企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:9772063 上传时间:2023-02-06 格式:DOCX 页数:7 大小:20.25KB
下载 相关 举报
企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx

《企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

企业社会责任英文原文加翻译.docx

企业社会责任英文原文加翻译

一.英文原文

MoralDiscourseandCorporateSocialResponsibilityReporting

ByMaryAnnReynolds,KristiYuthas

ABSTRACT

Thispaperexaminesvoluntarycorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)reportingasaformofmoraldiscourse.Itexploreshowalternativestakeholderperspectivesleadtodifferingperceptionsoftheprocessandcontentofresponsiblereporting.Wecontrasttraditionalstakeholdertheory,whichviewsstakeholdersasexternalpartieshavingasocialcontractwithcorporations,withanemergingperspective,whichviewsinteractionamongcorporationsandconstituentsasrelationalinnature.Thismovesthestakeholderfromanexternalentitytoonethatisintegraltocorporateactivity.Weexplorehowthesealternativestakeholderperspectivesgiverisetodifferentnormativedemandsforstakeholderengagement,managerialprocesses,andcommunication.WediscussmodelsofCSRreportingandaccountability:

EMAS,theISO14000series,SA8000,AA1000,theGlobalReportingInitiative,andtheCopenhagenCharter.Weexplorehowthesemodelsrelatetothestakeholderphilosophiesandfindthattheyarelargelyconsistentwiththetraditionalatomisticviewbutfallfarshortofthedemandsformoralengagementprescribedbyarelationalstakeholderperspective.Adoptingarelationalviewrequiresstakeholderengagementnotonlyinprescribingreportingrequiremenu,butalsoindiscourserelatingtocoreaspectsofthecorporationsuchasmission,values,andmanagementsystems,Habermas'theoryofcommunicativeactionprovidesguidelinesforengagingstakeholdersinthismoraldiscourse.

KEYWORDS:

stakeholderengagement,stakeholderreporting,relationalstakeholderperspective,corporatesocialresponsibility,TheoryofCommunicativeAction,discourseethics

Introduction

Throughoutthispaper,weuseHabermas'theoryofcommunicativeaction(1984,1987,1990)asameansthroughwhichtocritiquecurrentapproachescorporatethedegreemenuforsocialresponsibilityreportingintermstowhichthesereportsembodyrequiremoraldiscourse.Weprovideabriefintroductiontokeyelementsofthetheoryandgrounditinsocialtheory.WethendiscussthedetailsastheyapplytoCSRreporting.

Ouranalysisisconductedintwostages,relyingondifferentportionsofHabermas'theory.Inthefirstpart,weexaminetheconditionsthatallowforbasiccommunicativeunderstanding.Theseconditionsaretheunspokenassumptionsunderlyingcommunication.Innormalcommunication,fourbasicuniversalassumptionsaremade:

thatthespeakeristellingthetruth,thathemeanswhathesays,andthatwhathesaysisappropriateinitscontext,andthatitisunderstandabletothelistener.Inthefirstpartofthepaper,weshowhowmodelsorframeworksforCSRreporting,takentogether,addresstheseassumptionsandcontributetotheeffectivenessofCSRreportsasaformofcommunication.Inthesecondpartofouranalysis,werelyupontheethicalaspectsofHabermas'theoryasameansthroughwhichtoprovideanormativecritiqueofthebodyofCSRreportingframeworks.Thetheoryofcommunicativeactionsuggeststhatsocialprogresscanbeaccomplishedthroughrationaldiscourseunderspecificconditions.Thediscoursemustbeinclusive,democratic,andfreeofpowerasymmetries.Apel(1980)hassuggestedthattheethicalnatureofanagreementderivesfromtheprocessusedtoarriveatthatagreement(ratherthanuniversalorexternally-imposedethicalstandards).WeuseHabermas'principlesasameanstoexaminetheextenttocorporatecommunicationisreflectiveofmoraldiscourse.Wefindthatwhiletheframeworksgenerallypromotestakeholderconsultation,theyfallshortofprovidingotherconditionsneededformoraldiscourse.Inparticular,theyfailtoprovidemechanismsthatallowstakeholderswithdifferingresourcestoparticipatedemocraticallyindiscourse.

Thepaperisorganizedasfollows.First,weintroducesocialresponsibilityandcorporatedisclosureconceptsrelatedtoCSRreporting.Next,weexplorewidely-usedframeworksassociatedwithcorporateaccountabilityintheCSRrealm.Then,asnotedabove,weprovidea2-partanalysisofhowconceptsfromHabermas'theoryofcommunicativeactionarecurrentlyrealizedinguidanceprovidedbyCSRreportingmodels.Weclosewithconcludingremarks.

Background:

socialresponsibilityandcorporatedisclosure

Corporatesocialresponsibilityisaddressedincurrentbusiness,accountingandethicsliterature.Theissuewaswidelydiscussedintheseventiesandearlyeightiesandthendroppedoutofsight.Thecurrentre-energizedfocusincludessocial,environmentalandethicalreportingbycorporations.Thenotionofcorporatesocialdisclosurearisesfromaviewofsocialtheorywhichholdsthatthecorporationowesadutytothesociety;orhasasocialcontract.OnewidelycitedquotationcomesfromShockerandSethi(1974,p.67):

"Anysocialinstitution一andbusinessinnoexception一operatesinsocietyviaasocialcontract,expressedorimplied,wherebyitssurvivalandgrowtharebasedon:

1.Thedeliveryofsomesociallydesirableendstosocietyingeneraland,

2.Thedistributionofeconomic,socialorpoliticalbenefitstogroupsfromwhichitderivesitspower.

