外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx

上传人:b****3 文档编号:5099182 上传时间:2022-12-13 格式:DOCX 页数:8 大小:23.83KB
下载 相关 举报
外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共8页
外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共8页
外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共8页
外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共8页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx

《外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选.docx

外文翻译融资偏好的西班牙企业优序论证据节选

2000单词,1.1万英文字符,3700汉字

出处:

Sánchez-VidalJ,Martín-UgedoJF.FinancingPreferencesofSpanishFirms:

EvidenceonthePeckingOrderTheory[J].ReviewofQuantitativeFinanceandAccounting,2005,25(4):

341-355.

外文翻译

原文:

FinancingPreferencesofSpanishFirms:

EvidenceonthePeckingOrderTheory

JSánchez-Vidal,JFMartín-Ugedo

ThispaperanalysessomeoftheempiricalimplicationsofthepeckingordertheoryintheSpanishmarketusingapaneldataanalysisof1,566firmsover1994–2000.Theresultsshowthatthepeckingordertheoryholdsformostsubsamplesanalyzed,particularlyforthesmallandmedium-sizedenterprisesandforthehigh-growthandhighlyleveragedcompanies.Itisalsoshownthatboththemoreandthelessleveragedfirmstendtoconvergetowardsmorebalancedcapitalstructures.Finally,weobservethatfirmsfinancetheirfundsflowdeficitswithlongtermdebt.

AprimecontributiononinformationasymmetryincapitalstructuretheoryistheMyersandMajluf(1984)model.MyersandMajlufobservethattheempiricalevidenceisnotconsistentwithafinancialpolicythatisdeterminedbyatrade-offoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofmarketimperfections,mainlytaxes,costsoffinancialdistress,andagencycosts.Rather,companies’financialpoliciesseemtobebetterexplainedbythebehaviourdescribedbyDonaldson(1961).Heestablishesahierarchydescribedbycompanypreferenceforinternalfundsoverexternalfunds;inthecaseofexternalfunds,acompanyprefersdebtfirst,thenhybridinstrumentslikeconvertiblebonds,andfinallyequityissues.Thishierarchy,broadlycharacterizedaspeckingordertheory,indicatesthatcompaniesdonotmakefinancingdecisionswiththeaimofachievingoptimalleverage.

Althoughtheytendtobetakenasthesamething,thepeckingordertheoryandtheMyersandMajluf(1984)modelarenotstrictlyspeakingthesame.Thepeckingordertheoryismerelyadescriptionofcompanies’financingpolicy,whiletheMyersandMajlufworkrepresentsthefirstmodelthatattemptstodescribethisbehaviourfromatheoreticalpointofview,basedonthepresenceofinformationasymmetry.Moreover,theMyersandMajluf(1984)modelassumeslistedcompaniesandmarketswhereequityisissuedthroughfirmcommitments,suchastheAmericanmarket,notformarketswherethepredominantflotationmethodisrightsofferings,suchasSpainandmostothercountries.

TheaimofthispaperistoprovideevidenceonthepeckingordertheoryintheSpanishmarket.Theanalysistakestwodirections.First,weexaminetheevolutionofthethreelargestaccountingsourcesoffundingforacompany—retainedearnings,equityissuesanddebt—usingamodelbasedonWatsonandWilson(2002).Second,westudytheroleoflong-termdebtinmakingupfinancingdeficits,followingtheflowoffundsdeficitequationofShyam-SunderandMyers(1999).

ThereareseveralfeatureswhichdistinguishtheSpanishfinancialsystemfromtheAmericanone.Probablythemaindifferenceaffectingthepeckingorderistheflotationmethodinequityissues.Equitysecuritiesareissuedinawidevarietyofways,mainlyfirmcommitmentsunderwrittenoffersandrightsissues.Therelativeimportanceofthesemethodsdependsontheissuingfirm’scountry.IntheUnitedStatesrightsofferingshavedeclinedinfrequency,havingvirtuallydisappearedby1980.InSpain,rightsprevail.Thisdifferencemayplayanimportantroleinthehierarchydescribedbythepeckingordertheory.Inaddition:

(a)debtfinancingisprimarilyraisedprivatelyinSpanishfirms,thusbanksplayaveryimportantrole;and(b)theSpanishcapitalmarketislessdevelopedthantheAmericansecuritiesmarket,havinglowercapitalizationandsmallertransactionvolumes.AlthoughseveralpapershavealreadyexaminedthecapitalstructureofSpanishfirms,mostofthemhaveanalyzedtheeffectofdifferentvariablesonleverage.However,thereislittleevidencefocusingonpeckingorderandnostudyemployingtheWatsonandWilson(2002)methodology.

Theresultsshowthatsmallandmedium-sizedcompaniesbehaveconsistentlywithpredictionsofthepeckingordertheory.Whenwedividethesampleintosubsamplesonthebasisofgrowthandthelevelofleverage,weseethathigh-growthcompaniesbasetheirgrowthonretainedearnings,andfirmswithveryhighandverylowdebtratiostendtoconvergetowardsmoremoderatedebtratios.Estimationoftheflowoffundsdeficitequationshowsthatfunddeficitsaremetbytheuseoflong-termdebt.

