新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:28051696 上传时间:2023-07-07 格式:DOCX 页数:26 大小:39.53KB
下载 相关 举报
新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共26页
新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共26页
新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共26页
新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共26页
新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共26页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx

《新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx(26页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610.docx

新世纪大学英语教材第四册课文610

UnitSix

ReadingSelectionOne:

Mind/BodyProgramming

  Everytimeyoumissyourexitonthehighwaybecauseyouaredaydreaming,then"wakeup"todiscoveryourselfmilesfartherdowntheroad,youaredemonstratingthepoweroftheunconsciousmind.Oncesomethingislearned,wedon'thavetothinkaboutitconsciously.Thetasksimplyrepeatsitselfassoonasweinitiatetheprogram—inthiscase,byputtingthekeyintheignition.Therestofdrivingissecondnaturebecauseournervoussystemhasbeenconditioned—orimprinted—withthedrivingpattern.

  Becauseofourconditioning,weareallcreaturesofhabit.Mostpeoplegetanxiousbeforetakinganexampartlybecausetheyhavebecomehabituatedtofeelinganxiousatexamtime,whetherornotthesituationathandisactuallythreatening.Oncethreatenedbyanexam,aneuralconnectionisestablished.Thenexttimeanexamcomesup,theprobabilityisthatwe'llreactivatethatsameconditionedcircuit.*T

  Physiologicalconditioningisakindofrapidlearningthatevolvedtohelpusmastercause-and-effectsituationsthatmightdeterminesurvival.WeallarefamiliarwithPavlov'sfamousexperiment.Adogisgivenmeatpowder,whichnaturallymakeshimsalivate.Abellisthenrungeverytimethemeatpowderispresented.Afteratimethedogsalivatesmerelyatthesoundofthebell.Weseethesamemechanismoperatinginourselveswhenwe'reworkingawaycontentedly,thenglanceupattheclock,noticeit'slunchtime,andsuddenlybecomehungry.

  Themind'spowertoaffectthebodythroughconditioningbecamecrystalcleartomewhenIwassixorsevenyearsold.MyUncleDick,aconfirmedcheesehater,waseatingSundaydinnerwithus.Fordesserttherewasacheesecakecamouflagedwithripestrawberries.Itwassogoodthatheatetwopieces.AboutanhourlatermymotherexpressedhersurpriseatUncleDick'sdelightinthedessert,sincesheknewhowmuchhehatedcheese.Atthesoundofthewordcheese,UncleDickturnedpale,begantogag,andranforthebathroom.Evenasachilditwasobvioustomethattheproblemwasnotthecheeseitself,butsomementalconditioningaboutcheesethatproducedsuchaviolentreaction.

  Manypeoplewhoreceivechemotherapyforcancergetsicktotheirstomachsfromthemedication.Soon,throughconditioningsimilartoUncleDick's,theybegintogetsickbeforetheyactuallyreceivethedrugs.Somepeoplebegintogetnauseousthenightbeforetreatment.Othersmaygetnauseouscomingtothehospitalorevenuponseeingtheirdoctorornurse.Theyhaveinvoluntarilylearnedtogetsickasaconditionedresponsetothethoughts,sights,andsmellsofthechemotherapysituation.

  Whatwe'velearnedfromSovietstudiesfollowingPavlov'smodelisthattheimmunesystemitselfcanbeconditioned.InthiscountryDr.RobertAderandDr.NicholasCohenattheUniversityofRochesterinjectedratswithanimmunosuppressantdrugandatthesametimeaddedanewtaste—saccharin—totheanimals'drinkingwater.ThesaccharinactedlikePavlov'sbell.Afterawhiletheratsweresuppressingtheirimmunityatthetasteofsaccharinalone.

  Dr.G.RichardSmithandSandraMcDanieldidafascinatingstudyofthesuppressionofimmunereactionsinhumans.Onceamonthforfivemonths,volunteerswhohadreactedpositivelyinatuberculinskintestcameintothesameroomwiththesamearrangementoffurnitureandthesamenurse.Eachtimetheysawaredandgreenvialonthedesk,andeachtimethecontentsoftheredvial—tuberculin—wereinjectedintothesamearm,andthecontentsofthegreenvial—asaltsolution—wereinjectedintotheother.

  Monthaftermonththesameprocedurewasfollowed,andmonthaftermonththevolunteershadthesamereactiontothetuberculin—aredswollenpatchonthesamearm.Therewasneveranyreactiontotheinjectionofthesaltsolutionintheotherarm.

  Onthesixthtrialthecontentsofthevialswereswitchedwithoutthevolunteers'knowledge.Andthistimethevolunteershadalmostnoreactiontothetuberculin.Theirexpectationthatnothingeverhappenedaftertheinjectionfromthegreenvialapparentlywasenoughtoinhibittheimmunesystem'spowerfulinflammatoryresponsetotuberculin.

