目的论视角下英语商标的翻译Word文档格式.docx

目的论视角下英语商标的翻译Word文档格式.docx

《目的论视角下英语商标的翻译Word文档格式.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《目的论视角下英语商标的翻译Word文档格式.docx（16页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

DaiWei

UndertheSupervisionof

ZhangRuisi

SubmittedinPartialFulfillmentofthe

RequirementsfortheDegreeofBachelorofArts

SchoolofInternationalStudies

HunanInstituteofTechnology

June2015

Contents

Abstract:

Brandisaspeciallanguagesymbol;

alsoitisafavorableinstrumentwhenenterprisesparticipateininternationalcompetitions.Asuccessfulpropagandaofbrandforenterpriseshasinestimableeffectsonmarchingintotheinternationalmarketandachievingsalestargets.OntheperspectiveofSkopostheoriewhichisoneofthecoretheoriesofGermanfunctionalism,combiningparticulartranslationsofEnglishbrandnameswhichusedforprobingintotheprinciplesandmethodsofthetranslationofEnglishbrandnames,thisarticleindicatesthepracticalsignificantandsomethingshouldbenoticedinthestudyofthetranslationofEnglishbrandnames.

Keywords:

brand;

Skopostheorie;

translation;

principleandmethod

摘要：

商标是一种特殊的语言符号，是企业参与国际竞争的有力武器，商标的成功宣传对企业开拓国际市场，实现企业销售目标有着无法估量的作用。

本文从德国功能派翻译理论核心理论之一的翻译目的论视角下，结合具体商标的翻译来探讨商标翻译的原则和方法，并阐释商标翻译研究的巨大现实意义和一些需要注意的地方。

关键词：

商标；

目的论；

翻译；

原则和方法

注：

Introduction

ThecoreconceptofSkopostheoriehighlightsthefunctionalityofthetargettextinthetargetculture.Translationstrategiesandmethodsmustbedeterminedbytheintendedpurposeandthefunctionofthetargettext.Skopostheorieisfunction-orientedandfocusesonthepracticality.SkoposruleistheprimaryoneamongSkoposrule,coherenceruleandfidelityrule.WiththerapideconomicgrowthinChinaandasaresultoftheworldglobalization,theeconomicactivitiesofenterprisesfromabroadbecomemoreandmorefrequent.ThetranslationofEnglishbrandnamesbecomesparticularlyimportantforenterprisestoopenupoverseasmarketsandbuildtheirownbrandsintheinternationalmarkets.Asplendidbrandnameissoimportantforanenterprisetooccupyadominantpositioninglobalmarketcompetition.Therefore,howtotranslatethebrandnamessuitablyisoneofthemostimportantproblemsinfrontoftheenterprises.Todoso,theprimarypurposeofthispaperistofindoutthetranslatedstrategiesandmethodsonthebasisofthefeatureofEnglishbrandnamesandthetheoryfoundationofSkopostheory.

SkopostheorieisanapproachtotranslationwhichwasdevelopedinGermanyinthelate1970s.EmphasesofSkopostheoriemainlyshowedupinthreeaspects:

1）toexplainthenatureoftranslation;

2）toanalyzethecharacterswhoparticipateintheprocessoftranslation;

3）toputforwardtheprinciplesoffunctionaltranslation.TheforminganddevelopingprocessofSkopostheorieexperiencedthreephases.Phasesone,KatharinaReissbroughtthefunctioncategoryintothetranslationcriticismforthefirsttimeandhemadethelanguagefunction,texttypeandtranslationstrategyassociatedwitheachother,whichdevelopedtheschemesoftranslationcriticismbasedontherelationbetweensourcetextandtargettext,thuspresentinguswithanembryooffunctionalistapproach.TheidealtranslationkeepinginReiss’smindistheconceptualcontent,linguisticformandcommunicationfunctionareequaltothesourcetext.However,inpractice,hefoundthatanumberofequivalencewillnevercometrue,andtheseexceptionsarecausedbyspecifictranslationbrief.So,thetranslationcriticismcan’tonlyrelyontheanalysisofthesourcetext,butconsiderwhetherthetargettexthasitsintendedeffectornot.Phasetwo,Hans.Vermeerbrokethroughthesource-orientedequivalence,onthebasisofbehavioraltheoryandregardingSkoposasthefirstruleintheprocessoftranslation,Skopostheoriewascreated.

Chapter1AnIntroductiontotheSkopostheorie

SkopostheorieisanapproachtotranslationwhichwasdevelopedinGermanyinthelate1970s.

