优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx

上传人:b****4 文档编号:4640351 上传时间:2022-12-07 格式:DOCX 页数:8 大小:23.87KB
下载 相关 举报
优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共8页
优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共8页
优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共8页
优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共8页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx

《优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx

优序融资理论外文文献翻译

文献信息:

文献标题:

FinancingPreferencesofSpanishFirms:

EvidenceonthePeckingOrderTheory(西班牙企业的融资偏好:

优序融资理论的实证研究)

国外作者:

JavierSánchez-Vidal,JuanFranciscoMartín-Ugedo

文献出处:

《ReviewofQuantitativeFinance&Accounting》,2005,25(4):

341-355

字数统计:

英文2111单词,11535字符;中文3840汉字

 

外文文献:

 

FinancingPreferencesofSpanishFirms:

EvidenceonthePeckingOrderTheory

AbstractThispaperanalysessomeoftheempiricalimplicationsofthepeckingordertheoryintheSpanishmarketusingapaneldataanalysisof1,566firmsover1994–2000.Theresultsshowthatthepeckingordertheoryholdsformostsubsamplesanalyzed,particularlyforthesmallandmedium-sizedenterprisesandforthehigh-growthandhighlyleveragedcompanies.Itisalsoshownthatboththemoreandthelessleveragedfirmstendtoconvergetowardsmorebalancedcapitalstructures.Finally,weobservethatfirmsfinancetheirfundsflowdeficitswithlongtermdebt.

Keywords:

capitalstructure,peckingordertheory

Introduction

AprimecontributiononinformationasymmetryincapitalstructuretheoryistheMyersandMajluf(1984)model.MyersandMajlufobservethattheempiricalevidenceisnotconsistentwithafinancialpolicythatisdeterminedbyatrade-offoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofmarketimperfections,mainlytaxes,costsoffinancialdistress,andagencycosts.Rather,companies’financialpoliciesseemtobebetterexplainedbythebehaviourdescribedbyDonaldson(1961).Heestablishesahierarchydescribedbycompanypreferenceforinternalfundsoverexternalfunds;inthecaseofexternalfunds,acompanyprefersdebtfirst,thenhybridinstrumentslikeconvertiblebonds,andfinallyequityissues.Thishierarchy,broadlycharacterizedaspeckingordertheory,indicatesthatcompaniesdonotmakefinancingdecisionswiththeaimofachievingoptimalleverage.

Althoughtheytendtobetakenasthesamething,thepeckingordertheoryandtheMyersandMajluf(1984)modelarenotstrictlyspeakingthesame.Thepeckingordertheoryismerelyadescriptionofcompanies’financingpolicy,whiletheMyersandMajlufworkrepresentsthefirstmodelthatattemptstodescribethisbehaviourfromatheoreticalpointofview,basedonthepresenceofinformationasymmetry.Moreover,theMyersandMajluf(1984)modelassumeslistedcompaniesandmarketswhereequityisissuedthroughfirmcommitments,suchastheAmericanmarket,notformarketswherethepredominantflotationmethodisrightsofferings,suchasSpainandmostothercountries.

TheaimofthispaperistoprovideevidenceonthepeckingordertheoryintheSpanishmarket.Theanalysistakestwodirections.First,weexaminetheevolutionofthethreelargestaccountingsourcesoffundingforacompany—retainedearnings,equityissuesanddebt—usingamodelbasedonWatsonandWilson(2002).Second,westudytheroleoflong-termdebtinmakingupfinancingdeficits,followingtheflowoffundsdeficitequationofShyam-SunderandMyers(1999).

ThereareseveralfeatureswhichdistinguishtheSpanishfinancialsystemfromtheAmericanone.Probablythemaindifferenceaffectingthepeckingorderistheflotationmethodinequityissues.Equitysecuritiesareissuedinawidevarietyofways,mainlyfirmcommitmentsunderwrittenoffersandrightsissues.Therelativeimportanceofthesemethodsdependsontheissuingfirm’scountry.IntheUnitedStatesrightsofferingshavedeclinedinfrequency,havingvirtuallydisappearedby1980.InSpain,rightsprevail.Thisdifferencemayplayanimportantroleinthehierarchydescribedbythepeckingordertheory.Inaddition:

(a)debtfinancingisprimarilyraisedprivatelyinSpanishfirms,thusbanksplayaveryimportantrole;and(b)theSpanishcapitalmarketislessdevelopedthantheAmericansecuritiesmarket,havinglowercapitalizationandsmallertransactionvolumes.AlthoughseveralpapershavealreadyexaminedthecapitalstructureofSpanishfirms,mostofthemhaveanalyzedtheeffectofdifferentvariablesonleverage.However,thereislittleevidencefocusingonpeckingorderandnostudyemployingtheWatsonandWilson(2002)methodology.

Theresultsshowthatsmallandmedium-sizedcompaniesbehaveconsistentlywithpredictionsofthepeckingordertheory.Whenwedividethesampleintosubsamplesonthebasisofgrowthandthelevelofleverage,weseethathigh-growthcompaniesbasetheirgrowthonretainedearnings,andfirmswithveryhighandverylowdebtratiostendtoconvergetowardsmoremoderatedebtratios.Estimationoftheflowoffundsdeficitequationshowsthatfunddeficitsaremetbytheuseoflong-termdebt.

