Issues in Educational Research.docx
《Issues in Educational Research.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Issues in Educational Research.docx(15页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
IssuesinEducationalResearch
IssuesinEducationalResearch,7
(1),1997,69-86.
Doesschoolsizeaffectqualityofschoollife?
MagdalenaMok
MacquarieUniversity
MarcellinFlynn
AustralianCatholicUniversity
Thispaperexaminestworelatedresearchquestions.First,issizeofschoolapredictorofstudents'qualityofschoollife?
Second,whatattributesofsmallandlargeschoolscontributetoqualityofschoollife?
Twosampleswereincluded,furnishingbothquantitativeandqualitativedata.Thefirstsamplecomprised4,949Year12studentsfrom44Catholichighschoolsandthesecond570studentsfrom1independentand9governmentschoolsinNSW.Bothqualitativeandquantitativedataanalysesfoundnoapparentrelationshipbetweenschoolsizeandqualityofschoollife.
Introduction
Changingthesizeofastudentbodybymergingorclosingsmallerschoolsisoneofthepanaceasthatpolicymakersputforwardforenhancingeducationaloutcomesandoptimallyutilizingstateresources.Forexample,aboutonethousandstateschoolswereclosedinVictoriain1992toreducethecostofeducation.Similarly,inNewSouthWales,theDirector-GeneralofEducation,DrKenBoston,proposedtoreviewtheviabilityofsmallerschoolsintermsofcurriculumofferingsandtoclosethosenotdeemedviable(SydneyMorningHerald,2Jan1997,page1).TherecentqualityassurancemovementinNewSouthWalesandotherstatesprovidedfurtherimpetusfortherestructuringoftheschoolsystemtowardsmuchlargerschools,whichwerearguedtobemoreeffectivethansmallerones.
Thereisevidencefromrecentresearchinsupportofsucharguments.Thatis,largerschoolswereobservedtobemoreabletocapitaliseoneconomiesofscaleandstudentsenrolledinlargerschoolswerefoundtoperformbetteratpublicexaminations,evenafteraccountingforinitialdifferencesinschooltypeandstudents'homebackground(Mok&Flynn,1997a).However,itisunsettlingthatsuchfundamentalreformmovementsastheamalgamation,orclosure,ofsmallerschoolsbeestablishedongroundsofcostefficiencyoracademicachievement,whichisonlyoneofthemanydimensionsofschooling.
ResponsesfromtheAustralianschoolcommunitiesconcerningtheessenceofschooleffectivenessledMcGawandhisassociatestoconcludethat,"Learningandtheloveoflearning;personaldevelopmentandself-esteem;lifeskills,problemsolvingandlearninghowtolearn;thedevelopmentofindependentthinkersandwellroundedconfidentindividuals;allrankedashighlyormorehighlyastheoutcomesofeffectiveschoolingassuccessinanarrowrangeofacademicdisciplines"(McGaw,Piper,Banks,&Evans,1992:
174).
Workingfromthepremisethataschoolisacommunityofpeoplewhocometogetherinpursuitofacommongoal-thedevelopmentofthephysical,intellectual,vocational,social,emotional,aestheticandmoraldimensionsoftheyoungperson;itisnecessarytodiscernnotonlytheimpactofschoolsizeonacademicoutcomebutalsotheeffectofsizeofschoolonotherfacetsofschoollife.Thisisthepurposeofthecurrentstudy.Theresearchquestionsaddressedhereare:
1.Issizeofschoolapredictorofstudents'qualityofschoollife?
2.Whatattributesofsmallandlargeschoolscontributetoqualityofschoollife?
Literaturereview
Qualityofschoollifehasbeenaccordedspecialsignificancebyeducatorsbecauseitisviewedasimportantinitsownrightandalsobecauseoftherelationshipbetweenstudents'qualityofschoollifeandtheiracademicachievement(Bourke,1993;Mok&Flynn,1997b).Thus,thereisextensiveresearchonstudents'reportsoftheirwell-beingatschool(see,forexample,reviewinSmith,1997).
Whereasnumerousresearchstudiesundertakeninthepastdecadehaveexaminedqualityofschoollife,onlysomehaveinvestigatedtheconceptinrelationtoschoolenrolment.Theseexceptionshavesuggestedthattheclaimthatconstructschoolsizeisasignificantdeterminantofschoollifequalityishighlycontestable.Itseemsthatschoolsizeinfluencesqualityofschoollifeinacomplexfashionandatleasttwoopposingsetsofforcesareatwork,oneofwhichiseconomicandtheothersocial.Whetherornotstudentsenjoylifeatschoolislikelytodependontheneteffectofthesecountervailingforces.
Thefirstsetofforcesinvolveseconomiesofscale(Conant,1959;1967),whichisrealisedinlargerschools.Inthisregard,theeffectofschoolsizeonqualityofschoollifeismediatedthroughstudents'satisfactionwiththebreadthanddepthoftheformalschoolcurriculum.Severalpiecesofindependentresearchconfirmedthathumanandfiscalconstraintsassociatedwithsmallsizeveryoftenprecludedsmallschoolsofferingavariedacademicprogram(Barker,1985;Bryk,1996;Bryk,Lee,andHolland,1993;Haller,Monk,Spotted-Bear,Griffith,&Moss,1990;Poole1987).Thelimitedchoiceofsubjectofferinginverysmallschoolscouldleadtostudentdissatisfaction.