Inadnamicsociety,neitherthesourcesofinstitutionalpowernortheneedsforitsservicesarepermanent.Therefore,aninstitutionmustconstantlymeetthetwintestsoflegitimacyandrelevancebydemonstrafingthatsocietyrequiresitsservicesandthatthegroupsbenefitingfromitsrewardshavesociety'sapproval."

CarrollandBucholtzofferafourpartdefinitionofcorporatesocialresponsibility,"Thesocialresponsibilityofbusinessencompassestheeconomic,legal,ethical,anddiscretionary(philanthropic)expectadonsthatsocietyhasoforganizationsatagivenpointintime(2006,p.35)."Thisdefinitionreflectscurrentthinkingoncorporatesocialresponsibilityandacknowledgestheneedtonoteshiftsinsocialenvironment,thesemaybesocial,legal,orpolitical.

Corporateinvestorsarequestioningtheadequacyofthiscommunicationapproachandhavecalledforincreasedreportingonissuesofbroadsocietalinterest.Presentlyitisestimatedthattrillionsofdollarsareallocatedtoinvestmentsbasedonsomesocialcriteria(SparkesandCowton,2004).Confulionmayarisewiththelackofcomparablereporting.Implementableguidelineshaveconsequentlybeendevelopedbygroupsproposingmodelsorframeworksforreporting(communicating)andauditing(verifying).Leadingexamplesinordertheywerefirstissuedare:

EMAS(European,particularlyGermanenvironmentalmanagementandaudit)

ISO14001(Internationallyrecognizedenvironmentalmanagementcertification)

SA8000(SocialAccountabilityInternationallaborstandard).

AA1000(Internationalaccountabilityassurantereportingstandard).

CopenhagenCharter(Internationalstandardinvolvingstakeholdercommunications).

GRI(GlobalReportingInitiative)2000(Internationalsustainabilityreport).

Modelsforcorporatesocialresponsibilityreporting

Approachestosocialandnaturalenvironmentalaccountabilityhavebeendevelopedforvariouspurposes.ClassifyingthemundertheumbrellaofCSRreportingwewilldiscusssomewidelyusedmodelsandintroducealesswell-knownmodel,whichmayprovideadditionalbenefit.

Eco-ManagementandAuditScheme(EMAS,1995,2001)

TheEuropeanCommissionsetdownthebasicprinciplesunderlyingtheEMASschemeinCouncilRegulation1836/93-EMASoftheEuropeanCommission.Thepurposewasimprovementofenvironmentalperformanceandwasinitiallydirectedatmanufacturingfirms.Thishassincebeenextendedtoallowbroadparticipationbyanypublicorprivateentitywishingtoparticipate.Theregulationcallsforanenvironmentalstatementfromtheentityandrequiresauditing.Further,thereisacontinualrequirementtodocumentongoingcontinualimprovementthroughtheofimplementationpolicies,programmesandmanagementsystemsbyasystematic,objective,andperiodicevaluationofperformance.Thereisalsoanobligationtoinformthepublicoftheresultsoftheevaluation.

ThearticleonparticipationstatesthattheschemeisopentopublicorprivateentitiesoperatingintheEUortheEuropeanEconomicArea(EEA).Thesitemayberegisteredifthesitehasanenvironmentalpolicy,asitereview,anenvironmentalaudit,objectivesforcontinuousimprovement,astatementfromeachsite,verificationcoveringpoficy,programmes,themanagementsystem,thereviewandauditprocedure,andthestatementprovided.ThevalidatedenvironmentalstatementisthenforwardedtothecompetentbodyintheMemberState.Thestatementisalsodisseminatedtothepublicaftertheregistrationofthesitehasbeencompleted.Thestatementshouldbeaconcise,comprehensibledescriptionofactivitiesatthesite;withanassessmentofsignificantrelevantenvironmentalissues,including:

emissions,wastegeneration,consumptionofrawmaterials,energyandwater,noiseandothersignificantaspects;apresentationofthecompany'senvironmentalpoficy,programmeandmanagementsystematthesite,thedeadlineforthenextstatement,andthenameoftheaccreditedenvironmentalverifier.TheEMAS2001wasstrengthenedbyrequiringISO14001astheenvironmentalmanagementsystem.

CouncilonEconomicPrioritiesAccreditationAgencySocialAccountabilityStandard(SA8000,1998)/renamedSocialAccountabilityInternational(SAI)

Thisstandardhasachangeinfocusandisconcernedwithfairlaborpracticesworldwide.Itisdividedintopurposeandscope,normativeelementsandtheirinterpretation,definitions,andsocialaccountabilityrequirements.Thesocialaccountabilityrequirementsinclude:

childlabor,forcedlabor,healthandsafety,freedomofassocianonand

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 总结汇报 > 学习总结

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1