外文原版娱乐性恐怖当代恐怖电影的后现代元素.docx
《外文原版娱乐性恐怖当代恐怖电影的后现代元素.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文原版娱乐性恐怖当代恐怖电影的后现代元素.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![外文原版娱乐性恐怖当代恐怖电影的后现代元素.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2023-1/10/0de3e6d0-9229-4801-a4d9-f7f17145ffab/0de3e6d0-9229-4801-a4d9-f7f17145ffab1.gif)
外文原版娱乐性恐怖当代恐怖电影的后现代元素
外文翻译
RecreationalTerrorandthePostmodernElementsoftheContemporaryHorrorFilm
Theuniverseofthecontemporaryhorrorfilmisanuncertainoneinwhichgoodandevil,normalityandabnormality,realityandillusionbecomevirtuallyindistinguishable.This,togetherwiththepresentationofviolenceasaconstituentfeatureofeverydaylife,theinefficacyofhumanaction,andtherefusalofnarrativeclosureproducesanunstable,paranoiduniverseinwhichfamiliarcategoriescollapse.Theiconographyofthebodyfigureasthesiteofthiscollapse.Henry:
PortraitofaSerialKillerunfoldsinthispostmodernuniverse.Thefilm,whichdetailsthesanguinaryactivitiesofapsychoticserialkiller,wasreadyforreleaseearlyin1986butremainedonthedistributor'sshelfuntil1989,whenErrolMorris,directorofTheThinBlueLinebroughtHenrytotheTellurideFilmFestival(VillageVoice1990,59).AmongtheobstaclesthefilmfacedwastheunwillingnessoftheMotionPictureAssociationofAmerica(MPAA)togiveitanRrating.Thereason?
Its"disturbingmoraltone"(McDonough1990,59).FearfulbecauseanXratingmeansdeathattheboxofficefornonpornographicfilms,distributorslostinterest.EventhedirectorJohnMcNaughtonexpressedconcernoverwhetherthefilmwouldfindanaudience.AshetoldVariety,"[Henry]maybetooartyforthebloodcrowdandtoobloodyfortheartcrowd"(quotedinStein1990,59).McNaughton'sconcernandtheMPAA'sjudgementrestedonthefilm'stendencytoplaywithandagainsttheconventionsofthecontemporaryhorrorgenre.Whatmakesitaninnovativeanddaringfilmalsomakesitdifficulrtoclassify.Thisholdstrueaswellforthepostmodernhorrorfilm,ofwhichHenryosemblematic.
Theboundariesofanygenreareslippery,butthoseofthepostmodernhorrorfilmareparticularlytreacheroustonegotiatesinceoneofthedefiningfeaturesofpostmodernismistheaggressiveblurringofboundaries.Howdowedistinguishhorrorfromotherfilmgenreandthepostmodernhorrorfilmfromotherhorrorfilms?
InthischapterIwillarguethatthecontemporaryhorrorgenre,i.e.,thosehorrorfilmsproducedsinceabout1968,canbecharacterizedaspostmodern.Iwillformulateaworkingdefinitionofthepostmodernhorrorgenrebasedongeneralizationsdrawnfromthestudyoffilmswhichculturalconsensusdefinesashorrorfilms,thoughnotnecessarilyaspostmodernones.Inthecourseofdelineatingthepostmodernfeaturesofthecontemporaryhorrorgenre,Iwilldifferentitfromitspriorclassicalincarnation.
THEQUESTIONOFPOSTMODERNISM
InMonstersandMadScientists:
ACulturalHistoryoftheHorrorMovie,AndrewTudor(1989)chartsthedevelopmentoftheAnglo-Americanhorrorgenre,Theprimarydistinctionthedrawsisbetweenthepre-sixties(1931-1960)andthepost-sixties(1960-1984)genre,termsthatroughlycorrespondtomyuseof"classical"and"postmodern."Tudorparentheticallyalignsthepost-1960sgenrewithpostmodernismandthe"legitimationcrisis"ofpostindustrialsocietybywhichhemeansthefailureoftraditionalstructuresofauthority(1989,222).AlthoughTudordoesnotinvolvehimselfindiscussionsofthepostmodernismperse,hedoespointoutthatthelegitimationcrisisoflatecapitalismmaybethesalientsocialcontextinwhichtogroundthecontradictionsofthepost-sixtieshorrorgenre.Butbeforewecanaddressthepostmodernelementsofthecontemporaryhorrorfilm,wemusttacklethethornyissueofdefiningpostmodernism.
Socialtheoristsrepresentisasawidespreadandelusivephenomenon,asyetunclearlydifined,itsamorphousboundariesarehardtopindown.AndreasHuyssenportraysitasbothahistoricalconditionandastyle,"partofaslowlyemergingculturaltransformationinWesternsocieties,achangeinsensibility"(repr.1990,234).ToddGitlinassociatespostmodernismwiththeerosionofuniversalcategories,thecollapseoffaithintheinevitabilityofprogress,andthebreakdownofmoralclarities(1989,353).Jean-FrancoisLyotardcharacterizestheposrmodernasentailingaprofoundlossoffaithinmasternarratives(claimstouniversalTruth)anddisenchantmentwiththeteleologyofprogress(1984,xxiv).CraigOwensindentifiesitwith"acrisisof[Western]culturalauthority"(1983,57).