Thepeckingordertheory:

Theoreticalbaseandempiricalevidence

Thepeckingordertheorydescribesahierarchyincompanies’financialpolicyasfollows:

(1)Firmsprefertofinancetheirinvestmentswithfundsinternallygenerated,namely,retainedearningsanddepreciationexpenses;

(2)firmsbasethedividendpayoutratiosonthefutureinvestmentopportunitysetandtheirexpectedcashflows;(3)payoutratiostendtobestickyintheshortterm,soinsomeyearsinternallygeneratedflowswillbeenoughforfinancingcompanyneedsandinsomeyearsnot;(4)fundsobtainedinyearsoffinancialsurpluses,afterpaymentofdividendsandfinancing,aredirectedtofinanceshort-termfinancialinvestmentsortoreducedebt.Whenthereisafinancialdeficit,firmswillseekexternalfinance:

firstdebt,thenhybridsecuritieslikeconvertiblebonds,andfinallyequityissues.

ToexplainthisbehaviourMyersandMajluf(1984)constructamodelofinformationasymmetryassumingthatfirmmanagersactonbehalfofcurrentshareholders.Ifcompanieshaveenoughfinancialslack,theywillcarryoutallinvestmentsthathaveapositivenetpresentvalue.Ifexternalfundsareneededtofinancenewinvestments,themarketwillinterpretequityissuesasevidencethatcompanysharesareovervaluedandthusissueannouncementwillhaveanegativeimpactontheshareprice.

Thus,MyersandMajluf(1984)arguethat,ifthecompanydoesnothaveenoughfundstofinancenewinvestments,itwillissueequityonlywhenthereareveryprofitableinvestmentsthatcanneitherbepostponednorfinancedthroughdebt,orwhenmanagersbelievethatthestockisovervaluedenoughthatshareholderswillbedisposedtotoleratethemarketpenalty.Theinformationasymmetrymaycausecurrentshareholderstorenouncepositivenetpresentvalueinvestmentprojectsinordertoavoidadropinsharepriceduetotheissueofequity,therebycreatinganunderinvestmentproblem.Toavoidtheseresults,itseemsreasonablethatcompanieswillimplementfinancingpoliciesthatallowthemthecapacitytofinanceinvestmentsandavoidexternalfinancing.

However,theMyersandMajlufmodel(1984)hassomelimitations.ThefirstisthatitappliestomarketsliketheAmericanmarketwheresharesareofferedmainlythroughfirmcommitmentunderwritingsandnotthroughrightsissues,whichistheflotationmethodthatprevailsinmostothermarkets.Inanunderwrittenfirmcommitment,sharesareofferedsimultaneouslytothepublicatlarge.Thus,ifsharesareovervalued,therewillbeawealthtransferfromnewtocurrentshareholders.Inrightsofferings,currentshareholdersenjoypriorityinthepurchaseofnewshares,whichminimizesthepossibilityofwealthtransfers.Therefore,theMyersandMajluf(1984)argumentthatequityissueisthelastchoiceinfirms’financingpolicieshaslittlecurrencyinmarketswhererightsissuesaretheprevalentmethodofequityissue.

AnotherlimitationoftheMyersandMajluf(1984)modelisthatitisgenerallyintendedtodescribelistedcompanies,leavingtherest,mainlythesmallandmedium-sizedenterprises(SME),outoftheexplanation.Becauseofthis,authorssincethenhavetriedtoexplainthepeckingordertheoryusingalternativeargumentsappropriatetonon-listedSMEcompanies.

AmajorprobleminSMEfinancing,especiallyinnon-Anglo-Saxoncountries,islimitedaccesstocapitalmarkets(afinancegap)(HolmesandKent,1991).FinancingchoicesforSMEarethususuallyreducedtoretainedearningsandbankloans.Thisfinancegapcanbedividedintotwocomponents:

asupplygap,becauseoflimitedavailabilityoffundsorhighercost,andaknowledgegap,becauseoflimitedknowledgeaboutallthepossibilitiesofexternalfinanceandalackofawarenessoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofdebt.Asaconsequenceofthesetwocomponentsofthefinancegap,themainlong-termsourceoffinancewillbeinternalfinancingand,ifnecessary,bankloans.

Anotherfactorthatmayplayapartinthehierarchyoffirmchoicesisthemotivationtoretaincontrolofthefirm(HolmesandKent,1991;HamiltonandFox,1998).Aswehavenoted,inafirmcommitmentofferingstockissoldatonetimetothegeneralpublic;thus,currentshareholders’relativeownershipoffirm,aswellastheircontrolofthecompanymaybediminishedwithnewshareofferings.Suchacontrolproblemmayarisealsoinrightsissues,buttoalesserextent,becausecurrentshareholdersmayhavelimitedfundstoinvestinthefirstplaceormaywanttodiversifytheirinvestments,sotheymightnotpurchaseadditionalsharestomaintaintheirownershippercentage.Asaresultofallofthis,thecurrentshareholderswouldalsobereluctanttoissueequity.

ThesefactorsmentionedaboveimplyasimilarhierarchytotheonedescribedbyMyersandMajluf(1984);thatis,thecompanywouldmakeuseofretainedearningsinthefirstplace,thendebt(bankloans)and,finally,equityissues.

Variousauthorshavetriedtotesttheempiricalimplicationsofthepeckingordertheory.Next,webrieflysummarizesomeofthem.WatsonandWilson(2002)useadescriptivemodelintheBri

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 初中教育 > 语文

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1