Nevertheless,itisdangerouslysimplistictoconcludethattheeffectofschoolsizeoncurriculumcomprehensivenessisinvariantacrossallschooltypesandsocialcontexts.Inreality,schoolsizeisonlyaglobalmeasurethatisrelatedtoahostofotherschoolstructuralcharacteristicsandmayitselfbedependentondistrictsize(Williams,1990).Contemporaryresearchontheschoolsizeeffectthathasincludedotherstructuralfeaturesindicatesthatschoolsizehasdifferentcurriculumimplicationsdependingonthesocialclassoftheschool(BrykandFrank,1991;FriedkinandNecochea;1988),schoolgovernance(publicsectorversusCatholicsystem;Bryk,Lee,&Holland;1993),subjectarea,courselevel(advancedversusremedial),schoollocation(rural,suburban,urban)andunionisation(presenceorabsenceofateachers'unionwithintheschool)(Monk&Haller,1993).Bryk(1996)alsoobservedthatalthoughschoolsizecouldfacilitateinstructionaldifferentiation,sizeitselfmightnotbeadirectcause.
Anotheradvantageoflargerschoolsoversmalleronesingeneratingeconomiesofscaleisthattheformeraremoreabletorecruitbetterqualifiedteachersandhavesuperiorschoolphysicalenvironmentandfacilities(e.g.Haller,Monk,Spotted-Bear,Griffith&Moss,1990).Althoughthereisnoexplicitattributionintheschooleffectivenessliteratureofthequalityofschoollifetotheschool'sphysicalenvironment,severalenvironmentalfeatureshavebeenhighlightedascontributingfactorstoschooleffectiveness.Thesefeaturesincludedecorationofbuildings(Rutter,1980),lownoiselevel(Reynolds,1992)andaquietandorderlyatmosphere(Creemers,1992).Inaddition,theeasyavailabilityofabundant,appropriateinstructionalmaterialsandresources(Levine,1992)hasalsobeenshowntocontributetoeffectiveschooling.
Thesecondsetofforcesoperatingbetweenschoolsizeandqualityofschoollifeconcernstheaffectiveaspectsofschooling.Theadvantagesofeconomiesofscaleofferedbylargeschoolsmaybecounter-balancedbythisopposingsetofforceswhichcanhaveadverseeffectsontheschool'scommunity.Attheadministrativelevel,largerschoolsarefoundtohavemorecentralizeddecisionmaking,lowerlevelsofstaffcooperation(Rowan,Raudenbush&Kang,1991),moreformalmodesofcommunication,moreextensivebureaucratizationandahigherlevelofworkspecialisation(Bryk,1996).Incontrast,asmallschoolsizetendstofacilitatepersonalinteractionandsocialintimacy(Bryk,1996).Teachersinsmallerschoolsaremorelikelytofeelsatisfiedabouttheirworkthantheircounterpartsinlargerschools(Bryk,Lee&Holland,1993).
Onthestudent-benefitdimension,smallerschoolsarefoundtobeassociatedwithhigherparticipationratesinextracurricularactivities(Oxley,1994;Stevens&Peltier,1994),higherandmoresociallyequitableengagement(Lee&Smith,1995),moreopportunitiesfordevelopingleadershippotential(Bryk,Lee&Holland,1993),betterschooldiscipline(Haller,1992;Rowan,Raudenbush&Kang,1991),betterschoolclimate(Gregory,1992;Lindsay,1984;Oxley,1994),betterstudentattitudes(Fowler,1992)andlowerschooldropoutrates(Kleinfeld,McDiarmid&Hagstrom,1989;Toenjes,1989;Fetler,1989).However,theeffectofschoolsizeisnotinvariantacrossallschooltypes.Forexample,Brykandhisassociatesnotedthat,withintheCatholicsector,schoolsizehaslittleinfluenceonstudentoutcomesandreportedspecificexamplesofpositiveeffectsforlargeschools(Bryk,Lee&Holland,1993).TheirfindingsweresupportedbyBerkey(1996)whomaintainedthatifstudentservices,staffdevelopmentandcurriculaareproperlymanaged,largeschoolscanbeasefficientandeffectiveinestablishingagoodlearningatmosphereassmallschools.
Thecurrentstudydistinguishesitselffromearlierstudiesintworegards.First,thisstudyisundertakeninthecontextofAustralianschoolsandsecond,itcombinesqualitativeandquantitativeapproachestocollectingdatafromstudents'perspectives.Thus,thisstudyaddstoextantliteratureandisthefirstofitskindtoprovideaninsider'sviewpointonhowAustralianYear12students'well-beingisrelatedtosizeofschoolenrolment.
Method
Thestudydesign
Twoindependentinvestigationssharingthesamethemecontributeddatatothisstudy.ThefirstwasalargescalelongitudinalsurveyofthecultureofCatholicschools(Flynn,1993)andwasundertakenbetweenMay1990andMarch1991.Thesecond,aseparatesurveyundertakenin1993,wasconcernedwiththecultureofNewSouthWales(NSW)schools(Mok,1994).
TheCatholicschoolculturestudyisacomponentofalargerinvestigation(Flynn,1993)inwhichYear12studentsenrolledinsam