旅游服务业外文文献.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:9443361 上传时间:2023-02-04 格式:DOCX 页数:11 大小:24.96KB
下载 相关 举报
旅游服务业外文文献.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共11页
旅游服务业外文文献.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共11页
旅游服务业外文文献.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共11页
旅游服务业外文文献.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共11页
旅游服务业外文文献.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共11页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

旅游服务业外文文献.docx

《旅游服务业外文文献.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《旅游服务业外文文献.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

旅游服务业外文文献.docx

旅游服务业外文文献

 

毕业论文

外文参考资料原文及译文

 

外文题目(中文):

Culturalgoods,marketandnationalrelationsandinternationalfreetradesystem(文化商品,市场与国家关系和国际自由贸易制度)

时间:

2010年9月至2011年6月

 

Culturalgoods,marketandnationalrelationsandinternationalfreetradesystem

JimMcGuigan

Anexampleinculturalstudiesisthemostpopulartoday”culturaleconomy"—oneconomicandculturalthoughtstocheckit,ratherthanasanindustryasakindofwords.CulturalhistorianswillsaythetrendisdifficulttoAtlanticnewparty.In1992,BritishmediaacademicsJimMaiGuiGenblamedoncontemporaryparadigmcrisiscultureresearch,itsseparationfromculturalandpoliticaleconomy.Heputforwardlouderappealandapairofconsumptionculturemodeofproductionasthecenter.Hisproposalalsoapopulistcriticism,leading,consumptionasthecenter,withvalueofexamplesoftheaudience,’'positiveisasovereignconsumptionsubjectiswho(imagineis)notindustrialcontroleconomicandculturalexistencereasonMcGrigan,1992)。

MaiGuiGen,ofcourse,quiteapersoninhisowntime。

Howtoputbackonthebottle-fortheelvesin'economicrecoverymode,avoiditenters'keybacktomarxisteconomicrightsfatalism—isstillaprovocative,butnotoutofthemission.

In1992,whenthehumanitiescenteratWesleyanuniversityinMassachusetts,theoristandculturecombinedeach1teamdirectorinAmericancultureindustryforatermcalledseminar"producingandsalesculture”(MrMann,1996).Thisisanamazingattempt,sponsoredbyCoca—ColaCoca—Colafoundation,academicaccesstoculturalcriticismoftheindustry,howthelatterimaginemarketresearchandconsumer,andaskedthemiftheyintentionallycreateandshapeourhope。

Theresearchmethods,launchedamodule,thisconferencemostclosetoovercomeepistemologyisdividedintoproductioncenterandconsumptionasthecenterofthemethod,materialconditionsincultureunderstandingquery,namelyasadepartment。

Fastforwardtotheearly21stcentury,theeconomyofthe"culture"currentlyhypecultureandmediaresearchwonadditionalvalue,becausethistime,itisnotonlythescholarsintheivorytowerwhoissupporttheanalyticreasons.Moreimportantis,’aculturalturn’initsmomentumgatheredenterprisesector,accordingto'culture'playsakeyroleintheeconomicaspect,andmarketingpractices,ontheonehand,theperformanceoftheorganization,enhancetheother。

Howeverminoratrend,andalsoitisnotablethatineconomicdiscipline,akeyeconomicgeographerproposedqualityasaculturaleconomicsaset,discoursestructure,positiveframemarket.Therefore,beforethemarketdoesnotexistatthe2002·),describedsomeofitsobjective,transcendentalmethod(DEguayanddiscourse.Economictheoryisregardedasaneconomicstructure,positiveensembleshapingreality(Karen,1998,2000)。

Thepolitical,cultural,andpolicies.

IMaiGuiGeninagreementwithearlyinastandoffin1990saboutthisisculturalinvestigation。

Likehimbackafter,Ithinkthesimpleanswerisretrievealostcausesmaterialismofthereturnofthetraditionalcultureresearchpoliticaleconomics。

Inordertodothis,Iwilldevotemyselftotheproductionofmaterialculturestudy.Thetrajectoryoftheeconomyandculture,however,thereisawarning.Itrunstheriskoftriggeredbythecentralconcernofculturalresearchsubjectidentity,namelytheculturalpolitics。

Doublechallenge,Iwanttotakeaproject,throughpolicyresearchkey,islocatedinthemethodtoyourselfthehandontheculturalandeconomictiesbetweenabetween,andpoliticsandpolicy,suchasin.Letmeexplainmore.Mainstreamculturehastostayinmytwoaspectsofthefieldinaworldanalysisdifferentiation。

Intheirplanningthings,’politicalcommitment’needtoassumethecriticismandboycott;`policy,ontheotherhand,iswithsecurity,hegemony,andthestatusquo.Thisisunderstandablemainstreamcultureresearch(itsstaplefare,thatcriticismpower)firedpolicyguidancecultureresearchcommittedrevisionistrebelswhothoughtthebetrayaloffrommargin(1titleinthestudyofregionalcultureofprivileges)tocenter,where`power’isinstitutionalizedpolicyform,corruptionandtheabsolutenecessity。

Wewouldn’tbesittingheretodayinthisseminar,andifwebelievesuchapartialideaofeffectiveness.Thisisone-sided,becauseitdoesnotacknowledgebothdesireandpossibilityofthebridgeacademicworkerspoliticalcriticismandparticipateinthegapbetween.Forthoseofuswhotodaytoshareaconcept:

acriticalframepolicyresearchprovidesabreakthroughpointthesetransitionalactivities。

