Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx

上传人:b****1 文档编号:23142559 上传时间:2023-05-08 格式:DOCX 页数:14 大小:30.25KB
下载 相关 举报
Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共14页
Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共14页
Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共14页
Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共14页
Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共14页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx

《Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx(14页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

Application of Discourse Analysis to EnglishTeaching and Learning.docx

ApplicationofDiscourseAnalysistoEnglishTeachingandLearning

ApplicationofDiscourseAnalysistoEnglish

TeachingandLearning

 

.Introduction

Duetotheinfluenceoftraditionalgrammar-translationteachingmethod,teachersdonotlaunchonteachingfromthehierarchy,structureandinternalmeaningbutstillputemphasisontheanalysisofthedifficultpointsofgrammarandvocabularyteaching.Thiskindofteachingmethodhasnotmadefundamentalbreakthroughoftraditionalgrammar-translationteachingmethod.Therefore,studentscannotgettheproperthinkingmethodsandskillsthatstudentsshouldobtain.Discourseanalysis,asayoungbranchoflearningsprungupin1990s,hasundergoneatremendousdevelopment,likeanystudyofmulti-disciplinaryissues,itwasdeniedandignoredbysomescholarsforalongtime,butnowadaysitbecomesaprosperoussubjectthatdealswiththestudyandapplicationofapproachestoanalyzewritten,spokenorsignedlanguage.Contrarytomuchoftraditionallinguistics,discourseanalystsnotonlystudylanguageusebeyondthelexical,phraseandsentenceboundary,butalsoprefertoanalyze“naturallyoccurring”languageuse.

Thispaper,ingeneral,isanintroductiontodiscourseanddiscourseanalysis,whichisdividedintotwoparts:

theoreticalpartandpracticalpart.Theformerwhichpresentsascholarlysetofideas,andthelaterisdevotedtotheaccountofthestudyinordertosupporttheideaspresentedinthefirstchapter.theformerpartissubdividedintothreechapters.Thefirstchapterprovidesathoroughdescriptionoftheterm‘discourse’itself,includingexamplesofvarioustypesandfeatures.Thesecondonepresentstheoriginsanddevelopmentofdiscourseanalysis.AndthelastchapteroftheoreticalpartprovidesthewaysofapplyingthetheorytoteachingandlearningvariousaspectsofEnglishlanguage,suchasgrammar,textreadingandcomprehension,andtheemphasisisputontheinterpretationofwrittentext.

ThepracticalpartofthispaperdescribesthestudyconductedonagroupofpolishlearnersofEnglish.Thiscomponentfocusesonfindinglexicalchainsintexts.Despitethefactthatthestudyaimstochecktheperceptionandimplementationoflexicalchainsinwrittentexts,itisalsousefulinunderstandinglongspeeches,thenewlydevelopeddiscourseanalysisisaneffectivemethodusedinEnglishteachingandlearning,whichhasmaximizedteachingeffectsandlearningachievementsofEnglishteaching.

.Definitionofdiscourse

Theword‘discourse’originatedfromLatin'discursus'whichdenoted'conversation,speech’.However,discoursereferstoatoowideareaofhumanlife.Inthisthesis,onlyfromthevantagepointoflinguisticsisdiscourseexplained.

Thereisnoagreementamonglinguistswhenitcomestotheuseoftheterm‘discourse’,becausesomeuseitinreferencetotexts,whileothersclaimthatDiscourseisacontinuousstretchof(especiallyspoken)languagelargerthanasentence,oftenconstitutingacoherentunitsuchasasermon,argument,joke,ornarrative.WhileDakowskanoticesthatthedifferencesbetweenvarietyofdiscoursesindicatestheunityofcommunicativeintentionsasavitalelementofeachofthem.Andshesuggestsusingterms'text'and'discourse'almostinterchangeablybetokeningtheformerreferstothelinguisticproduct,whilethelatterimpliestheentiredynamicsoftheprocesses(Dakowska2001:

81).AccordingtoCook(1990:

7),novels,aswellasshortconversationsorgroansmightbeequallyrightfullynameddiscourses.

Beaugrande(1981)hassuggestedsevencriteriawhichhavetobefulfilledtoqualifyeitherawrittenoraspokentextasadiscourse.Theseinclude:

Cohesion-grammaticalrelationshipbetweenpartsofasentenceessentialforitsinterpretation;

Coherence-theorderofstatementsrelatesoneanotherbysense.

Intentionality-themessagehastobeconveyeddeliberatelyandconsciously;

Acceptability-indicatesthatthecommunicativeproductneedstobesatisfactoryinthattheaudienceapprovesit;

Informativeness-somenewinformationhastobeincludedinthediscourse;

Situationality-circumstancesinwhichtheremarkismadeareimportant;

Intertextuality-referencetotheworldoutsidethetextortheinterpreters'schemata;

Nowadays,however,notalloftheabovementionedcriteriaareperceivedasequallyimportantindiscoursestudies,thereforesomeofthemarevalidonlyincertainmethodsoftheresearch.

