优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx
《优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![优序融资理论外文文献翻译.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-12/7/03e319c0-18ec-49ff-8d62-85a0319e9b05/03e319c0-18ec-49ff-8d62-85a0319e9b051.gif)
优序融资理论外文文献翻译
文献信息:
文献标题:
FinancingPreferencesofSpanishFirms:
EvidenceonthePeckingOrderTheory(西班牙企业的融资偏好:
优序融资理论的实证研究)
国外作者:
JavierSánchez-Vidal,JuanFranciscoMartín-Ugedo
文献出处:
《ReviewofQuantitativeFinance&Accounting》,2005,25(4):
341-355
字数统计:
英文2111单词,11535字符;中文3840汉字
外文文献:
FinancingPreferencesofSpanishFirms:
EvidenceonthePeckingOrderTheory
AbstractThispaperanalysessomeoftheempiricalimplicationsofthepeckingordertheoryintheSpanishmarketusingapaneldataanalysisof1,566firmsover1994–2000.Theresultsshowthatthepeckingordertheoryholdsformostsubsamplesanalyzed,particularlyforthesmallandmedium-sizedenterprisesandforthehigh-growthandhighlyleveragedcompanies.Itisalsoshownthatboththemoreandthelessleveragedfirmstendtoconvergetowardsmorebalancedcapitalstructures.Finally,weobservethatfirmsfinancetheirfundsflowdeficitswithlongtermdebt.
Keywords:
capitalstructure,peckingordertheory
Introduction
AprimecontributiononinformationasymmetryincapitalstructuretheoryistheMyersandMajluf(1984)model.MyersandMajlufobservethattheempiricalevidenceisnotconsistentwithafinancialpolicythatisdeterminedbyatrade-offoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofmarketimperfections,mainlytaxes,costsoffinancialdistress,andagencycosts.Rather,companies’financialpoliciesseemtobebetterexplainedbythebehaviourdescribedbyDonaldson(1961).Heestablishesahierarchydescribedbycompanypreferenceforinternalfundsoverexternalfunds;inthecaseofexternalfunds,acompanyprefersdebtfirst,thenhybridinstrumentslikeconvertiblebonds,andfinallyequityissues.Thishierarchy,broadlycharacterizedaspeckingordertheory,indicatesthatcompaniesdonotmakefinancingdecisionswiththeaimofachievingoptimalleverage.
Althoughtheytendtobetakenasthesamething,thepeckingordertheoryandtheMyersandMajluf(1984)modelarenotstrictlyspeakingthesame.Thepeckingordertheoryismerelyadescriptionofcompanies’financingpolicy,whiletheMyersandMajlufworkrepresentsthefirstmodelthatattemptstodescribethisbehaviourfromatheoreticalpointofview,basedonthepresenceofinformationasymmetry.Moreover,theMyersandMajluf(1984)modelassumeslistedcompaniesandmarketswhereequityisissuedthroughfirmcommitments,suchastheAmericanmarket,notformarketswherethepredominantflotationmethodisrightsofferings,suchasSpainandmostothercountries.
TheaimofthispaperistoprovideevidenceonthepeckingordertheoryintheSpanishmarket.Theanalysistakestwodirections.First,weexaminetheevolutionofthethreelargestaccountingsourcesoffundingforacompany—retainedearnings,equityissuesanddebt—usingamodelbasedonWatsonandWilson(2002).Second,westudytheroleoflong-termdebtinmakingupfinancingdeficits,followingtheflowoffundsdeficitequationofShyam-SunderandMyers(1999).
ThereareseveralfeatureswhichdistinguishtheSpanishfinancialsystemfromtheAmericanone.Probablythemaindifferenceaffectingthepeckingorderistheflotationmethodinequityissues.Equitysecuritiesareissuedinawidevarietyofways,mainlyfirmcommitmentsunderwrittenoffersandrightsissues.Therelativeimportanceofthesemethodsdependsontheissuingfirm’scountry.IntheUnitedStatesrightsofferingshavedeclinedinfrequency,havingvirtuallydisappearedby1980.InSpain,rightsprevail.Thisdifferencemayplayanimportantroleinthehierarchydescribedbythepeckingordertheory.Inaddition:
(a)debtfinancingisprimarilyraisedprivatelyinSpanishfirms,thusbanksplayaveryimportantrole;and(b)theSpanishcapitalmarketislessdevelopedthantheAmericansecuritiesmarket,havinglowercapitalizationandsmallertransactionvolumes.AlthoughseveralpapershavealreadyexaminedthecapitalstructureofSpanishfirms,mostofthemhaveanalyzedtheeffectofdifferentvariablesonleverage.However,thereislittleevidencefocusingonpeckingorderandnostudyemployingtheWatsonandWilson(2002)methodology.
Theresultsshowthatsmallandmedium-sizedcompaniesbehaveconsistentlywithpredictionsofthepeckingordertheory.Whenwedividethesampleintosubsamplesonthebasisofgrowthandthelevelofleverage,weseethathigh-growthcompaniesbasetheirgrowthonretainedearnings,andfirmswithveryhighandverylowdebtratiostendtoconvergetowardsmoremoderatedebtratios.Estimationoftheflowoffundsdeficitequationshowsthatfunddeficitsaremetbytheuseoflong-termdebt.