ItspecifiesascholarBBS,tomeetthedecisionmakersandanalystswhoarewillingtoengageinmultidisciplinarypolicydiscussions.Mostimportantly,thetwoorganizationsdedicatedtothepossibilityofsocialtransformationinChinahasincrementalreformthroughtheregulatorysystem,fromthebackdropofculturalproduction`'meansamorecomplexthanwhattheprocessoftheculturalandeconomicmodecanbealoneprovides。

Forus,evenstartedthinking,culturalpolicyareasregulatorypolicychanges,wemustfirstrecognizethat'culture’cannotsimplyfollowmarketprinciples,becauseitisinthesametime"meansandpurposeofsocialregulationandgovernment”(Bennett,1992,26),therefore,’culture”isthesupervisionsystem,constitutivecanbeconsideredasindispensablerationalitygovernment.Thisculture/governmentcouplets,shouldbegivenequalweightsotheanalysisofthecorrectculturetendencyresearchemphasizethelinkbetweencultural/market。

Inaddition,wemustnotbeconceptmisleadingis,thecloserelationshipbetween’culture'and'government’isChinaalone。

EvenAmericaandBritainruledkingdomderegulationofspeech,stillbeontime,priceandtransmissionstandardcontenttelevisionindustryespeciallyinlanddepartments(hyjalLin,2001)pelosi.`culture’shouldbewhetherconsciousness,likeacommodityinthecenteroftheinternationaldebateisunderway

Thefeasibilityofaboutculturecross-mediabordertrade。

InCanada,EuropeandmorerecentlyintheUnitedStates(onmediaownershipdebateisinvolved,thefederalcommunicationscommission’srulingheart),countriesandculturalpolicyinstrumenttodelimitthenationalculturalmarketactiveparticipation。

Throwopentheresistanceofnationalculture,therefore,isnotjustChinamarketintegratedly。

Researchproblems,Ithinkpiecesareasfollows:

whatconstitutesaquerytheculturalmarketthepolicymanagement?

Andtheyshouldgotowhere?

Likeotherpolicyareas,ChinaafterjoiningtheWTO,culturalpolicyhasbecomesuchturmoilandcontroversialareas,itstripeeasierthanevertodifferentthoughtsandprescription。

InterventionIstillshouldnotice,nonlocalfluxbecauseinsuchacultureindustry"asapolicyofbirth”classificationofjustrecent.Itcanbetracedbackto2001,whenthe10thfive-yearplanmadeconspicuousplace,forthefirsttimechanyeforreformtomandarinerabegan.FromthecurrentchallengesofopeningChina'swtocontentindustryprovidescountryfurtherencouragedevelopmentthink-tankmusiccollegeinHongKongacademyforperformingartsinserviceastheyoungtalentsemergingculturalindustries。

Then,lastyear,twomainresearchinstitutions”nationalcultureindustry"alsolaunchedoneafteranother,inthenorth,inBeijinguniversity,inShanghaijiaotonguniversityinthesouth。

Meanwhile,theblueofculturalindustryeachyeartheinstituteofsocialcenterissuedbyChinesecultureresearchinscience.InChina,academiaprovidesafeasiblepolicySuggestions,locationandapplicationhumanitiesspiritisanobviousrealityculturalissuesmoreandmorepolicy。

ThedomainResearchproblem—basednowletusreturnandfulfillingmethodandmybigframeworkresearchproblemsspecificproblemsgroup。

Thoughtwhatthepurposeis’culture’and'economic','politicalandpolicyintheseriesservicetoourpolicyreviewChineseculture?

Thismakesmytable3

Thebasicpremisethatisabuilt-in:

on

1。

Culturalneedtobeunderstoodasaneconomicsector,namely'cultureindustry’asthestateregulators;2。

Cultureisacontinuousdevelopmentofrelations,economicandpolicyareas,andtrade;3.Cultureisthegoods,butnotlikeanyothercommodity。

Allthesebuildinggroundfloorismybigisbignotask:

iftheUnitedStatestheory'market'itselfisakindofwordbuilding,asChina?

Finalmodelinthemediaindustryinparticular,Chinashouldtakebacksharplytothecountry’spatternissimilartotheU。

S.publicculturalproducts.RollingprovideThishastakenontwolevels,andinthecountyTVmediaandboardlevelofsmall-scalenewsunitsacrosstheriver.Whethertoadoptaderegulationinoverbigmediacollectivizationformandcontent?

HowEurope,culturalmarket?

Indecision—makinganddebates,theEuropeanaffairscommitteenewregulationmeans?

Withdemocracyisculturalcommercialized,thefinalanswersculturalconsumptionspace,andcreateadiversityofcultures?

Theseproblemsaremorecomplex,becausetheyarehowtoanswerteamunderthelanguageenvironmentafterthetest.Thatistosay,therapidchangesoftheanswer,becausewehopeourcountriesturnofproblems,fromterraindemocraticU。

S。

CanadaandWesternEuropetoChina,politicalcredentialsinthebestinconsistent。

Theseproblems,butamoreinquiresafterourdiscussion,willclarifytheChinesemodelculturalpolicyshouldchooseasamediaindustryisslowingsculptureoutmoreautonomyspace。

Forthisreason,wemuststudytheseproblemstriggeredsettwentyyearsintheinternationaldebatelong—terminternationalfreetradefromculturalexemptionlaunchedbetweentheUnite

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 教学研究 > 教学反思汇报

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1