罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:6811796 上传时间:2023-01-10 格式:DOCX 页数:12 大小:30.94KB
下载 相关 举报
罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共12页
罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共12页
罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共12页
罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共12页
罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共12页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx

《罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

罗纳德 麦金农 中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价.docx

罗纳德麦金农中国盯住汇率制度与日本经验评价

WhyChinaShouldKeepitsExchangeRatePeggedtotheDollar:

AHistoricalPerspectivefromJapan

RonaldMcKinnon1

StanfordUniversity

China’sfixeditsexchangerateat8.28yuantothedollarfrom1994toJuly21,2005,andhasonlyallowedasmall,tightlycontrolled,appreciationsincethen.China’sproductivitygrowthhasbeenveryhighrelativetomostothercountries,itstradesurplushasbeenrising,anditcontinuestoaccumulatelargedollarexchangereserves.Theresulthasbeen“Chinabashing”withstrongAmericanpressureonChinatoappreciatefurther.

AlthoughappreciationneednotreduceChina’stradesurplus,thethreatthereofwillreducenominalinterestrates—ashappenedintheearliererafrom1978to1995of“Japanbashing”andyenappreciation.Theresultingdeflationfromtheovervaluedyen,coupledwithazerointerestliquiditytrap,ledtoJapan’s“lostdecade”ofthe1990s.ItcouldhappentoChinainthenewmillennium.

FromJapanBashingtoChinaBashing

Sincetheearly1980s,structuralfiscaldeficitsintheUnitedStatesandverylowpersonalsavinghavecontributedtorising“globalimbalances”,i.e.,arisingU.S.currentaccountdeficitfinancedbyheavyborrowingbytheUnitedStatesindollarsfromtherestoftheworld.2Withonlyabriefrespiteinthelastquarterof1991whentheU.Scurrentaccountbrieflytouchedzero,Figure1showstheU.S.deficitapproaching7percentofGDPin2006.MuchoftherealcounterpartofthisfinancialtransfercomesfromthehighsavingEastAsiancountries,principallyJapanandnowChina,collectivelyrunninglargetradesurpluses,mainlyinmanufactures,withtheUnitedStates.(Figure1showstheirsurplusesasaproportionoftheirsmallerGDPs).However,since2003,thesurplusesofthepetroleumproducingcountrieshavealsobecomeimportant.

ThemanufacturingtradesurplusesoftheEastAsiancountries,incombinationwithexchangeratestabilizationagainstthedollar,resultedinlargeaccumulationsofofficialexchangereserves(mainlydollars).TheseledtoincreasingmercantilistpressurefromEuropeandtheUnitedStatesforAsiancountriestoappreciatetheircurrencies.Inparticular,China,acountrywithremarkablyhighsavingrelativetoitshugedomesticinvestment,hascomeunderheavyforeignpressuretoappreciatetherenminbiin20052006—onthewidelyheldbeliefthatitwouldreduceitscorrespondinglylargetrade(saving)surpluses.

ThecurrentU.S.ChinatradefrictionsarereminiscentofU.S.Japanfrictionsfromthe1970sthroughto1995.TherisingpenetrationofJapanesemanufacturedgoodsintotheAmericanmarketledtoapoliticalphenomenonpopularlyknownas“Japanbashing”.Episodically,theJapanesegovernmentrespondedtoAmericanthreatsoftradesanctionsanddemandsthattheyenbeappreciatedbyimposing“voluntary”constraintsonparticularexportstotheUnitedStatesandbyallowingtheyentoappreciate.Theyenroseallthewayfrom360tothedollarinAugust1971toapeakof80tothedollarinApril1995.McKinnonandOhno(1997)showedthattheeverhigheryencausedadeflationaryslumpintheJapaneseeconomywithazerointerestrateliquiditytrap,butwithoutreducingJapan’scurrentaccountsurplusesmeasuredasaproportionofitsGNP.

WorriedabouttheslumpingJapaneseeconomy,theU.S.TreasurySecretary,RobertRubininApril1995announcedanew“strongdollar”policy,afterwhichJapanbashingmoreorlessceased.AlthoughawelcomechangeinAmericanpolicy,itcametoolatetopreventJapan’s“lostdecade”ofthe1990s.

Japanbashingfrom1978to1995occurredwhenJapanhadtheworld’slargestbilateraltradesurpluswiththeUnitedStates(Figure2).JapanwasthenAmerica’sforemostindustrialcompetitor—notonlyinheavyindustrysuchassteel,autosandmachinetoolsbutalsoinhightechnologysuchascolortelevisionsandsemiconductors.

America’sprotectionistthreatswereusuallyspecifictoaparticularindustrywithinsomeshorttimeframe.TheJapanesewouldoftenrespondseriallybytemporarilyrestrainingexportsinsteel,autos,semiconductors,andsoon.Butalsogeneralyenappreciation,whichwasnottemporary,oftenaccompaniedthesespecificindustrialdisputes—resultingin“thesyndromeoftheeverhigheryen”(McKinnonandOhno,Ch.1).

Inthenewmillennium,historyisrepeatingitself.ChinabashingisnowsupersedingJapanbashing.Figure2showsChina’sbilateraltradesurpluswiththeUnitedStatesrisingfrombeingtriviallysmallinthe1980stoequalJapan’sby2000,andthenbecomingmorethantwiceaslargeasJapan’sin2005—nowreachingmorethan1.5percentofAmerica’sGDP.