1.1TheDevelopmentProcessofSkopostheorie

SkopostheorieisanapproachtotranslationwhichwasdevelopedinGermanyinthelate1970s[1].EmphasesofSkopostheoriemainlyshowedupinthreeaspects:

3）toputforwardtheprinciplesoffunctionaltranslation.TheforminganddevelopingprocessofSkopostheorieexperiencedthreephases.Phasesone,KatharinaReissbroughtthefunctioncategoryintothetranslationcriticismforthefirsttimeandhemadethelanguagefunction,texttypeandtranslationstrategyassociatedwitheachother,whichdevelopedtheschemesoftranslationcriticismbasedontherelationbetweensourcetextandtargettext,thuspresentinguswithanembryooffunctionalistapproach.TheidealtranslationkeepinginReiss’smindistheconceptualcontent,linguisticformandcommunicationfunctionareequaltothesourcetext.However,inpractice,hefoundthatanumberofequivalencewillnevercometrue,andtheseexceptionsarecausedbyspecifictranslationbrief.So,thetranslationcriticismcan’tonlyrelyontheanalysisofthesourcetext,butconsiderwhetherthetargettexthasitsintendedeffectornot.Phasetwo,Hans.Vermeerbrokethroughthesource-orientedequivalence,onthebasisofbehavioraltheoryandregardingSkoposasthefirstruleintheprocessoftranslation,Skopostheoriewascreated.Hisbook“FrameworkforaGeneralTranslationTheory”becomesthebasisofSkopostheorie.

Thetheoryisthattheoriginaltranslationisbasedonapurposeofwhichdominatesthemostimportantposition.The 

Skopos 

rule 

thus 

can 

be 

regarded 

as:

the 

perfect 

target 

text 

should 

translated 

in 

a 

way 

that 

enables 

to 

functions 

specific 

situation 

and 

with 

people 

who 

want 

use 

it 

precisely 

they 

function.（Fraser,1996:

20）

Therefore,therealizationoftranslationbriefdependsontheconditionsoftargetcultureratherthansourceculture.Phasethreecameupwiththetheoryoftranslationactionreferencetothetheoryofcommunicationandaction,andhefurtherdevelopedthefunctionaltranslationtheorythatisaninterpersonalinteraction.Thistheoryisresult-orientedandregardstranslationasthetheoryimpelledbytranslationbrief.Nordmadeacomprehensivesummaryaboutthetheoryoffunctionaltranslationtheoryandcontinuedtoimproveit.Intheprocessoftranslation,hesystematicallyexplainedwhatoutsideandinsidefactorsshouldbenoticedwhenanalyzethetextandhowtoworkoutapracticabletranslationstrategyfitinwiththetranslationbriefbasedonthefunctionsoftheoriginaltext.Andheplacesthepurposeoftranslationinanimportantposition,“Supposingthepurposeoftranslationistofulfillsomecertainfunctions,anyobstaclethatpreventthetranslationtogetthereisatranslatedmistake.”（Robertson,2003:

28）

1.2RulesofSkopostheorie

TheSkopostheoriehasthreerules.“Skoposrule”asthetop-rankingruleforanytranslation,meansthatatranslationalactionisdeterminedbyitsSkopos,or“theendjustifiesthemeans”.Vermeerbelievesthateachtextisproducedforagivenpurposeandshouldservethispurpose[2].Coherenceruleandfidelityrule,theformermeansthetargettextsmustbecomprehensibletoreceiversintargetlanguagecultureandthecommunicativesituationinwhichthetargettextsaretobeused,andthetargettextmustbereadableandacceptable.Thelattermeanstheremustbeaninter-textualcoherencebetweenthesourcetextandthetargettext.However,thedegreeandformofthefidelitydependontheaimofthetargettextsandthetranslators’comprehensionofthesourcetexts.Loyaltyrulemainlyreflectedintwoaspects.Thetranslatorhasmoralobligationstothetargettextreceiversandmustexplainthereasonforwhattheyhavedone.Theotheristhetranslatormustbeloyaltotheoriginalauthor.Ofthethreerules,Skoposruleisthepredominatingrule.FidelityisconsideredlessimportantthancoherenceandbotharesubordinatetoSkoposrules.

3）toputforwardtheprinciplesoffunctionaltranslation.TheforminganddevelopingprocessofSkopostheorieexperiencedthreephases.Phasesone,KatharinaReissbroughtthefunctioncategoryintothetranslationcriticismforthefirsttimeandhemadethelanguagefunction,texttypeandtranslationstrategyassociatedwitheachother,whichdevelopedtheschemesoftranslationcriticismbasedontherelationbetweensourcetextandtargettext,thuspresentinguswithanembryooffunctionalistapproach.TheidealtranslationkeepinginReiss’smindistheconceptualcontent;

linguisticformandcommunicationfunctionareequaltothesourcetext.However,inpractice,hefoundthatanumberofequivalencewillnevercometrue,andtheseexceptionsarecausedbyspecifictranslationbrief.So,thetranslationcriticismcan’tonlyrelyontheanalysisofthesourcetext,butconsiderwhetherthetargettexthasitsintendedeffectornot.Phasetwo,Hans.Vermeerbrokethroughthesource-orientedequivalence,onthebasisofbehavioraltheoryandregardingSkoposasthefirstruleintheprocessoftranslation,Skopostheoriewascreated.

Chapter2TheTranslationofEnglishBrandNames

Brandisthename,graph,design,symbol,oranyotherfeaturethatidentifiesoneseller’sgoodsorser