科技论文具有通常所说的创新性.docx

科技论文具有通常所说的创新性.docx

《科技论文具有通常所说的创新性.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《科技论文具有通常所说的创新性.docx（3页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

科技论文具有通常所说的创新性

•科技论文具有通常所说的创新性（innovation）、真实性（reality）、重要性（significance）和可知性（indication），其目的与功能是传递知识和信息，这使得科技论文与其他文体不同，科技论文的基本语言特质是严谨（rigorous）、准确（accurate）、清晰（clarity）与洗练（concise）不需要华丽的辞藻修饰。

•Whatisascientificpaper

•Ascientificpaperisawrittenandpublishedreportdescribingoriginalresearchresults.Inbroadersense,itincludesreviewpaper,conferencereport,andmeetingabstract

•Anacceptablescientificpublicationmustcontainsufficientinformationtoenablepeers（potentialusersofdata）:

1）toassessobservations,

2）torepeatexperiments,

3）toevaluateintellectualprocess

•Organizationofascientificpaper

•Scientificpapershavestandardformat

•Organizedtomeettheneedsofvalidpublication,withdistinctiveandclearlyevidentcomponentparts.

•Themostcommonlabelingofthecomponentparts,inthebasicsciences,isIntroduction,Methods,Results,andDiscussion（hence,theacronymIMRAD）

•Alsohasthefollowingelements:

Title,Abstract（orsometimesafinalsummaryinstead）,ReferencesandAcknowledgement.

•Thetitle

•Thetitleofascientificpapershouldtellthereaderwhatkindofworkisbeingreported.

•Thelengthoftitle

•Titlesaretooshort

“StudiesonMycobacteriumtuberculosis”

suchatitlewasnotveryhelpfultothepotentialreader.

•Titlesaretoolong

“Ontheadditiontothemethodofmicroscopicresearchbyanewwayofproducingcolor-contrastbetweenanobjectanditsbackgroundorbetweendefinitepartsoftheobjectitself”

lessmeaningfulthanshortones.Itsoundslikeapoortitle,perhapsitwouldmakeagoodabstract.

•Needforspecifictitle

•“ActionofantibioticsonBacteria”

•Abstract

•Anabstractshouldbeviewedasaminiatureversionofthepaper.

•Provideabriefsummaryofeachofthemainsectionsofthepaper:

IMRAD

•Abstractenablesreaderstoidentifythebasiccontentofadocumentquicklyandaccurately,todetermineitsrelevancetotheirinterestsandthustodecidewhethertheyneedtoreadthepaperinitsentirely.

•Abstractshouldnotexceedthelengthspecifiedbythejournal（commonly250words）

•Theabstractshould:

1）statetheprincipalobjectivesandthescopeoftheinvestigation

2）describethemethodsemployed

3）summarizetheresults

4）statetheprincipalconclusions

•Introduction

•Introductionshouldsupplysufficientbackgroundinformationtoallowthereadertounderstandandevaluatetheresultsofthepresentstudywithoutneedingtorefertopreviouspublicationsonthetopic.

•Theintroductionshouldalsostatebrieflyandclearlyyourpurposeinwritingthepaper.

•Choosereferencescarefullytoprovidethemostimportantbackgroundinformation

•Whydidyouchoosethatsubject,andwhyisitimportant?

•Besides,introductionistheproperplacetodefineanyspecializedtermsorabbreviationsthatyouintendtouse

•Materialsandmethods

•Givethefulldetailsofthemethodologyemployedinthestudy

•Writteninthepasttense

•Themainpurposeofthissectionistodescribetheexperimentaldesignandthenprovideenoughdetailsothatacompetentworkercanrepeattheexperiments

•Alsoprovideinformationthatletreadersjudgetheappropriatenessofthemethods

•Manypeersmayskipthissection,becausetheyalreadyknowthegeneralmethods

•Listpertinent（related）chemicalandphysicalpropertiesofthereagentsused

•Experimentsanimals,plants,cells,otherregentsandthesourceofthemshouldbelistedanddescribed

•Informedconsent

•Needforreference:

ifthemethodisnew（unpublished）,youmustprovideallofthedetail.If,however,themethodhasbeenpublishinajournal,theliteraturereferenceshouldbegiven,andyoucanstatelikethat:

“cellswerebrokenbyultrasonictreatmentaspreviousdescribed”

•Results

•Theresultsofeachexperimentshouldbepresentedclearly,withoutcomment,bias,orinterpretation

•Resultsconstitutethenewknowledgethatyouarecontributingtotheworld,theearlierpartsofthepaperaredesignedtotellwhyandhowyougottheResults,thelatterpartsofthepaperisdesignedtotellwhattheymean.Therefore,thewholepapermuststandorfallonthebasisoftheresults.Thus,theresultsmustbepresentedwithcrystalclarity.

•Results

•Howdoyoupresentthedata?

•Discussion

•Inthissection,youevaluatethemeaningofyourresultsinthetermsoftheoriginalquestionorhypothesisandpointouttheirbiologicalsignificance.

•Iftheresultsareunexpectedorcontradictory,youshouldattempttoexplainwhyandpossiblypointoutavenuesoffurtherresearch.

•Relatedliteraturesshouldbecitedinthissectionforfurthersupportorpurposesofcomparison

•WhataretheessentialfeaturesofagoodDiscussion?

•Trytopresenttheprinciples,relationships,andgeneralizationsshownbytheResults.

•Pointoutanyexceptionsoranylackofcorrelationanddefineunsettledpoints.

•Showhowyourresultsandinterpretationsagreewithpreviouslypublishedworks

•Discussthetheoreticalimplicationsofyourwork,aswellasanypossiblepracticalapplications

•Stateyourconclusionsasclearlyaspossible

•Summarizedyourevidenceforeachconclusion.