UnlikeJapan’searliermoreconcentratedexportsurgesintospecificAmericanmarketsforadvancedmanufactures,China’sexportsurgeismoreinlightandmediumtechindustryandis“acrosstheboard”.Chinahasbecomemainlyanexporteroffinishedconsumergoods.ValueaddedinmostindividualChineseproductsisnothighbecauseinputsofcapitalgoods,subassemblies,andavarietyindustrialinputsincludingbasicmineralsandpetroleumproductsarelargelyimported.ChinaismerelythefaceofaworldwideexportsurgeintothesavingdeficientAmericaneconomy.BothJapanandGermanyaswellasseveralsmallerEastAsiancountriesnowhavebilateraltradesurpluseswithChina.Nevertheless,atChristmastime,whenAmericanfamiliesopentheirpresents,theyseemainlymadeinChinalabels!

Whilegoodforconsumers,producersblamecontractingemploymentinAmericanmanufacturingoncompetitionfromChinesemanufactures.TheconsequentriseinChinabashingismorefocusedondemandingthattherenminbibeappreciatedtoreducetheinternationalcompetitivenessofChineseindustrygenerally,ratherthanonindustryspecificprotectionismasintheearlierJapaneseexperience3.Otherthancontinualjawboning,AmericanofficialpressureonChinatoappreciatehastakentwospecificforms.FirstisabillintroducedintotheU.S.CongressinMarch2005toimposea27.5percenttariffonallU.S.importsfromChinaunlesstherenminbiwassubstantiallyappreciated.ThiswouldhavebeenanegregiousviolationofAmerica’sWTOcommitments.Ifpassed,itwouldbesimilartothe“Nixonshock”ofAugust1971whenheimposedatariffonimportedmanufacturesthatwasnotrescindeduntilalltheindustrialcountries—includingJapanbutnotChina—agreedtoappreciateinDecember1971.However,afterChinaspeededupitsrateofappreciationinAugustandSeptemberof2006,SenatorsSchumerofNewYorkandGrahamofSouthCarolinaagreedtowithdrawthebill.Butnextyear,theythreatentocraftamoreWTOcompliantmeasuretoforceChinatofurtherreformitscurrencypractices.

Second,everyyearinMayunderSection3004ofU.S.PublicLaw100418,theSecretaryoftheTreasuryisrequiredtoassesswhethercountriessuchasChinathathaveglobalcurrentaccountsurpluses,orlargebilateraltradesurpluseswiththeUnitedStates,aremanipulatingexchangeratestopreventeffectivebalanceofpaymentsadjustmentortogainanunfairadvantageininternationaltrade,withunspecifiedsanctionstofollowifhedoes.InMay2006,afterbeingheavilylobbiedbyindustryandlaborgroupstosanctionChina,theSecretarynarrowlydecidednottoofficiallyclassifyChinatobeacurrencymanipulator.However,hewarnedthatthisdecisioncouldchangeinthefutureiftherenminbididnotappreciate,awarningbasedonthemistakenpresumptionthatanappreciationwouldreduceChina’stradesurplus.

Consequently,wenowliveinworldwhere,althoughtherenminbihasnotyetappreciatedverymuch,astrongexpectationexiststhatitwillbehigheragainstthedollarinthefuture.

ThePoliticalEconomyoftheTradeImbalance

ChinabashingnowandJapanbashingearlierisboth“political”and“economic”.

Onthepoliticalside,thelossofjobsinAmericanmanufacturingarousestheireoftradeunionsandtheNationalAssociationofManufacturers.Unsurprisingly,Congressmenfromstateswithlargemanufacturingsectorshavebeenthemostvociferousindemandingthatsomethingbedoneaboutit.BlamingforeignersformisalignedexchangeratesiseasierthanfacinguptotheproblemofinadequateprivatesavingandlargestructuralfiscaldeficitsintheUnitedStates.

Butpoliticalpopulismisonlypartoftheproblem.Badeconomictheorizingisatleastasculpable.Mostmainstreameconomistsbelievethatagovernmentscancontrolitsreal(inflationadjusted)exchangerate,andtherebycontroltherealtradebalance.

Unfortunately,thispresumptionhasbeencanonizedinamodelcalledtheelasticitiesapproachto(ormodelof)thebalanceoftrade.Becausethiselasticitiesmodelfocusesnarrowlyontherelativepriceeffectsofchangesinrealexchangerates,itisseriouslyincomplete.Therealityisthatgovernmentscanatmostcontrolnominalexchangerates,forwhichanychangecanonlybesustainedbyalteringthestanceofthenationalmonetarypolicy.Sothemacroeconomicrepercussionsofsustainedexchangeratechangesarelarge,andnotadequatelytreatedwithintheelasticitiesmodel.

Foraninternationalcreditor,asaremostEastAsianeconomies,theincomeandspendingrepercussionsofasharpdiscreteappreciationagainsttheworld’sdominantmoneyaresostrongthattheeffectofcurrencyappreciationonitstradesurplusisambiguous.Toseethis,letusfocusonhowacreditoreconomywithatradesurpluswouldreacttoadiscretecurrencyappreciationintheshortandmediumtermswhendomesticpricesremainsomewhat“sticky”.Becauseanappreciatingcountry’sexportsbecomeobviouslymoreexpensiveinworldmarketsanddecline,whereasimportslookcheaperinthedomesticc

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 法律文书 > 调解书

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1