2.1Featuresofdiscourseanalysis

Asitisdifficulttounambiguouslyclarifywhatadiscourseis,itseemsreasonabletodescribefeatureswhicharemutualtoallitlinks.Todoitthoroughly,Saussuredistinguishedthelanguagecompetenceofthespeakerandtheactualphenomenaordataoflinguistics(utterance)aslangueandparole(Saussure:

1959:

13-14).Followingthisdivision,discourserelatesmoretoparole,foritconstitutestheimmediatelyaccessibledata,thelinguist’sproperobjectisthelangueofeachcommunity,thelexicon,grammar,andphonologyimplantedineachindividualbyhisupbringinginsocietyandonthebasisofwhichhespeaksandunderstandshislanguage,whilelangueisabstract.Herearesomeadditionaltraits:

discourseisalwaysproducedbysomebodywhoseidentity,aswellastheidentityoftheinterpreter,issignificantfortheproperunderstandingofthemessage.Whilelangueismoreimpersonal.Furthermore,langueisasetofconventionthatmembersofaspeechcommunityseemtoabideby,whileparoleistheconcreteuseofconventionnotspokenbyanyone.Consequently,onlydiscoursemayconveymessagesthankstolanguewhichisitsframework.

2.2Typesofdiscourse

Atypeofdiscoursemightbecharacterizedasaclassofeitherwrittenorspokentext,whichisfrequentlycasuallyspecified,recognitionofwhichaidsitsperception,andconsequentlyproductionofpotentialresponse(Cook1990:

156).TheOrganonmodelisoneofsuchdivisions,whichdistinguishesthreetypesofdiscourse:

informativetypeofdiscourse,narrativediscourse,argumentativediscourse.Thisdistinctionisduetoitssuitabilityforwrittencommunicativeproductsmorethanforspokenones.Whilesteger’sanalysisliesoutsidethedomainofwrittencommunicativeproductsandleadstotheemergenceofanew,moredetailedclassificationofkindsofspokentexts.Andstegerexaminedfeaturesofvarioussituationsanddivideddiscourseintosixtypes:

presentation,message,report,publicdebate,conversationandinterview.However,itisworthmentioningthatoraldiscoursemightalteritscharacter,forexample,inthecaseofpresentingalecturewhenstudentsstarttoaskquestionsthetypechangesintoaninterview,orevenaconversation.

Thepossibledivisionofdiscoursetypesmentionedabovedonotexhaustotherdivisionsdidbythetypologies,nowadaysashiftofinterestinthisfieldpresentlyfocusesonsimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenwrittenandspokendiscourse(Renkema2004:

64).

2.3Writtenandspokendiscourse

Therearealsootherdistinctionsbetweenthem.Exceptforobviousdifferencesbetweenspeechandwritinglikethefactthatwritingincludessomemediumwhichkeepsrecordoftheconveyedmessagewhilespeechisconnectedonlytoair.Itisimpossibleforaconversationinwhicheverysentenceistoberephrased.Buttalkingisspontaneous,whichcausesmistakes,repetition,sometimeslesscoherentsentenceswhereevengrunts,stuttersorpausesmightbemeaningful.Thisisbecausethespeakerusuallyknowsthefactthatheisbeinglistenedto,whichenableshimtoadjusttheregister.Anotherfeatureoforaldiscourseisthatnonsensevocabulary,slangandcontractedforms(l’ve,they’re)areused.

Incontrast,theauthorofatextdoesnotoftenknowwhoisgoingtoreadthetext,thushecannotadjusttoreaders'specificexpectations.Thewriterfrequentlyhasalmostunlimitedperiodoftimetoconsiderthecontentofhisworksoastomakeitmorecoherent,byusingcomplexsyntax.Henceneatmessageorganization,divisiontoparagraphs,layoutareofvitalimportancetomakecomprehensioneasier.Additionally,theorganizationoftables,formulas,orchartswhichcanbeportrayedonlyinwrittenformbutneverinoraldiscourse,owingtothelackofcontextexpressionsuchas'now'and'here'areomitted,sincetheywouldbeambiguousastextsmightbereadatdifferenttimesandplaces.

Thiskindofdivisionisquitestraightforward,anditispossibletocombinethetwointhecaseofalesson,whenateacherexplainssomethingwrittenontheblackboard,orwhenaspeakerpreparesdetailednotestobereadoutduringhisspeech.

.DISCOURSEANALYSIS-ITSORIGINSANDDEVELOPMEN

Discourseanalysisisageneraltermforanumberofapproachestoanalyzingtheuseofwrittenandspokenlanguage.Theobjectsofdiscourseanalysisarevariouslydefinedintermsofcoherentsequencesofsentences,propositions,speechesandsoon.Discourseanalysishasbeentakenupinavarietyofsocialsciencedisciplines,includinglinguistics,sociology,anthropology,cognitivepsychology,communicationstudiesandtranslationstudies,eachofwhichissubjecttoitownassumption,dimensionsofanalysis,andmethodology.

3.1Startingpointofdiscourseanalysis

Thetermdiscourseanalysisfirstcameintogeneralusefollowingthepublicationofaseriesofpapersbyzellingharrisbeginningin1952andreportingonworkfromwhichhedevelopedtransformationalgrammarinthelate1930s.However,becausehehadnotworkedoutacomprehensivemodel,itwasnottreatedasaseparatebranchofstudy.ItisRobertE.Longacre,oneofKennethL.Pike’sstudents,thatwasabletodisseminateitinadissertation.Inthelate1960sand1970s,an

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 初中教育 > 语文

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1