Thepeckingordertheorydescribesahierarchyincompanies’financialpolicyasfollows:

(1)Firmsprefertofinancetheirinvestmentswithfundsinternallygenerated,namely,retainedearningsanddepreciationexpenses;

(2)firmsbasethedividendpayoutratiosonthefutureinvestmentopportunitysetandtheirexpectedcashflows;(3)payoutratiostendtobestickyintheshortterm,soinsomeyearsinternallygeneratedflowswillbeenoughforfinancingcompanyneedsandinsomeyearsnot;(4)fundsobtainedinyearsoffinancialsurpluses,afterpaymentofdividendsandfinancing,aredirectedtofinanceshort-termfinancialinvestmentsortoreducedebt.Whenthereisafinancialdeficit,firmswillseekexternalfinance:

firstdebt,thenhybridsecuritieslikeconvertiblebonds,andfinallyequityissues.

ToexplainthisbehaviourMyersandMajluf(1984)constructamodelofinformationasymmetryassumingthatfirmmanagersactonbehalfofcurrentshareholders.Ifcompanieshaveenoughfinancialslack,theywillcarryoutallinvestmentsthathaveapositivenetpresentvalue.Ifexternalfundsareneededtofinancenewinvestments,themarketwillinterpretequityissuesasevidencethatcompanysharesareovervaluedandthusissueannouncementwillhaveanegativeimpactontheshareprice.

Thus,MyersandMajluf(1984)arguethat,ifthecompanydoesnothaveenoughfundstofinancenewinvestments,itwillissueequityonlywhenthereareveryprofitableinvestmentsthatcanneitherbepostponednorfinancedthroughdebt,orwhenmanagersbelievethatthestockisovervaluedenoughthatshareholderswillbedisposedtotoleratethemarketpenalty.Theinformationasymmetrymaycausecurrentshareholderstorenouncepositivenetpresentvalueinvestmentprojectsinordertoavoidadropinsharepriceduetotheissueofequity,therebycreatinganunderinvestmentproblem.Toavoidtheseresults,itseemsreasonablethatcompanieswillimplementfinancingpoliciesthatallowthemthecapacitytofinanceinvestmentsandavoidexternalfinancing.

However,theMyersandMajlufmodel(1984)hassomelimitations.ThefirstisthatitappliestomarketsliketheAmericanmarketwheresharesareofferedmainlythroughfirmcommitmentunderwritingsandnotthroughrightsissues,whichistheflotationmethodthatprevailsinmostothermarkets.Inanunderwrittenfirmcommitment,sharesareofferedsimultaneouslytothepublicatlarge.Thus,ifsharesareovervalued,therewillbeawealthtransferfromnewtocurrentshareholders.Inrightsofferings,currentshareholdersenjoypriorityinthepurchaseofnewshares,whichminimizesthepossibilityofwealthtransfers.Therefore,theMyersandMajluf(1984)argumentthatequityissueisthelastchoiceinfirms’financingpolicieshaslittlecurrencyinmarketswhererightsissuesaretheprevalentmethodofequityissue.

AnotherlimitationoftheMyersandMajluf(1984)modelisthatitisgenerallyintendedtodescribelistedcompanies,leavingtherest,mainlythesmallandmedium-sizedenterprises(SME),outoftheexplanation.Becauseofthis,authorssincethenhavetriedtoexplainthepeckingordertheoryusingalternativeargumentsappropriatetonon-listedSMEcompanies.

AmajorprobleminSMEfinancing,especiallyinnon-Anglo-Saxoncountries,islimitedaccesstocapitalmarkets(afinancegap)(HolmesandKent,1991).FinancingchoicesforSMEarethususuallyreducedtoretainedearningsandbankloans.Thisfinancegapcanbedividedintotwocomponents:

asupplygap,becauseoflimitedavailabilityoffundsorhighercost,andaknowledgegap,becauseoflimitedknowledgeaboutallthepossibilitiesofexternalfinanceandalackofawarenessoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofdebt.Asaconsequenceofthesetwocomponentsofthefinancegap,themainlong-termsourceoffinancewillbeinternalfinancingand,ifnecessary,bankloans.

Anotherfactorthatmayplayapartinthehierarchyoffirmchoicesisthemotivationtoretaincontrolofthefirm(HolmesandKent,1991;HamiltonandFox,1998).Aswehavenoted,inafirmcommitmentofferingstockissoldatonetimetothegeneralpublic;thus,currentshareholders’relativeownershipoffirm,aswellastheircontrolofthecompanymaybediminishedwithnewshareofferings.Suchacontrolproblemmayarisealsoinrightsissues,buttoalesserextent,becausecurrentshareholdersmayhavelimitedfundstoinvestinthefirstplaceormaywanttodiversifytheirinvestments,sotheymightnotpurchaseadditionalsharestomaintaintheirownershippercentage.Asaresultofallofthis,thecurrentshareholderswouldalsobereluctanttoissueequity.

ThesefactorsmentionedaboveimplyasimilarhierarchytotheonedescribedbyMyersandMajluf(1984);thatis,thecompanywouldmakeuseofretainedearningsinthefirstplace,thendebt(bankloans)and,finally,equityissues.

Variousauthorshavetriedtotesttheempiricalimplicationsofthepeckingordertheory.Next,webrieflysummarizesomeofthem.WatsonandWilson(2002)useadescriptivemodelintheBritishmarketandconfirmthepeckingordertheory,especiallyforclosely-heldcompanies(companieswhoseownershipisveryconcentratedandwhosemanagerisu

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 法律文书 > 调解书

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1