Formypurposes,thepostmodernworldisanunstableoneinwhichtraditional(dichotomous)categoriesbreakdown,boundariesblur,institutionsfallintoquestion,Enlightenmentnarrativescollapse,theinevitabilityofprogresscrumbles,andthemasterstatusoftheuniversal(readmale,white,monied,heterosexual)subjectdeteriorates,Consensusinthepossibilityofmasteryislost,universalizinggrandtheoryisdiscredited,andthestable,unified,coherentselfacquiresthestatusofafiction.Althoughthepoliticalvalenceofpostmodernismissubjecttodebate,thereismuchtobesaidfortheprogressivepotenialofthisparadigmshift.
Clearly,thetermpostmodernismacknowledgesashiftfrommodernism,onenotcleatlydefinedandunabletostandasaseparateterm.Butthisculturaltransformationwasnotusheredinbyanapocalypticendingoracleanbreak.Itwasandcontinuestobeamatterofunevendevelopment,where,toheedawarningissuedbypostmodernists,developmentcannotbeconflatedwithprogress.Insofaraswecanconceptualizethisculturaltransformationasabreak,itmightbemorefruitfultospeakofitasastressbreak,nottheresultofanoriginarytraumaticeventbutthecumulativeoutcomeofrepetitivehistoricalstressesincludingtheHolocaust,Hiroshima,theColdWar,Vietnam,theanti-warmovement,andthevariousliberationmovementsassociatedwiththesixties:
civilrights,blackspower,feminism,andgayliberation.Indeed,theimpetustosituatepostmodernismasasixtiesorpost-sixtiesphenomenonliesinthecelebrated(orscorned)associationofthatperiodwithculturalcontradictionsandresistancetoauthoritythatfiguresoprominentlyindiscussionsofthepostmoderntoday.
THERELAIONSHIPOFPOSTMODERNISMTOPOPULARCULTURE
Thecontemporaryhorrorgenreissometimescriticizedinmodernisttermsforbeingalignedwiththedegradedfromofpleasure-inducingmassculture.Criticsrelegatethecontemporarygenretotheranksofideologicallyconservativecultureandexcoriateorlauditforpromotingthestatusquothroughitsreinforcementofsuchclassicalbinaryoppositionsasnormal/abnormalsexuality.Indeed,inDreadfulPleasures(1985),JamesTwitchellportraysthehorrorfilmasamoralitytalethatdemonstratesthedangersofsexualityoutsidetheheteromonogamousunclearfamily.
Incontrast,thevexedrelationshipofthecontemporaryhorrorfilmtopostmodernismisrarelyarticulated.Whenthecontemporarygenreisassociatedwithpostmodernismitisoftentodiscreditoneorboth.ForKimNewman,"thepostmodernhorrorfilm"referstothoseeightieshorrorfilmscharacterizedbycamp.ThiscomicturnsignalsforNewmanadegneration,adyingoutofthegenre'scapacitytodepict"thehorrorsandneurosesoftheage",afunctionheclaimsisnecessarytoculturebutonethathasbeendisplacedanddispersedacrossothergenresthatarethemselvesincreasinglyhybirdinform(1988,211-15).Hespeaksasadisappointedhorrorfanforwhom"postmodernhorrorfilms"failtodowhattheyarefittedtodo.TaniaModleski,ontheotherhand,isnofanofthegenre.In"TheTerrorofPleasure:
TheContemporaryHorrorFilmandPostmodernTheory,"sheclassifiescontemporaryhorrorfilmsasanexpressionofpostmodernismandconcludesthattheformerillustratewhatismostperverseaboutthelatter.Thispositionbearsclosercloserinspection.
Althoughinprinciplepostmodernismerodesallbinaryoppositions,Huyssenlocatespostmodernism'sdefiningfeatureinitschallengetomodernism'sgroundingdistinctionbetweenhigh(artworld)cultureandlow(mass)culture.Postmodernismblurstheboundariesbetweenartandmassculture.Ironically,asbothHuyssen(repr.1990241)andModleski(1986156)argue,manypostmodernistsunselfconsciouslyreproducethehighculture/lowcultureoppositioninitsmodernistFrankfurtSchoolformintheirownwork.Theysay,ineffect,thatmasscultureproducepleasure,whichinscribestheconsumerintothedominatebourgeoisideology.Incontrast,thedecenteredtextproducesjouinssanceandtakesanadversarialstanceagainstbourgeoissociety.Modleskialignsthecontemporaryhorrorfilmwiththeletterformbutquestionsitsvalueforfeminism.
Modleskiidentifiesthefollowingaspostmodernelementsofthecontemporaryhorrorfilm:
open-endednarratives,minimalplotandcharacterdevelopment,and(relatedly)thedifficultyofaudienceindentificationwithundevelopedandunlikeablecharacters.Modleskiarguesthethedecentered,disorderedhorrorfilm,liketheavant-garde,changestextualcodesinordertodisruptnarrativepleasure,andthatassuchitisaformifoppositionalculture.(Huyssennotesthatpostmodernismappropriatesandrecylesmanyofmodernism'saestheticstrategies,liketheonesModleskiindicates.)Modleskialignsthehorrorfilmwithpostmodernismandbothwiththedisriptionofpleasureforwomen,giventhelengthstowhichwomenhavehistoricallybeendeniedpleasure,andconsequentlytoquestionthelimitsofpostmodernismforfeminism.
Modleskiraisesimportantquestions.Butherdepictionofthecontemporaryhorrorfilmsisflawedandthereforehercomclusionisflawed.Shefailstograspthewaysinwhichthecontemporaryhorrorispleasurable,notonlyforamaleaudiencebutalsoforafemaleaudience.Althoughthehorrorfilmisnotnecessarilycriticalorradical,itdoescontain,asHutssensuggestsforpostmodernism,"produc