A study to determine the opinion of expert practitioners of the most important risks in the developmWord文件下载.docx
《A study to determine the opinion of expert practitioners of the most important risks in the developmWord文件下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《A study to determine the opinion of expert practitioners of the most important risks in the developmWord文件下载.docx(13页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Relatedarticles
Relatedreferenceworkarticles
AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences
Abstract
ADF95isatooltoautomaticallycalculatenumericalfirstderivativesforanymathematicalexpressionasafunctionofuserdefinedindependentvariables.Accuracyofderivativesisachievedwithinmachineprecision.ADF95maybeappliedtoanyFORTRAN77/90/95conformingcodeandrequiresminimalchangesbytheuser.ItprovidesanewderiveddatatypethatholdsthevalueandderivativesandappliesforwarddifferencingbyoverloadingallFORTRANoperatorsandintrinsicfunctions.Anefficientindexingtechniqueleadstoareducedmemoryusageandasubstantiallyincreasedperformancegainoverotheravailabletoolswithoperatoroverloading.Thisgainisespeciallypronouncedforsparsesystemswithlargenumberofindependentvariables.Awideclassofnumericalsimulations,e.g.,thoseemployingimplicitsolvers,canprofitfromADF95.
Programsummary
Titleofprogram:
ADF95
Catalogueidentifier:
ADVI
ProgramsummaryURL:
http:
//cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/ADVI
Programobtainablefrom:
CPCProgramLibrary,Queen'
sUniversityofBelfast,N.Ireland
Computerforwhichtheprogramisdesigned:
allplatformswithaFORTRAN95compiler
Programminglanguageused:
FORTRAN95
No.oflinesindistributedprogram,includingtestdata,etc.:
3103
No.ofbytesindistributedprogram,includingtestdata,etc.:
9862
Distributionformat:
tar.gz
Natureofproblem:
Inmanyareasinthecomputationalsciencesfirstorderpartialderivativesforlargeandcomplexsetsofequationsareneededwithmachineprecisionaccuracy.Forexample,anyimplicitorsemi-implicitsolverrequiresthecomputationoftheJacobianmatrix,whichcontainsthefirstderivativeswithrespecttotheindependentvariables.ADF95isasoftwaremoduletofacilitatetheautomaticcomputationofthefirstpartialderivativesofanyarbitrarilycomplexmathematicalFORTRANexpression.Theprogramexploitsthesparsityinheritedbymanysetofequationstherebyenablingfastercomputationscomparedtoalternatedifferentiationtools
Solutionmethod:
AclassisconstructedwhichappliesthechainruleofdifferentiationtoanyFORTRANexpression,tocomputethefirstderivativesbyforwarddifferencing.Anefficientindexingtechniqueleadstoareducedmemoryusageandasubstantiallyincreasedperformancegainwhensparsitycanbeexploited.Fromauserspointofview,onlyminimalchangestohis/heroriginalcodeareneededinordertocomputethefirstderivativesofanyexpressioninthecode
Restrictions:
Processorandmemoryhardwaremayrestrictboththepossiblenumberofindependentvariablesandthecomputationtime
Unusualfeatures:
ADF95canoperateonusercodethatmakesuseofthearrayfeaturesintroducedinFORTRAN90.AconvenientextractionsubroutinefortheJacobianmatrixisalsoprovided
Runningtime:
Inmanyrealisticcases,theevaluationofthefirstorderderivativesofamathematicalexpressionisonlysixtimesslowercomparedtotheevaluationofanalyticallyderivedandhard-codedexpressions.Theactualfactordependsontheunderlyingsetofequationsforwhichderivativesaretobecalculated,thenumberofindependentvariables,thesparsityandontheFORTRAN95compiler
ArticleOutline
1.Introduction
2.FORTRAN90/95concepts
3.Usage
3.1.Afirstexample
3.2.Asecondexample
3.3.Fulldescription
3.4.Specialcases
3.5.Outputverification
4.Implementation
4.1.Userfunctions
4.2.SupportedFORTRAN90/95intrinsics
4.3.Implementationdetailsoftanh
4.4.Limitations
4.5.Undefinedderivatives
5.Tests
5.1.Verifyingthesolution
5.2.Performanceandcompilercomparison
6.Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
TheACGTMasterOntologyanditsapplications–Towardsanontology-drivencancerresearchandmanagementsystem
JournalofBiomedicalInformatics,InPress,CorrectedProof,Availableonline1May2010
MathiasBrochhausen,AndrewD.Spear,CristianCocos,GabrieleWeiler,LuisMartí
n,AlbertoAnguita,HolgerStenzhorn,EvangeliaDaskalaki,FatimaSchera,UlfSchwarz,SteliosSfakianakis,StephanKiefer,MartinDö
