生物技术转基因食品安全的英文论文.docx
《生物技术转基因食品安全的英文论文.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《生物技术转基因食品安全的英文论文.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
生物技术转基因食品安全的英文论文
Geneticallymodifiedfoodsafetyissues
Abstract
Asweallknow,modernbiotechnologyhasbroughthumannumerousbenefits:
Throughtheapplicationofbiotechnology,abroadandsignificantincreaseoffoodproductioncanbehappilyseenatglobalagriculturalproduction.ButwhenweenjoytheenormousbenefitsoftheGMfood,anewbutalarmingproblemalsocamethatifthesefoodissafeenoughforpeople?
ifsomethingseriouslyhappened,whatcanwedo?
Maybeyoucanfindsomeanswerinthisthesis.
Chapter1Introduction
Whatisbiotechnology?
Maybenottoomangpeopleknowitsdefinitionaccurately.Biotechnologyisatechnologywhichcanreformandmaketheuseofthenaturallivesontheingredientofthembytakingadvantageoftheresearchfindsinlifescienceswhichcangreatlyfollowthewillofpeople.Initspurestform,theterm"biotechnology"referstotheuseoflivingorganismsortheirproductstomodifyhumanhealthandthehumanenvironment.
Biotechnologyinoneformoranotherhasflourishedsinceprehistorictimes.Whenthefirsthumanbeingsrealizedthattheycouldplanttheirowncropsandbreedtheirownanimals,theylearnedtousebiotechnology.Thediscoverythatfruitjuicesfermentedintowine,orthatmilkcouldbeconvertedintocheeseoryogurt,orthatbeercouldbemadebyfermentingsolutionsofmaltandhopsbeganthestudyofbiotechnology.Whenthefirstbakersfoundthattheycouldmakeasoft,spongybreadratherthanafirm,thincracker,theywereactingasfledglingbiotechnologists.Thefirstanimalbreeders,realizingthatdifferentphysicaltraitscouldbeeithermagnifiedorlostbymatingappropriatepairsofanimals,engagedinthemanipulationsofbiotechnology.
Chapter2Statusofgeneticallymodifiedfoods
Asweallknow,modernbiotechnologyhasbroughthumannumerousbenifits:
Throughtheapplicationofbiotechnology,abroadandsignificantincreaseoffoodproductioncanbehappilyseenatglobalagriculturalproduction.Since1983whenthefirsttimehumangottransgenictobacco,potatobyusingrecombinantDNAtechnology,theplantgeneticengineeringtechnologyintheworldhasachievedrapiddevelopmentoftransgenicplantsforresearchanddevelopment,whichhasmadeaseriesofremarkableprogressandhasSuccessfullynurturedanumberofcropswithdisease-resistance,insecticideresistanceandevenanincrediblehigh-yield.withthehelpofthem,wecanfeedanothermorethanmillionsofpeople,Accordingtostatistics,uptonow,nolessthan1.6billionpeoplehavebenefitsfrombiotechnology.inthearea,ourmothercountryChinahasmadetremendouscontributionstotheworld'sbiotechnology.whatmustbementionedisBTcottonandhybridriceofYuanLongping.
Commercializegeneticallymodifiedcropsdatesfromtheyearof1996,includingSoybeans,cotton,cerealsandoilseedrape.GMcropsnowoccupy10%ofglobalarableland.In2010,81%ofworldwidesoybean,64%cotton,29%and23%ofthegrainisgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrape.Totally,29countriesgrowGMproductsallovertheworld.thetopthreecountrywiththelargestareaofcultivationisUnitedStates,BrazilandArgentina.TheproblemAboutthesafetyofGMproductshasbeencontroversial.Geneticallymodifiedfoodwillbringhumanandanimalallergensandtoxinsofunknown.
Chapter3GMfoodsafetyissues
Internationalconsensushasbeenreachedontheprinciplesregardingevaluationofthefoodsafetyofgeneticallymodifiedplants.Theconceptofsubstantialequivalencehasbeendevelopedaspartofasafetyevaluationframework,basedontheideathatexistingfoodscanserveasabasisforcomparingthepropertiesofgeneticallymodifiedfoodswiththeappropriatecounterpart.Applicationoftheconceptisnotasafetyassessmenpterse,buthelpstoidentifysimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweentheexistingfoodandthenewproduct,whicharethensubjecttofurthertoxicologicalinvestigation.Substantialequivalenceisastartingpointinthesafetyevaluation,ratherthananendpointoftheassessment.Consensusonpracticalapplicationoftheprincipleshouldbefurtherelaborated.Experienceswiththesafetytestingofnewlyinsertedproteinsandofwholegeneticallymodifiedfoodsarereviewed,andlimitationsofcurrenttestmethodologiesarediscussed.ThedevelopmentandvalidationofnewprofilingmethodssuchasDNAmicroarraytechnology,proteomics,andmetabolomicsfortheidentificationandcharacterizationofunintendedeffects,whichmayoccurasaresultofthegeneticmodification,isrecommended.Theassessmentoftheallergenicityofnewlyinsertedproteinsandofmarkergenesisdiscussed.Anissuethatwillgainimportanceinthenearfutureisthatofpost-marketingsurveillanceofthefoodsderivedfromgeneticallymodifiedcrops.Itisconcluded,amongothersthat,thatapplicationoftheprincipleofsubstantialequivalencehasprovenadequate,andthatnoalternativeadequatesafetyassessmentstrategiesareavailable.
