17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:9680256 上传时间:2023-02-05 格式:DOCX 页数:11 大小:24.58KB
下载 相关 举报
17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共11页
17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共11页
17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共11页
17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共11页
17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共11页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx

《17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

17246外文翻译 并购支付方式在欧洲的选择.docx

17246外文翻译并购支付方式在欧洲的选择

 

外文翻译

并购支付方式在欧洲的选择

 

姓名:

主力军

学号:

120107246

 

原文:

ThechoiceofpaymentmethodinEuropeanM&A

GlobalM&Aactivityhasgrowndramaticallyoverthelasttenyears,bringingwithitmajorchangesintheorganizationandcontrolofeconomicactivityaroundtheworld.Yet,thereismuchabouttheM&Aprocessthatwedonotfullyunderstand,includingthechoiceofpaymentmethod.GiventhelargesizeofmanyM&Atransactions,thefinancingdecisioncanhaveasignificantimpactonanacquirer’sownershipstructure,financialleverage,andsubsequentfinancingdecisions.Thefinancingdecisioncanalsohaveseriouscorporatecontrol,riskbearing,taxandcashflowimplicationsforthebuyingandsellingfirmsandshareholders.

InmakinganM&Acurrencydecision,abidderisfacedwithachoicebetweenusingcashandstockasdealconsideration.Giventhatmostbiddershavelimitedcashandliquidassets,cashoffersgenerallyrequiredebtfinancing.Asaconsequence,abidderimplicitlyfacesthechoiceofdebtorequityfinancing,whichcaninvolveatradeoffbetweencorporatecontrolconcernsofissuingequityandrisingfinancialdistresscostsofissuingdebt.Thus,abidder’sM&Acurrencydecisioncanbestronglyinfluencedbyitsdebtcapacityandexistingleverage.Itcanalsobestronglyinfluencedbymanagement’sdesiretomaintaintheexistingcorporategovernancestructure.Incontrast,asellercanbefacedwithatradeoffbetweenthetaxbenefitsofstockandtheliquidityandriskminimizingbenefitsofcashconsideration.Forexample,sellersmaybewillingtoacceptstockiftheyhavealowtaxbasisinthetargetstockandcandefertheirtaxliabilitiesbyacceptingbidderstockaspayment.Ontheotherhand,sellerscanprefercashconsiderationtosidesteptheriskofbecomingaminorityshareholderinabidderwithconcentratedownership,therebyavoidingtheassociatedmoralhazardproblems.Unfortunately,duetodatalimitations,thissellertradeoffcannotbeeasilymeasured.

Underexistingtheoriesofcapitalstructure,debtcapacityisapositivefunctionoftangibleassets,earningsgrowthandassetdiversificationandanegativefunctionofassetvolatility.Firmswithgreatertangibleassetscanborrowmoreprivatelyfrombanksandpubliclyinthebondmarket.Sincelargerfirmsaregenerallymorediversified,weexpectthemtohavealowerprobabilityofbankruptcyatagivenleverageratioandthus,greaterdebtcapacity.Thesefinancingconstraintandbankruptcyriskconsiderationscanalsoreducealenderswillingnesstofinanceabidder’scashbid,especiallyinrelativelylargedeals.

InassessingpotentialdeterminantsofanM&Apaymentmethod,ourfocusisonabidder’sM&Afinancingchoices,recognizingthattargetscanalsoinfluencethefinaltermsofanM&Adeal.However,ifatarget’sfinancingchoiceisunacceptabletothebidder,thentheproposedM&Atransactionislikelytobeabortedorelsethebiddercanmakeahostileofferonitsownterms.Foradealtosucceed,thebiddermustbesatisfiedwiththefinancialstructureofthedeal.

Bidderandtargetconsiderations:

*CorporateControl

Bidderscontrolledbyamajorshareholdershouldbereluctanttousestockfinancingwhenthiscausesthecontrollingshareholdertorisklosingcontrol.Assumingcontrolisvaluable,thepresenceofdominantshareholderpositionsshouldbeassociatedwithmorefrequentuseofcash,especiallywhenthecontrollingshareholder’spositionisthreatened.Tocapturethiseffect,weusetheultimatevotingstakeheldbythelargestcontrollingshareholder.

Abidderwithdiffuseorhighlyconcentratedownershipislesslikelytobeconcernedwithcorporatecontrolissues.Inlinewiththisargument,Martin(1996)documentsasignificantlynegativerelationshipbetweenthelikelihoodofstockfinancingandmanagerialownershiponlyovertheintermediateownershiprange.Therefore,weincorporatethepossibilityofanon-linearrelationshipbetweenthemethodofpaymentandthevotingrightsofabidder’scontrollingshareholderbyestimatingbothalinearandcubicspecificationfortheultimatevotingcontrolpercentageofthebidder’slargestshareholder.Inourrobustnessanalysis,wealsoestimateasplinefunctionforthisvariable.

