中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:10994445 上传时间:2023-02-24 格式:DOCX 页数:10 大小:23.38KB
下载 相关 举报
中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共10页
中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共10页
中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共10页
中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共10页
中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共10页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx

《中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析.docx

中英文报刊钓鱼岛新闻的批评性语篇分析

 

ACriticalDiscourseAnalysisof

ChineseandAmericanNews

aboutDiaoyuIslandsin2012

 

学生姓名 崔灿

     学号   12835014

  专业  外国语言学及应用语言学

    

Abstract

Criticaldiscourseanalysis(henceforthCDA)isacontemporaryapproachtothestudyoflanguageanddiscourseinsocialinstitutions.CDAisaformofdiscourse-orienteddiscourseanalysismethod,intheorybasedonHalliday'sSystemicFunctionalGrammar(SFG).Itseekstorevealtheunderlyingideologiesandpowerrelationhiddenindiscourseandexaminetheconstructiveeffectofdiscourseuponsocialstatus,socialrelationsandsystemsofbeliefsandvalues.

ThisarticlemainlyusesXinBin’sresearchway,suchasclassification,nominalization,passivization,modality,speechreportingandintertextualityasthetoolforanalysis.

Throughthecomparativeanalysis,itisfoundthatnewsdiscourseisneverneutral,transparentandobjective,butideology-loadedandaffectedbysocialandculturalstructures.

Itishopedthatthisstudywillcontributetoabetterunderstandingofcriticalanalysisofnewsdiscourse,givesomeinspirationtoforeignlanguageteachingandfostermoreinterestinmediastudies.

Keywords:

criticaldiscourseanalysis;newsdiscourse;ideology;comparativestudy

 

Introduction

Itiswidelyacknowledgedthatnewsmediaplayaverysignificantroleinourdailylife,notonlyassourcesofinformation,entertainmentandpleasure,butalsoasshaperofperception,behaviorsandinstitutions.Mostofoursocialandpoliticalknowledgeandbeliefsabouttheworldarederivedfromdozensofnewsreportswereadeveryday.Newsmediaexertgreatinfluenceonthelifeofpeopleinsociety.Beinganimportantchannelofinformationtransmission,newsisusuallypresentedastheunbiasedrecordingof"hardfact".However,eventheapparentlyunbiasednewslanguagedoesnotobjectivelyrepresentfacts,butisrelatedtothevalues,beliefs,andpracticeofitssocialcontextinvariousways.Thepresentstudyaimsatexploringsuchmediadiscoursetorevealtheunderpinningideologicalmeaning.Throughthecriticaldiscourseanalysiswecanfindtherealmeaningsbetweenlinesfromthelanguageperspective.DiscourseAnalysishasnowbecomeaverydiverseareaofstudywithavarietyofapproachesineachofanumberofdisciplines.Inthispaper,IfindthenewsabouttheDiaoyuIslandsfromtheChinaDailyandTheTimesin2012andtoanalyzetheunderpinningideologicalmeaninginthesetwonewspaperstorevealthatbiasunderthesuperficialandhelpfosterpeople'scriticalawarenessofnewsreports.Theauthorwillanalyzethismatterinthreeaspects,modality,transformation,andlexicalclassification.

Chapter1LiteratureReview

DiscourseAnalysishasnowbecomeaverydiverseareaofstudywithavarietyofapproachesineachofanumberofdisciplines.Theseapproachescanberoughlydividedintotwogroupsaccordingtothenatureoftheirsocialorientationtodiscourse:

the"non-critical"onesand"critical"ones.Criticalapproachesdifferfromnon-criticalapproachesinnotonlydescribingdiscursivepractices,butalsoshowinghowrelationsofpowerandideologiesshapediscourse,andtheconstructiveeffectsdiscourseshaveuponsocialidentities,systemsofknowledgeandbeliefs.

1.1TheResearchBackgroundofCriticalDiscourseAnalysis

Inthepasttwodecades,CriticalDiscourseAnalysishasdevelopedalot.TherealbirthofCriticalDiscourseAnalysisshouldbeattributedtothegreatscaleofresearchontheBritishMassMediain1970s.In1976theresearchersofGlasgowUniversityreportedtheirresultsofthe"badnews"onTVTheydiscoveredafterasystemicstudythattremendousnewsreportsexistedprejudiciallyinthegovernmentandcapitalists'favor.Theyimmediatelycameupmanyotherproductiveresults.EvenHalliday'sworkisverycompatiblewiththeiraimsininsistingthatthefunctionsoflinguisticstructuresarebasedonsocialstructures.InthefollowingthepublicationofthebookPowerandControl,RogerFowlershiftedhisattentiontothecriticalstudyofliteratureandlinguistics.GuntherKressin1985arguedthatwecouldnotremainatthesimplefactvalidatedinLanguageandControlthatdiscourseisnotideologicallyfree,andthereisacloserelationshipbetweenlanguageordiscourseandthesocialstructureorsocialprocesstheycomefrom.RogerFowler'scomingbacktothestudyofCDAwasfirstseenin1986,withthepublicationofLinguisticCriticism.Thebookisanintroductiontothecriticalstudyofdiscourse.AnotherbookNotesonCriticallinguisticsissuedin1987couldbeademonstrationofhischangeinpositioninghisstudy.Uptonow,thetheoryofCDAhasquitedeveloped.Forexample,in1991,RogerFowlerpublishedTheLinguisticEncyclopedia,whichhasbecomeamilestoneforthisbranchtowinitsofficialreceptioninthefieldoflinguistics.ManyfamouscriticallinguistsdistinguishthemselvesinthestudyofCDA.ThemodernlinguistcloughbegantoresearchCDAinthe1980s,andwrotedownmanybooks:

LanguageandPower(1989),NewLabor,NewLanguage?

