria.
LPSexposureisoneofthemostacceptablemodelsofinfection;LPSisasufficienttriggerforcytokineproduction.LPSadministeredtothepregnantmotheraretransferredtothefetusthroughtheplacenta(Kohmuraetal.,2000),andresultinincreasedcytokineslevelsintheamnioticfluid(Urakaboetal.,2001; Gayleetal.,2004)andthefetalbrain(Urakaboetal.,2001).Bacterialinfectionoflactatingmothersalsoresultsinanincreasedlevelofcytokinesinmilk(Bannermanetal.,2004).PretreatmentofsucklingratswithLPS(10mg/kg-dayx5days–thedosewhichproducesweak,transientsignsofendotoxemia)resultsinreducedpancreaticsecretionandattenuatesacutepancreatitisatadultageduetoanincreasedconcentrationoftheantioxidativeenzymeSOinthepancreatictissue,andtothemodulationofcytokinesproduction(Jaworekatal.,2007a, b).Thislate-effectofLPSisaccompaniedbydose-dependentreductionofmRNAsignalforCCK1receptoronpancreaticaciniaswellasmodifiedexpressionofacinarpro-apoptoticheatshockprotein-60(HSP60)andBaxproteins(Jaworeketal.,2007b,2008).EarlypostnatalLPSexposureresultsininceasedexpressionoftoll-likereceptor4(TLR4)andcaspase-3and9-proteinsinthepancreatictissueofadultrats(Bonioretal.,2012).ThesestudiesclearlyindicatethatperinatalexposuretoLPSmayhavelonglastingconsequencesontheGITfunction,andasexpected,thoughnotstudiedindetail,onthebrain-gutaxis.
Perinatalmaternalexposureoftwostrainsofrats,SHRorSDratdamstoLPS(200µg/kgbodyweight)resultedinincreasedrollovertime,delayedstartle,anddecreasedmotorlearning,withtheeffectsbeingbothstrain-andsex-specific.LPSchallengealsoresultedinatrendtowardsanincreaseincerebellarlevelsof3-NTandadecreaseinD2activitiesinLPS-exposedpups(Xuetal.,submitted).SeveralgeneswereaffectedbyLPS.NotablyType2deiodinase2(DIO2)andbrainderivedneurotrophicfactor(BDNF)expressionwassignificantlyelevated,whiletransthyretin(TTR)expressionwasdecreasedfollowingLPSexposure. Invitro,acuteexposureofcerebellarculturestoLPSresultedinadecreasedsizeofthedendriticareaofPurkinjecells.Ourdatathusdemonstratethatperinatalinfectionimpactsthedevelopingcerebelluminasex-andstrain-dependentmannerviamechanismsinvolvingoxidativestress,enzymesinvolvedinmaintaininglocalTHhomeostasis,anddownstreamgeneexpression.Interestingly,genechangesobservedinthebrainsofLPS-exposedratsweredistinctfromTM-associatedgeneeffectsuggestingthattheunderlyingmacromolecularmechanismmaybetrigger-specific.
PerinatalLPSexposurecouldhaveaprofoundeffectonthegutmicrobiomesimilartotheeffectofrepeatedtreatmentwithantibiotics.ExperimentsinhealthymicehaveshownthatdisruptingthenormalbalanceofthegutmicrobiomewithantibioticscausedchangesinmicebehaviorandwasaccompaniedbychangesinBDNFwhichhasbeenlinkedtodepressionandanxiety(Berciketal.,2011; Neufeldetal.,2011).PerinatalLPSexposuremostlikelyaffectsgutmotilityassuggestedbystudiesofirritablebowelsyndrome(IBS),wheremildbacterialovergrowth-associatedmotilitydisordercanbereversedbyantimicrobials(ScarpignatoandPelosini,1999).Animalstudieshavealsoshownthatstresscanchangethecompositionofthemicrobiome,wherethechangesareassociatedwithincreasedvulnerabilitytoinflammatorystimuliintheGIT.Couldgutdysbiosisbeinducedbyrecurrentinfections?
WehaveobservedanincreaseinneurotrophinlevelsinthecerebellaofratsexposedtoLPS(Sajdel-Sulkowskaetal,unpublishedobservation)andbrainregion-specificchangesinneurotrophinlevelsinASD(Sajdel-Sulkowskaetal.,2011).Togethertheseobservationssuggestthatabacterialinfectioncouldtriggerthegutmicrobiometoinducecytokineoverproductionleadingtoanimbalanceofbrainneurotrophinsandcontributetodevelopmentalabnormalities.
3.Effectofenvironmentalperturbationsonthedevelopingcomponentsofthebrain-gutaxis:
Intestinalpermeability,inflammationandgutmicrobiome
AsindicatedabovetheperinataldevelopmentoftheCNSstructureandfunctiongreatlydependsont