CorporatecontrolconcernsinM&Aactivitycanmanifestthemselvesinmoresubtleways.Concentratedownershipofatargetmeansthatastockfinancedacquisitioncancreatealargeblockholder,threateningthecorporategovernanceoftheacquirer.Iftheselleriscloselyheldorisacorporationdisposingofadivision,thenownershipconcentrationtendstobeveryconcentrated.ThisimpliesthatfinancingtheM&Adealwithstockcancreateanewblockholderinthebidder.Whiletheriskofcreatinganewbidderblockholderwithstockfinancingishigherwhenatargethasaconcentratedownershipstructure,thisisespeciallyturewhenrelativesizeofthedealislarge.Tocapturetheriskofcreatingalargeblockholderwhenbuyingatargetwithstockfinancing,weemployCONTROLLOSS,theproductbetweenthetarget’scontrolblockandthedeal’sralativesize.Therelativedealsizeiscomputedastheratioofoffersize(excludingassumedliabilities)tothesumofabidder’sequitypre-offercapitalizationplustheoffersize.Thetarget’scontrollingblockholderisassumedtohave100%ownershipforunlistedtargetsandsubsidiarytargets.

*Collateral,FinancialLeverageandDebtCapacity

Weusethefractionoftangibleassetsasourprimarymeasureofabidder’sabilitytopaycash,financedfromadditionalborrowing.COLLATERALismeasuredbytheratioofproperty,plantandequipmenttobookvalueoftotalassets.Myers(1977)arguesthatdebtholdersinfirmswithfewertangibleassetsandmoregrowthopportunitiesaresubjecttogreatermoralhazardrisk,whichincreasesthecostofdebt,oftenmakingstockmoreattractive.Hovakimian,OplerandTitman(2001)findthatafirm’spercentageoftangibleassetshasastrongpositiveinfluenceonitsdebtlevel.

Wealsocontrolforabidder’sfinancialconditionwithitsleverageratio,FIN’LLEVERAGE.Sincecashisprimarilyobtainedbyissuingnewdebt,highlyleveredbiddersareconstrainedintheirabilitytoissuedebtandasaconsequenceusestockfinancingmorefrequently.Abidder’sfinancialleverageismeasuredbythesumofthebidder’sfacevalueofdebtpriortotheM&Aannouncementplusthedealvalue(includingassumedliabilities)dividedbythesumofthebookvalveoftotalassetspriortotheannouncementplusthedealvalue(includingassumedliabilities).Thiscapturesthebidder’spost-dealleverageifthetransactionisdebtfinanced.ThismeasurediffersfromMartin(1996)whousesapre-dealbidderleveragemeasureadjustedforindustrymeanandreportsaninsignificanteffect.

Biddersizeislikelytoinfluenceitsfinancingchoices.Largerfirmsaremorediversifiedandthus,haveproportionallylowerexpectedbankruptcycosts.Theyalsohavelowerflotationcostsandarelikelytohavebetteraccesstodebtmarkets,makingdebtfinancingmorereadilyavailable.Thus,cashfinancingshouldbemorefeasibleinthecaseoflargerfirms.Largerfirmsarealsomoreapttochoosecashfinancinginsmallerdealsduetoitseaseofuse,providedtheyhavesufficientunuseddebtcapacityorliquidassets.Further,theuseofcashallowsthebiddertoavoidthesignificantcostsofobtainingshareholderapprovalofpre-emptiverightsexemptionsandauthorizationsandthehigherregulatorycostsofstockoffers.Wemeasurebidderassetssizebythelogofpre-mergerbookvalueofassetsindollars(totalassets).Inadditiontobiddercontrolandfinancingconsiderations,weneedtotakeintoaccountseveralotherbiddercharacteristics.

*RelativeDealSize,BidderStockPriceRunupandAsymmetricInformation

Hansen(1987)predictsthatbiddershavegreaterincentivestofinancewithstockwhentheasymmetricinformationabouttargetassetsishigh.Thisinformationasymmetryislikelytoriseastargetassetsriseinvaluerelativetothoseofabidder.Yet,stockisusedinrelativelylargerdeals,itproducesmoreseriousdilutionofadominantshareholder’scontrolposition.Finally,asbidderequitycapitalizationrises,concernaboutitsfinancingconstraintfalls,sincethereisarelativelysmallerimpactonitsoverallfinancialconditon.WeproxyfortheseeffectswithRELSIZE,whichiscomputedastheratioofdealoffersize(excludingassumedliabilities)dividedbythesumofthedeal’soffersizeplusthebidder’spre-offermarketcapitalizationattheyear-endpriortothebid.

BothMyersandMajluf(1984)andHansen(1987)predictthatbidderswillprefertofinancewithstockwhentheyconsidertheirstockovervaluedbythemarketandprefertofinancewithcashwhentheyconsidertheirstockundervalued.Asuncertaintyaboutbidderassetvaluerises,thisadverseselectioneffectisexacerbated.Martin(1996)findsevidenceconsistentwiththisadverseselectionprediction.Forasampleofpubliclytradedtargets,Travlos(1987)findsthatstockfinancedM&Adealsexhibitmuchlargernegativeannouncementeffectsthancashfinanceddeals.Heconcludesthisisconsistentwiththeempiricalvalidityofanadverseselectioneffect.Weuseasaproxyforbidderovervaluation(orundervaluation),calculatedfromabidder’sbuyandholdcumulativestockreturnovertheyearprecedingtheM&Aannouncementmonth.

Inadditiontobidderconsiderations,weneedtotakeintoaccounttypicaltargetconsiderations.Thesepreferencesarerelatedtorisk,liquidity,asymmetricinformationandhomebias.

T1.UnlistedTargetsandSubsidiaryTargets

Weuseanindicatorvariable,UNLISTEDTARGET,tocontrolforlistingst

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 表格模板 > 书信模板

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1