Atanearlystageintheintroductionofrecombinant-DNAtechnologyinmodernplantbreedingandbiotechnologicalfoodproductionsystems,effortsbegantodefineinternationallyharmonizedevaluationstrategiesforthesafetyoffoodsderivedfromgeneticallymodifiedorganisms(GMOs).Twoyearsafterthefirstsuccessfultransformationexperimentinplants(tobacco)in1988,theInternationalFoodBiotechnologyCouncil(IFBC)publishedthefirstreportontheissueofsafetyassessmentofthesenewvarieties(IFBC,1990).Thecomparativeapproachdescribedinthisreporthaslaidthebasisforlatersafetyevaluationstrategies.Other
organizations,suchastheOrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD),theFoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO)andtheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)andtheInternationalLifeSciencesInstitute(ILSI)havedevelopedfurtherguidelinesforsafetyassessmentwhichhaveobtainedbroadinternationalconsensusamongexpertsonfoodsafetyevaluation.
At1993.theOECDformulatedtheconceptofsubstantialequivalenceasaguidingtoolfortheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedfoods,whichhasbeenfurtherelaboratedinthefollowingyears(OECD,1993;OECD,1996;OECD,1998;Figure1).Theconceptofsubstantialequivalenceispartofasafetyevaluationframeworkbasedontheideathatexistingfoodscanserveasabasisforcomparingthepropertiesofageneticallymodifiedfoodwiththeappropriatecounterpart.Theexistingfoodsupplyisconsideredtobesafe,asexperiencedbyalonghistoryofuse,althoughitisrecognizedthatfoodsmaycontainmanyanti-nutrientsandtoxicantswhich,atcertainlevelsofconsumption,mayinducedeleteriouseffectsinhumansandanimals.Applicationoftheconceptisnotasafetyassessmentperse,buthelpstoidentifysimilaritiesandpotentialdifferencesbetweentheexistingfoodandthenewproduct,whichisthensubjecttofurthertoxicologicalinvestigation.Threescenariosareenvisionedinwhichthegeneticallymodifiedplantorfoodwouldbe(i)substantiallyequivalent;(ii)substantiallyequivalentexceptfortheinsertedtrait;or(iii)notequivalentatall.Acompositionalanalysisofkeycomponents,includingkeynutrientsandnaturaltoxicants,isthebasisofassessmentofsubstantialequivalence,inadditiontophenotypicandagronomiccharacteristicsofthegeneticallymodifiedplant.
Inthefirstscenario,nofurtherspecifictestingisrequiredastheproducthasbeencharacterizedassubstantiallyequivalenttoatraditionalcounterpartwhoseconsumptionisconsideredtobesafe,forexample,starchfrompotato.Inthesecondscenario,substantialequivalencewouldapplyexceptfortheinsertedtrait,andsothefocusofthesafetytestingisonthistrait,forexample,aninsecticidalproteinofgeneticallymodifiedtomato.Safetytestsincludespecifictoxicitytestingaccordingtothenatureandfunctionofthenewlyexpressedprotein;potentialoccurenceofunintendedeffects;potentialforgenetransferfromgeneticallymodifiedfoodstohuman/animalgutflora;thepotentialallergenicityofthenewlyinsertedtraits;andthe
roleofthenewfoodinthediet.Inthethirdscenario,thenovelcroporfoodwouldbenotsubstantiallyequivalentwithatraditionalcounterpart,andacase-by-caseassessmentofthenewfoodmustbecarriedoutaccordingtothecharacteristicsofthenewproduct.
FAO(shortforFoodandAgricultureOrganization)andWHO(WorldHealth
Organization)havebeenorganizingworkshopsandconsultationsonthesafetyofGMOssince1990.AttheJointFAO/WHOConsultationin1996(FAO/WHO,1996)itwasrecommendedthatthesafetyevaluationshouldbebasedontheconceptofsubstantialequivalence,whichis‘adynamic,analyticalexerciseintheassessmentof
thesafetyofanewfoodrelativetoanexistingfood’T.hefollowingparametersshouldbeconsideredtodeterminethesubstantialequivalenceofageneticallymodifiedplant:
molecularcharacterization;phenotypiccharacteristics;keynutrients;toxicants;andallergens.
Thedistinctionbetweenthreelevelsofsubstantialequivalence(complete,partial,non-)ofthenovelfoodtoitscounterpart,andthesubsequentdecisionsforfurthertestingbaseduponsubstantialequivalence,aresimilartothosedefinedbyOECD(1996).
TheCodexAlimentariusCommissionofFAO/WHOiscommittedtotheinternationalharmonizationoffoodstandards.FoodstandardsdevelopedbyCodexAlimentariusshouldbeadoptedbytheparticipatingnationalgovernments.TheCodexadhocIntergovernmentalTaskForceonFoodsDerivedfromBiotechnologyhasthetasktodevelopstandards,guidelinesandotherrecommendationsforgeneticallymodifiedfoods.DuringitsfirstsessioninChiba(Japan)inMarch2000definitionswere