  Conditioningisapowerfulbridgebetweenmindandbody….Thereasonisthatthebodycannottellthedifferencebetweeneventsthatareactuallythreatstosurvivalandeventsthatarepresentinthoughtalone.Themindspinsoutendlessfantasiesofpossibledisasterspastandfuture.*ThistendencytoescalateasituationintoitsworstpossibleconclusioniswhatIcallawfulizing,anditcanbeakeyfactorintippingthebalancetowardillnessorhealth.*Perhapsyou'rehungupintraffic,suretobelateforanimportant9A.M.meeting.Orit'smidnightandyourchildisstillout,orthedoctortellsyoushewantstorepeatatest,orsooninendlessvariation.Thefloodof"whatifs"and"ifonlys"engagesthevarioushumanemotions,whichcaninfluencevirtuallyallbodilyfunctions.*

  Thewayourmindswork—thedegreetowhichweawfulize—alsodependsonpreviousconditioning.Theresponsesofourparentsandotherinfluentialrolemodelsshapeourownreactionstolife.Awarenessofourconditioningisthefirststeptowardunlearningattitudesthathaveoutlivedtheirusefulness.*Suchawarenessopensourabilitytorespondtowhatishappeningnowratherthanreactionoutofaconditionedhistorythatmaybearchaic.*

ReadingSelectionTwo:

DoAnimalsThink?

ByMichaelC.Mix,PaulFarber&KeithI.King

  Scientistshaveinvestigatedthehumanorganismfromamechanisticviewpointforoveracentury.Theirunderlyingassumptionhasbeenthathumanscouldbeviewedaselegantchemicalmachinesthatfollowpredictablenaturallaws.*Thisapproachhashadstunningsuccess.Weknowagreatdealaboutthehumanbody,wecandesigndrugstoalleviatevariousailments,andwecancounternumerousconditionsthatcausesufferingordeath.Althoughsciencecantellusagreatdealaboutourphysicalconditionbytreatingthehumanbodyasamachine,noonedoubtsthathumans,unlikemachines,areconsciouscreatures.Ourownconsciousnessisevident.Whataboutanimals?

  Tothoseofuswhohavepets,suchasdogsorcats,itisdifficulttothinkofthemasmachineswithoutself-awareness—asentitiesmoreakintoourwashingmachines,personalcomputers,andblow-dryersthantoourfamilymembersandfriends.*Canitbethatourcleverdog,Cassie,that"comforts"uswhenwearedown,leapswith"joy"whenwereturnfromwork,andhas"outsmarted"theneighbor'sdogthatusedto"steal"herfood,issimplyageneticallyprogrammedautomaton?

OrthatZiZi,ourneighbor'scat,thatwouldseemingly"favor"starvationtodrycatfood,is,inherbehavior,justreflectinganidiosyncraticprogramratherthanexpressingaconsciouspreference?

  UntilshortlyafterWorldWarI,itseemedobvioustoscientiststhatanimalshadfeelingsandthattheycouldthink.CharlesDarwinbelievedthatfemalebirdsshowedaestheticpreferencesintheirchoiceofmatesandthatsexualselectionwasstronglyinfluencedbyit.

  Manywritingsdoneinthelatenineteenthcenturyontheanimalmind,however,wereuncriticalandhighlyanthropomorphic.*Humandesires,fears,andattitudeswereattributedtoanimals,andnumerousstorieswereacceptedwithoutanycarefulattemptsatverification.Itisnotsurprising,then,thatwhenwereadthisliteraturetoday,muchofitseemscomical.

  Psychologistsinthe1920sreactedstronglytothisuncriticalliteratureandtookthepositionthatitwasnotpossibletoverifywhetherornotanimalscouldthink.Theyconcludedthatthequestionofanimals'thinkingwasnotameaningfultopicforsciencebecauseitcouldnotbetestedexperimentally.Instead,psychologistsfocusedontheobservablebehaviorofanimals.Theyarguedthatinestablishingascientificpsychology,itwasirrelevantwhetheranimalsthought.Theyintendedtoestablishscientificlawsabouthowanimalslearnandbehavethatcouldbeverifiedbyotherscientists.TopsychologistslikeJamesWatsonorB.F.Skinner,theprivatemindoftheanimal,ifitexisted,wasclosedtohumaninvestigation.

  Ethologistswhostudiedanimalbehavior,forthemostpart,wereequallydismissiveaboutprobingtheinnerworldofanimals.Afewworkerswereinterestedinhowtheworldmight"look"toanimals,whichhavedifferentsenseorgansthanhumans,buttheprimarythrustofethologywasindocumentingrepeatablepatternsofbehaviorandincomparingthesepatterns,withtheobjectofestablishingevolutionaryconnections.*T

  Modernanimalbehaviordrawsonknowledgederivedfrompsychology,ethology,genetics,ecology,andotherfieldsofscience.Untilrecently,alloftheseareasofresearchhadbeenfarremovedfromdiscussionsofanimalthoughtoranimalawareness.

  Awell-knowninvestigatorofanimalbehavior,DonaldGriffinofRockefellerUniversity,arguesthatneglectinganimalawarenessandthinkingisnotonlyanoverreactiontothena?

veacceptanceofundocumentedanimalstoriesbutalsoablindspotthatretardsadvancesinthescientificunderstandingofanimalbehavior.*Griffinbelievesthatmentalexperiencesinanimalscouldhaveanadaptivevalue—thebetterananimalunderstandsitsenvironment,thebetteritcanadjustitsbehaviortosurviveandreproduceinit.Heisalsointerestedinanimalcommunication,whichhefeelscansometimesbeusedtoconveyinformationaboutobjectsoreventsthataredistantintimeorspace.Thisformofinformationmaysuggestawareness.

  Insupportofhisideas,Griffincitesvariousbehaviorsthatseemtoinvolveaccurateevaluationincomplexenvironments.Forexample,herefersto

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 法律文书 > 起诉状

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1