Thepeckingordertheory:
Theoreticalbaseandempiricalevidence
Thepeckingordertheorydescribesahierarchyincompanies’financialpolicyasfollows:
(1)Firmsprefertofinancetheirinvestmentswithfundsinternallygenerated,namely,retainedearningsanddepreciationexpenses;
(2)firmsbasethedividendpayoutratiosonthefutureinvestmentopportunitysetandtheirexpectedcashflows;(3)payoutratiostendtobestickyintheshortterm,soinsomeyearsinternallygeneratedflowswillbeenoughforfinancingcompanyneedsandinsomeyearsnot;(4)fundsobtainedinyearsoffinancialsurpluses,afterpaymentofdividendsandfinancing,aredirectedtofinanceshort-termfinancialinvestmentsortoreducedebt.Whenthereisafinancialdeficit,firmswillseekexternalfinance:
firstdebt,thenhybridsecuritieslikeconvertiblebonds,andfinallyequityissues.
ToexplainthisbehaviourMyersandMajluf(1984)constructamodelofinformationasymmetryassumingthatfirmmanagersactonbehalfofcurrentshareholders.Ifcompanieshaveenoughfinancialslack,theywillcarryoutallinvestmentsthathaveapositivenetpresentvalue.Ifexternalfundsareneededtofinancenewinvestments,themarketwillinterpretequityissuesasevidencethatcompanysharesareovervaluedandthusissueannouncementwillhaveanegativeimpactontheshareprice.
Thus,MyersandMajluf(1984)arguethat,ifthecompanydoesnothaveenoughfundstofinancenewinvestments,itwillissueequityonlywhenthereareveryprofitableinvestmentsthatcanneitherbepostponednorfinancedthroughdebt,orwhenmanagersbelievethatthestockisovervaluedenoughthatshareholderswillbedisposedtotoleratethemarketpenalty.Theinformationasymmetrymaycausecurrentshareholderstorenouncepositivenetpresentvalueinvestmentprojectsinordertoavoidadropinsharepriceduetotheissueofequity,therebycreatinganunderinvestmentproblem.Toavoidtheseresults,itseemsreasonablethatcompanieswillimplementfinancingpoliciesthatallowthemthecapacitytofinanceinvestmentsandavoidexternalfinancing.
However,theMyersandMajlufmodel(1984)hassomelimitations.ThefirstisthatitappliestomarketsliketheAmericanmarketwheresharesareofferedmainlythroughfirmcommitmentunderwritingsandnotthroughrightsissues,whichistheflotationmethodthatprevailsinmostothermarkets.Inanunderwrittenfirmcommitment,sharesareofferedsimultaneouslytothepublicatlarge.Thus,ifsharesareovervalued,therewillbeawealthtransferfromnewtocurrentshareholders.Inrightsofferings,currentshareholdersenjoypriorityinthepurchaseofnewshares,whichminimizesthepossibilityofwealthtransfers.Therefore,theMyersandMajluf(1984)argumentthatequityissueisthelastchoiceinfirms’financingpolicieshaslittlecurrencyinmarketswhererightsissuesaretheprevalentmethodofequityissue.
AnotherlimitationoftheMyersandMajluf(1984)modelisthatitisgenerallyintendedtodescribelistedcompanies,leavingtherest,mainlythesmallandmedium-sizedenterprises(SME),outoftheexplanation.Becauseofthis,authorssincethenhavetriedtoexplainthepeckingordertheoryusingalternativeargumentsappropriatetonon-listedSMEcompanies.
AmajorprobleminSMEfinancing,especiallyinnon-Anglo-Saxoncountries,islimitedaccesstocapitalmarkets(afinancegap)(HolmesandKent,1991).FinancingchoicesforSMEarethususuallyreducedtoretainedearningsandbankloans.Thisfinancegapcanbedividedintotwocomponents:
asupplygap,becauseoflimitedavailabilityoffundsorhighercost,andaknowledgegap,becauseoflimitedknowledgeaboutallthepossibilitiesofexternalfinanceandalackofawarenessoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofdebt.Asaconsequenceofthesetwocomponentsofthefinancegap,themainlong-termsourceoffinancewillbeinternalfinancingand,ifnecessary,bankloans.
Anotherfactorthatmayplayapartinthehierarchyoffirmchoicesisthemotivationtoretaincontrolofthefirm(HolmesandKent,1991;HamiltonandFox,1998).Aswehavenoted,inafirmcommitmentofferingstockissoldatonetimetothegeneralpublic;thus,currentshareholders’relativeownershipoffirm,aswellastheircontrolofthecompanymaybediminishedwithnewshareofferings.Suchacontrolproblemmayarisealsoinrightsissues,buttoalesserextent,becausecurrentshareholdersmayhavelimitedfundstoinvestinthefirstplaceormaywanttodiversifytheirinvestments,sotheymightnotpurchaseadditionalsharestomaintaintheirownershippercentage.Asaresultofallofthis,thecurrentshareholderswouldalsobereluctanttoissueequity.
ThesefactorsmentionedaboveimplyasimilarhierarchytotheonedescribedbyMyersandMajluf(1984);thatis,thecompanywouldmakeuseofretainedearningsinthefirstplace,thendebt(bankloans)and,finally,equityissues.
Variousauthorshavetriedtotesttheempiricalimplicationsofthepeckingordertheory.Next,webrieflysummarizesomeofthem.WatsonandWilson(2002)useadescriptivemodelintheBri