(2000),andsomerelativepapers,whichestablishedhisplaceintheCDAresearch.VanDijk,RuthWodakandNormanFairclougharealsoimportantCDAlinguists.However,theirwaysofCDAresearcharedifferent.WiththeSocio-cognitivemodel,VanDijkanalyzedtheideologyfromsocial,cognitiveanddiscourseaspects.Wodakmainlyusedawayofdiscourse-historical,whichwasinfluencedbydiscoursecognitivemodel.AnotheroneisNormanFairclough,hiswayofresearchwascloselyrelatedtoM.A.K.Halliday'sSystemicFunctionalGrammar.

RecentlynotonlyinWesterncountriesbutalsoinChinathatCDAhasrevivedgreatattentionoflinguists.ChenZhongzhu,aprofessorinBeijingUniversity,isthefirsttointroducecriticallinguisticsintoChina.XinBinisanotherprominentfigureincriticalnewsanalysisathome.HisresearchsubjectisverycomprehensiverangingfromthetheoreticaloriginanddevelopmentofCLtotheanalysisofrealdiscoursetoshowhowlanguage,powerandideologyperformindifferentdiscourses.Inhisearlyarticles,Xin(1996)proposesthatacomparativestudyonnewsdiscourseisveryuseful.Hemakescomparativestudiesonnewsreportsfromdifferentnewspapersreportingthesameevent,employingsuchanalyticaltoolsasclassification,nominalization,passivization,modality,speechreportingandintertextuality.Inaddition,therelationshipofCDAtonewsdiscourse,thatofCDAtosystemic-functionallinguistics(SFL)andthemethodologyofCDAarealsounderdiscussioninhispapers.Thisarticlemainlyuseshisresearchwayasthetoolforanalysis.

1.2ThePurposeandSignificanceofthePresentStudy

ThepresentstudyisundertakenformtheperspectiveofCriticalDiscourseAnalysis(CDA).Theauthorholdstheviewthatthroughthecriticalanalysisofnewsreports,itcanhelpfosterpeople'scriticalawarenessofnewsreportsandrevealtheunderpinningideologicalmeaninginthemedia.

ThisstudyfocusesonthenewscoverageoftheDiaoyuislandsissuefromTheTimes,andChinaDaily,alloccupyleadingstatusinnewsmediafield.Theresearchemploysthemethodofcriticalanalysistoexaminehowwesternmediaembedideologyinnewsreportingthustoachievetheirpoliticalpurposes.Andalsothestudyaimstofindouttherelationshipbetweendiscourse,ideologyandpower,soastohelpreaderstocultivateandenhancetheircriticalawarenessinthefaceofthepurpose-orientedmedia.

Chapter2CaseStudies

TheDiaoyuIslandsisalongdisputedissueintherelationshipofChinaandJapan.InApril17,2012,ShintaroIshihara,theJapanesegovernor,announcedtobuytheislands,whichrejectedbytheChinesegovernmentandpeople.InJuly,AmericaandJapansignedanamendmenttomaketheDiaoyuIslandscoveredbyaUS-Japansecuritypact.Amonthlater,theHongKongresidentslandedtheislandstoprotectthesovereigntythatwerecaughtbytheJapanillegally.Chinaclaimsthesovereigntyiftheislandsandurgessettlingtheissuethroughnegotiations.

ThispaperselectedfourextractedpiecesofnewsfromChinaDailyandTheTimesaboutthedisputein2012.Theauthorwillanalyzethismatterinthreeaspects,modality,transformation,andlexicalclassification.

2.1Modality

OneofthemostusefulitemsinCriticalDiscourseAnalysisismodality.ThealternativeexplanationofmodalityontheCriticalDiscourseAnalysis,especiallyonthenewsdiscourseanalysis,means"comment"or"attitude".ThedefinitionofModalityisakindofactivitytothetextordiscoursewhichcanexplicitorimplicitthelinguisticviewpointorstandpointtakenbythespeaker.

ThestudiesofModalityfocusonthetense,thechoiceofdirectandindirectspeechandthechoiceofthe.First,thetenseusagesbetweenthesetwonewsreportsarealmostalike.Therefore,thispapermainlyfocusesonthedirectandindirectspeech.Itisobvioustofindthedifferencebetweendirectspeechandindirectspeechfromthesemanticlevel.Directspeechisthematter-of-factwaytorecordtheutteranceofspeaker,whileindirectspeechisakindofparaphraseorinterpretationoftheoriginalutterance.However,weshouldpointoutthatthemaindifferencebetweendirectspeechandindirectspeechisthespeaker'sattitudetowardsthereportedspeech.Thesourceofthedirectspeechcanreflectthebiasofthemedia.Becausethemediacanchoosewhoshouldbelistenedinthenewsandwhichspeechshouldbeheard.Ontheotherhand,theusageoftheindirectspeechcanreflectmore.Theindirectspeechwillignoremanythingsofthespeaker,suchasthetone.Itmeansthatthejournalistsjustrespectthecontentofthe

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 经济学

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1