rr,NorbertGraf,ManolisTsiknakis
PurchasePDF(1199K)
Objective:
Thispaperintroducestheobjectives,methodsandresultsofontologydevelopmentintheEUco-fundedprojectAdvancingClinico-genomicTrialsonCancer–OpenGridServicesforImprovingMedicalKnowledgeDiscovery(ACGT).Whiletheavailabledatainthelifescienceshasrecentlygrownbothinamountandquality,thefullexploitationofitisbeinghinderedbytheuseofdifferentunderlyingtechnologies,codingsystems,categoryschemesandreportingmethodsonthepartofdifferentresearchgroups.ThegoaloftheACGTprojectistocontributetotheresolutionoftheseproblemsbydevelopinganontology-driven,semanticgridservicesinfrastructurethatwillenableefficientexecutionofdiscovery-drivenscientificworkflowsinthecontextofmulti-centric,post-genomicclinicaltrials.ThefocusofthepresentpaperistheACGTMasterOntology(MO).Methods:
ACGTprojectresearchersundertookasystematicreviewofexistingdomainandupper-levelontologies,aswellasofexistingontologydesignsoftware,implementationmethods,andend-userinterfaces.Thisincludedthecarefulstudyofbestpractices,designprinciplesandevaluationmethodsforontologydesign,maintenance,implementation,andversioning,aswellasforuseonthepartofdomainexpertsandclinicians.Results:
Todate,theresultsoftheACGTprojectinclude(i)thedevelopmentofamasterontology(theACGT-MO)basedonclearlydefinedprinciplesofontologydevelopmentandevaluation;
(ii)thedevelopmentofatechnicalinfrastructure(theACGTPlatform)thatimplementstheACGT-MOutilizingindependenttools,componentsandresourcesthathavebeendevelopedbasedonopenarchitecturalstandards,andwhichincludesanapplicationupdatingandevolvingtheontologyefficientlyinresponsetoend-userneeds;
and(iii)thedevelopmentofanOntology-basedTrialManagementApplication(ObTiMA)thatintegratestheACGT-MOintothedesignprocessofclinicaltrialsinordertoguaranteeautomaticsemanticintegrationwithouttheneedtoperformaseparatemappingprocess.
2.TheACGTMasterOntology
2.1.Technicaldetails
2.2.Scope
2.3.Aim
2.4.TheACGT-MOandsemanticintegrationintheACGTinfrastructure
3.PrinciplesguidingthedevelopmentoftheACGT-MO
3.1.Theadoptionofaradicallyrestrictivedefinitionoftheterm“ontology”,incompliancewiththeprinciplesofrealism
3.2.Enforcingastrictsubsumptionhierarchy,basedonaformallyspecifiedis_arelation,asopposedtoaloose“subclass”hierarchy
3.3.Avoiding(non-trivial)multipleinheritanceinthehierarchyofuniversals
3.4.AvoidingUnknownXandrelatedclasses
3.5.UsinganUpperOntology,namelyBasicFormalOntology
3.6.UsingOBORelationOntology(RO)asasourceof,andinsightfornewrelations/properties
4.MaintenanceoftheACGT-MO
4.1.TheACGTSubmissionSystem
4.2.TheSubmissionProcess
5.EvaluationoftheACGT-MO
5.1.Criteriaofontologyevaluation
5.1.1.Logicalsoundness
5.1.2.Domaincoverage
5.1.3.Taskorientation
5.1.4.Re-useofexistingontologies
5.2.TheroleoftheOBOFoundryintheevaluationoftheACGT-MO
5.3.TheuseoftheACGT-MOoutsidetheACGTproject
6.ExploitationoftheMOintheACGTproject
6.1.SemanticdataintegrationinACGT
6.1.1.Ontologiesindatabaseintegrationsystems–background
6.1.2.SemanticMediation
6.1.3.Queryprocessing
6.1.4.Themappingprocess
6.2.ObTiMA–anOntology-basedTrialManagementApplicationforACGT
6.2.1.Ontology-basedtrialsetup
6.2.2.Ontology-baseddataintegrationforcross-trialanalysis
6.2.3.OntologyevolutioninObTiMA
6.2.4.Advantagesofontologyintegration
7.Discussion
7.1.SemanticMediationinACGT
7.2.ComparisonoftheACGTstrategywiththecaBIGapproach
7.2.1.OverviewofthecaBIGdataintegrationplatform
7.2.2.caBIGvsACGT–theproblemofmetadata
8.Conclusion
9.Summarytable
9.1.Whatwasalreadyknownonthetopic
9.2.Whatthestudyaddedtoourknowledge
First-principlescomputationofmaterialproperties:
theABINITsoftwareproject
ComputationalMaterialsScience,Volume25,Issue3,November2002,Pages478-492
X.Gonze,J.-M.Beuken,R.Caracas,F.Detraux,M.Fuchs,G.-M.Rignanese,L.Sindic,M.Verstraete,G.Zerah,F.Jollet,M.Torrent,A.Roy,M.Mikami,Ph.Ghosez,J.-Y.Raty,D.C.Allan
Showpreview
PurchasePDF(159K)
Thedensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)computationofelectronicstructure,totalenergyandotherpropertiesofmaterials,isafieldinconstantprogress.Inordertostayattheforefrontofknowledge,aDFTsoftwareprojectcanbenefitenormouslyfromwidesp